InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 1708
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/11/2014

Re: AVII77 post# 81344

Sunday, 10/30/2016 11:08:04 AM

Sunday, October 30, 2016 11:08:04 AM

Post# of 702749
So let me get this straight, AVI proves that the trial is absolutely flawed and that NWBO could have intentionally misinterpreted the numbers to show DCVAX extending life when it really didn't. I mean this can't be a coincidence, it absolutely benefits NWBO to show DCVAx extending lives, so if it really isn't extending lives as NWBO showed in their proof diagram then NWBO only erred on the side of life extension which only benefits them thus making it intentional in AVI's opinion, that is what he is stating and he supply's his proof. A company cannot make such a flagrant error and call it an oops. They are entrusted in setting up the trial and interpreting it, period, no excuses here, especially one that could have changed the course of history and course of a patient's life.
So now the question begs is AVI really correct, does he know more than the researchers at NWBO and
can his interpretation stand since I don't know squat and was trusting NWBO and the Doctors running the show.
I guess this will be a defining moment for all of us, scary that AVI has presented this proof of work.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News