Do you know the deal Zell got for leaving? Do you know if someone, perhaps his wife, is ill? Is it possible that those are truthful reasons and Zell feels confident in leaving the company in Dean's hands?

You don't know what is going on - just like the rest of us - yet you take a negative approach - to each his own.

You have a right to be concerned - but no right to call us turkey's.

Another great day here in RCCH land.

Really happy that this hasn't gone lower on the non-news.

The sky is the limit on this stock!

Great news - this stock should start moving...

...any minute now.

here it goes.....

The problem is that the only news we get is always another "7-10 days" away.

The up-listing is always "soon".

Don't get me wrong, I hope everything works out as I bought 2 grand at the bottom of the barrel, but just being realistic here.

If 7-10 days is really in 2 years, I will still be here.

Nice battle of the wills shaping up here.

Don't know if I should take this as good or bad news - but will likely sit on my pile and wait.

Patience young Skywalker.

Thanks for the clarification. Seems like they could use a better secretary to stay up on theses details.

Billyburg D,

This seems like a simple change of address. Am I reading this correctly?

Thanks - nice find, btw.

Maybe you are right. Maybe everything you've posted is the truth.

"Sorry gang, I hope this will be the last time I beat this horse."

I doubt that.

Thanks for your well wishes - so sweet.

We can't wait for you to get off too. Best of luck to you and everyone else.

Obviously, not going to change your mind - and neither will I, so this debate will go nowhere fast.

All I can say is that I am comfortable with my DD, my investment and with Dean running the show. I am a long with over 4 million shares and loving that I can add at these levels.

He did not lie when he said "will likely not change". "Likely" leaves open the possibility that he might. Therefore, it is not a lie.

As far as the acquisitions - the dates get missed all the time, especially when dealing with 4 at once.

Key words here, "will likely not change".

Looks like the night crew is working the day shift today.

Thanks for the heads up, PC.

Agreed - just bubbling inside knowing what I know about this stock. Not worried, just antsy.

I have been in QASP since early this year and have been buying, when I can, ever since. I am long, no doubt, but my insides feel like every tomorrow is Christmas.

Just waiting for Santa Dean - but in the meantime, I should take your advice and lay off the ticker.

The suspense is killing me. Can't wait to see the next chapter unfold before our eyes.

Thanks to all who do good DD and post intelligent insights.

The night crew sure beats the day trippers.

Go QASP.

Fair and well though out - thank you.

Be very interested in his reply.

Bingo! Lets get this puppy moving.

Can anyone post a recent L2, please.

C'mon hold that line til I gets mine!

Watching RCCH is like treading in pudding.

Full list here:

http://www.pinksandbb.com/market_makers.aspx

So delete it already.

Thanks!

Go QASP!

L2, por favor.

I guess, but your logic, in this case, misleads you, and has the potential to mislead others, imo.

ARCA is looking for a MASSIVE amount of RCCH shares to put in my pocket.

Which it did for me last week as well. And will continue to do so when I tell it to.

"Seeing a Market Maker like ARCA that only showed up on RCCH last week simply means some entity moved money to trade with another broker."

Is this a fact as well, or does "simply means" code for "typically" as well?

Not sure how you can say "All Marker Makers typically show 5,000 shares when on the bid and ask. That is a fact."

Is it typically that way, or is it a fact - or is it typically a fact?

Or is it my bid for a grand?

Again, G, you might be over reading a $1,000 buy. 10,000,000 is a MASSIVE number of shares, yes - but dollar wise, its measly.

Perhaps ARCA is purchasing for an E*Trade account?

Ditto!

Be careful in over thinking a $1,000 buy.

I give my blessing to QASP - now go forth and multiply.

It was not.