Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Remember it is a pk sheet stock and preception is everything until they the have goods - earnings earnings that are growing. Funny if I do not believe in the company how come I posted the Baron's article on ES with all of the clean up potential out there. I did why not you bring this up to the MB since you believe in the company and try to clculate out the potential for the company. If you read and listen to the news Bush signed an agreement to work with the russians to clean up the nuclear mess I believe for militay weapons. So it should be pointed out that NNRI has a high probability of winning some of that business of the 55B to be spent. So if you are such a cheeleader for the company how come I supposedly a basher or something like that put the information out. I guess the company can win at least 5B in that 4 yr period and that would be on the low side. So I am negative on the company?? I am just negative on how poorly they communicate with the shareholders and let the MMs, shorts & etc ruin the stock.
No problem
You sound like ST Junior. First off I have given many times my forecast of how large the business could be for NNRI in the next 1-2 yrs. I have never seen you respond on any of to see if you believe in my forecast and analysis. Since you are so knowledgible about the company you surely can give a more accurate forecat.
Secondly I have probably talked to Iceman and listened too more of his conference calls than anyone on this board. I have hung on for two hr listening to him talk to his supposedly Hispanic brokers & others. I have talked to him many of times on Saturday for 20 minutes listening to him yell & scream. So I have a pretty good idea of his view on the company. First off he is a little out there but some of what he is saying has some merit. When Kingtrophe writes he bings out some of what Iceman does but in a real professional manner with better explanations. He seems to know more about how the market works than anyone I have listened to and read. He has something to say and I feel he is on the mark.
The PR blunders that NNRI has made that make it look like a pk sheet operation are
- 100M order Atoll had in the bag for 3rd qtr - no update but learned that they did not win it -from MB
- Roar spin off stock - never an update & have learned from MB that will not happen
-Russian Nuclear conference - had to learn about it on MB- said they gave a presentation - does not show on the agenda - just shows in a discussion group. If so then they should have put up the presentation on the website with PR. Since you know so much about companies you know if you are giving a major presentation you put out a PR and then the presentation.
We just get little bits from ST & MBs
- The VYSO debacle - When an officer is on another companies board it is an honor and most good PR department puts out a PR on it
- then the website is taken down after the shareholders find out about it.
And then you say we have no right to express our views- With these actions and being on a pink sheet stock what do you expect. The company's PR & investors relationship get an F. Jim Hock get an A for effort and reponsiveness but the company does not back him. He is right you need to communicate all of the time with the good and the bad.
On talking to Jim when I talked to him a few days ago he did not know anything on the VYSO. I believe him. So call him and ask him if that is correct since you seem to have the inside track with ST, management & IM.
When I called Jim a few days ago he did not have any information on this issue. He is very helpful and I believe he is honest and a very investor oriented PR person. This issue does not smell kosher. If the company had put out a PR on it it would not look like they are hiding anything. Then you add on top of that after this leaked to the shareholders through the MB the company VYSO took down their website (our it says it is under construction) The timing does not smell kosher on this one. It sends up red flags. You question thinks like what is up? Is NNRI trying take control of the Gobal rights to NuCap, is it a shell to move the NNRI company into VYSO to make millions for a few at the expense of all the shareholders. Look at the shell NNRI bought. Look what they did to their shareholders of the shell they bought. On a pk sheet you ask all of these questions. You have Iceman who has a past history with manipulating stocks and his closeness to some of the people that were involved in this setup of NNRI. You have ST spinning the stock when it keeps going down. You say you do not see what all this has to do with NNRI. It has the shareholders wanting to know what is going on. So far I am giving NNRI the benefit of the doubt but they keep making PR blunders that you have question the bad.
It sounds like the biggest blunder by NNRI management. They do not need to be tried up in a legal matter. Does NNRI have legal consuel??
Great posting. You forgot the best one when he said after hitting a new low at around 1.50 this is great news. During those times it was breaking support he would never say the 144 sellers were selling just the shorts. His changing story now smells. If he is so close to management he knows what is going on. It is being attacked and 321k of shorted stock is not going to force the stock down. It is being manipulated like Iceman has stated along with you. Now management has decided to attack the problem by having expers look into the problem while ST just trys to save face while his site is going down. He needs to just stop trying to put up explanations and the company should recognize he is hurting the company's image and terminate him from his contract. As share holders we need to get a copy of his consulting agreement to see how he is getting compensated. He is really starting to come across as a paid pumper.
