Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The record date for the dividend has already passed, right? There is no need to continue to hold to get the stock dividend.
West coast her - just getting going today.
You beat me to it :)
That would be great - a F500 company actually taking an equity stake as part of a significant initial order.
That is not actually a far-fetched idea. Any F500 company looking for an EV partner ABSOLUTELY HAS TO assure themselves that the prospective partner will be in business 5 years down the road. Taking an equity position would position accomplish that, and would give the small co (MULN in this case) the working capital to ramp production immediately and in a large way.
I would actually be more concerned if there was broad=based selling during the regular session.
That had to be a T trade, as there is no AH trading in otc securities.
yeah - me too. I have some available cash and actually looked at adding some MULN for a flip today - did not pull the trigger.
Dream on. He's not the first CEO to make an over-optimistic statement and won't be the last. My thinking is that he underestimated how long it takes a really big (F500) company to go from a handshake to a signed contract, I worked for a F500 company for a good number of years. Lots of small companies wanted to do business with us. All of them were surprised and frustrated by how long it took to get formal approvals and sign-offs, and all of them were unprepared for the extensive rigor that characterizes the procurement operation in a really big company.
They may in fact not have a deal, but for now I am going with "delays" as opposed to "lies".
I still own some but at this point the share structure is to me the only positive.
Right now, CLHI is a whole lot of nuthin' cut into not very many pieces.
Yes - I know what I have here. A shell that was left at the altar, possibly because of complications in its paperwork and filing history. The yenta (Ben/Synergy) is trying to arrange another match, but it is possible we are dealing with damaged goods. Additionally, it is possible that many of the other young maidens working with this yenta are more attractive to the universe of suitors he has contact with.
They also play somewhat fast and loose with financial terms.
I agree it seems silly. If such a rule is actually needed, the threshold should be simply in dollars and it would probably make sense to have some kind of "if you do this 2/3 times in a given 30 day period" in there to eliminate paperwork related to one-off trades.
Like I said, I have no experience with this rule. Nor do I know the consequences of non-compliance.
True, one hit would do wonders for the stock.
My nagging concern with GSPI is that they lack focus. They have a lot of irons in the fire, but seem to be more interested in putting more irons on the fire than actually ironing anything.
I was not aware of that rule, possibly because Schwab's trading platform does not allow orders of 1M shares or more.
I guess maybe next time spread the 2M shares over 2 or more days.
Your broker can probably assist you with obtaining the necessary IDs.
I agree with all your points. However, right now we got nuthin. Anything will be a step in the right direction.
I have no idea.
CLHI dropped to the expert market as of today
Thanks! Go for it! I think you have a great approach.
Give it a rest. How about we revisit this issue in 6 months or so?
If you are looking for instant gratification in penny stocks you are setting yourself up to be disappointed.
Yes, assuming the record date is still the same.
They are all for sale.
Thanks. That is a good approach. While I agree with being selective, this does raise the question of whether IPTK in fact is constrained by not having enough trained personnel to onboard and support multiple well qualified airlines at once.
As problems go, that would be a nice one to have.
I think the ones your trades are just partial fills on someone’s legitimate by order. I’ve had that happen to me a lot. I put in a trade at sufficient quantity to show on level two, but then I get a trivial little Phil at my price but my remaining order is no longer large enough to qualify to show on level two. I think that’s what’s happening here as opposed to people intentionally buying one share or selling one share
I'm not telling you anything. I just posted that I bought in and am waiting to see what happens.
me too - I always am checking for symbol changes and tier changes.
Let's see what happens when the D comes off.
Joined the HRAAD party with a small starter position this morning.
You may not be depressing the shares, but you certainly are depressing the rest of us here...:)
No - there actually is another question that is relevant. When would such a r/s occur? If you can out out before then that is one possible trade. If you elect to wait out the (prospective) r/s, then you have a different investment thesis - one that is inherently longer term and inherently more tied to the actual business prospects of the new entity.
Share structure looks good. However, I get nervous when I see Chinese names associated with Lazar shells - he has sold some to various Chinese entities in the past, and those new owners have often gone radio silent and not given a damn about legacy shareholders.
I will watch it.
Yes. By definition that is what a forward split would do
Well, either way it’s a wait-and-see proposition I have a good number of shares and high hopes, but some of the numbers being thrown around here are totally unrealistic.
Opening at $100 million market cap is very very optimistic
The new owners are not gonna be concerned about legacy shareholders. They are going to deploy the share structure that they want going forward. We are along for the ride till we choose to get off.
I don’t know that one. As a general rule however I would take all dates to be cast in Jell-O. Expect delays.
Reverse. There is no way a sub penny stock does a forward split.
I agree with both the points that you made. Sell the rip when a company is announced in an RM like this. Whether or not you want to own the incoming company is a Completely different investment thesis and the answer is usually no. And, as you say, trading the shells in an IRA allows you to sell into the rip whenever it happens without tax considerations.
I think you meant revenues of $100M per year after prospective acquisitions, not earnings, right?