Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
What I notice is that the more talk of how good it's going behind the scenes.......the lower the pps keeps going. Correlation? I know, I know, means nothing. More bargains.. Or could it be a clear lack of confidence?
No worries.... As you know, it's perfectly logical, sensible, practical and EXPECTED, for "smart investors" to wait til all this great news good direction, drives the price way up before they start buying. I mean, why would anyone think otherwise? Isn't that the obvious way to go?
I wonder what it's like, going thru trading life. not having a CLUE what patent validity IS or MEANS.....??? Does it hurt? Does one have to take medicine for it?
Anyway, May 17 bearing down quick. They're beating the doors down, no? Why, just look at all the excitement brewing... Ya gotta hand it to the self styled wise men, they sure know whats goin on...
Oh boy, oh boy, oh boy!!! Do I get my 50 cents on 5/17?? Promise?
I am not worthy..I am not worthy....
.............................................................................
Most intelligent investors understand that these infringers have to try and prosecute these patents prior to acquiring them. This is done to prove to themselves the validity of the patents. No board of directors are going to approve the purchase, without doing so. It’s just part of the process.
Pretty simple to comprehend, IMHO.
....................................................................
Most SMART investors recognize this hogwash as just that, incoherent hogwash... The idea that companies need to validate the patents is no less than ridiculous. The patents are valid and were supremely certified as valid by the ptab 12 times. Doesn't get anymore VALID than that. So newbies, don't listen to that drivel. It doesn't make a lick o sense. The patents have been valid since the day they were born, period. What's more, I've explained numerous times that patent validity, which vplm most certainly has, means not a damn thing regards NEED, EFFICACY or VALUE. The real deal is that vplm, for years, has been attempting to sue (that's what patent trolls do) for infringement. So they have to show infringement, is the deal. The companies have to show they are not infringing. Now, the rub is that since I think the patents are bogus, then if so, then someone COULD show invalidity which would be the death knell for vplm. If they can't show the patents to be bogus, and they court can't show the companies to be infringing, then vplm is again, a dead duck. And as has been for the last 10 yrs or so, nobody want to buy the patents so again, dead duck. Dead duck, lame emu... All that left is all that's been......which is a fiat share selling scheme, supported in an ongoing way by dirt cheap fire sales, p & d's 2.0, and the self benefitting cabal. Works for them, not for you, unless you are smart enough to know how to nickel & dime trade it. Validity is not the question and never has been. Validity carries almost zero clout. Many patents are valid & worthless. That whole argument is INVALID!
Some just can't comprehend certain things. That's nothing new. Wrong has been shown for years... Many already know this.
I'm not gonna believe what's gonna happen soon, so don't tell me,...
Yeah I saw it...
Yes, I'm seeing more monkeys throwing some wrenches around the scene... They have to... It's part of the design here, to delay delay delay .... Delay of the the truth about this farce is imperative to keep this house of cards standing. These "muck up the works" distractions have actually been steadily coming for many years, but ppl forget sooo easily. And they become complacent as well to the pathetic penny to penny and a half pps. Oops, forgot ....pps doesn't matter.
Did you attend the ceremony for the 100mm shares put back? Damn I missed it ....
Anyway keep your eye on the ol VWAP & use in conjunction with your decoder ring for the truth & wiseness of a psychotic broker...and keep the faith for that .25, .35,. .45 cents next week or month....would you believe year ?
Vplm...home of gluttons for punishment. Actually, its pretty painless. They go and get hooked up to the collective and then just get slowly but surely assimilated and sucked dry. Happily, mind you...
For over 10 yrs the vplm patents have failed to generate a dime or do anything for the voip industry. Only the vast hype surrounding the patents, the big whopper created by vplm, is what allowed them to sell zillions of fiat shares and garner many new shareholders. And it continues on and on due continued hype by the emu and paid pumpers and p&d 2.0.
And by those who keep on donating to the "cause".
.........................................................
