Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yup TDA took 1 hour and 1 min but now showing filled the UOIP 50k @ .01
003, I entered TDAmeritrade order for 50,000. More than 1/2 hour not filled. Wonder what is going on? Your Sell order still open?
Entered:11:32:26 11/21/18 --Buy at .01 UOIP Unifiedonline, Inc Common... Not AON & Not FOK
If Billy tried to sneak under Evil's radar by selling 200 K sh per day, it would take him 4,500 trading days or over 18 years.
Pretty sure that is not his plan. LOL
AJ, remember that Billy as the manager of UOIP/Chanbond has the seen the patent valuations.
And he has seen what the other side provided in trial discovery.
Old bridge saying: “One peek is worth two finesses.”
He has the advantage on us - and he is in it to win it.
I'm staying
Strong UOIP >> Strong Oaks _ Maybe even 4000 yr old Sequoias
BTW - What are those trees near you that the Monarch Butterflies migrate to for protection??
We wish. LOL
First pacer. This was only the court granting 6 day delay for patent Director to get his brief filed - now due Nov 19. However, we do know that the Director will be supporting Chanbond request to deny Arris appeal.
Second Pacer. Chanbond's excellent Reply to Arris Brief. They shredded it. Fed Court should just copy Chanbond's reply in their final written decision.
Sorry Scruff, This trade was me. Still nibbling.
Didn't realize it was me until TD Ameritrade alert. Have a ladder of 10 orders in. FYI - this order was entered a week ago after suggestion from board to break big orders up. Amazing that I can get .016 when others have .02 orders.
BTW - Put me down for .92 settlement or buyout.
Thanks Justus. Will modify my buys. I had GTC 100k buy orders at TDA for a week and not even partial fills. Now I will put smaller orders in and ladder them from to .01 to .02. Amazing how the available shares are drying up at under .02.
Me - Already got enough in my position to never work again after UOIP win - just adding desert to my meal.
Supply demand logic says a higher pps is needed to shake more shares loose. Per you neighbor in Carmel, Harry Callahan, "Well, ... A good man always knows his limitations..."
Mine will start to loosen above $.50. Go UOIP
Hey dp, I have a large buy at .01 at TDA.
Got enough back in April but with the end coming thought I'd put up a wall & see if their were any shares to be had. You never know - might get lucky.
Vacationing in Seattle - got lucky - no rain just weeks of 65-70 and egg yolk sunny.
UOIP - what a great stock - provides entertainment & good company while waiting for pot of gold at end of rainbow.
Thanks for sharing.
Chanbond/UOIP lawyers make good arguments that are easy to understand.
Can't wait to read Cisco brief due on Nov 13.
Don't need a psychic reader to see the future massive UOIP win coming.
When you reply to a post - please read it all.
PPS is not important for longs waiting for legal success against Cable companies. GO UOIP.
UOIP went from Pink to Grey. This a very different world for most of us and we are in learning mode. And this board helps by sharing trading activity.
What I have learned since UOIP went grey:
1. Brokers like TDA don't make a market and appear to only trade from their own inventory. There are no MM (market makers). If both buyer and seller have TDA account, then TDA has control of trade and guarantees delivery of shares. If Buyer was on TDA and seller was on eTrade, then TDA couldn't 100% guarantee delivery of shares to their customer.
2. MM (market makers) are allowed to provide unsolicited buy or ask quotes on grey market stocks but may not "make a market" in the stock by providing unsolicited quotes. So no Level 2 reporting and no shorting.
3. The UOIP price drop is mainly because our the dramatic drop in demand... weak holders trying to get out of UOIP and the skepticism of new investors to buy(cross bones, because of the move to Grey, trading is very difficult - just ask Cherry). It's like buying a tractor trailer full of apples, then the FDA puts out a warning on apples... You'd have to sell them at a much lower price to get rid of them. But after a panic period is over people still demand apples so buying and selling resumes in somewhat normal pattern,
4. UOIP has a good story for those that do their Due Diligence. This means there is demand out there for anyone wishing to sell. We are in a testing phase to find correct share price. After trading resumed on grey market - initial sells were as low as .008, UOIP has slowly recovered to the .02 range.