Did anyone see Baron's Article this week on ES. It stated how large the clean up is for the US military and UK. The US military will spend 55B and the UK will spend 25B in 5 years. I am guessing with the Russia, EU and these two countries that it we are looking at close to 100B for clean up over the next couple of years. Huge market for just a few capable companies.
Great posting. As my father always said a true professional knows when to ask for professional help. It is obvivious T is not a professional a least in the area of finance. You know so much more thn most people here on this baord when it comes to how the markets work. He has know idea how it works. If you are a technical guy you stay in your field. I know I probably cn how my own with almost anyone here when it comes to the technical end of the business but when it comes to finances and how the market works I know to bow out so I do not show my ignorance. I think ST has really showed it with his postings. If I was the company I would have him say on his board and say away from any other MB. I just think the more he says the more he setups the company for a class action suites. All they need to do is subpoena his recordings, emails, and postings and then a pattern can be shown of missing leading the investors while being paid. I wish the company would cancel his contract and hire new PR people. This last posting really hurts - it is like rubbing salt into the investors wounds.
I think you have a good handle on this stock. I agree with you management had no idea what they were getting into with pink sheets. When you an honest group of managers you do not think like the scum that works this market and you get taken advntage off. I would like to see the stock get back to in the 4 dollar area so I am even on some of my holdings and have gains on the others. I realize how great the potential is for this company. I have been in very competitive businesses like the autos & appliance industry and have never seen a better business model NNRI has if they implement it. I believe if the company will release Atoll's earnings in Jan and their back orders we will get a feeling how big this business can be. If the back orders are in the 100M area like I think you stated before, we will know Atoll is getting orders from all of those new plts. If so then you will be right that NNRI will have the pick of the litter of the best companies they can acquire to grow the business more.
I still believe with 8-10 new plts being build a yr that the potential is huge.(500M - 1B for NNRI in the next 1-2 yrs) Unfornately the environmentalist in this country will slow up the building here while they will be pushing hybrids & electric vechicles. Unfortunately you have to get the power some where for these vehicles and any hydrocarbon plt (coal or gas) if I remember from my thermodynamics is only 38% efficient. (more pollution but they cannot think on a complete system cost, production,& pollution) Again the rest of the world will probably break the grip of OPEC while we do stupid things here. They have destroyed our nuclear business which makes NNRI even better.
I wonder if Iceman still has "friends" that want to get even at any turn with him??
See: http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:fdI8LnCILiMJ:www.citronresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/barry-davis-2.pdf+barry+davis+-+stock+broker&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us
I bet he knows very well how stocks ae manipulated.
I believe you are correct but it is politically correct to say it is under construction. I just hope this month the company can turn things around with their story. I hope they are going to use some new people to do it. If they cannot turn it around this month then it will take another 6 mos to get 2 qtrs of good earnings to convince funds to buy. It could be another 6 mos of dead money. I sure hope they do everything possible this month.
I am a little slow so let me see if I understand this- Newbridge is then a MM that in the past helped with the 2.5 M line of credit. The company told me that you have to have a MM to sponsor you for the listing. So there is a different company for handling certificates which is Signature is that correct?
Question is NNRI responding to the second round of questions for the listing?
It is interesting that the website for Vyso is now under construction after the what happened. My understanding that perception is everything on wallstreet until the goods come in which are the earnings and growth. Unfortunately if you look like you are hiding something it is just adds fuel to the fire for the manipulators, shorts and etc. Unfortunately this is about 5th blunders in the PR arena I see NNRI having committed that just keeps adding fuel to the fire and distracts the real story which is the huge potential of the company. I think this is the month they have a chance to turn this around. I am no expert but I think they were in denial too long of this problem. I hope they get the job done this month unfortunately if they don't I feel it will take 2 qtr of great earnings before funds will even touch the stock so we would be looking at the end of the 2nd qtr of 08 on equity accounting which means summer of 08. This would be another six months. I wonder how ST & Iceman can spin it for another 6 mos without destroying their websites??? Again thanks for the great information. Again how do you know all of these things?? It is incredible.
When you google it it says under construction.
Great postings. Question I thought Newbridge was their transfer agent. Who is Jason? They need to hire you to do the explaining instead of ST.
