Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yep, Tyrus and I go way back. Isn’t it interesting how gvsi has just been chilling under .002 like it would never recover at all. Will be interesting to see what happens here, that’s all I’ll say. The risk reward seems like early 2021 to me.
Lol Nicky. Always rejoicing at the misfortune of Sharp shareholders. It ain’t over till it’s over, and I wish you well. Hang in there buddy.
Folks have had time to load up here at .002. To say a 90% reduction from .02 might have been a bit excessive is an understatement. We are entering speculative season again. Bitcoin is consolidating and crypto assets will maintain their bullish sentiment imo. The interesting thing will be when the FOMO hits once speculative assets really begin to skyrocket. Bitcoin to $250,000+ will send in money from the high yield savings accounts and money market funds like you can't imagine.
The only thing I'm focused on is time and chance. WNFT previously went parabolic from.01 to .45, and on relatively low volume. I knew when the Calasse case wouldn't go away, that I would be holding all the way down simply out of principle, if for no other reason than to see Calasse lose. It's a matter of justice and the Supreme Court making the right decision that is in the best benefit of shareholders.
Sharp has the stock fully registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission which is good enough for me. Fully tradable with brokers. If you ask me, Sharp is waiting for the right timing in the IPO market and liquidity in general to launch the right type of deal, that will benefit shareholders in the best type of manner. We all know that when speculative assets and IPOs are dropping like crazy, that your deal has a better chance of succeeding.
You can at least give him credit for spending his own money and obtaining proper legal counsel to fight off Calasse, along with all of the money spent on his tickers to maintain a tradable market on the OTC, which is actually a very expensive endeavor, especially when you are considering regulators such as the SEC, FINRA, etc.
Those of us who were here in 2020 and 2021 saw the fireworks and volcanic eruption of TSNP, and the international headlines it made. The funny thing about TSNP is that just like WNFT, GVSI, FORW and SRNW, there was dead trading volume and not much going on before the merger blew up and made CNBC, Seeking Alpha, Forbes and tons of other international news outlets. To say something like that can't happen again is a complete fallacy.
I'll take my chances, and good luck with your zero shares.
I've been enjoying every minute of it. How have you been doing with your zero shares? Don't worry, I've been working the 70+ hour weeks so I can buy more Wolf Tickets.
The argument that you haven't lost money until you sell. Because you have your money tied up for years - it is dead money.
There's definitely an opportunity cost, and I accept that fact. You can point the finger any which way you want, but it doesn't matter at this point. The only thing I am trying to do is eagerly await the Calasse decision, and manage my existing position as best I can.
If the parabolic run never hits, so be it. When I re-joined the OTC market back in 2020, I probably put about $5,000 into a couple OTC stocks, and hit it big with a series of trades, at which point I was able to invest about $100,000 into GOFF in early June of 2021. I then was able to make another $100k or so to pay off our car, credit card debt, along with put a down payment on our house.
So all together, regardless of what happens here, I'll accept the outcome, and it is what it is. But it's not over until it's over, and I still believe the odds are stacked against Calasse, due primarily to the fraud and sketchy $hit that happened back in 2013. I don't believe the SC will view those matters favorably at all.
Sharp is the scammer.
On a final note, I keep hearing this, but I fail to see any court briefings submitted alleging Sharp of fraud. Isn't that funny? Perhaps we will see something from Maverick and his lawyer submitted here before too long. Lol
$WNFT
Listen buddy, you can continue to play your morally superior high horse game because you think you're trying to defend and protect investors from Sharp, but I have been invested in this stock since June of 2021, at an initial average cost of .0233 (.07 GOFF price). I held most of my shares through the long decline, and I refuse to let Calasse win this show.
You can call that stupid, foolish, or whatever you want, and I really don't care. My average cost is almost under .01 at this point, with the fact that I have been able to buy more shares of this stock at such a steep discount. I understand many are bagged in this stock, and that's no fun either.
I'm bagged too, down well over 50%. But that doesn't mean I'm going to throw in the towel, just because retail traders want to crash the stock. In fact, I could care less if retail wants to crash the stock another 75% at this point. It's just more low liquidity games that don't matter in the long run.
