Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
4x10 eom
4 on the bid now. eom
When .0003 hits this is going to be fun imo. eom
gmenrule, Longs do you recall in 2004 when certain people said it has to go to .0005-.0007 for starters. Well either the company will get us there or fellow investors. Either way we have to get there to start imo. Am I right? Or way off base? Or just dreaming. lol eom
Crash OverRide, Welcome back from the darkside. lol :>) eom
illuminati2012, CrashOverRide could be manic. Now I feel bad for yelling at him. eom
Wow their out in full force tonight. Gorbec can you pass the bug spray. lol eom
Crash OverRide, Whoa, you see the light or something? What a turn around from you. lol eom
GoodPenny, Your welcome and we're glad we can assist you in dumping your shares. You make a great partner. We'll take all you got, just keep them coming. Thanks again eom
2TimeDWI_Dan, What you trying to reach your quota? eom
2TimeDWI_Dan, Where are the revenues coming from? LMAO dumbdidumbdidumbdumb eom
Good thing is the insiders continuing to buy. They won't sell anytime soon imo So even when the traders flip or pick their exit points, with a stronger base we won't be your typical run and retrace all the way down. imo
This is a great opportunity for all who dislike the CEO and company to get out. MM's buying. eom
Gorb, would you say this is just the beginning of the good news? :>) eom
primate investor, No I'm retired and have common sense. What are you an idiot?eom
Also thats the reason for no reverse, the people who were paid with stock for the majority ownership in their business would get screwed.imo lol eom
brmrich, This is strictly my own opinion, but the more time I have to think about it, well here it goes. Btw some may have already been mentioned I don't know, maybe subliminal. lol
Dan wants to expand his business skiershop, high media etc. The problem is he lacks capital and the banks won't give him a loan for lets just say lack of collateral. So now he goes out and strikes a deal with Astrom to get the prrm shell. Some call Astrom other things, but Dan had to. Now Dan looks for other existing entities who also wish to grow and expand, but, they have the same problem Dan did, Lack of working capital and no collateral or not enough revenue to support a loan. So SMMW goes in and strikes a deal with these individual entities and brings them under the umbrella of SMMW. Dan uses shares to puchase these entities, but you notice each company maintains a small percentage of ownership apart from SMMW. The people Dan is striking the deals with are experts in thier field and continue to run there companies. Thier also now all majority owners of smmw with thier stock holdings. I'm sure the percentages vary. Now they go to the bank as smmw with all these businesses under it's umbrella and now they go to the bank for a loan and they have some power. The bank sees a plan and potential revenue and decides we'll lend smmw money. Pretty good when you started out in the hole. Also the stock price has to go to the agree upon purchase price, probably .0006 to.0007 lol eom
gmenrule, Lot of people bashing Dan, but to me he's implementing a brilliant strategy. eom
gorbec1, Tonight I hope. eom
mosh5382, Why, we have you with your "pointless and continuous posts" lol eom
Do you own this stock? How many pinkies do you know in an effort to increase the pps the CEO and other insiders buy back shares? Usually they do a reverse and dilute again with bs pr's. Do restricted shares eventually end up in the float howbeit a certain % per quarter once the restrictions are lifted. The overall outstanding has decreased. Skiershop? Well I think thats why Dan has to get the pps up to close the deal. We'll see. Anyway there is positives to think about rather than constantly going over negatives. Just wondering if you have ever been impaired? Let me let you in on a little secret. If you leave rubber from a stop position on a public way you could be charged with reckless driving. eom
So if Dan corrects that you'll be happy, right? Or do you look for something else to complain about? Never ending battle. eom
Where's Gorbec today? eom
Let the company itself buy a few shares back and release a pr stating something like As you know SMMW has stated it will not do a R/S. As our revenues dictate SMMW will be buying back shares in an effort to create a better share structure and increase the value of our stock. A little creative writing is required. I'm getting excited reading that .lmao I bet the public will to. eom
themountnman, The problem the average shareholder is having is lack of communication with the company. You state insiders continue to buy to create a better share structure. That's terrific, but let the public know. I know Dan has mentioned his continued buying in a previous pr as a almost oh by the way I continue to buy shares. Lets have a pr specifically dedicated to that with his clear intent. The current shareholders and people on the sidelines are just waiting for something to get excited about. You can post all the info you want, but until it comes directly from the company people aren't going to bite. How about a letter to the shareholders outlining what has been accomplished and what his plans are for the future. That's what we need imo. As far as crash? Well if they are all as professional as he was the other night, I would prefer they look into another company. He was trying to perform a character assassination on Dan. eom
Sorry I got to post this response from clockwatcher so I don't get accused of being one sided. eom
By: clockwatcher10
12 Mar 2006, 02:45 PM EST
Msg. 66978 of 66978
(This msg. is a reply to 66957 by mugsy9.)