"Analysts report that more than 95% of patents are worthless-- not because patents as a class are worthless, but because companies fail to understand one simple principle that makes patents powerful"
Jun 24, 2020
ARTICLE
The One Secret Everyone Needs to Know About Patents
June 24, 2020
The Association of Engineers & Architects in Israel Newsletter
By Gerson S. Panitch
This is a true story. A highly innovative Israeli component manufacturer in the mobility space had a big problem. It employed some of the smartest minds in its industry who developed solutions that were incorporated into OEM products worldwide. By international standards, the Israeli company was small, but it punched far above its weight, so much so, that the last eight generations of OEM products incorporated the Israeli company’s innovations.
So why was this such a big problem? None of the large OEMs purchased the Israeli company’s products. Instead, year after year, the OEMs copied the Israeli company’s innovations. The Israeli company thought its products were well protected with over 15 U.S. patents and many more patents worldwide. But its patents could not stop the copying.
This story is not unique to this particular company or this particular industry. Many companies in Israel and around the world have similar problems. Analysts report that more than 95% of patents are worthless-- not because patents as a class are worthless, but because companies fail to understand one simple principle that makes patents powerful. To understand, it is helpful to take a step back and first consider the differences between strong and weak patents.
Strong patents have one important function: blocking competitors from offering competing products. Achieving this is more difficult than it sounds because every time a company develops and patents a valuable new solution, smart competitors try to find ways to offer a similar product with a different solution that avoids the patents. Consider machine-vision driver assist systems. A number of companies offer competitive products, each using a different technical solution. In many cases, they have found ways to avoid each other’s patents, because most of the patents are highly technical, and competitors are often able to find another technical solution to achieving the same goal. In other words, patenting specific technical solutions often makes for weak patents.
In contrast to weak patents that are technical in nature, strong patents are conceptual in nature. That is, those who are able to generalize their inventions to cover the goal itself rather than a limited technical solution for achieving that goal, can block all the competitors’ pathways to offering a competing product.
Apple demonstrated this idea in a patent that it received for unlocking a cell phone using facial recognition. Apple realized that before unlocking the phone, it needed some indication of the user’s desire to unlock. Otherwise, the phone might unlock if the camera picked up an image of the user’s face while the phone sat idly on a table, for example. So Apple patented the concept of capturing the facial image only after the phone is moved in a manner indicative of a desire to unlock the phone. If Apple had specified the algorithm of motion detection, or specified a type of motion sensor needed to ascertain the user’s intent, a competitor could have used a different algorithm or could have employed a different sensor to avoid the patent. This example demonstrates that patent value may be generated when the patent strategist steps away from the technical details, and realizes that despite the pride with which the inventors describe those details, including them in the scope of protection often provides competitors with an easy way to avoid patent infringement. Thus, the ability to conceptually protect an invention is often much more powerful than a typical technical approach to patenting.
Although the conceptual approach may seem like a logical way to patent, most companies fail to do it successfully. One analyst anecdotally reported that after examining over 3,000 patents from a few hundred startup companies, he could find only about three patents in the entire lot that had any appreciable value. The vast majority of patents tended to be too narrow to block competitors. This happens when companies use patenting methodologies that result in technical, rather than conceptual patents.
If your company is like most, the decision on what to patent is left in the hands of engineers. This leads to two challenges. First, engineers who arrive at brilliant technical solutions tend to focus on patenting those solutions. Many do not realize that patent law allows broader conceptual protection for the invention. The patent attorneys do what they are told, and write technical patents. In this way, companies can create expensive patent portfolios with very little value.
The second challenge is that the engineering leadership who make patenting decisions are often experts in their field. This poses a challenge because experts tend to quickly dismiss as unpatentable broad concepts that are in fact patentable. The author’s clients regularly obtain valuable patents over the initial objections of engineers who see their own conceptual ideas as obvious. Under the law, a patent may be granted if the invention is not obvious to a “person of ordinary skill in the art.” An expert’s view on what is obvious should never be the litmus test for patenting decisions.
The solution is to adopt a business-driven approach to patenting where a hand-picked group of the company’s technical and business visionaries shift the focus of patenting from what the inventors find most interesting to the revenue streams that need to be protected in order for the company to gain exclusivity in its market. Then, working together with a patent strategist skilled in conceptual protection, patents can be tested before they are written to determine whether, if granted, they are likely to accomplish a critical business goal. The concepts that pass the test become the company’s key patent assets. Those that don’t, are discarded. In this way, companies can avoid wasting money on patents less likely to make a difference, skewing the patent portfolio to the gems likely to drive higher valuation.
