Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
It's not the Company who's doing it...
They got slapped with an "E" at the end so "Investors" are warned that this Company is a deliquent Filer.
Dead wrong, they've used the extention of 5 Days (NT) a few times but never became deliquent. But there is a first time for everything...
Especially when Toxic Debt Notes are involved...
They just triggered another "Event of Default" by not Filing the 10Q in Time
Just one example from the Terms of these Notes as signed by Steve Saleen.
EVENTS OF DEFAULT
.
.
.
.
The Company shall become late or delinquent in its filing requirements as a fully-reporting issuer registered with the Securities & Exchange Commission.
Upon the occurrence of any Event of Default, the Outstanding Balance shall immediately increase to 120% of the Outstanding Balance immediately prior to the occurrence of the Event of Default (the “Default Effect”). The Default Effect shall automatically apply upon the occurrence of an Event of Default without the need for any party to give any notice or take any other action.
Talking about laughable...
The Osceola Mining District in Mary Ann Canyon has been historically one of the most prolific producers of gold deposits in of any of the Nevada regions. Based on the geological report prepared for the Osceola Gold Inc by the geologists at Skookum Geological and samplings from the area. The estimated recoverable reserves of precious medal deposits for the entire Mav claims is over $2.1 billion and could be as high as $3.6 billion.
These figures are based on a recovery rate of $32 - $40 per yard (.28 ounces per cubic yard). Historical mining in the district was focused on discovering nuggets leaving the majority of the fine gold in place. Moreover, early miners stopped at false bedrock leaving reserves beneath the false bedrock untouched.
is it still Part of the Promo?
Per the Disclaimer it has ended already...
We haved received a total compensation of $1,120,000 from Oct 23 thru February 3 from a non-affiliate third-party and expect further compensation.
Zion Capital Ventures... LOL
https://savagealerts.com/about/
PYHH of coarse featured here:
https://savagealerts.com/news-and-events/
Contact #Savage Office.
Sjalloh@zioncapitalventures.org
1300 19th Street NW Washington, DC 20036
Need the App?
https://itunes.apple.com/gm/app/savagealerts/id1081288165?mt=8
Or Apk?
https://www.androidpit.com/app/com.chatwing.TheWallStreetSavage
Or Join him at Profit.ly
http://profit.ly/user/thewallstreetsavage?page=1&size=5
Twitter?
https://twitter.com/theonlyesbe
Yep, looks very professinal and legit... Zion Capital Ventures aka "The Wall Street Savage"
This will be an interesting one to watch...
since the CEO of NTEK is also part of the BOD here.
Very interesting Interview from the CEO can be found already here:
http://www.princetonresearch.com/digital-advertising-stock-news/
and Video here:
2006 -> The last Ford GT rolls out of Saleen's Troy, MI facility
http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/01/the-last-ford-gt-rolls-out-of-saleens-troy-mi-facility/
BS, Filing was published at the NVSOS ~1hr prior to the close.
Paid off nearly all debt? You better check the Filings again...
GL
A/S increased to 5 BILLION shares per NVSOS Filing
Previous Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 2,002,000,000 Value: $ 0.001
No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 2,002,000.00
New Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 5,000,000,000 Value: $ 0.001
Par Value Shares: 2,000,000 Value: $ 0.001
No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 5,002,000.00
Use the cached Version
Mainpage: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Mi8rxdD19qsJ:www.bennysam.com/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk
About us: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ah5PP_PyftwJ:www.bennysam.com/contact-us.html+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk
Contact Us: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ah5PP_PyftwJ:www.bennysam.com/contact-us.html+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk
yep it did
AIDC, FITX and IGRW got suspended today
All of em got Promomoted today... by the same Group... with the same paying third LOL
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/2016/34-77178.pdf
OTCROCKSTAR.com, which is now wholly owned by Freedom Ventures, LLC, has been compensated up to Ten Thousand Dollars Cash via bank wire by a third party, MicroCap Consultants, LLC, for this one day marketing and awareness campaign on AIDC ending on Friday, February 19th 2016.
FortuneStockAlerts.com, which is fully owned and operated by Freedom Ventures, LLC, has been compensated up to Ten Thousand dollars cash via bank wire by a third party, MicroCap Consultants, LLC, for this one day marketing and awareness campaign on FITX ending on Friday, February 19th 2016.
PennyPickAlerts.com, which is now wholly owned by Freedom Ventures, LLC, has been compensated up to Ten Thousand dollars cash via bank wire by a third party, MicroCap Consultants, LLC, for this one day marketing and awareness campaign on IGRW ending on Friday, February 19th 2016.
Does PYHH own the copyrights on any of these Pics?
Copyright
Q: What is copyright?