Jump to msg. #
Mugsey:
You said, "Isn't this the guy that has sent you emails outlining his visit to Stowe, Vt.?
Mugsey, you asked me if I were part of the group. I answered your question in that respect. I only know Crash via the emails he has sent both MOUNTAINMAN and I since last November. MountainMan has been utilizing Crash's information since October.
You stated, "Is he the guy who fed you info that he allegedly obtained that turns out to be bs? The content of the conversations being denied by both Bobby and Dan."
Mugsey, to date I've yet to see Bobby or Dan publicly state the visit did not happen nor did the conversation. IN ADDITION, MOUNTIANMAN STILL QUOTES BOBBY FROM THIS EMAIL. You do realize or remember that it was MountainMan who first posted that email and first used it to support his perspective, don't you? How do you account for that? Will your next email be to MountainMan to tell him to stop quoting from Crash's post?
You'll find this email I got on 12/3/05 interesting. I've deleted the remaining portion of the email addresses so
RB would post it.
From : Crash Over Ride
Sent : Saturday, December 3, 2005 11:49 AM
To : ClockWatcher10
CC : TheMountnman
Subject : A Very Important Update
Pierce Williams called Bobbie Roehm when he discovered that I was in Stowe Vermont and had her call me at my home. Bobbie Roehm almost seemed like she was in a panic. She told me that Pierce Williams wanted her to be sure that I was Informed that Dan had his office back and for her to make sure that I knew this fact. Bobbie Roehm told me on the phone that Pierce Williams was at lunch while I was in Stowe Vermont and that I had just missed him.
I was in Stowe for about 4 hours. All I can say is: That was one long lunch.
Crash OverRide
You stated: "This Crash Override finally came out of the closet and let his true intentions be known, to bash Dan and SMMW at all cost regardless of facts. Are you still in the closet?"
Mugsey, you must have just joined us. I have explained to the group, in the past, that one of the Crash group is not happy with Dan. I've been out of the "closet" on this one for some time. If anything, I think you just peeked your head out the door just now.
You stated: "Dan was not convicted of DUI. Why? because he wasn't legally drunk."
Mugsey, do you think the Cop stopped Dan to see if he had his seat belt on? Obviously he was driving impaired and erratic. It caught the attention of the Cop. Nothing more need be said. You don't have to be legally drunk to still be driving impaired and erratic.
PERSONAL NOTE TO SELF: Why am I so friggin' addicted to these boards.....must stop posting. Let Mugsey and the rest have their way with the newbies and uninformed.... must stop caring and quit this.
Crash OverRide I did give you credit on this one for having the guts to admit your intention.
By: mugsy9
12 Mar 2006, 12:19 PM EST
Msg. 66957 of 66978
(This msg. is a reply to 66951 by clockwatcher10.)
Jump to msg. #
clockwatcher10, I was going over your last post and must say it gave me food for thought. This line you wrote in reference to "a new character, Justin The Benevolent" I quote "Those of you reading this, beware, you're his mark and he has a clear agenda."
Reading this line you wrote made me laugh. Why? I always thought you had a clear agenda, although more subtle than Crash Override.
This is a good one. lol
"Crash Override should be renamed Crash&Burn. His efforts went too far in his attempt to make it sound like the cop supported his views of Dan as a crook. Ouch! Crash, your "over the top" efforts have stung both of us.....and I don't even know you!"
Isn't this the guy that has sent you emails outlining his visit to Stowe, Vt.? Is he the guy who fed you info that he allegedly obtained that turns out to be bs? The content of the conversations being denied by both Bobby and Dan. This is the guy who claims he spoke with the arresting officer and was given info about his arrest and Dans character. Who by the way the Stowe PD denies.
This Crash Override finally came out of the closet and let his true intentions be known, to bash Dan and SMMW at all cost regardless of facts. Are you still in the closet?
This is a real good one. lmao
"More than likely they’ll form a mutual admiration society (Justin, MountainMan and Illuminati) with the IHUB posters tripping over themselves to be first in line to kiss their feet."
You mean like your little group here who post clockwatcher10 we need you, post please clockwatcher10 we need your wisdom? LOL It seems to me you have your own little following. BTW, you said you wouldn't post for two weeks, but you did and even managed to get your shots in. Also the emails you had going back and forth with your followers. I'm wondering if it was some more negative bs about Dan and company that couldn't be contradicted on this board.
