InvestorsHub Logo

nyt

Followers 25
Posts 12732
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2011

nyt

Re: None

Friday, 04/01/2022 4:33:12 AM

Friday, April 01, 2022 4:33:12 AM

Post# of 131105
NONSENSE AND MORE BULLSHIT!
First of all, these infringers DO NOT have to try and prove these patents aren't valid prior to acquiring them! No board of directors is going to approve any acquisition, especially patents, BASED ON VALIDITY. It's not too difficult to understand that not only are all patents valid (unless & until ruled invalid by a judge) but validity has nothing to do with anything anyway because patent validity carries with it NOTHING IN THE WAY OF NEED, VALUE or EFFICACY! The only thing that matters is if a court of law establishes & rules its been infringed upon, which has ZERO to do with validity.

IT'S REALLY NOT THAT DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND! (for most intelligent readers).


12 IPR victories AND ALL PATENTS HAVE YET TO BE PROVEN INVALID, PERIOD, END OF STORY.

VALIDITY IS NOT WHAT DETERMINES INFRINGEMENT, UNDERSTAND?

All my commentary is to be considered as my personal opinions, to which I am entitled. And there is no proof of said opinions unless I offer it in the comments.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News