Engineers can contribute greatly to this process by asking themselves the question, “assuming my competitor were to get this patent , would it stop our company from competing in the market?” If the answer is, “no,” the patent needs to be broadened before it is filed to define the invention more conceptually.
And engineers need to fight the inclination to view conceptual inventions as obvious. It’s the Patent Office Examiner’s job to raise objections, and it’s the company’s job to fight hard to obtain commercially valuable protection.
Get those helmets on... The monkey wrenches are coming...
Oh-oh...I'm seeing incoming monkey wrenches again. Some will be genuine Moncky & some will be left handed, but no worries, you have been conditioned to handle it like always....with spin extraordinairre!
Remember, price doesn't matter
23 yrs of zilch doesn't matter
Penny and a half at best doesn't matter
6 or 7 yrs of attempted litigation about them nada
It's all about the process baby!
No test results ever even mentioned, lolol
No licenses
No sales
Sole revenue is fist share selling
"Once the patents have proven the infringement in discovery"
That sounds kind of odd...as if the patents will don a suit & stand up in court to prove themselves, lol.
It's never gonna happen though.... infringement proving that is. Instead, it's gonna more of the vplm circus in court..... It'll be like the Pink Panther!
In fact I've prepared a preview of of Inspector Hudnell doing some of his finest courtroom work. In the 2nd clip, we see Inspector Hudnell breaking down voip telephony in discovery....you know....in case you can't make it to court .
So much misinformation & misunderstanding of the nature of this circus.......and so much time for it to continue to be the fodder of fools ...
1st of all, "thanks for the explanation. Appreciate your thoughts". Gotta be kidding me. Gag me w/a spoon... And "appreciate your appreciation", I 'bout threw up in my mouth. Followed by more appreciation (of the pps), oh gawd...sickened...
It's amazing this point in time still those who don't get the concept of patent trolls. If bought patents & don't use them (especially if you promised your shareholders you would use them, but lied & didn't), and have done nothing but attempt to sue "made up", alleged infringers, then you are a patent troll by any definition out there. And.......
if some dumb company decides to buy them (funny thing, none have been dumb enough to do so for the past 10 yrs or so, as they know the patents have been proven worthless), and does the same thing, ie, does nothing but file lawsuits for infringement, they too will be patent trolls, plain & simple. It's not a difficult concept to get, but some just can't get it.
It's unbelievable, also, that the concepts of patent validity and how patent validity is seen by the legal system. Some totally don't get it. It couldn't be any simpler. When a patent application gets approved, a patent is issued and now it is a valid patent. The requirements of the USPTO to get that approval is not that difficult. I have posted those few prerequisites here a couple of times. They most certainly DO NOT include proof that it works, need for, value of (in any way, shape or form), or efficacy. Many many patents have been issued in the past that do not work, period. And almost all patents wind up having not any value at all. That's fact! And patents are valid until some judge rules otherwise. Plus, inn the case of vplm patents, they were challenged for validity like 12 times & the challengers lost ea challenge, so those valid patents remained valid to this this day and that means there is no chance of any outside company showing them to be invalid. And YET........ according to some here, they are trying to do just that. Well actually, regardless of what I just said above, it might happen anyway, in spite of what I said, because even tho the patents are VALID PATENTS, I believe they are bogus patents that are not capable of doing what vplm has cracked them up to be able to do. Sounds like a big conflict ......and it IS ! Many patents, valid patents, turn out to be worthless, do nothings... I am sure that's the case with the vplm suite of patents, for many reasons that I have connected the dots to show.
So vplm, the patent troll poster child, is suing several voip big dogs for infringement. Doubtful that infringement can ever be shown. And some of the big dogs are trying to prove invalidity, which, as I've laid out above, is pretty much an impossible thing to do. So what you have is a kind of Mexican standoff... It is purposely designed to go round & round like it has for the past 6 or 7 yrs, while it's true nature & true purpose is fully fueled and successfully churning out the fiat shares & selling them to those who know how to make a few bucks on them, as well as the poor retail dupes who are all & always underwater. And also there is the beneficiaries, the emu, his friends & family, supporters and the paid & unpaid pumpty dumpties and the rest of the cabal, who wait awhile & then cash in. It's a beautiful thing, in their eyes and they continue to benefit...
