Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yeah the waiting sucks. SC playing hot potato with the case i suppose. My guess is it’s been shuffled around with all of the judge changes and what not
Yep. At this point we could wake up to 10 billion shares being on the OS and Sharp slipping off to Costa Rica. Perhaps a trip to the Maldives as Cubans get their bank accounts frozen?
Your sentiment and mine are the same on the Calasse BS. After that, I would estimate that based upon the price action for Sharp tickers, many are just completely exhausted, don't care and/or believe Sharp is totally done here, and will never be successful.
the good news is that there is a whole new generation of speculative investors who absolutely love this $hit. We shall see what unfolds here.
And in all fairness, $GOFF/WNFT did in fact reach $1.35 briefly, and it happened within about a year of that post. Not quite multi dollars, but I wasn't that far off either. Too bad so sad, Calasse (or Sharp depending upon your victim mindset) has made everyone mad.
Bro you were on that board pumping it non stop I remember lmao. And who cares, OTC stocks were going up left and right when that was happening.
At least I made money. In fact I bought at .02 for about $20,000 and dumped at .06 for about $60,000. Took those profits and rolled some into $GOFF. And yes still here. Not a loss until you sell.
i Glow has the best stuff. Wish he would share which kind it is. Would love to take a puff
I think we may be the only two bulls left on this board. Best of luck to you my friend.
Sharp is already loaded. He definitely doesn't need the money. The sentiment has turned so sour here that folks are focused on how Sharp is going broke with his horse racing endeavors and therefore needs to dump millions of shares on investors to survive and pay his bills. He's had coming up on over 3 years to dump on investors. and could have easily walked away with millions when $GOFF was trading at fresh highs.
This is an unpopular opinion, but I believe Sharp is going to get the right deal done when the IPO market is red hot and speculative stocks are flying left and right. We may be getting close, especially with the crypto cycle restarting, stocks hitting all time highs, expected interest rate cuts, and of course the election. Will be interesting to see what happens here.
Most have given up on any kind of positive developments ever happening. That type of sentiment is your opportunity. Don't be left chasing when the fireworks start.
This is the OTC. You either play the game or you don't. We all know what can happen with these stocks on the upside. I would argue under .01 the risk reward is quite favorable here, especially with Calasse gone. Glad I don't chase and have a low average.
There were very few that made a profit on TSNP/HMBL
That's why you fucking buy before everyone else starts chasing the stock. This is high risk, high reward shit here. They don't call these lotto plays for nothing. Volatility and volume can pick up dramatically, and it can happen extremely quickly. Just as volume can pick up substantially on the downside as well. I'm going to continue to camp out here and see what unfolds.
Yep. Stocks go up and down. And there is hardly anyone is left who believes Sharp will accomplish anything with these tickers, ever.
The bearish sentiment for these stocks is at an all time high. Maybe that’s what Sharp wants. Get rid of all the retail Joes and then pull the ace out of the sleeve.
I have a feeling that some prior holders may be quite disgusted eventually, and “if only I didn’t sell”, “I could have made X amount”, etc.
We all know what can happen when FOMO kicks in, just as it does when stocks crash and shareholders feel devastated.
Will be interesting to see how things play out here. $GVSI is not my favorite by any means, and has seen its fair share of massive problems. But overall, I would say the risk reward here is favorable, especially given the steep sell off and extremely negative sentiment.
LFG!!!!
Are you saying that the OTC will never see a significant increase in volume again? Are you suggesting that buyers will never overpower sellers in this market again?
I mean, is liquidity that dry and the economy so bad, that things must be so pessimistic & Sharp tickers have absolutely no hope whatsoever of rising from the ashes?
I wouldn't necessarily discount a legitimate deal from unfolding here, potentially resulting in significant exposure. If not, that's the risk we take, the price we pay I suppose.
Absolutely! $OWCP was insanity but that was the first time, (along with $DOLV) that I realized what was possible with the OTC. From nearly ZERO dollar volume to multi-millions, along with a parabolic straight line.
That's what many don't realize can happen, and it can happen suddenly. By the time you realize it, too late (except for those who bought low).
Believe it or not, I bought approximately 2 million shares of $DOLV at .0011, selling them for a quick flip at .0012, right before it jumped to .05+ shortly after.
