13 million shares sold and pps down 25%.

Mr. Market is telling you not to believe any of the shit that VPLM's minions on social media are trying to sell you.

Plus we all know that no insider sells tens of milions of shares if they honestly believed that waiting a few weeks or months would mean their profits would be multiplied many times.

The VPLM jig is up.

“Real live testing takes time.”

It also takes money, but Leo Ehrlich has given all IPIX’ money away.

Well, apart from his and Redbrick Jane’s excessive salaries and bonuses, of course.

“Barbara and Emil are on a 7 week vacation in Italy!!”

Figures.

I wonder if they plan ever to come back?

(I think there’s an extradition treaty between Italy and the US, but there’s lots of countries nearby that don’t have one.)

I think that deep down we all know that VPLM is simply yet another penny stock scam run (and promoted) by unscrupulous grifters.

The major issue to sort out afterwards will be who were the folks who couldn’t admit to themselves, and more importantly who were the folks that always knew but couldn’t admit to others because it would have blown their cover.

“JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(c), Plaintiff VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. (“VoIP-Pal”) and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) hereby stipulate to dismissal of all claims by VoIP-Pal WITH prejudice and dismissal of all counterclaims by Samsung WITHOUT prejudice as moot, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.”

No wonder Babs is selling shares hand-over-fist every single day.

The wonder is that she’s filing Form 4s. I wonder if all the insiders are filing Form 4s in a timely fashion?

“yesterday's court order at the request of VPLM to strike portions of T-Mobile's expert witness testimony”

That didn’t happen, as has been established on this very message board, and I do wish this gross misinformation was no longer disseminated.

VPLM’s lawyers drafted a motion that they would like the judge to sign. He hasn’t.

End of story.

“It looks like Leo intends to be here for awhile”

I’m sure that’s what Leo would like his victims to think, but if that were the case he wouldn’t have shuttered IPIX’ development programs and gifted the majority of shareholders’ cash to his Israeli chums leaving only enough for his and Redbrick Jane’s generous remuneration packages for another year or so.

No, he’s feathering his nest before he ditches his poor marks for once and for all.

“A billion dollar market cap for a multi-national company in the AI and supply chain space isn't crazy.”

Maybe so, but UAMM isn’t one of those companies.

In reality UAMM is a long-standing festering suppurating sore on the already mangy scab of the OTC penny stock scam market.

And to add insult to injury, it’s run by French Canadian mafiosi.

Another lie:

“Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc. (IPIX) is a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company developing a portfolio of innovative therapies addressing multiple areas of unmet medical need, including inflammatory diseases, cancer, and infectious diseases”

IPIX isn’t developing anything.

They gave the majority of shareholders’ funds to Leo’s Israeli buddies.

The rest is dedicated to Leo and Redbrick Jane’s generous remuneration and travel expenses (Tel Aviv First Class return air fares aren’t cheap).

I see Leo is still lying through his teeth about the outcome of the COVID-19 trial:

“Brilacidin has also been evaluated in Phase 2 testing in moderate-to-severe hospitalized cases of COVID-19 (by intravenous delivery), with beneficial treatment effects observed in patient subgroups”

That’s the exact opposite of the truth, of course.

I wonder what else he’s lying about?

Perhaps a shorter list would be things that Leo Ehrlich is telling the truth about.

“WOW!!! ANOTHER BIG WIN FOR HUDNELL!!!”

No, it really isn’t. Read the reply from Sou - at this stage it’s merely wishful thinking that unfortunately has been misrepresented as a VPLM victory when in fact no decision has been made.

And non-reporting of insider transactions involving hundreds of millions of shares over many years is actually a serious offense even if VPLM’s avid defenders claim otherwise.

The interesting question is why Babs has decided to ‘fess up after all these years?

Wells Letter? Plea bargain? It certainly wasn’t the pangs of a guilty conscience.

Do you mean that contrary to the impression given, in reality VPLM’s motion in this case has not yet been granted and indeed may never be?

I wonder why anyone would pretend differently?

