Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Speaking of Bashers, one guy posted 32 times in less than 6 hours today, starting around noon. Posts that had a disruptive tone to say the least. Either someone is begging for attention, or they have way too much time on their hands. I thought "free" accounts were limited to only 15 posts a day?
Question re: BSDS
This is probably very late in the game to be asking, but what exactly does BSD bring to NEOM's table? Are they a key element of NEOM's business model? Simply put, is this deal worth the perceived damage to share price in the last 10 months? If they (BSDS) do have something that is integral to NEOM's needs, could NEOM not have looked elsewhere to have those needs met, since this has dragged on for so long?
It just seems like so much importance has been placed on this deal, yet I have not seen any justification for why NEOM needs to make this happen.
Thanks, Success. That makes sense to me as well; hopefully we can avoid further litigation with this additional patent for clarification. Hindsight is 20/20, but it makes you wonder why they didn't initially apply for a specifically targeted patent (i.e. for use with camera phones), since that is the premise of paperclick. Either way, looks like we are locked and loaded now!
Question regarding the new patent:
I haven't read over the technicals yet, and even if I did, I'd probably still be asking this question. What does this patent solidify that the others did not? There has always been talk that we own the "bridge". Now today I read that this new patent is actually the "bridge". What gives? Are our other patents not as strong as we thought? Could someone else have circumvented our "bridge" prior to NEOM obtaining this additional patent? Or maybe there is more than ONE bridge? There is an inconsistency somewhere.
Isn't it against I-HUB policy to proclaim libelous statements having no merit? I'm sure the SEC would frown upon it, even if Matt doesn't.
Freephoto: in the future, if you wish to make outrageous accusations, could you at least cite a credible source.
"they [NEOM] even admit the software dosent work"
That's news to me. Can you provide documentation supporting your claim?
The dividend was a one-time offering, so any new buyers today would not have been included in the issuance. I think (and hope) something much bigger is brewing.
Success:
That explanation makes sense. I was just curious if something new came out of the SHM, that implied that NEOM has changed its previously speculated goals in obtaining relationship with a SP.
I remember a long time ago, forming a partnership with an SP was seen as a critical step in deployment of our technology. This speculation may have been perpetuated by TS, and/or our DDer's on the board here, but at one point it was accepted as general knowledge. In fact, many here speculated that the "20% partner" and the SP were one in the same.
However, after numberous reports (from Personalizit & S_R_M) at CTIA's in the past, the general consensus was that we do not need a SP "partner".
When I saw Moxa's comment about needing a contract with a SP, I assumed some new info had come out of the SHM, that represented a shift back to previously held opinions. I'm sure if that is the case, JP will elaborate in his wrap up report.
As mentioned many times before, thanks to all who have contributed their time, effort, and money to provide valuable information to those of us who could not attend.
Personalizit & Moxa: I found the post where the relationship with NEOM and a Service Provider (SP) was discussed.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=7933013
Some specifics from the discussion, which took place between a NEOM rep and one of the amigos:
There will be no PR about a service provider (.). This makes sense now. How could PaperClick be locked into one service provider or even two or three? This makes it a non issue, kind of like they are all generic, and who cares. It’s just a mobile web access, and all mobile phone companies offer it. In the end, service providers will also make money by default, since you will need to get the mobile internet connection, and pay the fee, where as before you were not internet connected. The service provider does not even need to know that PaperClick even exists.
I'm just asking because I'd like to know it they said something different yesterday?
Re: Service Provider
I thought that after the last CTIA, we were told that NEOM did not need a service provider. Now I see that they are actively pursuing a contract with a provider? What is the story?
I wonder how much discussion they had for Slide #2 ?
OT- your welcome x2
Watching and waiting...
Early Retirement
Can someone post the list of questions for the SHM?
I'm curious to see if it has been updated recently, given that we only have a week or so left. I remember Personalizit was going to make a few additions, once we got closer to the date.
Thanks in advance.
OT: Woogs - Is the "something good" still on tap for this week?
Tomorrow is Friday. Just asking. Do you think this is our last chance to load up at these levels?
OT- post deletion policy question.
I was in the middle of catching up on some reading and saw what looked to be an informing post from Personalizit deleted before my eyes. Since I did not get to read it in time, can someone provide justification for why it was removed?
OT: re: LVCP, volume looks real good too.
LOL.
Someone purchased 500 shares for $40.00
OT - Mickey
LOL. Let's hope not. I don't have all my of eggs in the NEOM basket, but definitely too many to feel comfortable trading at these levels.
StockTrader-
Nothing in my portfolio looks good today. In fact, the Dow is only up 20 or so. It's a stretch at best to say "The markets are up big" IMO. Good Luck!
"Launch" was off by one day - not bad!*
OT - Fat Fingers just means a typo was made.
Get it? Not sure about the Freddy reference.
WTH- Got an email response from Dave Kaminer this morning confirming what you said yesterday. He expects QP to end soon and WR launch by the CTIA. Did not specifically that say he had 3 PR's lined up and ready, but he did say to "keep watching, we expect to have much to say soon."
Don't know if PacAttack ever got in touch with Dave, but I'm sure he would hear the same. Ref msg # 7463819
American Express also offers Mobile alerts.
You just log into your account and set them up.
OT: Who estimated a 3% weekly drop until news?
I was going to suggest that it looks more like a 3% daily drop, but at this rate of bleeding, I'd be happy to keep it to only 3% a day! The .20's are almost upon us.
Worse than riding all the way up just to ride back down-
Is that some people bought in the $.70's
Let's hope that this quiet period ends fast, or lots more will have jumped ship.