Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Wrong forum sorry, was speaking about AMRN. Don't know how I did that.
Agreed no bo, just where we should have been months ago and hopefully on to higher ground.........it would be appropriate considering what is represented here.
Right about now Pyre is calling his clients celebrating that he stopped the train this am. It is pretty loathing when a fellow human being wants to kill a cure for all of humanity in order to make some mullah.
Oh chit Mars just be quiet already, we all know your thoughts by now. Don't jinx it whatever you do.
Pyre,
your final sentence says it all. Your specialty isn't research it is psychology and your psychology is desperate and infantile but a form of psychological warfare at least.
You are completely transparent in your motivations, the goals of a shorter who will be down and out shortly one way or another.
Keeping up the excellent writing Stevie!
Suspicious you say...like calling the kettle black wouldn't you say......wow....ballsy aren't we Pyre.
From my vantage point it is now only conservative in nature but the EXACT thing to do, its called a smart business decision/execution....something you wouldn't know about considering what you charge for your roll of toilet paper.
AH pps now up .43! And it is early, we are moving up even now. This is unusual and hugely positive.
How big or small was your second?
I will go out on the limb, and opine that this week will be an excellent week for us, and that includes next week too!
It only goes up from here.
GO AMRN!
We know JT is ULTRA conservative, seems to always under promise and over deliver. So it is exciting to read this latest PR from him, which basically means the actual numbers will be far greater.
Also I feel like we are getting set up in a good way by him, that this is just the beginning of a series of great PR's all too enable many possibilities:
a sale, or gia (at this moment with the future goal for a bo) and a way to finally have the stock dramatically rise so when they counter in the 3 digits the current share price isn't that far off.
I am thinking that JT has a time line on his desk with the goal of getting the share price close to $100 or $100 plus. As an example look at Beyond Meat, it opened at $20, quickly rose to $40 first day of trading and within weeks went to as high as $200) its now at $150. Tell me AMRN isn't the drug equivalent of the greatest food invention in history. We are where Beyond Meat was when it spiked, just nobody knows/realizes it yet. I am happy to be in this even at an ave price of approx $20 or so. It will seem low in the not too distant future.
Zu,
what would be your personal experience with knowing what you know about reps,
ty
NetFlx seen from a newer series entitled Bigger Little Lies"
Scene I:
Middle of the day in the crowded courtroom of Superior Court Judge Swack.
The defendant Steven Giardino is on the stand being grilled by the Company's top Civil Case lawyer.
The Company's lawyer: Mr Giardino, you are Mr Giardino correct?
The Defendant Steven Giardino: Yes, err I mean no, well yes, but not really....its complicated.
The Company's lawyer: Do you recognize this 86 page report in front of you Mr Giardoni? Is that your signature? Did you actually spend 6 moths while you were on sabbatical from posting on IHUB to write this pos?
The defendant Steven Giardino: I do not post on IHUB, never have. I am not Steven Giardino. I have never seen this report until today. I am a NYC carpenter.
The Company's lawyer: So you have never posted on IHUB using any alias or your name?
The Defendant: Well, I haven't but he has.
The Company's lawyer: Who is that Mr Giardin? Please point to him.
The defendant: Raises his hand and points meekly to himself. He has, I am me, not him.
Fade to black
I am here to learn about my investment. I got in late but at least I got in. I got in from between $10-$20+.
I don't give a rats ass about the day to day price fluctuations. I give a crap about it being approved and being sold to everyone that needs/wants it and to even those who don't know that they need/want it.
How does anyone give a hard time to BioBillionaire. He is an expert in this field, he is totally passionate about it, and tell s it like it is. Does he change his mind and do a some 180's from time to time, sure but at least he will always tell you where he stands and why.
Calling Congressmen/womam, contacting Woodhouse, informing JT et al, writing letters etc is more than anybody here does. He does t for the patients benefit thus his motivation is completely sincere.
I respect BioBillionaire and all longterm holders.
So tired of all the trading talk to be found here, $18.15, $19.10 blah blah blah. I am here for the pps to zoom to $100plus and anything below that is bubkiss.
Please provide original source docs poring Trump is on our V.
TY
Love it!
I love it when history is accurately reflected and not constantly rewritten. What a complete liar.
In my lowly opinion of course
"That which is brittle breaks"....come on, if that isn't exactly how Purr writes what is?
Arrogance at its most extreme.
This guy and his Meds Co remind me of Phase v that tried to destroy NWBO. I wonder if the 2 are linked in some way.
Go AMRN!
Tarzan needs to read this very closely....so does LP.
Absolutely agree with this writing. Hate to agree but have to it because it is the truth.
Having a wonderful promising science is the goal, but having absolutely poor mgmt isn't and can destroy the goal. You need both and one without the other, anyone is a death blow to the science and for investors and not necessarily to save mgmt.
This is all my opinion.