A: Copyright is a form of protection provided by the law to the authors of “original works of authorship.” By virtue of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, works are protected in all 160 countries that are party to the Convention, as well as various other laws such as the US copyright act.
Q: Does this apply to all images?
A: Yes, this applies to all images. From the time it is created, a photo or other image is automatically protected by copyright.
Q: What is copyright infringement?
A: Infringement can include a violation of the rights of the creator or rights holder. Examples of imagery infringement may include:
• Use of whole or part of an image without permission
• Use beyond the scope of a license or permission
• Adapting an image without permission (art rendering)
• Asking another photographer to identically recreate the image
Q: Who’s responsible when infringement occurs?
A: Responsible parties may include:
• The party that infringed (the photographer or the person that stole the image in the first place), even if unintentionally
• Employees or others who participated in the original infringement
• Anyone who published the infringing image, whether they had knowledge or not
• Anyone who authorized or encouraged infringement
Q: Why should I worry about copyright infringement?
A: Infringement of copyright may result in monetary damages, lawsuits, costly legal fees and under some rare circumstances, criminal charges.
Q: Surely no-one will be able to find one image in the whole of the internet?
A: New technology now enables copyright owners to identify unlicensed imagery and act to protect their rights. Imagery is ‘fingerprinted’ so that it can be tracked and found in use, even if it has been modified, recreated or if only part of the image has been used. The image is then flagged up to the copyright owner so that they can check if the correct license is held.
Q: I’m using an image I found through a Google Image search. If it’s on the internet, doesn’t that mean it’s free?
A: No. Just because an image is on the internet, it doesn’t mean the image is free to use. You may still need the correct license to use it. There is a difference between an image being online and an image being “in the public domain” (the term given to content that is not owned or controlled by anyone).
Q: Someone else created my website. Am I liable if the images are not licensed correctly?
A: If a third-party designer, employee, contractor or intern designed and developed your company’s website, you are responsible for ensuring they have licensed the images for your use. If no valid licenses exist the liability of any infringement may fall on the company (the end client) who used the image.
Q: If someone else built my website, how will I know when the licenses will expire?
A: Don’t assume your designer or image provider will contact you about an expiring license. Where the license to the image expires (which is generally not the case with royalty-free images), the imagery provider may send a renewal notice to the purchaser of the license, so your designer may receive this notice if they licensed it on your behalf.
It is best to get invoice numbers or sales order numbers for the images on the website and contact your imagery provider to confirm if the license is connected to your website. It’s also wise to keep all your licenses organized so that you know the scope and expiration dates of each license.
Q: I’m just a blogger and my site is non-commercial. Can I use images for free?
A: In most cases, no. Unless your use is specifically permitted by copyright law, all the images on your website must be properly licensed, regardless of the nature of your site. You can, however, license very inexpensive images from many imagery providers that are perfect for web use and will be properly licensed.
Q: How can I be sure I’ve taken the appropriate steps in licensing an image?
A: There are various places that you can go for information; hopefully this website will give you a basic understanding of the potential risks you need to bear in mind. You should consult with your legal counsel if you have specific questions. Please also see our resources section for more information and also take a look at our ‘what you need to do’ section.
And by the way they DO make is sound like it's THEIRS:
Even more confusing, it's shown now again as GREY SHEET Stock
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/PHOT/profile
Image got just taken:
It was showing OTCBB right after the close...
Filing in Feb'15 showed 7.7%. Filing in Feb'16 shows clearly less than 5% ownership.
Since the LaBel was sold to CATO... why would he buy or hold any stock in this now empty shell?
Whatever at one point there might be a Filing that explains all this a little more, but at this point its just an empty shell, with likely a ton of debt left. They even tried for Cahpter7 and it got dismissed by the judge.
What is or has happened it's unclear at this point, but per the CO Webpage they sold the Label to CATO, and Cato Corp is trading on the Nasdaq...
JMHO
It's only needed above 5% not below.
I'd assume he sold out... Why should he stay invested in an EMPTY SHELL ??
Forget the 7.7% he clearly says he has less than 5% in the latest Filing
If this statement is being filed to report the fact that the reporting person has ceased to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the class of securities, check the following: x .
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=11139280
And on top of that the CATO Group bought the Label and is trading on Nasdaq , which leaves CACHQ as an empty shell.
They even posted it on their Homepage: www.cahe.com
A/S increased to 5 BILLION shares per NVSOS Filing
Previous Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 1,000,000,000 Value: $ 0.001
No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 1,000,000.00
New Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 5,000,000,000 Value: $ 0.001
Par Value Shares: 500,000 Value: $ 0.0001
Par Value Shares: 2,000,000 Value: $ 0.0001
Par Value Shares: 27,500,000 Value: $ 0.0001
No Par Value Shares: 0 Total Authorized Capital: $ 5,003,000.00
Reinstatement filed with the NVSOS
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/corpActions.aspx?lx8nvq=ubNAsUeVmWH8a8dQYfNMzA%253d%253d&CorpName=JOEY+NEW+YORK%2c+INC.