Those of us who have who have been around long enough know that with OTC stocks, the volume, liquidity and atmosphere of the stock can change quickly. I know that there will be dozens upon dozens of more stocks that go on massive parabolic runs in the future, because that's just how the market works.
Buyers and sellers, that's it, nothing else. No emotion, nothing. We saw massive runs in 2021, 2017 and going back to 2013 as well. Isn't it interesting how the more money they create in the economy, the larger the booms in speculative assets seem to be when they hit.
Take it or leave it, this game is not for everyone, and nobody said the Wild West of the stock market is full of dandelions and cupcakes.
Only the members of the Sharp cult brag about losing money.
The funny thing about losing money in the stock market is that on paper, it means nothing. When you hit the buy or sell button, that's when it counts.
So how much have you lost so far?
Nothing, because I haven't sold. I actually made about $100k after taxes on the last run up. Could have taken more profits sure, but ever since Calasse has reared his ugly head, there will be no hitting the sell button.
Yep anything can happen. No limits, anything on the table. Bitcoin holding at $70,000. FOMO kicks in past $200,000 and especially $250,000. Crypto mania and speculative assets go on another crack pot boom. As long as Sharp keeps the stocks tradable with major brokers, there's no reason they can't skyrocket. We know that the younger investor base is particularly attracted to more speculative assets, including OTC stocks and crypto meme coins. When the crypto speculation goes haywire, you know that many penny stocks will be skyrocketing as well. We've seen it time and time again, every four year cycle comes with new opportunities.
Calasse isn't a big deal - Sharp is selling Wolf tickets and you bought them all.
Absolutely my friend. Wolf tickets to the moon. That would actually be a good crypto meme coin. Anyway, all the best to you, and no hard feelings. We all have our opinions, and I know it can get heated at times. That said, I'm still bullish and don't think this story is over yet. I suppose I'm one of the only bulls left. I've seen how stocks can go down 99%, only to rise from the ashes, and this is especially true with OTC stocks, where many times you have low liquidity and retail traders driving the price action. Anything can happen here, and until Sharp throws in the towel or stops filing financial statements with the SEC, then it is still fair game imo
I understand your concern with regulators. I have most of my basket in WNFT and some SRNW (thank God they are SEC registered), but GVSI, imo, is looking very attractive from a risk reward standpoint, down at .002. Sure, it could fall to .0002 or it could go to .20. But that's the risk we take I suppose.
It is very cheap indeed. From .02 to .002. Is .0002 next? Is the stock really dead? Last I checked, it is at least pink current and tradable with many brokers. Sharp can bring any kind of random crypto company he wants in here. I personally think he is focused on quality and also benefiting shareholders in terms of timing things correctly with the IPO market. Perhaps I'm just blowing smoke and elated from too much oregano, but this stuff is not far fetched imo.
Sharp even said the merging company wanted to withdraw for WNFT, due to basically the IPO market being dead. That said, when liquidity picks up in these OTC issuers, we've seen what can happen. Of course, if you believe Sharp never had any kind of merging company, that's another story. You should probably just move right along then.
It's not far fetched at all to believe that GVSI could see another fantastic 6 - 12 months of nothing but a parabolic moonshot. Perhaps even .20 or .50+, crazier things have happened in the Wild West of the stock market, that's for sure.
Raoul Pal has discussed the typical 4 year cycle with blockchain, crypto and speculative assets. If the assumptions are correct, at some point in 2025 or late 2024 even, we see many stocks start to go off like fireworks, including some on the OTC. Let's see what happens and best of luck to you my friend.
Until Sharp says "I'm walking away from the trifecta / done / good luck" there is still hope for these shells. In fact even if Sharp were to walk away, (don't believe so, hypothetical) he could just pass the baton to someone else. At some point when the IPO market gets super hot again, these stocks have the potential to go parabolic. FORW went to $1+ in short order, over a $500 million market cap at the peak of the TSNP mania. It can happen again. Do you know what 2018 looked like on the OTC? It was dead, until late 2020 and 2021 hit. 2017 was a bull market as well. Those who have been playing the game long enough remember. Keep your buys low, and you'll be okay when the volume picks up here. Long game or nothing.