I agree with you 100% on the management was clueless on the stock being under attack. Now they are behind the curve trying to get on top of this problem. Lets hope they are successful.
If I was a betting man (which I am not)I get the feeling and still do think ST was a pawn for the short sellers & 144 sellers of NNRI stock. Who he was a pawn for I would be guessing but I have one idea which i will not say. Thanks for all of the information. Where did you learn all of this stuff.
I seriously question that small investors have a real impact on stock prices. As Bill O'Neil publisher of the IBD says it is instituational investors that move stocks. If i remember it has to get in the 20+% to move a stock. We peions here basically have no effect. It was the 144s that have and still moving the stock along with the shorts. We need institutional investors for NNRI. So it would be better to talk about the potential this company can do instead of wasting our time trying to hunt down bashers. Bashers are just sad people that probably are misfits in society. You all would be better to work on a forecast of the potential for this company and help to refine one on the MB. So when the institutional buyers do their DD they will scan some of the boards to get a feel for what the small investors thinks of the stock. If they see that the little guys understands the potential better than them they will have more reason to buy the stock. Unfortunately no one but I have done that. Will the help of some of the smart people here we could probably put together a better forecast than the company.
Question on Velkont vs Atoll - It is my understanding that Atoll makes mostly replacement parts for nuclear plt. From the little information I have for Velkont it looks like they make most of the new parts for new plts. According to the attachment they have significant orders in the time frame of 08-10. This information is from March 07. I would like to know how much more it has grown with all of the new plt announced.
http://www.primenewswire.com/newsroom/news.html?d=116163
You make a good point. I hope it is a life changing event to the upside so far it has been the other way.
Thanks, I could not find it on his website the other day. Spotting if you ask me. Some times he does it and other timeshe does not.
Sounds like the same phrases Iceman used. (I wonder if they ever talked - asking for your certificates to stop the shorts was used first buy Iceman then I think ST put it out there- ha did he come up with that by himself?) Ha I wonder if the lawyers reviewed his website so there are no trails for a class action suit. I have not been able to find anymore on his site where he states he has 50K shares. It use to be at the bottom of his home page. Let me know if it is still there.
I guess the company is serious about making sure that claims can be supported. When your an old fart with grey hair you can usually smell if something is up. It is funny when you talk to people enough times in person or on the phone you can pick up on little things even if they do not discuss a topic specifically.Lets hope the promoters are stopped. It is a good sign that next yr will be different.
I have talked to iceman many times and just recently he is not talking to people about the stk or on his site. I have had many 10-15 minute conversations with him to here his story. Since I lived in NY for 5 yrs I take his BS and obnoxious ways better than some of the people on this board that i talk to regularly on the phone with. They tell me to call him since I get him to talk the most to me than them. He has told me things about his interaction with the company. I am not at liberty to discuss them. If I have the time I would go back to my cell bills and spit out all of the times and lenghts of these calls. I have also called many times to the company and I have had talks with them about the promoters. Based on the two sides I can bet that the company is going after people that miss represent the facts about companies. So I think I am right that the odds are very high he has been contacted by legal consuel. I was never told this by the company but they have planned not to allow mis representation.
I disagree with you on ST. He never disclosed his relationship with the company until I raised this issue with the company. No fortunate 500 company would allowed a paid consultant or promoter do that job without a disclosure at the end of his postings.
I talked to a retired general back home on this issue. He was a expert on mideast affairs. He turned down a job to be an advisor to Bush after he retired. Before he retired he tired to give advise to the president. According to his expertise he told me when I was doing DD on this stock with him, he stated that Eygpt did not have any nuclear weapons or nuclear plts. So I took his word. I will call him again and see if he & you can get on the phone to discuss this issue. I am still would like someone to explain where they have gotten this nuclear waste. I did not say they did not have it but was wondering how they would have this material.
I think you nailed it when you say few companies have the people to manage the business and the science. You have to add in the ability to handle a pink sheet stock. The people that can handle this area well are con and scam artist which I do not feel these guys are. This just adds a new dimension to your management skills needed. I think they had no idea how tough it is to manage and run a company on the pink sheets. The last gaf of not informing the share holders of Vsyo is a perfect example of it. Then you have ST (probably honest guy) out of his league trying to promote the stock on top of the Iceman that has a shady past you just magnify the problem. So they really need professional help in this arena and I feel they are moving in that direction next yr. You can tell Iceman is quiet. If I was a betting man I bet he was served legal papers. I would bet ST's services have been terminated. Iceman will not even talk when you call him about NNRI.