HUGE mistake, that's all I will say.
Wishing you the best my friend!
Congrats! I remember $MMEX. So many historic runners. Remember $OWCP from trips to $1+ by chance? One of the Hall of Famers. Things can change quickly in this market, no doubt
I remember the run. I also remember when the OTC was not doing too much before the run happened. When $TSNP went off, numerous OTC stocks followed suit. The runs were epic, and went parabolic.
The funny thing about the OTC is that nobody believes it can happen, until it does.
Who would have thought, that a lowly OTC stock by the name of $TSNP would rise from .0001 (yes, it did in fact trade there) to reach $1.93 per share, or well over 1 MILLION+ percent from the lows.
It really doesn't matter what anyone says. One of the reasons we are still discussing Sharp, is because his deal did in fact make international headlines.
When buyers over power sellers by a significant margin, things get interesting. Just as the sellers have overpowered the buyers for quite some time when it comes to Sharp tickers.
I remember the run. I also remember when the OTC was not doing too much before the run happened. When $TSNP went off, numerous OTC stocks followed suit. The runs were epic and went parabolic.
The funny thing about the OTC is that hardly anyone believes it can happen, until it does.
Who would have thought, that a lowly OTC stock by the name of $TSNP would rise from .0001 (yes, it did in fact trade there) to reach $1.93 per share, or well over 1 MILLION+ percent from the lows.
One of the reasons we are still discussing Sharp and what happened in late 2020 / early 2021, is because his deal did in fact make international headlines.
We are here for the significant increase in volume which can happen, or when buyers over power sellers by a significant margin. Just as the sellers have overpowered the buyers for quite some time when it comes to Sharp tickers.
Yep exactly. Markets change all the time. What is low volume, low liquidity today will not be tomorrow.
Do you remember $ALPP by chance? I participated in that run. In fact, when I was buying under .05, I remember thinking "when it gets to .40-.45 definitely take profits" and I did. Sure enough, it exploded past $8+ per share and reached a $1 billion market cap after trading hardly any volume whatsoever, and being a dead stock for a long time.
We are buying $WNFT at a significant discount, believe me. This thing was flying past $1+ when it was GOFF, or the equivalent of .35+ before the forward split and Calasse BS.
It can absolutely happen again.
Just remember what truly drives the market, which is emotion / fear & greed.
Nothing will stop buyers from paying over inflated prices, and nothing will stop sellers from dumping their shares at rock bottom prices.
It's simply the nature of the game, and nothing is new under the Sun.
Best of luck to you.
Calasse is a fraudster, and Sharp will not be sitting on "any big fish" for $WNFT until Calasse is done for good.
If you have any further questions, you can direct them towards Sharp and the WNFT twitter OTC markets page.
You either believe that Sharp will successfully complete a deal once Calasse is out of the way, or you don't. Regardless, it doesn't change the outcome.
Sharp is here to complete a real deal. That means with a real company, and one that has the potential to benefit shareholders in the best possible fashion.
This is a game of liquidity and dollar volume. Retail has been running this show with their fear and believing that Sharp will not get a successful deal done, is a total scam, etc.
If you believe these narratives, then you should probably sell and move on. If not, then perhaps the tide will change eventually, and Sharp will deliver something of value for shareholders.
Perhaps even, (as crazy as it is to suggest), $WNFT will see a significant increase in volume & exposure, resulting in a much higher share price.
Or perhaps not. The beauty of the Wild West is, anything can happen.
Let's goooooooo
Someone with patience in the house. I love it. Been invested in the trifecta since 2021 and I'm here until a successful deal is completed.
2025 is not far away. I've seen folks complain about the "several month delay" with Sharp tickers and I must laugh. Especially considering that I was once a millionaire on paper, and I have lost over 99% of my portfolio.
However, I have not given up on my belief that Sharp will get a successful deal done that could potentially send these trifecta stocks parabolic, and therefore I continue to hold onto my shares with full conviction (and buy a few more when I have a chance).
It is in fact lime time (cheers!), & I completely agree! If you recall with $WNFT, Sharp even tweeted that the target acquisition candidate was withdrawing during the ongoing Calasse nonsense, due in part to the "market conditions".