I like to be BOLD and HOLD because I haven't SOLD in 2 years and I know there ain't know FOLD.
Yes I agree. There's nothing more important than getting Calasse out of the way and completing a successful deal for shareholders. With all due respect to GVSI shareholders, WNFT and SRNW are both SEC reporting, which is also a definite advantage in terms of the potential quality of asset.
If you truly believe Sharp is a terrible person and doesn't want to seek the best fiduciary duty benefit for shareholders, then it would be best to sell and move on.
I will take my chances. In November of 2020, I personally witnessed what Sharp worked out in terms of international dealings with TSNP, which completely fired up and ignited the OTC markets into a frenzy. That was the #1 best parabolic run in OTC history, hands down. Tons of money from the deal flooded back into the OTC market, and numerous stocks reached $1 billion+ market caps in short order.
To say something like this can't happen again IMO is a complete fallacy. If we know fear and greed always drive the market, then why can't similar events such as this happen in the future? If it takes another 12 to 24 months for that life changing money to hit, then so be it. I'm here for "as long as it takes".
Ugh. There's just no getting through to either side. Conservative or liberal, democrat or republican, Calasse or Sharp, yada yada SC will lay the ruling down soon enough, and I can't wait for the day. My gut feel is that there is simply no consideration given for Calasse, due to all of the sketchy business dealings which took place back in 2013, followed by his abandonment to shareholders. As I've said previously, if I'm wrong I will eat dust and never post on here again.
Why has it taken Sharp 3 years to find a company for a reverse merger - and Sharp still hasn't found a company.
Because Sharp is strategic and it would be dumb to launch a merger or large scale, international deal in a crappy IPO market.
In over 5 years as the CEO of FORW Sharp still hasn't generated any revenue. Let me guess you have an excuse for Sharp.
My excuse is that Sharp is picky, but also patient, and is seeking the proper deal so that all parties can benefit. This includes shareholders and all corporate directors and insiders associated with the deal.
You are ignoring the facts and putting blinders on.
I can't wait to put my blinders on and stare straight at the sun tomorrow, burning out my corneas (and my wallet) in the process on trifecta shares.
$SRNW
Amen. This either goes parabolic at some point, or I'm never selling.
I'm sorry that you are so blinded by your hatred for George Sharp that you actually think Calasse is the victim here. Calasse has provided zero value to shareholders, and the SC will see right through the BS, whichever desk this case finally lands on. If there is any question in terms of securities laws being broken, the SC will most definitely take the safe approach and rule in favor of the individual (or individuals) who will comply with applicable securities laws, and provide a fiduciary duty to shareholders. Calasse did not comply with securities laws or provide a fiduciary duty to shareholders. But apparently you and some others believe the SC cares about none of these things. Can't fix stupid.
O'Flynn was the one that dumped them without a proper registration statement, not Calasse.
So why was Calasse making up bullshit about gold mining activity in a bunch of press releases? Seems to me that Calasse was directly involved with the fraud, or at least assisting these unscrupulous firms with the dumping of shares, by deliberately lying to shareholders about the ongoing endeavors with GOFF, in order to drum up demand for the shares.
And I'm sure behind closed doors, there was probably some type of exchange where Calasse benefited tremendously. Once again, the SC will not look favorably upon these matters, and cluckster and his lawyer will be finished for good.
I used to joke around in discord about riding the titanic to the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean if the GOFF merger didn't work out. Turns out we are still waiting on a merger (and something else). Perhaps the Carpathia will pick us up soon, and it will be smooth sailing again. Either way, I'm prepared to go down with the ship.
Calasse was involved in a fraud. What don't you get about that? The Supreme Court does not look favorably upon a fraud. They do not look favorably upon bad actors who abandon shareholders and provide zero value to them in the process. And given the nature of the events which unfolded in 2013, the Supreme Court of Nevada will see right through the BS, and come up with the proper ruling for shareholders, that is in the best interest.