Just saw a 100k trade go at .02, then 25k trade go at .013 followed by a 25k trade at .0194. IMO - Each broker is only allowing buying and selling between their own customers and this makes for inefficient price activity. If you had an account at say 3 brokers... TDA, eTrade, & Schwab - you could test all 3. But most of us are stuck with one broker.
PPS is not important for longs waiting for legal success against Cable companies. GO UOIP.
Judge Richard G. Andrews, United States District Court, District of Delaware is presiding over Cable company patent infringement.
Most on UOIP board knew who you meant but newbies might not.
Appreciate info. UOIP was my first pink and now my first grey.
Been in UOIP since April - what a ride - watching it go from under .01 to .06. And like "most" on this board, I believe - you ain't seen nothing yet.
Because this is a pure patent play, the pacer documents on UOIP board are something wouldn't want to lose - Thanks Evil, Khenry, & Phump.
Thanks Zomby, Hope it works out that we continue to trade until trial.
Renee told UOIP board that ALJ would be quick to delist. If UOIP didn't respond within 10 day suspension, the ALJ wouldn't even bother to have a hearing but make the decision immediately.
So my concern was how to get info on UOIP if private. Does iHub let UOIP have a board if it isn't trading??
Long UOIP.
Does anyone have a clue as to how fast the SEC/ALJ can complete the process to revoke/delist UOIP?
IMO - Someone (cable companies?) is fast tracking this process with SEC - probably because there will be less bad publicity (CNBC, WSJ, etc.) when they lose to UOIP/Chanbond as a private company.
Could someone who has been through a company going dark share a strategy for following UOIP. Thanks.
Maybe I will have to take some time off and attend Delaware trial if not settled before April. LOL
Supreme Court "Order of Court" Oct 1 9:30 am List - RPX V Chanbond case 17-1686 shows as still pending - no decision yet
No additional info on why no decision - just pending from 9/24 conference.
Apology to Rolling Stones: it should be "You can't always get what you want."
Different word -same meaning
Just like UOIP - Public or Private - means value recognized and payment received.
Will I still get a 1099 for the private sale of UOIP shares? HaHa
Don't want to get in trouble with the IRS. LOL.
Of course, everyone would prefer a trade on NYSE, but as the Rolling Stones said "You don't always get what you want."
I faced longer odds in Vietnam - but USAF, US Navy, US Marines, & US Army got me home.
For UOIP longs,
- Supreme Court will finally stop RPX tomorrow -10/1/18.
- Fed Court of Appeals - will side with UOIP against ARRIS by Nov 2018
- Fed Court of Appeals - will side with UOIP against Cisco by Jan, 2019
- Fed Circuit Court of Delaware - jury will side with UOIP against 13 cable companies by summer of 2019. Sidebar - Who loves or trusts Comcast?
Yes, there is some risk in believing Mr. William Carter (58% majority shareholder) will prevail against the bully but life is about choices.
When UOIP's stock registration is revoked … all shareholders will have TOTAL LOSSES.
Is that a fact? or just your opinion?
How is that legal?
If I own a truck and don't pay registration fee.
Virginia revokes my license Plate but I still own the truck.
Believe me - the truck is not "worthless" and neither are "UOIP" patents until the April 2019 jury in the Delaware Federal Court of Judge Richard G. Andrews says so.
Is this an appeal to Fed Court of Appeals by ARRIS on their PTAB loss?
If they lost on "Time Bound" - wonder what their appeal reason is?
OCT 1 - Supreme Court publishes "Order of the Court" every Monday that they are in session.
Last one was 6/25 when session ended for year. Look for next one on OCT 1 when Court is in session again. It should list all certiorari denials and grants from the conference of 9/25. Including RPX VS Chanbond(UOIP)
Reporter for Bloomberg news said it would be Thursday 9/27 - wrong = fake news.
You can check on Supreme Court web site in 2 places.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/
- under Case Documents/Docket Search use "17-1686" to see all activity of RPX V Chanbond
- under Case Documents/Orders of the Court all decisions from 9/25 conference should be in Monday's Order List. They are listed by Year - this will probably be the first item in Term Year 2018. Open it and find 17-1686.
Sometimes a great message goes by too quickly when lot of folks posting.
UOIP is where the money is!
Gotta have UOIP common shares to share -- in win.
