Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
so much is riding on one sentence, and
imo, it has nothing, absolutely nothing, to do w/MM. It sounds like you think MM has credibility, let alone Jay Wright? Judging by the volume, this sentence is the one that needs credibility, IMO.
_______________________
...that will generate sufficient cash by July 1, 2007 to pay the principal and interest owed to Cornell Capital...
wadrium1, maybe, just maybe..., Jay is getting
ready to go bye-bye, maybe he doesn't need to purchase them anymore? I know, yet another conspiracy theory...
Crazylegs-RE: Zigbee patents
MobilePro currently working on the situation.
http://www.wi-fiplanet.com/news/article.php/3338011
Guess joke's on me, eh? Oh well, what
comes around, goes around, literally full circle, lol. Damn man, I was getting my hopes up, all for not!
Actually stockdoc, no I didn't know that,
someone posted that on RB as well. I do know that a "quiet period" refers to time before a company goes public, but don't know of other details involving merger/buyout, seems plausible. "If" there is a big deal coming up, judging by the volume, Jay must be the only one who knows of it, currently. Anything is possible, but on a lighter side, your post was funny, thanks for the response.
Cougar40, you bring up a good point
"Let's give the man the benifit of the doubt that he will come though with a deal that will send MOBL in a positive direction."
His resignation would do wonders for the positive direction of MobilePro, imo.
level, it's been a good flip, imo. em.
sorry about that Cougar/stockdoc, I wasn't
trying to pull a "fast one", I was simply pointing out the timing of last year's CC, and understand I should have made that point a little more clear. Sorry for the confusion, my mistake, and apologies. I goofed!
The point was the timing of last years CC,
following 10KSB. Something I guess I should have explained in great detail, to you.
jmalroy, here is the link to last 10KSB CC,
http://www.hawkassociates.com/moblpr222.aspx
I hope Jay Wright is there to receive the call, I'm going to be asking him about his "other jobs", and how he thinks these "other jobs" benefit the MobilePro SH's. I don't believe he will be acceppting calls, considering last 10QSB CC, courtesy large funds. Large funds was much too nice (lol), another long has given me ammo to support those "stuck", and I savor the moment. This , of course, w/all due respect to large funds.
Bly03, I for one never said TA doesn't
work for penny stocks, I just said it doesn't work for MOBL.
As far as trading strategies, what works for some, doesn't work for others, so I would rather not discuss how I trade, doesn't matter, imo. Look at what MobilePro opened at yesterday AM, and what it went to, and that should explain it all in detail, imo. Good luck to you, my order is for .0315 today, whether it is filled, will remain to be seen, MobilePro could go over .04 today, for all I know, because I don't :).
Thank you for your support slim,
your never ending supply of jay mails and contributions regarding MobilePro is nothing short of overwhelming. Oh, btw, lol.
Regards,
z
slimfastjunkie, the mark my words came
from someone you use to stick up for by the name of "wiseinvestments", notoriously known for a wide array of false/misleading posts, among other things.
I plan on getting back in when it drops back down, perhaps low .03's, or BMiles .027 range, but I'm going to stay quiet regarding that, otherwise he will think I agree w/him on a price target, heaven forbid. If it does drop to low .03's, or lower, I will evaluate my decision before buying, and the actual time frame it takes to get back down there. As past history has indicated w/Jay, nothing may happen in the month of June, so i am not as anxious as other's here currently are. Good luck, and hope your making money here as well!
Z
BMiles, thanks for your note, your chart
reading expertise says it all. I have indicated that this particular stock is very volatile in nature, and extremely difficult to chart, due in large part to the "Cornell" factor, so until they are completely out of the picture, or better yet, "if" they are finally "rid" of, you will have a difficult time charting MobilePro, and I will remind you again soon. Many others have been insistant about charting MobilePro, and then they are suddenly gone, lol.
I do not look at these "membermark" thingys, as you indicate, they must hold something that you desire, and I cannot give you. I guess you can call it "tough luck" on your behalf. Talk MobilePro all you want, as I will to.
I understand crashman, I'm simply pointing out
another's blunder, no personal attacks are needed, and I agree. Posting false/misleading post should be heavily scrutinized, imo, but thank you for the kind note, I will take your advice.
BMiles, your .05 prediction was guided 2 Fridays ago. Are you having trouble remembering what you stated? All the trends pointed towards upward movement, now, all of the sudden, it's downward movement. Can you make up your mind, as you are sounding somewhat silly w/your bogus predictions, as anyone can look at the pps and do what your doing. Hey, at least your providing entertainment, albeit not accurate entertainment!
Posted by: BMiles
In reply to: investology who wrote msg# 9334 Date:5/24/2007 6:34:44 PM
Post #of 9521
Investology, I would agree with you if the candlestick was at the top of the trend but that is not the case thus it is not a hangman. In this scenario, the candle formed on a pull back that did not first search out a new high. The pattern actually created a high wave in which the bears won the battle early in the morning but lost control as the bulls took back control and pushed the share price back up to near the high of the day. This pattern indicates the upward trend is still very well in tact and points towards continuation up tomorrow. All the other oscillators also indicate the up trend is still very well in tact. The MACD shows this is just the beginning with at least 1 – 2 more weeks of upward movement to take place. As I have stated in my previous post today, I expect a close tomorrow at or very near 5 cents.