Ever heard of fiduciary duty? Who do you think has more favor with the courts? Someone who abandoned their duty to shareholders, or someone who spent their own money to reinstate the corporation and do everything by the book, for the benefit of shareholders?
It is hilarious to me that very few seem to consider the fact that Calasse was involved in a pump and dump scheme, was caught lying and pumping GOFF stock, and couldn't even prove a receipt for his own shares. To suggest that the Supreme Court of Nevada would rule in favor of such a character, who has provided absolutely nothing of value to shareholders and to the corporation, is a complete fallacy.
The point is this: if you violate securities laws and are involved with numerous unscrupulous firms, while dumping tens of millions of dollars of stock into the open market without a registration statement, and then you abandoned shareholders after these events unfolded, without ever proving that you owned the shares in the first place, what makes you think that the Supreme Court of Nevada would look upon these events as something that they should rule in favor of?
If this is the case, where is the evidence of dilution and of selling shares on the open market? Do you have verifiable evidence that George Sharp used, say WNFT or SRNW to his own benefit, selling shares and directly diluting shareholders? It seems to me at least, that shares were instead cancelled, not diluted, like you would have us believe:
Sharp wants this to drag along forever - as it is his personal ATM. His stock is free and all of his tickers.
Ladies and gentlemen, it has truly been an honor playing the game with you.
Crack pot? I prefer a good dose of Tylenol with codeine, mixed in with some Indian pale ales, and a solid dose of despair about my life being completely worthless, after losing 99% of my portfolio in the trifecta. Then, I smoke a good sativa to once again uplift my creativity and send me soaring through the stratosphere with grandiose visions of what $GVSI can one day become, once George Sharp sends in the international buyers. But that's just me. Late 2025 to the moon. Brett Rosen can get fucked.
Doesn't take much to move these OTC stocks, does it?
It's all doom and gloom, until it's not. I have been invested in GOFF coming up on 3 years, and have seen all of the ups and downs, along with the craziness, hype, euphoria, distress, despair, anxiety and every other emotion you could possibly imagine.
When the tide turns here, it won't matter what anyone says. Buyers and sellers dictate literally everything. Now, all we must do is wait for buyers to overtake the sellers in a dramatic fashion, and we will go parabolic. It's not much different than when the price comes tumbling down over 90% from where it was trading at a few months ago, just in reverse.
Best of luck to you DrugDoc. What's the pharmacy offering up today? I'm looking for a mellow buzz and a pain reliever from losing so much money on paper, because my entire life is attached to this stock, and I will completely lose my mind if $GVSI doesn't go up soon. The toxic bashers have really gotten to me as well, so I feel depressed and worthless now. Looking forward to hearing what concoction you can come up with. Do you accept Bitcoin?
Let's go. Sharp for the win. Ace pulled out of the sleeve. Every other opinion be cursed. For whoever blesses Israel will be blessed.
You as well!! Hope you all had a good one.
Pecos, MBA Dude and Keith are all my good friends. Also Tyrus, Goose, and the rest. Remember 10BaggerHunter? Great times. Better times coming imo. Just have to literally sit on shares here and ignore the noise. These prices have not been seen in quite some time. You either fold now or you ride this out. It's your choice. As for myself, I shall never surrender and will be riding this all the way like the Dogecoin millionaire, win or lose.
We shall see what transpires here my friend. No hard feelings, win or lose. If you're right, I will eat dust and never post on this board again. If you're wrong, I will be doing a victory lap across all of the trifecta message boards. Literally nothing to lose at this point. WNFT either hits down the line and goes parabolic on high volume, or it sits here with anemic volume and never climbs above .01 again.
Dan, great to hear from you, hope all is well. And yeah I hear you man, great times. I wouldn't mind relaunching the discord at some point. I think I mentioned to someone on here that once we get past .05 again I will relaunch in celebration. Calasse has been nothing but a nuisance and I can't wait to see him lose. This has been the craziest ride ever, but it has also taught me patience and the ability to persevere and shift your mindset, even in the midst of adversity.