A Reverse Split?
A/S increased to 5.4 BILLION shares per NVSOS
Previous Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 1,800,000,000 Value: $ 0.001
Par Value Shares: 5,000,000 Value: $ 0.001 No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 1,805,000.00
New Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 5,400,000,000 Value: $ 0.001
Par Value Shares: 5,000,000 Value: $ 0.001
No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 5,405,000.00
Per the filed A/S reduction it looks like a 1:100 RS,
but you'll have to wait for the related Filing since the AS can be set to whatever the Company want it to be.
All Splits need to be approved by Finra and many Company's do file a PRE14C/DEF14C in advance. Obviously not here.
But since they filed it with the NVSOS i'd assume it has been approved already for an unknown Factor. The A/S will reduced by Factor 100 but if the same Factor will apply to the O/S is unknown at this point. The Factor could be bigger, but it will be at least the same if approved.
No Effective Date yet, and it's not on the Finra Daily List yet.
The 1:417 FS was filed with the NVSOS on 9/17/2013 and had an execution date of 10/2/2013. As you see the Factor as applied to the A/S was different since the A/S was ONLY (lol) set to a whooping 37.5 BILLION shares from formerly 100M.
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/corpActions.aspx?lx8nvq=XyV6cffW1Tn2%252fakWOqcIkA%253d%253d&CorpName=RICH+PHARMACEUTICALS%2c+INC.
R/S filed with the NVSOS
Previous Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 37,503,000,000 Value: $ 0.001
Par Value Shares: 10,000,000 Value: $ 0.001
No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 37,513,000.00
New Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 375,030,000 Value: $ 0.001
Par Value Shares: 10,000,000 Value: $ 0.001
No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 385,030.00
New A/S = 1.9B shares per NVSOS
Previous Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 800,000,000 Value: $ 0.001
No Par Value Shares: 51
Total Authorized Capital: $ 800,000.00
New Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 1,900,000,000 Value: $ 0.00001
No Par Value Shares: 51
Total Authorized Capital: $ 19,000.00
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/corpActions.aspx?lx8nvq=S7aU1hbYy2JW6RIyg5Jrhw%253d%253d&CorpName=NEW+AMERICA+ENERGY+CORP
Merge-In, Namechange and A/S increase Filing at NVSOS
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/corpActions.aspx?lx8nvq=Xi0Lk73xqM22e7vQ%252bjph0Q%253d%253d&CorpName=ENERGIZER+TENNIS+INC.
New Company Name: WEST COAST VENTURES GROUP CORP.
http://nvsos.gov/SOSEntitySearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=Xi0Lk73xqM22e7vQ%252bjph0Q%253d%253d
Nothing to find about the new Co.
VLOV now a Wheeler shell per NVSOS Updates:
OLD
NEW
Reinstatement Filed
AS increased from 13.3M to 650M shares
Name changed to KALI, INC.
New Sole Officer: WARREN WHEELER
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=Bu2h8fMr%252fPS86ssWKdmlBw%253d%253d&nt7=0
NVSOS Updates:
Reinstatement Filed
AS increased from 13.3M to 650M shares
Name changed to KALI, INC.
New Sole Officer: WARREN WHEELER
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=Bu2h8fMr%252fPS86ssWKdmlBw%253d%253d&nt7=0
Yes, wonder why they didn't try ZIKA instead
He was CEO of Nx Global (fka NEGS) too
Co got revoked
I ran the address through google search
You are aware that the shown Addy is the Address for DomainsbyProxy.com an Internet WHOIS privacy service but not for the Company itself, right? Same for the phone number
Of coarse you did...
and so did i as posted.
GL Sir
Another month passed by and still no Permit?
Water Permit NEV2011107 NEVER got renewed so far, and prolly never will.
http://ndep.nv.gov/admin/public.htm
"Mine" is still listed as ABANDONED
http://mines.findthedata.com/l/82935/Mary-Ann-Canyon
good enough for now imo
A lot of shares to come is the message, since the coversion price was likely lower, based on the high vol days.
A/S is only 2.5B for now
Convertible notes payable: $3,557,605
are we there yet?
You should read that again...
The Securities and Exchange Commission today issued a report that makes clear that companies can use social media outlets like Facebook and Twitter to announce key information in compliance with Regulation Fair Disclosure (Regulation FD) so long as investors have been alerted about which social media will be used to disseminate such information.
BS that's NOT a PR it's taken from a Blog -> Confirmed!
GL Dude
That's from December 6, 2013...
LOL