That’s pretty spectacular law/breaking right there:

2023-06-20 2023-06-16 4 Baggio Barbara vplm COMMON S - Sale D 0.0789 -90,000 -7 181,742,342
2023-06-20 2023-06-16 4 Baggio Barbara vplm COMMON S - Sale D 0.0783 -109,477 -9 181,832,342
2023-06-20 2023-06-16 4 Baggio Barbara vplm COMMON S - Sale D 0.0767 -120,000 -9 181,941,819
2023-06-20 2023-06-15 4 Baggio Barbara vplm COMMON S - Sale D 0.0785 -100,000 -8 182,061,819
2023-06-20 2023-06-15 4 Baggio Barbara vplm COMMON S - Sale D 0.0770 -250,000 -19 182,161,819
2023-06-20 2023-06-14 4 Baggio Barbara vplm COMMON S - Sale D 0.0764 -100,000 -8 182,411,819
2023-06-20 2023-06-14 4 Baggio Barbara vplm COMMON S - Sale D 0.0774 -150,000 -12 182,511,819
2023-06-20 2023-06-13 4 Baggio Barbara vplm COMMON S - Sale D 0.0780 -150,000 -12 182,661,819
2023-06-20 2023-06-13 4 Baggio Barbara vplm COMMON S - Sale D 0.0760 -150,000 -11 182,811,819
2023-06-20 2023-06-12 4 Baggio Barbara vplm COMMON S - Sale D 0.0784 -200,000 -16 182,961,819
2023-06-20 2023-06-12 4 Baggio Barbara vplm COMMON S - Sale D 0.0800 -250,000 -20 183,161,819
2023-06-12 2023-06-09 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0770 -150,000 -12 183,411,819
2023-06-12 2023-06-09 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0760 -100,000 -8 183,561,819
2023-06-12 2023-06-08 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0750 -180,000 -14 183,661,819
2023-06-12 2023-06-08 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0770 -100,000 -8 183,841,819
2023-06-12 2023-06-07 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0740 -150,000 -11 183,941,819
2023-06-12 2023-06-07 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0750 -200,000 -15 184,091,819
2023-06-12 2023-06-06 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0740 -150,000 -11 184,291,819
2023-06-12 2023-06-06 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0750 -21,950 -2 184,441,819
2023-06-12 2023-06-05 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0750 -178,050 -13 184,463,769
2023-06-05 2023-06-02 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0640 -200,000 -13 184,641,819
2023-06-05 2023-06-02 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0740 -100,000 -7 185,070,275
2023-06-05 2023-06-01 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0700 -228,456 -16 184,841,819
2023-06-05 2023-06-01 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0620 -150,000 -9 185,170,275
2023-06-05 2023-06-01 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0610 -100,000 -6 185,320,275
2023-06-05 2023-06-01 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0630 -70,000 -4 185,420,275
2023-06-05 2023-05-31 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0660 -150,000 -10 185,490,275
2023-06-05 2023-05-31 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0670 -59,701 -4 185,640,275
2023-06-05 2023-05-30 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0740 -35,000 -3 185,699,976
2023-06-05 2023-05-30 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0700 -121,544 -9 185,734,976
2023-05-30 2023-05-26 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0760 -150,000 -11 185,856,520
2023-05-30 2023-05-25 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0650 -200,000 -13 186,006,520
2023-05-30 2023-05-24 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0561 -150,000 -8 186,206,520
2023-05-30 2023-05-24 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0580 -200,000 -12 186,356,520
2023-05-30 2023-05-23 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0620 -200,000 -12 186,556,520
2023-05-30 2023-05-23 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0670 -150,000 -10 186,756,520
2023-05-30 2023-05-19 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0750 -220,000 -16 186,906,520
2023-05-30 2023-05-19 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0800 -286,375 -23 187,126,520
2023-05-22 2020-12-17 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0010 -1,893,917 -2 68,106,083
2023-05-22 2020-12-16 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0110 -700,000 -8 67,406,083
2023-05-22 2020-11-13 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0150 -1,303,886 -20 61,079,878
2023-05-22 2020-11-13 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0140 -1,858,271 -26 62,383,764
2023-05-22 2020-11-13 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0130 -2,294,048 -30 64,242,035
2023-05-22 2020-11-12 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON G - Gift D 0.0010 30,000,000 30 80,984,559
2023-05-22 2020-11-10 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0170 -766,100 -13 60,081,468
2023-05-22 2020-11-10 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0160 -232,310 -4 60,847,568
2023-05-22 2020-11-06 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0190 -2,995,300 -57 5,541,168
2023-05-22 2020-11-06 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0180 -1,545,000 -28 58,536,468
2023-05-22 2020-11-01 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0120 -870,000 -10 66,536,083
2023-05-22 2020-10-15 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0210 -626,570 -13 53,464,668
P