I wish someone would finally refute Mr Ick because nobody ever does and he speaks one side of the coin extremely accurately. I feel because Lp & Co are a bunch of attorneys they understand the rules of engagement very well, to them as most learned attorneys silence is golden.
All my opinion.
Everyone please notice how Connedcapk has now gone silent. He makes a supposed statement of fact, based on another rumor or so he says and when peppered with questions by members here regarding is supposed statement he hides. His one answer was something along the lines like do your own DD.
He wanted to start a rumor but doesn't know how to finish it or explain it which is entirely the right and reasonable thing to do.
Obviously member not to be trusted.
I am planning on doing the same. It is a total joke imho, just a way for family and friends to continuously enrich themselves at shareholders expense, it is totally legal , they play the game, since they are quite experienced and knowledgeable at it. We are dealing with experts, just not cancer killer experts like we all thought.
This is all my opinion, but I have come to terms with it.
I am sure Marz will make his 176th incorrect prediction any day now.
Typical cop out answer by Concopout. He makes an announcement and then when is asked to show proof, his source or answer some simple but poignant questions he bails out. All form no content. This is a member who cannot be trusted simply by his response. He is just a trader trying to make a couple of bucks. He is not worthy of our time. I expect him to disappear only to come back under another alias and never admit it.
BB my personal prediction if it means anything, in reviewing the trends and the latest publicity and Pyrr's real worry, I believe you will be very pleased tomorrow A.M. with the results.
This point is absolutely true. NW gave credence to a bs report. If NW didn't shin a light on it things would have gone much differently. This is a fact imho. So what does that say about NW, his ego, his plans and his motives. Add his sending his teammate Katherine Wolfe head of Health sciences for Ondra into the equation and you got even more games being played. NW started the ball rolling, unfortunately LP finished the job imho.
How about another poll of when Pyrr aka Medpills whatever it is that he named his lying machine is going to pop up here again spewing his faulty negative so-called research.Remember please don't feed the troll and please ignore that i just did.;)
Edited to add: On second thought the way our price action is headed today maybe Pyrr's bullcrap is doing us a good service. Afterall he seems to be always missing the boat, the sailor that he is down in Florida for the summer.
V is for me.
Lets stop this nonsense and find out the answer to the $5B$ question?
TY
IMHO The huge and absolute flaw in aVii's argument is that he says that Lp said she planned it for 2015. therefore it must be true i.e. or had to have occurred.
Yet in how many other instances does AVii sa that y Lp said she promised something that never materializes, so why doesn't he accurately go by all her past failed promises & timelines and rely on that more reliable proven argument that it couldn't have happened with the simple statement if LP planned it then he most assuredly never happened because whatever she states never comes to fruition.
He doesn't use this valuable argument because it doesn't fit with his agenda or bias.
This is all my opinion, but it is far more believable than Aviss'.
I am still waiting for:
the immense shouting from the rooftops
and the great crescendo of successive pr's.
what happened to those promises?
This would be the first time I would agree with the happy librarian,
So let me get this straight, AVI proves that the trial is absolutely flawed and that NWBO could have intentionally misinterpreted the numbers to show DCVAX extending life when it really didn't. I mean this can't be a coincidence, it absolutely benefits NWBO to show DCVAx extending lives, so if it really isn't extending lives as NWBO showed in their proof diagram then NWBO only erred on the side of life extension which only benefits them thus making it intentional in AVI's opinion, that is what he is stating and he supply's his proof. A company cannot make such a flagrant error and call it an oops. They are entrusted in setting up the trial and interpreting it, period, no excuses here, especially one that could have changed the course of history and course of a patient's life.
So now the question begs is AVI really correct, does he know more than the researchers at NWBO and
can his interpretation stand since I don't know squat and was trusting NWBO and the Doctors running the show.
I guess this will be a defining moment for all of us, scary that AVI has presented this proof of work.
NWBO
The most ridiculously run company with the greatest product to fight cancer. What a dichotomy!
This is just my opinion, prove me wrong.
That is why I love this company and hate this company at the same time.
That is why I nervously own 100K shares, I don't know if mgmt is capable of handling this company.
I would love to know what Dr Linda Liau really thinks, but unfortunately that we will never know, at least now we won't.
Here is the sentence from the UCLA gift of $1M grant announcement that nails it, in the middle of the article the author identifies the one specific approach of researcher Linda Liau and I quote
"A tour of researcher Dr Linda Liau's lab helped seal Gagliano's commitment. Her team has developed a novel vaccine that trains a patients immune system to recognize and destroy brain cancer cells, adding
years to the patent's life."
So when the article first states in more general terms "His generous gift will enable the UCLA Dept of Neurosurgery to pioneer new approaches to fighting aggressive brain cancer and enable more patients to lead longer lives". It is obvious that the author is talking about DCVAX explicitly in the middle of the article whereas earlier describing it in more general terms as a new approach, the author is being pretty darn accurate stating what it is imho.