No question their close contacts in these gov't agencies is like IP. The market needs to put a value on these contacts soon. I hope that will mean a higher PE. I have heard that the Velkont and the other acquistions are more profitable than Atoll. If so then I wonder if their products are more high tech and strategically needed for building nuclear plts. I think jan will help to tell where the company is. The only question I have that i think is not on the mark is Egypt. It is my understanding they have no nuclear plts or weapons. So I have a hard time seeing any signicant business here. I would like someone to clarify this too me.
Thanks for the posting. I am not trying to throw around numbers for just numbers sake. Since we have not gotten any guidance I am trying to put together some potential for the company to justify if I should ride this out. I am glad that you have confirmed what you think Atoll numbers will be next yr. I feel the same way 200M is obtainable. The 4th qtr numbers will help to confirm this. If backorders are given it will really help. The information on the container business for the Russian cleanup did help to formulate a potential for determining that business. It looks like we can use a 10% factor on the cleanup number to calculate the container business portion. It is early but I am guessing NNRI should win @ 1B dollars of that that would be 100M dollars per yr. I am assuming it would be close to the same for the EU cleanup. They are the ones with the laws outlawing lead. On the new plts I am still in the early stages of trying figure out the business potential for NNRI. The core to use beecom/feecom I figured the material was around 3M dollars based on the limited information from ST. I figure with engineering, consultanting cost the core sheild could run 10-20M possibly. Then when Atoll gives use the earnings maybe we can start calcuate the potential business each new plt could mean to them. I do realize these plts are a few yrs out but I am sure that orders will have to be placed starting next yr. From my reading, it appears the US nuclear industry has been devasated. It is almost impossible to get core containers any any parts out of this country. So I believe parts to build plts are in short supply which is great. This is where the real potential is for NNRI if AToll & Velkont have the right parts & technologies.
On the VSYO debacle I realize it is a none material event but as I explained to Jim Hock today it is one of the last 4 screw ups by the company that I feel makes this stock feel & smell like a pk sheet stock. The 4 issues I have are as follows:
- the PR stating Atoll had the 100M order in the bag for 3rd qtr & we have to find out they lost it on the MB
- the Roar spin off & shares for us - learning from the MB it will probably not happen
- the nuclear conference in Russia had to learn about it from the MB, ST & Iceman. Then they were saying they were presenting & I could only find out that they were in a discussion group. If they gave a presentation the co. should have released a PR with the link for the presentation like most co. do.
- last to have find out about the VSYO issue from the MB and that the CFO is on their board is like the final straw to break the camel's back
So I pointed this out to Jim stating if it was not for him returning calls and getting me in touch with company people to answer questions and trying to calcuating out the potential I would have been like the average investor and run and called the company just another rip off pk sheet stock.
Unfortunately there are so many factors involved with the price dropping - I feel it is manipulated by the MM(some due to personalities & getting back at a few people - I can only describe that in a personal email), forward selling of the 144s (I mean shorting the stk without presenting it to the brokerage house), poor communications by the company, some tax loss selling, converting the warrants before they become useless and the unbelievable spin by a few promoters. I am sure there are others but these are the ones I feel have caused the most damage.
I believe the company will change their approach starting next yr. You can see it beginning now - Iceman is quiet and ST is not as talkative. I believe a more professional approach will be seen next yr. I am like you the end of Jan will tell the story to see if management can turn this thing around. Lets hope so because I cannot find a company with this much potential - a few solar stocks but that is it.
Next question to you and the others. The company stated they are going to meet with Atoll the 3rd week of Jan for the earnings. Does that mean we will get the earnings and any guidance shortly after or will we have to wait all the way up to the end of march the time allowed for a 10k filing 90 days after the qtr's close. If we have to wait then I might have to long at some other strategy like selling and makeing up the money on other stocks and then buy back in. 3.5 mos to get a picture is a long time to sit on dead money. It has been 405 for me now.
Lets face it these guys in the company better never run a media company - lets hope they get the story out for the potential and show us their stuff to make this a great company. When we all make a ton of money we can get a fund together and get them some classes on PR and crisis management so when they move on to the next company we what to make a fortune on they will not go through these mistakes again.