“Does Peru have a flexible enough corollary”

I have literally no idea of what that means. Please could you explain?

TIA!

“B + B = C (BRILACIDIN + BEAMED = CASH $$$$$”

The real equation:

LE + B(DIBR)= -$4m

Where:

LE = Leo Ehrlich
B = his Israeli BeaMed buddies
DIBR = deal in a back room
-$4m = money stolen from IPIX shareholders.

Only one bit of this is possibly true (highlighted). The rest is easily falisfiable garbage:

Huan Nguyen may have polished up the handle on the big front door until he became the ruler of the Queen's Navy, but UAMM is and always will be an obvious scam controlled by Canadian mafiosi.

It sounds a whole lot better, but unfortunately it's a complete misrepresentation of the actual meaning:

LOL.

It's always helpful when an obvious scam like UAMM identifies other companies that clearly need scrutiny.

So who are Pascal Studio, and where is their website?

Maybe it's these people, but the website is deeply uniformative:

https://pascal.studio/

The lack of clarity about the actual people involved in a company is always telling.

"I used 'you're' wrong in a post here. Do I get limited posting privileges now?"

It should be this:

It’ll still be a scam no matter who’s in nominal control.

6.1 million shares dumped so far today.

I wonder how many of those are Babs’ or other insiders?

Recent history tells us that it’s probably most of them.

When penny stock CEO self-enrichment schemes like VPLM fall below 10 cents and begin their inevitable (although often punctuated by brief spikes) decline to the trips, it becomes clearer who among their followers are sheep who have been woefully misled and misdirected by the said CEO, and who are the wolves in sheep's clothing who have actively connived with the CEO to transfer his marks' money to their own pockets while pretending to be among those very marks.

While I already have a pretty good idea who on social media (not iHUb, obvs!) falls into each camp, it will be fascinating to get a more forensic feel for this over the coming months.

In the meantime with abandoned lawsuits (for which VPLM has to pay its own costs) and MegaDilution, it's going to be an interesting rest of 2023.

Zero possibility.

It would be grossly illegal.

Of course they do.

But it's very "preliminary".

LOL.

As someone who can actually read, I deplore the new "post a message" page, with its plethora of images and its absence of actual words.

Ugh.

Oops. Hindenburg thinks TIO is a scam:

“ But next approvals happening in this summer is very possible as Mr. Ehrlich said.”

Depends what you mean for “approvals”.

But FDA clearance for use of this laser in patients with epilepsy is at least three years away, including a several hundred subject “product test” (=clinical trial) and several million dollars cost (even the insurance for such a study will be well North of a million dollars).

Of course, it will never happen.

It’s just another bait and switch.

Blimey.

The development of this system is years further away than we were led to believe originally.

I can see why the BeaMed boys and Leo “tomorrow never comes, unless it’s pay day” Ehrlich are such bosom buddies.

Or partners-in-crime, as they like to “joke”.

“I guess that why some are a Little Irritated....Not making some EZ money Flipping PKTX..”

I think it’s more likely they’re irritated with themselves for falling for this obvious scam.

Ten minutes’ research would have shown them that PKTX is owned and run by Canadian mafiosi, even if latterly they’ve used an American beard to attempt to disguise the truth.

“ her insider trades were not illegal.”

But not reporting them within two days was illegal.