Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
None of the above.
Probably wondering why someone in a clown suit just drove by his house.
why didn't 3bb's broker then just bust all her trades?
You, on the other hand, have no interest here...nothing to gain or lose
The brokerages just acted on their clients behalf (more or less)... but the MMs that filled the buy orders had to get the shares from somewhere, right
No idea. Richard Laminack was the only other person I have spoken to.
One out of Texas? They were all out of Texas.
Not fixated with the DTCC. Just obsessed with people who blame the DTCC for issues that are actually the result of the brokerages.
I'm not saying the law firm itself is not good. They are. It's just being O-for in cases against the DTCC is not good.
O'Quinn, Laminack, and Pirtle is a good law firm. Would never hire them for securities cases though.
The Whistler case against the DTCC was ugly.
So,
They refused to take the case based upon the Statute of Limitations.
Same stock, 4 years later....
The person I am referencing is P. D. from a suburb outside of Philly.
BTW, how did that work out for you back then? I know... all you did was "talk-the-talk"... just couldn't "walk-the-walk" could ya?
despite their vast knowledge, still cannot claim to be neutral. That is very clear
Huh? No doubt you will bring that up if TM goes with them as MM
Unfortunately, TM marches to his own drummer, so we must play the cards we are dealt...and at this point, that is seeking a legal strategy from Attaway group
op, back when my business partner and I used to exchange emails with Art, we used our legal counsel at Berger and Montague to seek an opinion. We were going to sue Capital Growth, JH Darby, Sytner, and Pino using a shareholder here as lead plantiff (this guy is also a licensed attorney who spoke to Megas via phone several times).
The SOL began when Megas issued that filing showing the results of his legal efforts and had to issue more shares. Basically, we were told we missed the deadline, there were too many red flags, and their due diligence is how we learned about Sytner and his friends.
Want to fix this? Start with Megas signing a sworn statement as to what the actual share structure is, what the short is, and have him swear he had no part in any of this.
Second, pick one broker dealer and have the company sue them for fraud. Force them to settle and use their trade logs to see where they were claiming to be receiving shares from.
That's if Tom is telling the truth.
Your post is nothing but window dressing and speaks zero to the core issue. Why does not surprise me
i thought the DTC was supposed to GO TO THEIR MEMBER BROKERS to get shares that they need from ftd
or move us to the LSE
The DTC has a global lock...no clearing services. Right? What good is having a fully reporting company if you have no clearing services? Please answer that question only.
what exactly r u sayin, mretgnol
Hint: check back the last time TM brought it current.
TM explained that with the lock still in place, it would be throwing good money after bad
That is the most interesting aspect. It does require that shareholders get off their butts and ping the T/A.
I love it. Because if they cannot find a FTD after people do this, you finally know who is lying about why so many shares are owned by so many people.
I wish every brokerage holding BCIT shares was doing this.
I don't see how the T/A can comply
Hello McMasterflash. That's what T/A's do. If positions exceed what should be in the market, the T/A issues a notice of an offical FTD. No Megas mails, no theories, a legit legal notice of a FTD.
I'm with TD Waterhouse
So am I. So are three others I know in this including one attorney. I just emailed one of those people and hope to hear back from him tonight.
Those who 'believe' and have large enough BCIT positions will probably have to pay the $250
You of all people would be the last person I expected to want to keep his position at the brokerage. This is like a reverse certificate pull with the brokerage telling you to obtain a cert from your T/A (or issuer since TDA appears to think that BCIT has no current T/A). Either TDA is really crazy and they are going to expose their share issues or TDA is not remotely worried about people registering their positions.
(2) Re-register NSA positions into your name by the issuer or its transfer agent
Request that the security be re-registered to your name with the security issuer. You can call
the TD Ameritrade Non-Standard Asset Department at 800-632-9095 for more information
on the process. This means that your NSA(s) will no longer be custodied at TD Ameritrade
Did you notice how some of the posters skip over this part? TDA will no longer hold a master position for BCIT shares (or other stinky revoked stocks).
You have to ask the Transfer Agent to place your position in your name now. If you want to leave your revoked stock as is, TDA will charge you an annual fee per turd position.
This means the Transfer Agent is now going to have an updated list of names and positions for everyone who uses this option. Legally, BCIT's Transfer Agent will have to file a notice of failure to deliver if the T/A finds a FTD in a brokers position.
Imagine that....the T/A now having a late 2010 list of share positions. This also means that TD Ameritrade would be exposing their true position in this stock.....and they don't seem too worried.
Which part is good?
Matt's only about 40% right. That makes him 60% doofus
Nah, he's been a stock shyster long before the weiner man thought of dumping additional shares.
Umining was classic. Trying to claim it could be worth $78 per share on a $2.8 Billion asset base.
You know what cracks me up?
Vinny used to run around Vegas with his hooker/girlfriend telling people he made about $20 Million off the PCBM scam. He used to say they made almost $200 Million split between all the insiders.
Then we saw his 2.2 Billion share dump thru Jeffries.
His wife found out about his hooker girlfriend when she was being questioned over their laundering of funds in Florida.
But I bet the morons over on RagingBull still think the stock was "short" even after Paul Applebaum at MH Meyerson stated the insiders were dumping fast and furious.
except Flounder liked woman.
You know, if more than 3 of us buy shares from Scamboy, we can turn around and report him to both the California Attorney General and the S.E.C.
Maybe it's time to end his crap
LMAO.
About 10 of us should print that off and send it to the judge.
...they put out that PR after the SEC leaned on them to do so
Considering these same scammers have released 10 years of lying press releases. That's probably BS too.
and who is Sib Almaz?? How come Sib was not covered by Turino
No wonder Treffry is sweating trying to dump some shares for cash.
He and Ed pumped the pizz out of VWAY/Cash4Homes/etc.
By the way, who pumped GBDX before anyone knew it had changed from a seafood company to a diamond scam? It was on the RagingBull PCBM thread under the alias guru11. Used to post here as gubbly33
Go figure.
They found poopium
So, he's going to sell shares of an unregistered stock?
I'm sending that one to the California Secretary of State's office.
Nothing.
I sent one of their directors an email offering funding for their Project 150 efforts. No returned response.
In the meantime, I'm going to ask UTC Power for help on my fuel cell projects if the guys at FCE do not bother to respond.
don`t forget the fact that shareholders are victims of a CRIME
The fact that a Judge ask for records is encouraging
Refund alone, probably not, but refund added to compensation and penalties, probably yes
You have allows been able to take your complaint to your broker and get a refund