I hope next year the company does a better job disclosing information when they are off the pink sheets. I have to say I was a little surprised to see this one have to come up on the MB. It appears bad at first since we had to get it off the MB. But in the long run it is a good deal for the company to have access to the top person for nanotechnology. It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out that materials are what improves a product and can turn it into a commerical product that is cost effective.
We need to let this one go and say the company should have done a better job of informing us of it.
The thing that will get the stock going is getting off the pink sheets and discussing the potential of this company. The street discounts things by looking out 6-12 mos. Unfortuantely every time I try to put out an analysis of what I think the company can do no one ever says I am way off or on the mark. Just the other day Iran stated they plan to build 19 nuclear power plts. I wonder who will win them?? Russia I bet and whow might get a large share of the business-NNRI?? I think so. So if they get 3-5% of a 3B plant that would be over 90M of product for each plt. So if you would talk about the potential the stock might move. The company has not done a good job communicating and it will improve next yr. So here is my projections for the company starting in 09 and beyond. Remeber that sounds like a far time out but orders have to be placed 1-2 yrs before plts are built so some of the huge potential will becoming next yr. Atolls 4th qtr and any guidance should help to confirm this.
Projection from 09 on
- 100M/yr for 10yrs for Russian containers (10% of 14B for clean up)
- 100M/yr for 10+ yr for the European cleanup (14-20B fund - 10% for containers)
-8-10 nuclear plts per yr (NNRI wins 50% of business from major contractor 3-5% for product off $3Bplt)
- from above 300 -500M for plts per yr
So the company could easily do 400-700M dollars in the 09 or 10 yr.
This does not include the bieecom/feecom for medical and other applications.
It would be nice to see if anyone agrees or diagrees with the numbers. The company screwed up in my opinion on this last one and lets quit beating a dead horse. If these guys were making 500k+/yr from the company we would have to worry but they are working for peanuts and they are going to get paid just like us when the stock get up there hopefully in the 60-80 range if they do the numbers I am forecasting. 25% net margin on 500M equals 125M dollars divide it by 50M shares you have 2.50 dollars earning times 20-30 pe equals 50-75 dollar stock. I can live with that.
The point is NNRI is better capitalized than Global and they are worried about NNRI taking over the lead with NuCap if it is modified for the needed applications. NNRI has better resources. I do not think either side mis represented themselves in the development area. The one company that mis represented their shareholders was NNRI for not informing them of this new company they are involved with. If they were working behind the scenes they did not have to disclose it but when your CFO is appointed to the board and they are working to setup this company it is a different story. I wonder how many other things are going on with NNRI's management. I sure hope it does not hurt the listing. I consider seting up an new company and having your CFO appointed to their board a material change that needs to reported on a 8K but what do I know. I just know NNRI's management is acting more like a pk sheet stock instead of a listing of a company on a major lisitng. Lets hope they get listed with this gaf.
I cannot wait to hear it. If I did not own the stock I would be laughing and rolling on the floor.
You nailed it with this posting. It is not what is legal or not it is just good business sense to inform your shareholders that your people have been appointed to another companies board. It is all about creditability and intergity when doing business. Scorry you are the one that says we do not know anything about business. An old timer told me right out of college 25 yrs ago people do business with people and it is all about trust. This company keeps losing trust with its shareholders everyday buy their actions. Allen is right it is not the board it is the management. They might be eggheads and talented in the technical end but they sure are not up to the other end of the business. I am like Allen, I stated before I can smell a rat. In this case the scent is going up and the management keeps blowing every chance they have it. The problem their is a freud going in mgt and we are paying
Well put. I do not think Scorry is intentionally trying to insult us but the way he approaches it is the problem. He truly believes in the company like I do but I feel like you they have an obligations to update their shareholders. They have created this situation and the manipulators have taken advantage of it. I find it interesting when the company cannot understand why people would listen to MB when they are supposedly 95% not truthful. I have to state it is sad when a shareholder has to use a MB to get updated on the company and most of the time it is accurate. On top of that the promoters spinning how great the company is and never saying they have a problem. The classic one is ST telling you it is great news the company has hit a new 52 week low. Boy the company has great PR here. I have been taught when a company hits a 52 week low it is not good news it means there is something significantly wrong with the company. I just boils done to the fact that the company does not have enough experience in handling the wild west of the pink sheet listings. Lets hope the business implementation supercedes everything else and the price moves higher next year.