Gr8 job PB. I believe you. Makes perfect sense.
>> It helps tremendously.
>> It means Carter's windfall is in common shares.
>> He'll try not to do anything to jeopardize common shares, unless do not win; hence, his LLC.
>> UnfiedOnline, LLC is to protect his personal assets and liabilities.
>> It means another poster is lying. Has been most of the time. IMO, this person is devious and HIGHLY unstable.
>> Also, agree with, "Did his due diligence".
>> https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=143823100
>> Plus, Carter implied, doesn't want to be bothered and not obligated to answer for UOIP, Inc.
>> Finally, Carter quiet for a reason. Since UOIP "Grey" & dark, cannot promote or release any more shares.
>> I would not bother him or upset him. Let it play out. We're all in this together.
Business structure:
>> UnifiedOnline, LLC (Carter) has controlling interest in UOIP, but is removed legally from UOIP, Inc.'s daily decisions.
>> UnifiedOnline, Inc (UOIP) is an indirect subsidiary of UnifiedOnline, LLC.
>> ChanBond, LLC is subsidary of UnifiedOnline, Inc. (UOIP).
Someone mentioned, UOIP not needed, but disagree. UOIP is where any future monies reside, that is, in the common shares.
This all sets up with winning via settlement, judgment (verdict/award), buyout or merger.
If/When gets all the legally signed agreements, going private and being acquired/merged.
Afterall, UnifiedOnline, LLC. colocates with IP Navigation Group, LLC, which touts in IP monetization business.
As a side note about other concerns posted:
>> No one is going to rush to sell. Cannot be done. No racing involved. It's all or nil.
>> Don't believe the 2 newbies. They're paid FUDders.
>> And yes, SHORTS, especially NAKED are screwed. Yes, illegal, but done b/c "Justify necessary to make market" (and "Overlooked" & accepted by SEC).
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=140681693
And thank you, thank you and mucho, mucho bÜenÖ.
All JMO, Straightforward (we go) Scruffer
Update Supreme Court - new cases list expected Thursday 9/27 @9:30
With UOIP trading suspended, no impact on pps but still good to know outcome of RPX vs UOIP/Chanbond for us UOIP longs.
Bloomberg - 9/26
Vildana Hajric and Liz Capo McCormick
...the Supreme Court, which if it follows its typical practices will issue a list of new cases Thursday morning at 9:30, or about a half hour before the Kavanaugh hearing is set to begin. The eight current justices met privately earlier this week to discuss which cases to add to their docket. Their term formally opens on Monday.
Yes I see same thing. Earliest seems to be OCT 1 to see result.
Supreme Court publishes "Order of the Court" every Monday that they are in session. It lists all certiorari denials and grants. Last one was 6/25.
So 17-1686 RPX V Chanbond was scheduled for conference 9/25 because more than one judge was interested in it. It could be in the Order List of Oct 1 since they will be in session- unless they treat it as miscellaneous and issue it this week.
From SC website:
The vast majority of cases filed in the Supreme Court are disposed of summarily by unsigned orders. Such an order will, for example, deny a petition for certiorari without comment. Regularly scheduled lists of orders are issued on each Monday that the Court sits, but "miscellaneous" orders may be issued in individual cases at any time. Scheduled order lists are posted on this Website on the day of their issuance, while miscellaneous orders are posted on the day of issuance or the next day.
Thanks for the catch. Gotta keep the players straight.
Richard Gibson Andrews is a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Appointed by unanimous vote in US Senate in Nov 2011.
He is the one that is going to preside over the UOIP/Chanbond jury trial that may be necessary if MSO's don't wake up and realize that "Judge"ment day is coming and settle early.
I believe : Explaining is on going on multiple fronts for UOIP.
Supreme Court was in conference on 9/24 concerning UOIP/Chanbond and RPX.
Federal District Court Judge Richard Allen is constantly meeting and making pretrial decisions on UOIP/Chanbond vs 13 cable companies.
With a long ill and now deceased CEO, an Administrative law judge is required to "hear" both sides SEC vs UOIP/Chanbond.
UOIP is a "patent play" stock.
UOIP has PTAB wins, Markham win, and the final jury trial against 13 largest cable companies going forward with no stay in sight.
Trial scheduling conference in December 2018.
