InvestorsHub Logo

nyt

Followers 26
Posts 12809
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2011

nyt

Re: None

Monday, 04/18/2022 12:40:16 AM

Monday, April 18, 2022 12:40:16 AM

Post# of 131898
Hey kids ... Got some.new bizarro logic for you to be entertained by........ Did you know that if you commit criminal acts ......BUT ....you aren't caught or arent convicted (for one reason or another ...), then GUESS WHAT, you are not a criminal. Repeat: you have committed crimes and others have been witness to, but never convicted.....so you are not a criminal. So let's say you witness someone rob & pistol whip someone..but you have no proof & there are no other witnesses or any other evidence and the perp gets off easy. So is he a criminal OR NOT??? HE COMMITTED CRIMINAL ACTS BUT SKATED ..... CRIMINAL OR NOT?
In my opinion, if he committed crimes against others, he is a criminal, regardless of convictions. Another analogy: let's say someone often sends private msgs to other ppl, that are rude, crude, nasty and often obscene but he (or she) never gets caught or busted for it because it's supposed to be private, but in reality, it's really not as private as they think, so is that human debris guilty or is he (or she) not guilty? I mean after all, they did the nefarious deeds but it's supposed to be private so even tho the deeds break rules, nothing happens to them, so again, are they guilty or not guilty? Another analogy, vplm CEO, the Emu, was NAMED as being found GUILTY, by a jury of his peers, of "Breach of Fiduciary Duty" & also NAMED as guilty of "UNJUST (personal) ENRICHMENT". However, the pro side has stated many times that he was not guilty & that it was someone else who was guilty, but the court decision CLEARLY names him as a defendant, along with other vplm BOD members & others. So WAS HE GUILTY OR NOT GUILTY???
Isay he was guilty without question, especially having been found so by a jury of his peers. He, lol, stated that he was very eased with the decision of the court (sane or not sane?).

Another analogy: many have stated here, unequivocally, that the bigs have infringed upon the vplm patents BUT NO PROOF HAS EVER BEEN PRESENTED YET. SO ARE THEY GUILTY OR NOT? No one can say, because maybe they are & maybe they arent. No one yet knows. I say no, because his can you infringe on bogus patents? You figure it out....lol

All my commentary is to be considered as my personal opinions, to which I am entitled. And there is no proof of said opinions unless I offer it in the comments.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News