It is an unfortunate reality, but it is also the truth. Sharp doesn't want to do a deal if the IPO market is total trash. The best time to launch a deal is when liquidity is red hot, and there are new issuers coming public nonstop. We saw that during 2020-2021, and I believe we will see it again.
That said, most don't have the patience or ability to see through the thick smoke and instead will become susceptible to fear, volatility and negative sentiment.
Those who remain steadfast, on the other hand, have the potential to benefit tremendously. Best of luck to you, and hope you make bank! I've been picking up some $GVSI shares myself here recently, and believe that things can turn here on the whim.
As I've mentioned, that's what I love about the OTC - the ability for $10,000 in daily dollar volume to quickly become $10 million+ in dollar volume at a moment's notice.
Completely disagree. Just like any other market, the OTC is driven by supply & demand. Most investors/traders are scared into avoiding the OTC, and for good reason - there is high volatility, high risk and a lack of liquidity at the forefront of this market.
That said, fortunes can be made. I've been trading the market since 2015 (off & on) and I have seen my fair share of parabolic movements. 2015-2017 had some good ones (including DOLV if anyone remembers that one - from .0001 to .10+) and then we had the 2020-2021 market which was absolute insanity, due to all of the additional liquidity pumped into the markets during that time.
This is all a matter of time & chance. At some point, the Fed will lower interest rates, and don't be surprised if we get some type of UBI or crazy $hit down the pipe line like we experienced with COVID.
In other words, the markets are unpredictable, and that's why I love the OTC or the "Wild West" of the stock market. Literally anything can happen here, and I can't tell you the number of times I've witnessed these penny stocks go from literally nothing, nada, zero trading volume to trading seven, eight or even nine figures in dollar volume for several weeks our even several months on end.
That's your opportunity, and opportunities will abound again in this market, no doubt in my mind. The key is REAL DEALS & a resulting demand shock to these tickers, which I personally believe Sharp will in fact get done.
All imo, and GLTU
It’s decided then. eToro to the f***ing moon
$ETORO
Let me simplify this for you:
$WNFT cheap. WNFT oversold. Sellers bring down price of WNFT. Buyers no get relief. Fear and uncertainty send price of WNFT down big. Buyers and sellers dictate price of stock. Supply and demand run show. Buyers can overpower sellers if WNFT gain enough exposure. Demand increase result in higher share price. Sharp working on real deal. If you no believe Sharp then move on. Good day sir.
Yep, the late 2020 / early 2021 bull market was absolutely fantastic. TSNP went off, and dozens upon dozens of other OTC stocks went off within roughly a 3-6 month span. As I'm sure you remember, many of them climbed to $1 billion+ market caps from absolutely nothing. It was quite an epic market, and it can happen again. Hence why I continue to camp out here and wait for things to turn in our favor. When you see a straight line and several weeks or months of record breaking volume, you will know that our patience has paid.
It's not going back to the expert market. Unless Sharp abandons the ticker, which he has already stated he has no intention of doing (even with $GVSI, which was by far his most difficult ticker). If you don't believe Sharp, then perhaps that's another story.
As far as the purchase goes, it's a matter of supply and demand. Someone wanted shares, and there were no sellers available under .01 at the time the order was placed.
Just as traders can drive the price down substantially with excessive rumors, fear and negative minded speculation, it can work in reverse as well.
I just hope a deal gets done here soon. Calasse has been holding up this show for quite some time. I believe the time is right for an OTC stock to go parabolic again. Why can't it be $WNFT?
If we can make international headlines, then the volume will increase substantially. When that happens, we could see $1+ per share. But it requires that the stock gain significant exposure and is correctly digested by shareholders. After all, we are talking about creating an imbalance of supply and demand here, just as we have seen on the way down (supply of shares far outstripping demand).
That said, I'm optimistic, and my gut tells me that $WNFT goes parabolic eventually. If Calasse would simply go away, shareholders could potentially benefit tremendously. We either hit the jackpot here or nothing at all. I'm taking whatever I get from WNFT, and buying gulf coast Florida real estate, that's for sure.
Either Calasse loses and we see a parabolic run on high volume, or it's dead money.
And what are those reasons?
When a OTC company files a Form 15 and tells shareholders they are doing it to save money - don't believe it - because there are other reasons and none that are good for shareholders.