I am revising my "9 more yrs of this" to "9 to 14 more yrs". And it will continue beyond the expiry of the patents. It's a well planned & executed money making machine AS LONG AS YOU KEEP GIVING TO THE EMU GO FUND ME PLACE ! SO Give GENEROUSLY AS EGYPTIAN EMUS ARE AN ENDANGERED SPECIES.
sticky material sticky material sticky material sticky material
Hey kids ... Got some.new bizarro logic for you to be entertained by........ Did you know that if you commit criminal acts ......BUT ....you aren't caught or arent convicted (for one reason or another ...), then GUESS WHAT, you are not a criminal. Repeat: you have committed crimes and others have been witness to, but never convicted.....so you are not a criminal. So let's say you witness someone rob & pistol whip someone..but you have no proof & there are no other witnesses or any other evidence and the perp gets off easy. So is he a criminal OR NOT??? HE COMMITTED CRIMINAL ACTS BUT SKATED ..... CRIMINAL OR NOT?
In my opinion, if he committed crimes against others, he is a criminal, regardless of convictions. Another analogy: let's say someone often sends private msgs to other ppl, that are rude, crude, nasty and often obscene but he (or she) never gets caught or busted for it because it's supposed to be private, but in reality, it's really not as private as they think, so is that human debris guilty or is he (or she) not guilty? I mean after all, they did the nefarious deeds but it's supposed to be private so even tho the deeds break rules, nothing happens to them, so again, are they guilty or not guilty? Another analogy, vplm CEO, the Emu, was NAMED as being found GUILTY, by a jury of his peers, of "Breach of Fiduciary Duty" & also NAMED as guilty of "UNJUST (personal) ENRICHMENT". However, the pro side has stated many times that he was not guilty & that it was someone else who was guilty, but the court decision CLEARLY names him as a defendant, along with other vplm BOD members & others. So WAS HE GUILTY OR NOT GUILTY???
Isay he was guilty without question, especially having been found so by a jury of his peers. He, lol, stated that he was very eased with the decision of the court (sane or not sane?).
Another analogy: many have stated here, unequivocally, that the bigs have infringed upon the vplm patents BUT NO PROOF HAS EVER BEEN PRESENTED YET. SO ARE THEY GUILTY OR NOT? No one can say, because maybe they are & maybe they arent. No one yet knows. I say no, because his can you infringe on bogus patents? You figure it out....lol
Hahahahahahahaha
Look at all that foolishness.......
NOBODY, NOT ELON MUSK, NOT THE DOCTOR, NOT MICROSOFT, NOT TWITTER, NOT THE PHONY BALONEY OFFERS ON THE TABLE (too phony, too funny), NOT ANY FORTUNE 500 Co, NOT ANY S&P 500 Co, NOT AT&T, NOT FOR $150MM, NOT FOR $150, NOT BY ANYBODY EVER FOR ANY AMT CUZ THEYRE NOT INTERESTED AT ALL, WHATSOEVER AND HAVE SAID IT AND SHOWN IT TO BE THE CASE FOR ALL THESE YEARS: GO POUND SALT THEY SAY TO VPLM.GO POUND SALT....
OH, AND THE NSA REJECTED VPLM ALSO AFTER THEY SAW THE PATENTS WERE THINLY SLICED BALONEY TINGED WITH GREEN.
HEY, HOW'S THAT GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH COMPANY WITH THE PHONY BALONEY NAME DOING? WHERE ARE THEY?
GIVE IT UP, MR EMU.....AND FOR HEAVENS SAKE,JUST SELL THE SCREENPLAY TO MR CAMERON AND GIVE JS A FEW BUCKS & MOVE ON TO A FRESH SCHEME. THIS ONES KINDA BEAT
My kid made more money selling lemonade in one day than vplm ("billions & billions") has made in 20 yrs!! But they're gonna slay the dragons!!! Hahahahahahahaha hahahaha, lololol lololol hehe hehe hehe ooh ah ooh ah ah bing bang walla walla bing bang, ooh ah ooh ah ah, bing bang walla walla bing band, hahahahahahahaha hahahaha lololol lololol <cough, cough>, choke, choke, chortle, chortle. Man oh man oh manichevitz, good golly miss molly lawdy lawdy, inside down, upside out, absotively, posolutely, no bout-a-doubt-it! Wowza!
