Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Thanks
I would prefer to see an announcement on Tuesday, not tomorrow. Lots of people off tomorrow, more eyes on it Tuesday when everyone says "ok, summer is over, now what should we buy?".
Actually, I am not counting on an announcement either day, but if I could choose, I would choose Tuesday over Friday.
Schwab is migrating customers is waves. I received a notice that ToS was coming, but no firm cutover date, just a general "BOLO" indicating the change was forthcoming.
If there is a reverse split it would also include any restricted shares.
I am pretty sure most could trade the Aus exchange but commissions would be higher than for US.
Will IPTK continue to trade at all on any US exchange?
While i hope things ultimately work out for the company, I will probably need to sell and move on. Even if I wanted to, I don' think I am allowed to hold stock in a private company in my IRA.
Thanks. Seems too good to be true unless AESO issues shares to those that owned GOLQ and RCRT.
In a nutshell, what is the connection between RCRT and AESO?
I apologize if the answer has already been posted. TIA.
You can edit your post for 15 minutes. After that, it’s locked.
Old news.
Me too - thanks Potse! keep 'em coming!
Not advocating the setup, but presumably it is to allow the company to appeal to income investors (on the dividend side) and growth investors (on the other side).
I would agree - it is a slow process and MKT Capital/Iljin have little choice but to wait out the strategic review before taking any further action. They understand that a strategic review takes time if it is done thoroughly. Initially they would be looking to identify potentially interested parties, then there would be sharing of detailed data and financials under an NDA, and only after that would one or more parties possibly enter into negotiations. We are still "early days" in this process.
If the review of strategic alternatives concludes "we ain't got none" then PG will be gone. However, I don't think MKT would have pressed for the review or that Iljin would have supported it if they did not believe that there were viable endgame alternatives out there.
Maybe we will get an update on the strategic alternatives process in the earnings call. I doubt it, but we can hope.
You actually have to observe the spelling to determine if it is right...:)
Makes sense.
Either way, I don't think it matters. If you were entitled to 99 more shares, they will eventually show up, even if you sell the original share now. Anything you do now does not impact what your position and entitlement was as of the record date.
That's just silly. VDRM would have to have an actual business going to qualify as part of a sector.
As for InvestosObserver, any rag that would rate VDRM as being in any sector, let alone at the top of it, is immediately suspect.
They probably stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night.,..
In this context, "SS" means "Share Structure" and RM means "Reverse Merger".
Even if a deal was really close, you want a full BOD. They would be wide open for shareholder lawsuits if they had an incomplete board approve a deal.
Wow! ADMG totally ran away from my limit order.
I don't know Jess. I have been called a lot of names in my life, but very few if any were worse than being called a lawyer :)
That would be great.
I am not a lawyer, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night...
You don't just hire an M&A lawyer to finalize the terms and conditions once an offer is received. You hire them to guide you through the process, with two objectives. The first is obvious - negotiate and select the BEST offer (especially if the offers are "different" from each other in some way other than dollars, i.e. partnership vs. buyout vs. sell just the drug). The second is to provide a structured framework for due diligence that if needed can be used to mitigate the inevitable class action claims which will say (regardless of deal terms) that AUPH could/should have done better.
Not necessarily. They may not have an offer in hand, but presumably expect some kind of deal at the end of the strategic review process.
Yeah - i know they have been listening to (for?) offers, but initiating a formal strategic review is different and far more concrete.
I think we have transitioned from "make us an offer we can't refuse" to "make your best offer", which to me is a significant difference. It is very hard for me to believe that a strategic review will conclude that GIA is the best course of action. If it does, I would expect the activist funds to immediately begin the process of removing PG.
I am not really concerned about today's trading or today's close. Yesterday's announcement was STRATEGIC, and it will take time for us to see tangible results. It was a very clear indication that the company is for sale, and the the BOD wants to begin the endgame NOW, both of which are very positive things.
I think that if a deal happens, payout (and the related tax event) will be in 2024.
I too am long, and I hope this finally signals the beginning of the end game. I suspect we are looking at a 3 to 6 month process to identify what the best (available) outcome is, then another 3 to 6 months to close the deal and transfer any monies due AUPH shareholders.
Most shorts are also smart enough to realize that any strategic review (like this one for AUPH) takes time. Retail shorts might panic and bail, but institutional shorts will take time to work their way out of positions.
I may join you tomorrow but for now I am sitting at a lower bid.
sorry - don't do Instagram
No - I put in an order at .0065 when I saw the drop but it had already bounced back.
Maybe the quick reply (pun intended!) indicates that he is not very busy and has nothing better to do than replay to an email from an iHub guy...
I agree - the main thing here is the product validation the sell-to-Pemex JV brings for MVNT. I will look forward to seeing actual sales revenues from this contract.
Pemex is obviously big enough to buy MVNT if it wanted to, but buying up their supply chain is simply not what major oil companies do. They buy the products they need, not the companies that manufacture them,.
True, but that was a quarterly, for which the 10Q deadline is 45 days after quarter end. The deadeline for the annual report filing is 60 days after fiscal year end.