Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The false and misleading financials issued by scam company YIPI:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=113619059
and
CEO has explained in detail that the financials presented are accurate and right.
The false and misleading press releases issued by scam company YIPI:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=112652526
and
Information was entriely accurate at time of press release. Explaination of changes were throughly and completely outlined
The promotion of stock of scam company YIPI by a corrupt stock promoter:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=113281893
Yippy did not pay for any promotion. The suggestion was based on merit
False and Misleading statements purposely attacking Yippy without proof.
Granville did not pay for promotion. Yippy was suggested based on merits not payment. To say otherwise is just intentionally false and misleading
Ha! Pump for a Dump of 5.1k volume. That's ridiculous.
Bid size now at .23 for 160k shares
Technically it is an F109. Make no mistake that a contract with Fluor would be a very big deal.
I heard he paid in hugs and pats.
Money in the bank, shorty what ya thank! Ha!
99.995% chance YIPI stock is not going down, but up. I would choose not to err on those stats.
Obviously that is not what most of the market thinks, heh? 0.005% of the company shares are shorted.
Waiting on information that does not exist on YIPI. Classic!
So with all this information at your fingertips and an open and shut case why aren't you and the others on this board massively shorting YIPI?
If it is a clear SCAM why not take the easy money?
All of this information and I think that this is the biggest "tell". All talk no money.
If YIPI was a SCAM as you are screaming why are you not taking advantage of your knowledge and setting yourself up for a big paycheck?
Shouldn't you be positioning yourself For The Win??
Easy money is never left on the table.
That's OK don't need a buyout just sales to push price up. If you admit it's not a scam then I would hop on board b/c the sales are coming.
According to the previous poster IBM accepted YIPI stocks as a form of payment. If that is the case they absolutely gave "consideration" to YIPI.
YIPI Answer To False Accusations:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=113344461
Ha, Quite contradictory.
If they accepted YIPI stock for payment than they did indeed invest. Payment is exchanging something of value, so you are saying IBM accepted the shares for a certain declared value.
When you say not a single document you mean these 2
One
http://reports.standardandpoors.com/aidata/maccess/pdf/98584y20.pdf
Two
http://reports.standardandpoors.com/aidata/maccess/y/yipi_440324_stock.htm
As in nothing you mean Blue Flame Appliance, EASE 360, Defcon, Search Engine.
As for people who do not know who to put it together you mean Errol Walsh, 31 year IBM veteran, Art Huffman, former CTO of Haliburton, John P. Macartney, Chief Scientist of Cengage Learning,
Kenneth C. Jolly, previous Chairman of the Board of Directors for the National Football League Former Players Association
I am not sure where it ever states that ISO Certs will be delayed 9 months.
Can you provide where you are getting your timetable facts?
Obviously IBM thought differently than you because it bought Velocity before Watson ever existed.
If IBM saw it valuable enough to acquire why wouldn't it won't to protect it's investment from competitors.
The premise of your analogy is incorrect.
Velocity is Watson's source code. If one has access to your source code that's a big deal.
If one had the ability to sell pieces of your foundation I would think you would retract the statement regarding it;s value.
I have worked in the tech industry for a long time and know how these license structures work.
You can think anything you want Iknow for fact that Yippy has the ability to distribute the Velocity license.
I can say without a doubt Yippy has the right to distribute Velocity and could do so to any of IBM's competition if they chose to do so.
IBM bought that right for $millions and Yippy has the right to sell it. That's a pretty solid negotiating position any way you look at it.
Yippy received a worldwide unlimited perpetual license for the Velocity platform in its acquisition of Clusty with the right to redistribute.
Can you imagine if Oracle bought Sun and Sun had entered into an agreement with another 3rd party company giving that third party company the right to distribute Java as well.
Ha, except for the part that Oracle charges a license fee for every single instance of Java.
From his statement that means that Yippy can do the same....say handover a license to Google, MSFT, Yahoo, or whoever else they choose. How do you think IBM would like that. I going to guarantee you not very much.
There's your value
BAM!
You do realize Oracle charges for the right to use Java.
http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/pricing/price-lists/java-embedded-price-list-1977272.pdf
Velocity is a framework. Watson is built off that framework.
Think of it like this Watson is is the walls, fans, toilets and cabinets.
Velocity is the boards, electrical and plumbing.
In that case yes Watson has added some additional functionality to the framework, but Yippy still has legitimate ownership claim to the framework and vital components that run Watson.
Your saying that if someone wrote an outstanding program in Java language that Java would no longer be owned and fail to exist essentially rendering it unusable by any other party that chose to use that programming language.
Yippy Explains Financial Question
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=113344461
Yippy HIPAA and FISMA Alignment
http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/marketwire/1186833.htm
YIPI Patents from Acquisitions
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=113372290
Yippy Explains Financial Question
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=113344461
Yippy HIPAA and FISMA Alignment
http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/marketwire/1186833.htm
YIPI Patents from Acquisitions
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=113372290
Here is some research for you guys.
Patents obtained from acquisition of:
Clusty
https://www.google.com/?tbm=pts&gws_rd=ssl#tbm=pts&q=%22clusty%22
Gigablast
https://www.google.com/?tbm=pts&gws_rd=ssl#tbm=pts&q=%22gigablast%22
With a contract duh?
From here forth Yippy Inc will hereby be referred to Company: A
and "X" will be referred to Company: B
legal legal legal etc
#5 You shall not pay us a dime until you love it.*
#5 establishes an expiration date for "company B" to make decision stated in stated in "#5", to accept or refuse the services.
A Termination Fee of "X" amount (this will be enough to cover the cost)
End Contract
So AR would not recognize the termination fees as revenue, but the actual amount owed for accepting the hardware/service within the established time frame.
The most important facts is that after the established expiration period they still have a revenue buffer in place to at, the least recoup cost.
Recouping cost is a sign of strategic planning and establishing safety nets for dynamic trajectory regardless of the variables.
Not something you see in a SCAM company.
Your Thoughts?
Just for everyone hear to understand that has never run a pilot program in a tech company.
The pilot agreement can be a year. During the pilot money would not be paid, so it is not at all uncommon to have AR go past a year for a proof of concept within an environment.
If they were selling the appliance on the open market with POC already 100% proven and product/service available to any company willing to front the cash then I would agree that the common turnover should be 60-90 days.
Sales Tax is not part of a companies reported revenues.
You mean companies like Google, who's entry level search appliance sells for $32,000 for 500,000 documents.
That looks like a nice even and divisible number of $1,000.
tell us, how does YIPI end up wit six consecutive quarters of financials with the A/R all ending up in "662" if the financials aren't fake and fraudulent?
The carry forward of the 662 is simply only even thousands of the receivables were carried forward. The sales numbers include small amounts of advertising that were collected during the Q, therefore not receivables. We booked time a materials invoice that was not over 1,000 that changed it last Q.
Hope this answers your question.
take care...