Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The share price speaks for itself.
I wonder why they bothered with the 4:1 split?
The scam comes crashing down.
Boiler room operation.
Very true about financial in the next week or two but it has nothing to do with your earlier post which was a scam. They wanted $1900 to get the name of the secret little $2 company.
It's some biotech pump.
http://pro.moneymappress.com/ERNRBTINS/LERNS207/?h=true
I doubt they're taling about Spectra7 as it's never gone over even $1 Canadian and there has not been a 2500% surge in volume. Too badl, would have been nice.
Forget about this company. A total waste of time.
And they'll do this with the $13 in their treasury? Hahaha
I hope he gets released and gets some help. Clearly he must be suffering from some psychiatric issues.
I hope he is released soon. Has his case been resolved? What's the outcome?
I mean resolution.
What was the resultion?
Has our favourite posters case been resolved yet?
Thanks! Feel sorry for the poor guy.
What court room?
Clinical trial results won't be out till 2017 according to last conference call. Results announced are not that impressive. I can't see a major move up for two years. In the meantime additional financing and probably a move to the OTC.
Some have received the dividiend.
My understanding is that you will have to relinquish your dividend to the person who bought your shares.
Watching for what? Wonder how much it'll drop tomorrow?
1. Wednesday is called "payment date" meaning that you must be holding the stock at the close of the market to get paid.
2. So do not sell before Thursday.
3. I seem to remember that the dividend will appear in your account in about a month. Can't find the info now.
I'm confused.
The company Q1 report says that the dividend will be paid on August 12 to shareholders of record of July 21.
The Wikipedia page on Special Dividends says:
If you sell stock after the record date but before the ex-dividend date, your shares will be sold with a book entry sometimes called a "due bill," which denotes that though the company will pay the dividend to your account (as the shareholder of record), your account must, in turn, turn that dividend over to the buyer of your stock. Conversely, if you buy stock after the record date but before the ex-dividend date of a large special dividend, you are entitled to the dividend and will receive it via the due bill process.
This suggests that the only significance of the July 21 date is that if you sell between July 21 and August 12 you have to turn over your dividend to the one who bought your shares between those two dates.
It seems that as long as you hold the shares on August 12 you will receive the dividend no matter when you bought them. The July 21 date is meaningless.
Thanks for posting. So sad. Not clear from the report if the case has been argued. Is the next step sentencing?
If true, that would be a MASSIVE $600. Some guy is going to get a Ferrari tomorrow!
Because the bid is only .051 you'd still be a loser if you tried selling now.
800% of what? lol
As well, there are no analyst estimates. See below:
eWorldCompanies, Inc. (EWRC) -Other OTC
0.06 Down 0.00(1.64%) 12:47PM EDT
Add to Portfolio
Analyst Estimates Get Analyst Estimates for:
There is no Analyst Estimates data available for EWRC.
Got this e-mail two days in a row.
A Message from Trader Tip!!! This Stock could have a Rumble after the
Tumble!!!
Currently traded: .06
Name: E World Companies
Symbol to buy: E W RC
Target Price: 0.75
Trading Date: Fri, Apr 24, 2015
Analysts say 800% profits! This Company Has Breakout Written All Over
It Put It On Your Radar Now.
What's special about Monday?
Since you don't, ie, you have no evidence, you shouldnt shouldn't be calling it a conspiracy.
What conspiracy? He pumped the stock like many people who either believe what they're saying or just trying to make some money. Many do this without any conspiracy. If there is a conspiracy, please provide some proof.
Just as their short claims are unsubstantiated, so are claims of a conspiracy.
The only connection is that he happened to lose a bundle in TEVE. But everyone knows that TEVE hasn't done well and he might just as easily have lost it any one of a thousand other stocks. Sad story, that's all.
The trial has nothing to do with Teve or trading in Teve. The only connection may be that he lost money on the stock. And you of all people should know better than to insinuate otherwise.
I have no idea what you're talking about.
You didn't answer my question about why anyone would bother manipulating TEVE as there is hardly any activity and thus no money to be made playing the stock.
What exactly is the point of manipulating a stock that doesn't trade and has gone dark? The whole dollar value of last year's trading is probably less than half a million bucks and that's probably an exaggeration.
The only question is why does a puboic company require a NDA? The only reason I can see is to discourage potential new shareholders and thus suppress the sp with lack of new buyers. It seems to be working. And why would it want to do that? To be able to take the company private as at low a price as possible.
So it actually makes perfect sense.
He certainly wasn't charged for doing anything ilegal in the stock arena. The rest is your interpretation.
The jailing has to do with a shooting and nothing to do with TEVE or stock trading.
I simply asked for someone to cite one case where someome has been charged with insider trading in a similar situation to TEVE's. Since no one has been able to do so I'll just assume that all the warnings are pointless and do not apply here.
I would have thought that an expert in the field would have precedents at their fingertips and would not need to do any research. If you don't have that information then what are you basing your daily warnings on? And why do that on a daily basis. The three or four posters here who have signed tn NDA (and I haven't and have no shares) need no further warnings I'm quite certain.
I asked before and I ask again - please provide a link to some precedent showing someone being convicted of trading for a few thousand dollars in gains ( or losses) trading on insider information.