I must add that the $1m I am certain would also be used for other approaches too as you mentioned if Dr Liau or Prins wanted it.
So lets say that Dr Linda Liau is receiving an award due to her work in DCVAX trials which was basically announced via mentioning her baby DCVAX. This is a fund raiser for her achievement with her baby DCVAX and for others at UCLA and their achievements . Wouldn't it make fascinating headlines if Dr Linda Liau knew all along that the trial was an ultimate failure and yet still paraded around and a accepted the accolades and award(s) and talked it up in her speech and personal discussions with the funders just to separate them from their money and make sure she and UCLA financially benefitted. How would that sit with the public, does that sound like who the Doctor Linda Liau is, does she appear that dishonest to you?
How can anyone here say that Dr Linda Liau would do such a thing given her reputation and standing in the field and in her tight knit community in which she lives and works. Would she allow herself to be also implicated in a biotech scandal of sorts too, by staying mum on DCVAX when she knows NWBO trades on its very breathe?
I believe this gala event is more telling then just a fund raiser imho. If DCVAX was a failure and she would obviously know that now, I do not believe she would parade around accepting the generosity of others and allow in writing the naming of her crowning achievement's success if it were truly dead in the water. Come on guys John Gresham couldn't write a better treatment.
Go NWBO!
Yes thanks but I just can't wrap my head around all the PR's and communication we used to get years gone by and the promises made and fast forward to where we are today with the dome of silence. At one time they used to ignore AF, then they argued via PR's with him and now they ignore everyone and anything no matter whether they be pro company or basher.
My own personal history with lawyers isn't very positive and I have often witnessed the ploy of least said the better when there is nothing positive to say and that herein lies my concern in a nut shell. I hate attorney speak or in this case nonspeaak aka silence.
When you say you know the identity of the investor, that is an interesting style of writing. Is it an individual, person or a group, you are very vague and the way in which you write borderline misleading or just being incredibly vague to cause uncertainty.
Second why wouldn't you name IT if we will all find out shortly one way or the other i.e. what prevents you from naming names?
Let's see if you provide intelligent succinct answers to my queries?
Don't you think if our Company wanted to name the investor they would, but they didn't. They did however announce it was one individual which is interesting. Again an example of positive spin when they can. I am sure they do realize that it has to come out who the investor is with all the members digging so if it were a negative name our company would be silly touting that it is one individual. So there must be a reason that they don't want to be the one naming names now. The investor knows his name will be uncovered at some point in time so privacy right now must be the issue. I also find it interesting that AF announces that he knows who it is and yet doesn't announce it, or did he say he knows it isn't Woodford so maybe he heard just that from hearsay. But if AF knew who it was and that it was a bad name wouldn't it be in AF's best interest to announce who he is. To me again it means it is either a positive name or AF is going on hearsay that it just isn't woodford.
Time will tell.
Love the transparency and the positive spins.
I find this interesting, AF knows who did the financing, amazing his connections. I would think that he would not lie as he normally does since it will be verified shortly but notice he goes only so far to say it wasn't Woodford because that would be hugely positive and then he sticks to his negative attack by putting his usual negative spin on what he is reporting. To me that means it is still positive.
I also find the following interesting, today I called the broker's office to ask if they have ever done business with Woodford, they said they have dealt with three of his funds. So interesting that they have and multiple times. So maybe we should take what AF eagerly announces with a grain of salt and not discount what others have predicted here. Knowing AF I got to believe his is being honest in it not being Woodford so he gains credibility and thus making his spin even more credible. After all he knows that the facts will emerge forthwith so he can't be that stupid to lose whatever credibility he believes he has left.
And lastly notice he said it was an individual, that is telling in and of itself because if it was good enough for Woodford and that would be deemed positive to stockholders why wouldn't another named individual be as positive, it jus means another large investor felt it was the right time and a great price. The fact that AF adds his negative spin that the investor is going to dump the shares asap is just doing what he does best. Why wouldn't Woodford dump it immediately if he did the financing, and I will answer that because it would be profitable or prudent and thus the unnamed financier wouldn't either. Any unnamed financier would be motivated by the opportunity if he was familiar with the company at this point in time knowing whatever he knows, and he has to know something ignorer to drop $5M trust me on that.
Please convince me that I am wrong:
MGMT has not tried to support our pps and yet at the same time continues to support/protect Cognate over us and at our expense..
All I hear said is that NWBO's DCVAX is going to get approval and that will propel the pps and then all mgmt's previous failing will be undone and it is all behind the scenes since all we do see is negative filings and no news. So basically I shouldn't believe what is in writing but only what numerous cheerleaders blindly promise here. Hearsay over writings is what I should go with.
Does this make any sense to you, is this how a public company should be run, and why do they run their private company so efficiently? I would rather own Cognate imho.