Your posting is the best one in the last couple of weeks. It truly lays out the story of NNRI and what has to be done. I think you stated it well that they gave out unrealistic guidance for 07 and the promoters were trying to keep it alive. Your point that if they do not get a listing by the end of jan is critical to know if there is something wrong with the transfer agent. You seem to lay it out there with the facts wihout any hype. I really appreciate your postings of all of the facts. After talking to the company I feel like you they are very serious now about the stock price and getting things right. Unfortuantely I believe as shareholders we have suffered from the fact (in my opinion) that there has been some significant internal political and management struggles of different factions in the company and the manipulators of the stock have taken advantage of this situation. Hopefully now they have corrected these internal problems and have united to get the business rolling and looking after the shareholders. I would like your input on the potential of this company. I have laid out some of my thoughts on the their potential but have not gotten any inputs. I thought a MB like this is what people discuss. Thanks again for being so factual without any hype.
You forget that you would be right on what you say if the company had kept us updated on the following issues they put out in PRs instead we have to find out the information on the updates from a MB. The following ones are-
The PBr for the 100M to be won for Atoll by the end of the 3rd qtr. We have to find out from Kingtrophe they lost the business and that they hope to be a subcontractor to some of the 100M of the business. I realize they might not know how much they will recieve as a subcontractor but to have to find out on a MB is unacceptable.
The spin off stock from the Roar purchase. I am getting the information that this will not happen from the MBs. The appointment of the CFO and the other person to the board of another company we find out about on a MB. The question is how hard how much time does it take to put out a PR on these topics. I bet it would only take 1 hr. that is supposedly how much time you are saying Todd is spending on the new company. I have worked for a start up company and major corporations (some the biggest in the US & foreign countries) So when you say some of us do not know anything about small companies I find you are stretching the facts. It is almost insulting. Why don't you ask for the resumes of some of us and I think you would be surprised how much we know and have experienced.
I know that the executives are working for peanuts. I am grateful for that and their dedication but they are making their job harder by not disclosing and communicating to the investors. Most good companies that communicate well always inform their shareholders if one of their own has been appointed to the board of another company. It is sad we have to find these things out on a MB. The rumors would not be flying if they communicated better. Wall street works on the assumption there is always something wrong and you are not being told the information. They head for the exits and ask questions later. Unfortunately the way this company is communicating it is causing people to exit and the manipulators are taking advantage of their poor communications. You have to wonder with the price going done and the promoters keep telling you how great the company is and then you learn about this on a board not from the company and the address of the new company the same as NNRI if something is up. I spent yrs in New York and you learn to smell a rat as they say. I am not saying that the company is up to any wrong doing but they sure as hell have sent up a scent to make you question things and they only have themselves to blame. You always say do your DDs. Part of your DDs is to question the actions of a company. If the price goes to zero then some of these questions have merit or if it gets bought out for $1.5. I worry mostly about the company getting bought for basically nothing.
I think that way but it is interesting it was not disclosed. The Israeli's are leaders in certain technologies. Security sotware in my opinion are the leaders. It does make sense if you realize how my Russian Jews immigranted to Israel that were highly educated in technical fields. Lets hope for the best but it sure shows how poorly the company has communicated to the investors. It is too many of these things that make you suspicous. If we had more information then the red flags would not be raised all of the time.
I find it interesting ST is off this week for damaged storage property? I think there are people like ST, Iceman, the supposedly big investors that know things we do not know and the 64,000 question are they good for the small investor or just good for the big boys. I sure hope it is for both of us. The only problem I have is the lack of information from the company and this one really bothers me. I am not 100% sure that Todd is working a 100% for us. So many of the people involved have trememdous amounts of stock that i believe they are trying very hard to get the business plan implemented but if the lisitng has been delayed because the CFO is running another company I am getting suspicous.
What also bothers me is how much time has this taken away from Todd from getting the stock listed. Could this be a reason why it has taken so long to get where we are?? Now I understand some of the reasons why some of the people we listen too for information why they have had concerns for the financial people in the company.
What really bothers me the most is both companies have the same location. It does make you wonder what is the agenda of NNRI.