Let's get this straight.
"then there’s Bobky boasting 80 posts on IHUB for the day, “something must be up.” Bobky fails to consider that almost all of the posts are dealing with the subject of Dan’s Drinking problem, either pro or con. That’s something to brag about?"
Dan was not convicted of DUI. Why? because he wasn't legally drunk. He was below the legal limits. If any of you have gone out with your wives for dinner and had a few drinks, you would register some alcohol content in your blood.
In closing, you can say what you want about Crash Override and distance yourself anyway you can, but at least he was man enough to post this
Posted by: Crash OverRide
In reply to: None
Date:3/11/2006 5:57:30 PM
Post #of 2901
It would now seem that all of my Associates were very very Disturbed by the way I posted on the I-Hub message board as of last night with the word "Associates" attached to all of my post.
As of today I have been Kicked out of the Group that I once was a member of for carrying out a personal attack on Burgess. Seems I may have gotten some what carried away with all of the post about the DUI in Stowe Vermont.
Also:
I was warned to let you know that the other Associates did/does NOT Agree with the way I posted and that they were NOT AWARE that I would Abuse my position in this way.
So I have been THROWN OUT of our Group until such time as I can Conduct myself in a more Professional Manner.
Seems I have Broken every rule that I was sworn to Live/Invest by. No need to ever reply again To Crash OverRide. Sad day indeed but this is what happens to a little bit of power to some on a message board.
Maybe some day I can make this right!
"My Apologies" To the SMMW Stockholders and Daniel Burgess of Stowe Vermont!
And So It Goes!
Crash OverRide Without The Associates
eom
By: clockwatcher10
12 Mar 2006, 11:42 AM EST
Msg. 66955 of 66978
(This msg. is a reply to 66952 by mugsy9.)
Jump to msg. #
Mugsey:
For the public record, I am not nor ever been one of "The Associates" that make up the group Crash Over-Ride spoke of.
I posted my email address in the fall of 2005 on RB and started getting emails from Crash Over-Ride, the same as MountainMan and others, unsolicited. Some were very negative and some positive. Many of them contained links to support their positions. Based on the emails, there has always been dissention in the group concerning PRRM/SMMW.
And yes, both MountainMan and I, by virtue of reading the emails sent to us, consider Crash Over-Ride a source of information.....information to be accepted or discarded as appropriate. I've always read Crash's comments the same as I've read any other comments....all of them as information with some of the information useful and some not.
Mugsey, If you've been reading along since last November, you'd already know that many times I've mentioned Crash in my posts. MountainMan has as well. He also considered Crash a source of information. Recently he praised Crash for their renewed interest in PRRM/SMMW.
These latest posts by Crash? To date I've received three emails to my hotmail account relating to the posts from yesterday. Wanna know who’s cc'd? MountainMan! He's also getting them, but don't expect him to post the emails. They don't support his position.
SIDE NOTE: I don't doubt that Crash talked to the Cop. I just felt he went too far in attempting to have a cop validate his position on Dan. Even if it happened, it would have sounded so unbelievable that he shouldn't have posted it, knowing it would be challenged heavily.
So if you're going to try to make a case about Crash as my source of information, and attempt to use my answer of “affirmative” to prove a point you want to make, better think again. Recall, MountainMan also relied heavily on information from Crash as well. The most famous is the December email RJ posted on IHUB a few messages ago. MountainMan used that email for a factual source of information to suit his agenda.
Any accusation you wish to level at me concerning Crash you also level it at your hero, MountainMan as well
Crash OverRide, Ya he denies being a member. I still think thats where his info came from though. eom
2TimeDWI_Dan, LOL that's the first fact you got right. eom
LOL eom
gorbec1 are you justin? eom
RJ Trotts Your not a good pumper? You don't have to pump this one. Everyone knows it's going to .10+ lol Just kidding. Well we can dream can't we? Hey I have seen stranger things happen. eom
illuminati2012 ask Dan if he wants me and you to represent him. lol eom
RJ Trotts No panic here. Did you notice the increase of bashing in the last week or two or is it just me? lol eom
sirant, I like your post :>) eom
Ya illuminati2012's and my blood pressure. lol eom
Oh look Crash OverRide brought his little friend exposehimself with him. He going to help you bash? lol eom
Well this post here just proves to me your a dickhead. lol eom
illuminati2012, I hope crash override isn't driving now cause I think he had a little to much to drink. lmao eom