We can easily move past .01+ and in fact it did that the other day on very low volume. I would love to see $1+ WNFT, which is no doubt a possibility if we get the right volume and conditions.
At this point, $WNFT is either going to retire my family and I, or I will hold onto my shares forever. Welcome to the land of milk and honey, where dreams are crushed, retail traders fight each other for entries and exits, and every now and then, a zip code is changed.
Trying to convince I-Glow is like trying to convince a brick wall. You are correct that going from SEC reporting to OTC markets reporting would NOT result in the expert market, as he has suggested.
Although many believe Sharp is full of $hit at this point, the move would in fact result in cost savings, which is the main goal. This Supreme Court case has been ongoing for quite some time, and until WNFT is ready for a merger or some type of deal that requires SEC reporting, it's simply a cost saving maneuver.
GVSI from .002 to .20 - a fantasy now, until the next bull market for OTC stocks. Do you know what happened in 2020-2021? If the economy goes into the gutter, the money printer goes brrrrr.
We only have so much time before the next series of stocks goes absolutely ballistic. Each run and cycle has the potential to be more powerful than the one prior. Time and chance fellas.
You’re assuming the Supreme Court remands the case back to the district court for WNFT. I would strongly disagree that Calasses fraudulent actions from 2013 warrant any consideration from a legitimate court of appeals in the state of Nevada.
It is evident from the briefings and dealings primarily in 2013, that Calasse was a fraudster, or at least he was involved in a very sketchy pump & dump scheme, in which it is additionally very evident that he directly lied in press releases, in order for a bunch of unscrupulous firms to dump $10 million+ in short order, while the share price of $GOFF collapsed in the process.
Any consideration given by the SC therefore, directly contradicts common sense with securities laws and would be considered null and void.
The SEC is the supreme law of the land when it comes to securities, and Calasse along with his dealings with these sketchy firms had missing paperwork all along the way, and couldn’t even provide a registration statement for the shares that were dumped.
Unless I’m missing something and this nation has gone completely insane (lawlessness without any regard for the best interest of all shareholders), then Calasse will lose this case hands down.
What’s good my good luck charm! How was your day? $GVSI pumpers? Thoughts? Doomed until 2025? Let’s hear it my friend!
What's so difficult to believe about that?
For example, a common argument that I hear is: "Sharp hasn't gotten a deal done in almost 3 years for his tickers."
I would argue that just as important as completing a deal is, it's also important to complete the right type of deal, and under the right type of market conditions. You don't just "drop any sort of old deal" into the ticker and hope that it pays off.
Instead, you diligently seek out the best deal for shareholders, and audit companies to ensure they are not only compliant with securities regulations, but additionally would be a deal that would potentially be favorable for all stakeholders, insiders, directors. etc.
That said, if you're looking at this in terms of believing that all of Sharps tickers are scams, then you might as well just sell and move on. There's no point in convincing you otherwise, you move on and find another investment.
I'm still here because I believe Sharp has every intention of benefiting shareholders in the right time, and perhaps I am alone in that belief, or close to it. No worries, and best of luck to you.
Once people become married to a stock/CEO - they put blinders on and ignore the facts. And resort to posting more nonsense to defend Sharp.
Let's discuss the facts then. Last I checked, there is ZERO dilution or intentional share issuances with the sole purpose of benefiting the CEO of the company, which is George Sharp. You can go back to the same terms and arguments you always use, but it doesn't change the facts.
That is, no dilution, and that GOFF/WNFT has been SEC reporting since late 2021, and tradable with all major brokers which allow the trading of OTC stocks. None of this would be possible without Sharp taking over the stock. Would you rather have a dead ticker that is not tradable with brokers whatsoever?
First what has Sharp accomplished that is so much greater than Rosen.
Rosen does deals that are highly toxic and dilutive to shareholders. Now you could argue that HMBL/TSNP was also highly toxic and dilutive, and fair enough. That management team is such a $hit show, no wonder Sharp decided to distance himself from them.
Sharp gave them a brand new vehicle, and they wrecked it with toxic debt and dilution, much like Rosen does with his deals. But before that happened, the stock made international headlines and traded $100's of millions in dollar volume for months. Just saying.
Since Sharp has taken over his shells, (and these are facts that you simply cannot deny unless you have your "blinders on"), his tickers have CANCELLED shares and the share structure has IMPROVED.
