Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Oh conspiracy theories. Gain of function, labs and all that stuff.
Aah so now the Chinese were working on a bio-weapon involving Covid.
Stoopid Soviets spent the entire Cold War working with far deadlier viruses, and bacteria.
And how exactly does that suddenly make it an experimental treatment?
You keep droning on and on. Nobody is interested in repetition.
Yes you do keep droning on about quack Covid treatments.
And waggs gave us a hint in a CC
That massive stock dilution was on the way 2 yrs ago, and it occurred.
Isn't Kenny wonderful? So much so he gave himself a salary raise.
Now comes an R/S, and Kenny pumps about an mythical up listing. Then a repeat of the dilution back to 2.4B and beyond of O/S shares. That will also be wonderful for SHs.
Rome wasn't built in a day-and PMCB hasn't
build anything in the past 9 yrs. Other than the O/S of 2.4B shares.
The mRNA does not exist long term
France is hiding nothing
Their HCQ almost ad hoc test failed.
If you read the Lancet article I posted, you would have known that dexamethasone was only used in hospitals not for home treatment.
And how exactly does that suddenly make it an experimental treatment? It has been used for decades as an anti-inflammatory. And with other conditions it can be readily used at home.
Bascially long term, it is unknown whether or not the innate immune system will be compromised
There has been no evidence presented of a "long term effect" by mRNA vaccines.
One should be more worried about what the Covid virus itself can do to the innate immune system. The evidence is the "Long Hauler" syndrome.
PMCB patent abandoned in U.S.
Thank you for finding that updated nugget.
As far as dexamethasone, it was not widely used and considered "experimental"
Wrong again.
Neither was there anything in your link, that claimed it was experimental.
It is also widely used for those as the article clearly indicates:
So whatever science you're into, it's shallow and one-sided
The only thing shallow is the make believe cures, and total lack of understanding of the immune system, including vaccinations, from your anti-VAX side.
Even though there is plenty...you just continue to twist the science until it fits your narrative
It's impossible to twist anything of your pretzel eye-of-newt science, than what you already have.
Balonga I have not put the "control mask"
You make a lot of presumptions
What presumptions? No, I follow science, not wacko anti-VAX conspiracies.
So far HCQ, Ivermectin, and long term vaccine effects have been refuted.
I'm surprise the anti-VAX theory that vaccines are going to alter human DNA hasn't come up. Care to describe how that happens?
Then how in the Sam FUCK did Everyone GET COVID during the same period?
Is that suppose to be a serious question? Or are we having a zoom zoom brain fart again?
When the annual flu strains (it's just not one) arrived last Oct-Nov, what percent of the population already had immunity to those strains? Answer: The percent of the population which had previously seen all but the latest of the flu strains, in a past epidemic, and still had immunity to them. Or possible partial immunity to the latest strain.
When the Covid epidemic started in earnest during April 2020, what percent of the population already had immunity to Covid? Answer: 0%. Why? Because ...duh... the Covid-19 strain had never been seen by the human immune system before.
Was there a State wide mask mandate for Covid when it was starting to spread in Feb? Wasn't you cult hero tRUMP trying to make fun of those wearing masks? Some States didn't enact mask mandates till end of Jun. Months where the Covid virus could freely circulate. When flu arrived in Oct, State wide mask mandates were in effect. The little flu bug never got started well. Instead of the flu being transmitted with every sneeze, there was a wad of snot in the mask.
As for your Mahler ecstasy, probably no one on this forum ever told you, it was impossible for a vaccinated person to come down with a (mild) infection of Covid. But rather you created it out of thin air.
Are we getting an update next week? We are due.
Normally when the PPS continues to slip, Kenny comes out with some repetitive BS pump. But will he instead just let things ride till the 16-Jun SH meeting? The bat chit, and moon pie Kenny PR pumps are already mapped out in the
Proxy
Everything from a R/S to be followed by more stock dilution, to pretending about a mythical uplisting to the Nasdaq. So exciting! LOL
If I were vaccinated, I'd hate to hear from people that have concerns regarding the long term effects.
If one was considering being vaccinated, and prone to fear, then one should educate themselves, and find out there are no long term concerns.
I like the new plant based covid19 vaccine that is being worked on instead of all the harsh chemicals
Although the Medicago vaccine is interesting, along with the Novavax using an insect cell line, there are no harsh chemicals in the mRNA vaccines. Certainly no more harsh than the vaccine adjuvants the protein vaccines will use.
Here's a listing of
Vaccine ingredients
Some of the lipids can cause part of the inflammation at the injection site. And when the small amount of nano-Lipids finds its way to the liver, after mRNA delivery, it's easily degraded by the liver.
I won't not because I am anti-vax, I simply know that I have no need for it when I can use hydroxy or ivermectin and prefer to develop my own immunity.
GL on that approach due to many reasons...
Neither does the idea Ivermectin is protecting me, therefore it's allowing me to develop "my own immunity" have any validity. First, if Ivermectin was protecting you, wiping out Covid, then your immune system wouldn't recognize it was infected, and mount an immune response. Then again, there's no evidence Ivermectin has any efficacy against Covid.
JAMA
The only reason, you have not come down with Covid is because you have not been exposed to it. If you believe otherwise, then get your Dr to order a sero test for Covid Abs. It will come back negative.