By the by...think I'll become a stockbroker with this license I just found in a crackerjacks box & wait for the Crackerjacks to be recalled, lololol. Don't worry, I took special math courses & I know how to apply neg 400%
Pickled people with patience pay with pain. The pain pickled people pay is patience for patents
Apologies for the typos. Normally I edit. Missed it...
I was saying "it" was "corruption". Amongst ptab, USPTO, panel judges...
I've got joke for you. See, there was this little make believe, wannabe Voip co. For yrs they rented other providers platforms & made believe they were a real service provider but they didn't pay most of their bills & kept getting kicked to the curb & sued, etc. They were longtime friends with another little wannabe Voip company almost an exact copy of them. The 2nd company decided to pay some ppl to write up some patent applications for the better application of voip. Then the 2 wannabe companies decided to merge & pool their resources. They decided to test the patents in different places worldwide. The tests probably, in retrospect, didn't go too well, so the kept the results hidden ever since. So now they had nothing to offer & no way to produce revenue. This situation gave rise to some "scheming". The scheme was to try to use the worthless patents as though they were super great & useful & powerful.....in order to excite & entice many ppl to become new shareholders & to keep putting out bogus PRs to keep selling more & more shares. They also kept printing more & more of these fiat shares with which to pay ppl to keep promoting the stock & tell more lies about all the billions of dollars the patents were worth. Finally this led to offering to sell the company for billions otherwise they would start suing all the big dogs for alleged infringment. And that's just what they did. And for 10 yrs they put on this charade & got nowhere & except for a couple pump driven & news driven spikes, the price always goes down or sideways & for years hangs around a penny or two, sometines even subpenny. They left many many shareholders holding the bag & way underwater. Many have simply given up, sold out & left. Others just keep looking for an ever elusive exit point.
Anyway above is all my opinion. Most based on facts as I see them, alot of dot connecting, and my personal opinions using common sense, and I'm sticking to it. This bogus wannabe company has been around, wasting space & grabbing peoples money for 23 yrs. I predict it'll go on like this for about another 9 yrs, just as I've been correctly calling it & what would come of it.......for the past 10 yrs...
Just remember...commoj sense dictates that any product that purports itself to be the end all be all of an industry & worth many many billions of dollars......WOULD MIST CERTAINLY RELEASE THE RESULTS OF ITS WORLDWIDE NODAL TESTING THAT IT SAID IT DID. Of course it never DID release those results FOR DAMN GOOD REASON.........AND the self proclaimed smart investors couldn't care less & believe regardless.... If THATS smart, I'd rather be dumb. Remember, very very important.....almost anything can be patented & patent criteria & validity absolutely does not deem any patents to be needed, necessary, effective, compatabie w/current Voip systems, or of any value whatsoever. Thems the facts jack & no one can show proof they're not true. Infringement has NOTHING to do with validity. All validity means is that enough $ was paid to the USPTO & enough basic requirements (I've posted those requirements here b4) were met. You can patent a rock or a donut hole. And if they (uspto) want more money, they hold up the patent til u give their "fair share" & then maintence fees in perpetuity (life of patent). The USPTO & their arm, the ptab, have the power to levy that ol one two punch of corruption with the IPRs. In the case of vplm the IPRs went their way AFTER 3 SETS OF JUDGE PANELS, THE RESIGNATION OF THE HEAD & AN ENTIRE YEAR & THE THREAT OF FEDERAL RICO CHARGES BY A VERY VERY WELL CONNECTED Tom Sawyer. Anyone who thinks that vplm was the ONLY troll in IPR history TO BE ABLE TO PULL OFF A SWEEP.....BECAUSE THEY ARE THAT GOOD AND NO OTHER COMPANY EVER WAS, BEFORE OR SINCE, IS LIVING IN A DREAM WORLD. IT WAS CLEAR CUT & IBVIOUS CORRIOTION. VPLM IS NOTHING MORE & NOTHING LESS THAN A FIAT SHARE PRINTING/SELLING & DISTRIBUTING MACHINE & WILL NEVER GET ANY INFRINGMENT WINS. ITLL JUST DRAG ON FOR YRS & YRS MORE JUST LIKE IT ALREADY HAS FOR YRS & YRS. What a joke, eh?
Oh yezzzz... Plz DO KEEP BUYING & BUYING. Keep "loading up", baby! The more you keep buying the more you support the ongoing fiat share printing/selling scheme, thus promoting the ongoing P&D 2.0, which in turn gives the poor underwater retails a chance to keep chipping away at recouping at least small portions of their unfortunate robbery losses. Some keep on keeping on buying that terlet paper. It's nice to give to needy charities.
NONSENSE AND MORE BULLSHIT!
First of all, these infringers DO NOT have to try and prove these patents aren't valid prior to acquiring them! No board of directors is going to approve any acquisition, especially patents, BASED ON VALIDITY. It's not too difficult to understand that not only are all patents valid (unless & until ruled invalid by a judge) but validity has nothing to do with anything anyway because patent validity carries with it NOTHING IN THE WAY OF NEED, VALUE or EFFICACY! The only thing that matters is if a court of law establishes & rules its been infringed upon, which has ZERO to do with validity.
IT'S REALLY NOT THAT DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND! (for most intelligent readers).
12 IPR victories AND ALL PATENTS HAVE YET TO BE PROVEN INVALID, PERIOD, END OF STORY.
VALIDITY IS NOT WHAT DETERMINES INFRINGEMENT, UNDERSTAND?
............................................................
Aaaaaaand........
It is absotively, posolutely & unequically
NOT the courts that decide infringement via validity. That's ludicrous... The patents were VALID the day they became patents & NEVER stopped being valid for a second. Even when they were challenged with the IPRs, they still were valid & remained valid after the IPRs as the challenge was lost. So, there IS NO QUESTION OF VALIDITY! They are all valid, period. It is simply a matter of the courts deciding NOT VALIDITY, BUT WHETHER OR IT THEY WERE INFRINGED UPON.
It's difficult for some to comprehend apparently. It's actually very simple. Just because a patent is valid, lends it NO need, efficacy or value & just because it's valid does not mean it can & would be necessarily infringed upon because it may not do what IT'S CRACKED UP TO BE IN THE 1ST PLACE.
AND THEREIN LIES THE CRUX OF THE MATTER... THE PATENTS ACTUALLY WILL BE FOUND TO SUCK THE PROVERBIAL CANAL WATER WHOOP CHURNS IS WHY THEY HAVE NEVER BEEN BOUGHT OR LICENSED OR SETTLED ON OR PARTNERED WITH.....AND NEVER WILL...
NONSENSE AND MORE BULLSHIT!
First of all, these infringers DO NOT have to try and prove these patents aren't valid prior to acquiring them! No board of directors is going to approve any acquisition, especially patents, BASED ON VALIDITY. It's not too difficult to understand that not only are all patents valid (unless & until ruled invalid by a judge) but validity has nothing to do with anything anyway because patent validity carries with it NOTHING IN THE WAY OF NEED, VALUE or EFFICACY! The only thing that matters is if a court of law establishes & rules its been infringed upon, which has ZERO to do with validity.
IT'S REALLY NOT THAT DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND! (for most intelligent readers).
12 IPR victories AND ALL PATENTS HAVE YET TO BE PROVEN INVALID, PERIOD, END OF STORY.
VALIDITY IS NOT WHAT DETERMINES INFRINGEMENT, UNDERSTAND?
The reality of it is this is the same never ending dish you'll eat here for the next approx 9 more years so the good news is: you're used to it!
Where's those TEST RESULTS? lol
Are they buried on OAK ISLAND?
Notice that no one cares? ........... I know, I know...it means something good, hahaha.
And it makes PERFECT SENSE, hahah....that not a single voip service provider or other investor EVER saw fit to buy vplm w/it's patents they told us were worth upwards of hundreds of billions of dollars. Nor a license. Nary a one. Of COURSE they ALL had the exact same thought process about it. OF COURSE! ANYBODY KNOWS THAT. And all the infringement lawsuits that vplm is gonna eventually win <cough, cough>, OF COURSE DO NOT MATTER TO THE INFRINGERS. IT WOULD, OF COURSE, NEVER OCCUR TO THEM THAT INSTEAD OF PAYING ALL THOSE HUGE TRIPLE DAMAGES, THEY COULD HAVE BOUGHT THE COMPANY & COLLECTED ALL THOSE DAMAGES THEMSELVES!!!!!
NAAAAAAH, makes tons more sense to pay the damages. No doubt their shareholders would vote for THAT, eh?
Keep giving generously to the Emu go fund me project! A good scheme is a terrible thing to waste...
I've called the P&D 2.0's now, correctly, for so many days in a row that it's boring. These pumps & dumps 2.0 continue on a daily basis & the key players have become smart enough & bold enough to step it up with higher lows & higher highs & larger profits, as well as now multiple cycles per trading session.
That's the way...uh-huh,uh-huh, they DO it, uh-huh, uh-huh... That's the way, uh-huh, uh-huh, it's done!
Like taking candy from a baby..
Approx 9 yrs ago, after the acquisition of the patents, vplm, in its quest to sell many shares & aquire many new shareholders, bald faced lied to everyone by promising to immediately fold the alleged technology into their so-called Voip services platform, but instead, opted to become the biggest patent troll of all time. Since then........
No sales, no licenses, no infringment case wins & nothing but print & sell fiat shares in a worthless company, benefifting only friends, family, supporters & insiders.
8 yrs ago.........THE SAME
7 yrs ago.........THE SAME
6 yrs ago........ THE SAME
5 yrs ago........ THE SAME
4 yrs ago........ THE SAME
3 yrs ago........ THE SAME
2 yrs ago........ THE SAME
1 yr ago......... THE SAME
Today............ THE SAME
TOMORROW..........THE SAME
THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW.....THE SAME
NEXT WEEK.........THE SAME
NEXT YEAR.........THE SAME
10 YRS............TOAST
Vplm...the technical leader of the fiat share printing/selling, otc, patent trolls.
23 mm shares last week & its a penny & a half, lololol...
There's nothing wrong with Emu having his own personal "go fund me" site (vplm), is there?
Book em, Dano
Vplmwillnotspringahead
And the daily P&D 2.0 continues & they have been bringing up the level to score more. But at the end of the day, it's still in the one cent range, lol. Face it, vplm is a 1 penny stock & always will be... There's nothing good going on in the background as there's no reason for anything good. Soon it'll be back to a penny again where it belongs & likes being there. This is what vplm is and how it operates & always has been. It doesn't need anyone to admit it, it just is, like it or not, believe it or not. Same shit been going on for 23 years. Emu deeply thanks the supporters that keep the wheels turning. I'm giving it about 9 more yrs of this before its burnt out.
Vplm:land of the illusions, delusions & amusing!
Let the dots connect!
You wanna see double digits? Stick around, soon it'll be .009xx...double digits
You know when someone says that trading vplm is a 100% sure thing (did he really say that??), they must be a professional trader/bs artist
hugs...sending over some oxygen...
Is it time yet? Keep watching that red bouncing ball. Newtonian action in the form of potential energy awaits....
Ooh, I almost forgot.... Is there still a chance I'll see my 50¢ today? PLEASE!
Oh my goodness. Over a penny and a half. Can you imagine? Break out the champagne.. Damn, I'M almost convinced to start buying.............................. not.
It's just them teasing and enticing you to keep buying... Haha... Standby for .011x
Investopedia P&D 2.0
Pump-and-Dump 2.0
The same scheme can be perpetrated by anyone with access to an online trading account and the ability to convince other investors to buy a stock that is supposedly "ready to take off." The schemer can get the action going by buying heavily into a stock that trades on low volume, which usually pumps up the price.
The price action induces other investors to buy heavily, pumping the share price even higher. At any point when the perpetrator feels the buying pressure is ready to fall off, they can dump their shares for a big profit.
Very entertaining as I watch it happen almost daily.
More predictions. We need more predictions of bang, zoom, to da moon, lolol
They know how to make daily money using P&D 2.0, lol. It has zero to do with any news of any sort. Duh. Standby for the big dump probably later today.
Hugs, it says on the vplm website that you can "click here" the get the last court decision (locksmith vs voip-pal). That would be the one that the pro element is telling everyone is vplm winning & getting the infamous shares returned. Anyway, when I click on the "here" or the whole link, it either does not work for me (on the "here" part) or the bigger link simply switches back to the same page (so you go nowhere). It could be my browser but I thought I'd ask if it works for you. I know how to access it elsewhere but I still wonder if it's broke or or not (as is so often the case with this website).
If the link works for you, lemme know. If. If not, then simply copy the case number & paste it into your browser url box to get to it. I can't understand a whole lot of legalese but some. So read it & I don't want to lead you, so just let me know if you find anything off the wall about the decision. But in order to make such a judgement, I guess you would have to 1st read the decision from the previous (2019) decision, the won that the pro vplm ppl were trying to tell ppl that it was won by vplm but of course it was not won by vplm, it was clearly won by locksmith & vplm had to pay over a half mm $ in damages. That decision should be linked on the website as well. So read them both, if you will, and then tell me what you think about the recent decision allegedly in favor of vplm. It IS in favor of vplm but I have found its not that simple...
Did you know that Sawyer was also a Knighted member of some hokey religious military order and that he was mandated by that order, to go out and procure millions of pounds of gold???
That whole myopic shpiel about ptab being corrupt only FOR the big guys is bullshit & fails its own argument. You see, if vplm was granted any kind of judgements that contributed to its full ship coming in & found to have had its patents infringed on, it then would proceed to becoming one of the biggest entities in existence. They would then be worth many billions and be in complete and total control of the world of voip communications, worldwide & become one of the biggest companies there is. And I would also stop all the illegal competition, making them even bigger. They would them arrive in the same class as APPLE, T, TWITTER, & all the rest of the bigs. And it would have been the PTAB as the number 1 catalyst to that end.
Nope, sorry, doesn't work. Sounded good but no cigar. It's beyond obvious that the IPRs in favor of vplm were the result of it the kind of corruption that I noted they were guilty of, but WAS IN FACT THE RESULT OF BEING THREATENED WITH FEDERAL RICO CHARGES. THAT WOULD'VE ALSO SEVERELY DAMAGED THE USPTO SINCE THE PTAB IS AN ARM OF THE USPTO.
There were, if one carefully checked, 3 seperate panels before the final decision. If it were true that the corruption was only in favor of certain bigs, then there have been at least a couple of other ptab decisions that were 100% in favor of some other company, like it was for vplm (on the 3rd try, lol). Also, and this is SOOOOO obvious.....if Sawyer hadn't written those letters, then why didn't the 1st 2 panels QUICKLY rule in favor of the bigs? Throws that theory out the window instantly.
Has there been other small patent troll companies to have won ALL there IPRs brought against them by bigs, SINCE??? I highly doubt it.
No ruling had even been made yet when Sawyer wrote his letters. The whole point by me was that the rulings were based on the legal threat made by Sawyer and not due to the alleged merit of all the patents.
The corruption was for whoever handed out cash and/or shares and we know that kazillions of shares were handed out by vplm to mystery ppl for mystery reasons
Did you know that the highly vaunted former vplm ceo, Dr Tom Sawyer, who served 4 US presidents, wrote 5 or 6 letters to congress, the president & the head of uspto & ptab, describing the fraudulent nature of the ptab? And threatened to bring forth federal RICO charges against them if they didn't find in favor of vplm? And that this resulted in the known corrupt ptab changing panels (judges) twice (so there were 3 different panels looking at & ruling in vplm's IPR challenges w/NO EXPLANATION) during the course of 1 year? And that finally, after the all the letters and the unprecedented full years time w/no decision, that they finally ruled 100% in favor of vplm on all the IPRs, something that had never happened before or since. And then, ever since, rather than acknowledge that level of corruption known to have existed within the ptab, those decisions have been praised up & down 6 ways to Sunday? That it's the NUMBER 1 THING the pro vplm side brings up on a daily basis, ever since, even tho it's ridiculously obvious that the threat of federal rico charges seemed to be the impetus for the 100% positive ptab rulings. Did you know THAT?