Sharp pumped all 3 hijacked dormant/zombie shells - the true believers started buying and buying as you were enriching Sharp.
What's your definition of "hijacked? A legitimate custodianship through the Nevada court system, which plenty of others have done as well? Are you saying every single person who files a custodianship petition has bad intentions and is simply out to get shareholders?
This part is complete lunacy - "but I truly believe Sharp is acting in the best fiduciary duty to shareholders" - no one could possibly believe that - Sharp has been the CEO of FORW for over 5 years and he has brought in two scams and in 3 years Sharp has dangled the carrot about mergers - companies lined up begging to work with Sharp and his worthless shells.
Then I stand alone, and that's fine. Do you even know what the definition of fiduciary duty is? It is not about "getting a deal done for the sake of it." Instead, it's about "acting in a manner that is beyond conflict of interest or other issues that would conflict with the shareholders of a corporation, and ultimately doing what is in the best interest of all stakeholders."
Now, that is a broad definition, and up to interoperation, but the point is, if Sharp was so hell bent on diluting shareholders and causing chaos, he would have done so already. Your argument is that Sharp has the malicious intent of scamming shareholders, when everything has been completely legit and done by the book. Just ask the Securities & Exchange commission what it means to be fully reporting.
Ask the Nevada court system what it means to petition for custodianship of a publicly traded corporation. Just because you throw around fancy terms such as "hijacking" and "scam" it doesn't mean anything.
That isn't Sharp was acting in the best interest of shareholders - and Sharp failed miserably when he neglected his fiduciary responsibilities.
If Sharp intentionally diluted shareholders here with WNFT or SRNW for example, and walked away from the tickers and it was provable that he didn't have any intention of ever completing a successful deal, then there may be cause to believe that perhaps Sharp acted maliciously or without the best interest of shareholders. However, your points, as always, are not grounded in reality or fact, even though you believe that they are.
What are you talking about? Where’s the dilution? Do you know how much it costs to keep these tickers fully reporting? I would bet Sharp is in the red on these tickers, even if we assume he dumped his GVSI shares at .02 or whatever.
Fair enough. Everyone has their opinions, and who can blame shareholders for throwing in the towel.
After all, it’s been coming up on 3 years for GOFF/WNFT and even longer for GVSI. I guess the difference for me anyway, is that I bought fairly low initially for Goff, and I still believe Sharp has every intention of completing a deal.
What comes out of that is anyone’s guess, and it is definitely a volatile, risky endeavor. But I suppose I’m one of the few here from 2021 who still believes that Sharp didn’t do all of this for nothing.
And I do agree with your stance that GVSI has major issues it has been trying to work through, and I feel like you have done a pretty good job of documenting the paper trail in terms of the shit show from previous management and finra/sec issues.
That said, I believe GVSI may present an opportunity in terms of the current price, much as you believe Wnft may present an opportunity with the current price and what could happen with the court decision. Best of luck to you.
Based upon the volume, it looks like it was a nothing burger Doc. Just someone who bought a bunch of shares without there being available liquidity, hence briefly pushing the price above .01.
I must admit, when I saw the price action this morning, I almost immediately checked the Nevada Supreme Court website.
100% let's go Lucky. You're my new good luck charm. Looking forward to seeing hokie jokie & normie again.
You only lose money if you sell. I've sold for a profit on the last run up, even though I could have taken more. Just because the share price is down and it's on paper, it doesn't make it real. That's why it is exciting I suppose to see the share price down here at .0023 after much grief. I mean, it just seems like there's a possible chance that $GVSI might be slightly oversold, that's all.
I’m not saying Sharp is walking on water, but he has done fantastic in terms of not diluting shareholders, and even successfully cancelled shares across the board for his stocks.
The point is, Sharp is the majority shareholder and until that changes, he has a ton of flexibility in terms of issuing shares, and could have dumped on shareholders by now if he wanted.
That said, thank GOD this is not a Brett Rosen shit show, where deals are financed with toxic, dilutive debt that destroys the capitalization structure and ultimately shareholders.
This may be a far fetched opinion at this point, but I truly believe Sharp is acting in the best fiduciary duty to shareholders, and is trying to seek out the best deals, at the right time, for investors.