Judge to decide on which expert witnesses to allow in March 2019.
The original premise for longs is valid and will sit on fence until judgement day.
No need to remind us. We know that there are no earnings, that debt has been converted into UOIP shares, that no SEC filings suspension means loss of liquidity and that CEO has gone to his ultimate reward. Deleware "void" status for UOIP and H-10 non-filing suspension do not end or invalidate existing shares.
Yup. Good chance to average down on cost on my UOIP.
UOIP moves on news you are correct. Just wait for the jury to award the triple damages. If MSO's are smart, it will be less expensive to settle early.
The Transfer Agent (Old Monmouth)has my broker account to dump the cash into.
UOIP is going to have a day like AMRN did yesterday. In other words, stocks that hinge on product or patent play respond to news. Millionaires will be made over UOIP.
Don't be that guy/gal..
If you can't sleep worrying about UOIP, then sell but don't use "market" order --- no L2 for grey but you will see last trade price when it does execute - then use a "limit"
From lucky's post:
Its first day on the Greys will not be heartening for anyone holding. Normally the first trade will be executed shortly after the bell, and will be a lowball. Very low. It may take the stock down as much as 80%. Very likely that the person who ventures that initial trade has entered a market order. Don't be that guy.
Us Perma-Longs will miss you but do what's best for you and your family.
Thanks
I bet Billy knows but he is keeping quiet for now.
So which state - Deleware or Texas - covers shareholders? Anyone Know?
UOIP is obviously Deleware but if terms of OCT 2015 sale of Chanbond require governing law to be Texas.
Is that requirement just for the sale or forever?
Could make a big difference per Kapoor and Tony.
with UOIP incorporated in Delaware, but with the terms of the agreement (Misc. - Section 8.2) with Chanbond noting that governing law would be the State of Texas - eastern district --as minority shareholders, Texas would be pretty rough on us anyway (see Ritchie vs Rupe 2014).
No Problem. When I look at my UOIP shares, I don't see pink. I don't see Grey.
I see GREEN. UOIP = unrealized gains just means I can't spend them yet. UOIP Longs will be the eventual winners.
PTAB wins and activities leading up to jury trial mean more to me than posts by those with no DD on this patent lawsuit - giving just their opinion.
Notice: I am giving them the benefit of doubt that they don't have an ulterior motive to talk the stock down and panic some shares into their hands during the 8 or 9th inning.
June 2019 - UOIP/Chanbond Executives introduced to Trial Judge Andrews
Steve Brauerman from Bayard on behalf of plaintiff
ChanBond, LLC.
I'm joined at counsel table by Robert Whitman, Mark
Raskin and Dominick Vitaliano of Mishcon de Reya.
And I would also like to introduce, your Honor, the
three inventors that are here with us today, Earl Hennenhoefer,
who is the President and Chief Executive Officer of ChanBond,
Incorporated, Robert Stine, who is the Chief Technology Officer,
and Dick Snyder, who is the Executive Vice-President.
I like how you think.
BTW - info from you back in April (SA) convinced me to take a flyer on UOIP. No regrets. Thanks.
May Monday wake up be to all our shares have gone at your lock up price. Y' all have locked up your shares, right?
Great weekend to all. Long & strong UOIP.
UOIP longs - Winners for sure.
Remember: What does 'Pigs get fat, hogs get slaughtered' mean?
This idiom is used to express being satisfied with enough, that being greedy or too ambitious will be your ruin.
Me too. Buy the rumor sell the news.
Realized I won't live forever.
Need to get out when it hits my price on the SP run up to the trial or a prior settlement/buyout prior to trial.
If either happens - I will retire to Pebble Beach CA with a permanent smile on my face. Grateful for the UOIP board - best on Ihub.
Best of luck to all that want the "Maxwell House" good to the last drop.
“whether and under what circumstances an inconsistency in expert testimony permits a court to set aside a jury verdict and grant the losing party judgment as a matter of law.” From Parkervision win overturned on appeal
Thanks Evil
- that helps explain why experts used in PTAB wins are being deposed now - MSO's will try to find problems with expert testimony. This way: if they lose jury trial they get the Fed appeals court to throw out the UOIP win - like happened with Parkervision. Not to mention it drags it out another year.