The only thing protecting you, has been asymptomatic carriers of Covid being required to wear masks. Preventing them from exhaling aerosols of Covid particles into the air, for you to breath in. Along with the vaccinated wearing masks, where there is currently no evidence the vaccinated can be carriers with detectable virus. Well guess what has happened in the last 24 hrs...
CDC now recommends those vaccinated don't need to wear masks inside/outside. Outside of the kooks who believe the vaccinated are shedding toxic skin cells requiring masks, the rest of the anti-VAX crowd will feel outrage, and prosecution: "Why should only the un-vaccinated have to continue to wear masks indoors!?". The only ones left wearing a mask will be the still frightened immuno compromised (N92 mask please). Where they do have cause to remain frightened. Along with the kiddies.
In another words you are entering a dangerous time. Currently 40% fully immunized. Another 20% with only 1 jab, making them potential short term carriers until their 2nd jab. The kiddie population 12-15 yrs old still wearing masks. The rest unvaccinated not wearing masks free to cough/sneeze/spit/whatever, passing the virus around, and infecting each other. You will no longer have a masked up population for protection against infection.
So do keep taking the "unproven" Ivermectin. And make an effort to go out in public as much as you can. Covid will find you.
BTW - what is the established dose for Ivermectin protecting against Covid infection (even though it can't)? Answer: There is no establish dose. Also, for all of those lab in vitro studies with Ivermectin against Covid, the equivalent mg/kg dose in humans would be toxic. Thus, your Dr gives you a low dose of Ivermectin, and sends you on your way.
I see that you did not find any studies as to adverse side effects from Ivermection
Neither did you provide any links proving efficacy. From controlled clinical trials sanctioned by the FDA.
There is a bright side...
A critical unmet medical need exists-sigh
That's RIght!! Twist that Science BABY!!!
Your beliefs of science are already twisted enough.
Sorry you are wrong-I'm never wrong
when confronting anti-VAX conspiracies.
Don't play God buddy. You don't know the long term effects.
Oh my the admonishment! I'm not your buddy.
Many people have died after getting the vaccine-wrong
There have been no proven deaths traced back to vaccination by the mRNA vaccines. None. A person who has advanced coronary disease, high cholesterol, hypertension, and dies a week after vaccination, didn't die from the vaccine. However, such a person would get an entry into the AVERS database. Any death after a Covid vaccine, no matter the true cause, must be reported.
Really, so the working percentage is LESS than the Virus Survival Rate?
WTF is that suppose to mean? A random brain fart on your part???
Well PMCB is doing this-for future stock dilution
Common ploy for a Microcrap stock. Dilute to billions of shares, R/S, and then dilute back into the billions of shares again.
There is no scientific proof that the vaccine prevents the virus.
Are we living in some anti-VAX fantasy land?
The Pfizer (and Moderna) showed 95% efficacy in preventing disease, and 100% efficacy in preventing severe disease. Never mind the tests which measured resulting high virus neutralizing Ab titers, and T-cell activity. Let's also add on, new cases are now at a yearly low in the US at 30K.
PMCB will be above .002 next week
Probably.
Well, if the long termers took ivermectin they'd have no long term effects.
False statement.
Yesterday it was HCQ that was disproven. Today Ivermectin.
Ivermectin fails
What are the long term effects-none
Again again and again I'll ask: Explain on the molecular level how a mRNA vaccine could possibly have a long term effect?
It's not only the MRNA its your own immune system being affected by the invader
Yes, the immune system reacts to the spike protein from the Moderna mRNA being presented in the MHC-1 of the cell. And the Dendrite cell floating by, that recognizes it as foreign has no ability to know if the spike protein fragment came from a Moderna mRNA vaccine, or from a Corona virus. It merely reacts to it to initiate the acquired immune response. That's the whole idea of a vaccine! It stimulates Ab/T cell production, specific against the antigen detected.
They are not reliable-because?
Why don't you disprove absolutely why no side effects will occur.
Because of the following:
1. In science you can not prove a negative. All research is based on positive, not negative results.
2. Side effects of any vaccine occur in the first 6 months. Not 20 yrs down the line. Name one vaccine with a side effect that never occurred within the first 6 months, but rather occurred 20 yrs after being administered?
3. YOU are the one that claims Covid mRNA vaccines are dangerous.
What permanent changes would the mRNA vaccines make, that show up 20 yrs from now on the cellular level? And what is the molecular basis for claiming it can?
How would you test positive for covid when the covid test wasn't reliable?
Except that the rt-PCR test is extremely reliable. All the way down to 10 copies of virus/ml. Covid infections typically can generate 10,000 viral copies/ml from a nasal swab. More in the sputum and feces.
There is no problem with the rt-PCR tests available.
I checked the JAMA site your listed, and all the studies are outdated from last year. Reported in 2021 but outdated since news trials confirm efficacy of hydroxy.
The conclusion as reported in 2021 are not outdated. The virus or disease pathology has not changed- outside of new more dangerous variants. HCQ still has the same molecular formula.
Same can of worms, same chit different day.
Same conspiracies?
REPORT: Pfizer Vaccine Confirmed-that's a crock
Complete with a bio terror conspiracy embedded in the referenced paper: