Bancorp International Group Inc (fka BCIT)

[mretgnol]

despite their vast knowledge, still cannot claim to be neutral. That is very clear

Which part should I be neutral on? See, I was scammed years ago on Econnect. For about 10 years, I have whacked countless penny stock scams. I have a couple of friends who lost money here.

The irony of most of these shams is that the same posters show up posting the same crap time and again. Megas? He's not much different than LoCastro was between 2002 and 2004. Not much different than Tom Hughes was in 1999. Same behavior as Joe Monterrosso.

Red flags and multiple lies are what cause me to not be neutral. I've drank the KoolAid before masta. Loch Industries had me posting crap all over RB and e-arguing with posters attacking that company. I was badly wrong in the end.

CSHD is one that I crap on because I have worked with Lili Bello, the owner of the VENZ bond in the past. CMKX? Same insider sham at another 6 pennies with the same insiders and the same results.

Neutral? Practice what you e-preach sometimes.

Rock my world? Nah. Because in the end, I trust my securities attornies who have a record of rocking people's worlds. Attaway can't even answer the question of how he is going to trump the Statute of Limitations. Even more pathetic, even if Megas was able to work some kind of deal in PNG, 2011 valuations have zip zilch nada to do with 2005 stock value.

It's not smooth talking, it's common sense to those who understand actual securities law.