Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
If there are no buyers at $8.30 how do you imagine anyone buying at $68?
What starting price and share number should be used for this calculation?
If Teve is makins so much money that it's about to pay dividends why would they need to save money on compliance? Very few successful companies do that.
Shorts destroying TEVE makes no sense as the company has been funded by Mr. Lenfest and never went to the public markets to raise funds. Had they needed to do that, it's true a low share price would have been dilutive, but since they didn't need to do that there was no way for shorts to "destroy" the company.
Thanks Joe, but still no bid of 2 to 3k
Grandma, where is your bid for 2-3k shares? Or is that your bid of .01 for 10,000 shares?
Can't be that exciting. Only $83 was spent on 10 shares at $8.30. That's only 4 cents pre consolidation. Someone must have broken open the piggy bank.
I can sell my non-existent shares since I didn't sign an NID.
And I don't mean short them sincre I've never shorted any stock and wouldn't start now.
If trading on non-pubic information is illegal, then whichever party or parties, whether the buyer or the seller, or both, could be charged.
Yes, but now at $8.75, down from $26
Whoever was offering the 3062 shares at $26 earlier sold 500 shares yesterday at $9 and has dropped the offer to $8.75, hence the 2562 shares at that price.
Looks like the next price is likely to be $8.10
Looks like the seller of the 3000 + shares at $26 has lowered his ask to 8 and was the seller of the 500 shares.
What shorts?
If the shares are worth way more than $70 why aren't all the shares under $15 gone then and the volume only 30 sharea a day on average?
Where are they then?
I have no opinion only the FACTS I stated, but you seem to have no facts. $30 millin in accumulated losses and a $10 million loss last year.
Are you suggesting that iHub is wrong?
Where are your facts?
cslewis,
I agree with your statement:
An opinion based on nothing has little value.
Where are your facts?
What I see is that TEVE has been losing money since day one and continues to do so. Check the detailed quote on ihub.
https://au.finance.yahoo.com/q?s=TEVE
They show a $10 loss per share, or $6 plus million loss last ifscal year.
It's true, a billionaire has been funding this and they have 30 some millions in losses. How does that suggest that the company can turn this around? I see no change to indicate that.
They've been serving communities for all those years and still losing money. Please show where you see indications of a turnaround?
I'd like to know the smallest dollar value gained through insider trading that's led to a prosecution.
Thanks.
The SEC is sure to prosecute an investor for selling or buying 10 shares at $ 15
Both extreme views are way off base.
There is no great rush for the exits otherwise the volume with be higher, but neither is there a short situation as has been shown and those claiming a short position have not been able to demonstrate it. We have a committed group holding on to their shares but not buying much. And outside of this little group talking about teve very few potential investors have heard of this company.
teve will either do well or fail, but we have no ideas as the company remains dark. So just cool it everyone and wait for devlopments.
Firms this size will not have legal departments but have a lawyer they use when needed.
You mean you THINK there are only three people who own more than 5,000 shares. Then you dont know for sure what anyone other than you is doing. Unless of course you have some insider souce for that info.
Wonder what would happen if the one trying to sell 3000 shares at 27 changed that to a market order? Under a dollar. Because no one seems to buy significant numbers of TEVE shares.
The post said:
Good IT engineers are forced to man a help desk 24x7x365 and are expected to know every minute detail of a customer's configuration.
The issue is not whether the engineers are good or great, but that they are given unreanobable tasks to perform.
If the engineeers are great, it 's an even greater folly.
Joe says "shorty has thrown in the towel". If there are no shorts how can they throw anything? If they were throwing in the towel, the price would be rising as they would be buying. No? The latest activities have been sells at lower and lower prices.
So, no shorts and the only towels being thrown are by longs finally getting out at the best price possible -the bid price.
Aren't you forgetting the 3000 plus shares offered at 27 or so?
Nothing was bypassed. Bid was 10.52 or so and ask was 17.00 when the 390 sale at 10.52 happened. What was bypased? Please show it if you have evidence.
Please provide ONE example of your proof of a short position that you constantly claim as fact.
What were the shorts doing and how can you tell?
Constant claims of shorts (Joe claims he has proof of 2500 screen shots) yet not one has been posted here as proof. That story is running out of legs and credibility with no proof.
POST ONE PIECE OF PROOF.
It's "disappeared" as you're only showing the three lowest offers. It hasn't disappeared, just more lower priced sellers.
Oh, by the way, where is ONE example of a current short position.
Joe, where is ONE piece of evidence of a current short position.
Did you not read what I said? Post ONE with an explanation, not all.
No thanks. The last screen shot you posted here showed nothing to me. You gave no explanation. Post ONE with an explanation. If there are shares short today there should be some evidence of that NOW. What happened fifteen years ago is irrelevant. As I said, if there were any before they could have been covered by now.
If there were any they may have covered over the years.
Please show some proof of shorts TODAY.
How can that have anything to do with shares short today? if there are no shorted shares today what may have happened fifteen years ago is irrelevant.
You are wrong too. If I wanted to sell at $15 or buy at $14 that's what Level II would show. So either there are no buyers or sellers and the market maker puts up their own prices or these are the actual buys and sells from shareholders. Since the numbers are odd 277 or 3022 that's highly unlikelly to be market makres putting up numbers. These most likely represent real shares from real buyers and sellers.
You're wrong too. There are a couple of hundred shares on offer around $10.00 but very few want to sell at that price just as very few want to buy at the offer.
It's a standoff for now. Highly illiquid stock.
Maybe no one is selling but there are shares for sale. But no buyers for those shares.
They only show the top four asks. The 3000 plus has been pushed off the list. More lower priced sellers.
What's morality got to do with this?