InvestorsHub Logo

nyt

Followers 26
Posts 12939
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2011

nyt

Re: None

Friday, 04/29/2022 12:00:25 PM

Friday, April 29, 2022 12:00:25 PM

Post# of 132821
.............................................................................
Most intelligent investors understand that these infringers have to try and prosecute these patents prior to acquiring them. This is done to prove to themselves the validity of the patents. No board of directors are going to approve the purchase, without doing so. It’s just part of the process.

Pretty simple to comprehend, IMHO.
....................................................................
Most SMART investors recognize this hogwash as just that, incoherent hogwash... The idea that companies need to validate the patents is no less than ridiculous. The patents are valid and were supremely certified as valid by the ptab 12 times. Doesn't get anymore VALID than that. So newbies, don't listen to that drivel. It doesn't make a lick o sense. The patents have been valid since the day they were born, period. What's more, I've explained numerous times that patent validity, which vplm most certainly has, means not a damn thing regards NEED, EFFICACY or VALUE. The real deal is that vplm, for years, has been attempting to sue (that's what patent trolls do) for infringement. So they have to show infringement, is the deal. The companies have to show they are not infringing. Now, the rub is that since I think the patents are bogus, then if so, then someone COULD show invalidity which would be the death knell for vplm. If they can't show the patents to be bogus, and they court can't show the companies to be infringing, then vplm is again, a dead duck. And as has been for the last 10 yrs or so, nobody want to buy the patents so again, dead duck. Dead duck, lame emu... All that left is all that's been......which is a fiat share selling scheme, supported in an ongoing way by dirt cheap fire sales, p & d's 2.0, and the self benefitting cabal. Works for them, not for you, unless you are smart enough to know how to nickel & dime trade it. Validity is not the question and never has been. Validity carries almost zero clout. Many patents are valid & worthless. That whole argument is INVALID!

Some just can't comprehend certain things. That's nothing new. Wrong has been shown for years... Many already know this.

All my commentary is to be considered as my personal opinions, to which I am entitled. And there is no proof of said opinions unless I offer it in the comments.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News