$GVSI bears won't see it coming. It's just like 2021 all over again. The 4 year super cycle repeats itself. We all know that 2013, 2017, 2021 and soon to be 2025 were all epic in massive proportions, for cryptocurrencies, blockchain and speculative assets. The trifecta is far from over, and we are most definitely in the (very long) first inning here. Retail dollar volume doesn't dictate the show. International buyers on the other hand, now that's a different story.
Amen MBA Dude. Marking this for the upcoming ruling from the SC.
The SC will deal a decisive blow and make sure another Calousee situation doesn't happen in future on other custodianship. In the annals of the SC/OTC history, Calasse v. Sharp will be quoted for decades when future appeals from GOFF type scam CEOs come up demanding justice after share cancellation. This is an important case and you are by association (with the stock) important. Like many others of course. Unfortunately, the bad guys can't win the war and GS will land that victory. Perhaps in 2024 but that is ok.
Happy Easter everyone. Hopefully Calasse is officially toast here soon.
This is all low liquidity, retail driven price action. Retail, in the general sense of the term, is a complete joke. If $SRNW starts trading $10 million+ in dollar volume, things will become a bit more exciting. It's easy to make these OTC stocks run big when the volume spikes. Seen it happen plenty of times. It's all doom and gloom until it isn't, and the stock goes parabolic.
Yes, there is no deal and no foreseeable one in the future, which is why the stock has dropped massively. The expectations of retail traders were crushed, and the liquidity completely dried up for $GVSI, resulting in a massive share price collapse, along with panic and a sense of unease.
But what about GVSI before 2021? How about WNFT before Sharp took over custodianship? These stocks were doing absolutely nothing (with the exception of Lazar initially with GOFF), and there was very minimal trading volume associated with them whatsoever.
When Sharp took over custodianship, both WNFT, GVSI and SRNW performed very well on the speculation, and Sharp allowed it to continue for quite some time without any news events whatsoever.
It wasn't until Sharp took these stock over, that retail decided it was time to significantly push up the price of these stocks in speculation of a large reverse merger, or some other type of event.
At the same time, George Sharp did not dilute shareholders, but rather was able to get shares canceled for his tickers, while additionally obtaining pink current tradable status for his tickers, and SEC reporting for SRNW and WNFT.
Since 10/24, so about 6 months since the last briefings/documents were submitted.
Good luck to you as well. At least small caps and crypto are heating up again. I've stubbornly held my shares through the long decline, in part because I've wanted to know that I had the perseverance to see this through until the end, and of course I don't want to give Calasse the victory.
In my mind (and this may be totally warped), if I sell shares while the case is still pending, Calasse has succeeded in causing me to capitulate. After holding since June of 2021, there's no point in giving up now. Either Calasse loses the court case, or we drop another 70 - 90%. Might as well hold this through the Calasse decision and whatever comes after that.
I do think the OTC will eventually see another massive bull run like we did in 2021. Liquidity is dry now, but when these stocks go parabolic, they can shoot up 1000's of percent quickly. One of the benefits of a thinly traded market I suppose.
Bitcoin’s 4-year cycle, a period marked by significant fluctuations and culminating in a halving event, is a critical aspect of its economic model. The halving, scheduled to occur on April 19, 2024, will see the block reward for miners decrease from 6.25 BTC to 3.125 BTC. This mechanism, which is designed to reduce the rate at which new bitcoins are generated, and theoretically aims to counter inflationary pressures, enhancing the asset’s scarcity, and thus potentially increasing its value over time.
Historical precedents set by previous halvings in 2012, 2016, and 2020 suggest a pattern where the price of Bitcoin experiences substantial growth following these events. For instance, the 2020 halving saw the price of Bitcoin increase from $8,821.42 on the day of the halving to $10,943.00 just 150 days later. Of course, this was also marked by a significant increase to $60,000+ by the end of 2021, followed by a steep selloff under $20,000 by the end of 2022.
Going back further, Bitcoin peaked off at approximately $20,000 around the end of 2017. Additionally, in 2013, Bitcoin peaked at approximately $1,242 by November, beginning at just $150 per coin in October.
https://dailyinvestmentadvice.com/the-cryptocurrency-market-is-turning-very-bullish-april-2024-update/
$GVSI (bullish, on Bitcoin, and GVSI from current levels)