ROLMFAO!
.0355/.037, most done selling, nobody buying
at .037.
AIMHO
slimfastjunkie, Cornell is NOT out of
the way. Refer to Mainlander's post, there is appr. 11.6MM shares left for conversions, and guess which MM's pushed this up today? Doesn't matter to me, .005 gain for me in three days work!
AIMHO
BMiles, that is all good, fwiw,
but you have never seem to factor Cornell Capital into the equation since you have "appeared". Yes, now .027 is safe, yet .05 last week. Please explain how you went from .05 to .027, if capable...
Well BMiles, around May 24th, you were looking
at .05, the very next day, and you weren't even close (under .04 qualifies). Now, (2) weeks later, your calling for almost two (2) times under that pps. LOL, anyone can do that, your charting disability is obvious.
AIMHO
OT: BMiles, where did the pump go?
Guess you went on vacation, eh? Please inform me where you chart goes next, or what level, I'm all PC..
Lihkauai2004, When reading what can be a
lenghty SEC filing(s), these "foward looking statements", (see below), are always contained in the filings, to cover there azzes, and just my opinion. I do not think legal proceedings could be justified, under these circumstances. Mainlander made a simple point, though, about a Jay-mail, to me regarding "current scrutiny of Cornell", if you recall, and why, if the SEC had current scrutiny of Cornell, were the SH's not disclosed of this situation, only Jay? I wasn't smart enough to realize it at the time, but Mainlander made a very good point about such wishy-washy emails from J.
AIMHO
GLTY-ZZ
Forward Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The statements contained in this document that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including without limitation statements regarding our expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding our business, and the level of our expenditures and savings for various expense items and our liquidity in future periods. We may identify these statements by the use of words such as "anticipate," "believe," "continue," "could," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "might," "plan," "potential," "predict," "project," "should," "will," "would" and other similar expressions. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to us on the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements, except as may otherwise be required by law. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.
stockdoc68, regarding Jay's contract, he is
under contract until December 31st, 2007, unless he opts out earlier.
the good ol' shakeout lingo, eh? I put an .033
order in this AM, left, came back just a little while ago, and order filled. This stock too volatile to chart, imo, but have your say w/the shakeout stuff, I'm currently green!
lemonhead1de, there should be no need to guess,
simply look to the last 10QSB for the answer. Better yet, I'll provide it for you.
http://biz.yahoo.com/e/070209/mobl.ob10-q.html
As you know, typically the winter months for one of Moblepro's largest revenue streams is slow. Let me know what you think, I'm all ears...
Thank you.
Cougar40, your posting to a new breed here, imo.
They do not care what you bought it for, there here to pump and make money, it's all chart talk, and no solid DD. MobilePro is currently not close to $100MM annually, just look at the filings.
AIMHO
Z
Hey BMiles, if you don't mind me asking,
what happened to your +.05 target last week?
LOL
OT: investology, fwiw, no one is currently
working in the office, and Jay confirmed that info. in an email to me as well. Calls are being fowarded to Kite in Ridgeland(?), although all I have been getting is an automated machine. Rumor has it there are two desk sitting in the office and Jay at one time had a secretary there taking calls, but I cannot confirm that.
Good luck, and take care.
Z
OT:investology, whatever you do, don't call
MOBL's corporate office.
investology, check out last line of Jay's
reply to me and see what you think regarding termination of SEDA, last year. To me, and just my opinion, he failed to "keep executing", is this how you would see it as well?
_____________
John:
Thanks for your note.
Our $15 million debt with Cornell is and has been public
record. I am mystified as to why some shareholders believe
that being able to pay the note only in cash is superior to
being able to pay for it in either cash or stock at the
Company's option.
I am also mystified as to why a note due in September is
riskier than one due in August.
I am also mystified as to why a note that was not callable
is deemed superior to one that is callable.
Bottom line, whether you and other shareholders understand
it, this restructuring is good for the financial health of
the company. Given your reaction, I expect it will have a
short term negative on the stock price. With us not
issuing any shares right now, that is something we will
just have to bear.
If we keep executing, the price will rebound. Of that I
have every confidence.
Sincerely,
Jay Wright
Chairman and CEO
Mobilepro Corp.
On Sun, 9 Jul 2006 11:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
<zgoldies2@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Jay,
> I guess I should have formatted my question to you in a
> different manner, as you elusively replied that you can't
> draw on the SEDA, past May 19th, as it expired. It
> doesn't mean your relationship w/Cornell expired. I guess
> CEO's sometimes know how to put the comforters on the
> bed, w/o the sheets underneath them. Very elusive answer,
> and quite disappointing to see this company continually
> be diluted. I'm sure you won't reply, as there is no
> possible way to sugar-coat what is transpiring w/this
> company. It's no wonder you are not able to entice new
> investors, seeing is believing, and they haven't seen
> anything but negatives concerning MobilePro. I've started
> putting my sell orders in at the .15 range, as many other
> long-term shareholders are doing as well. The ship
> appears to be sinking, and the CC did nothing to upright
> it.
> Good luck, your going to need it.
investology, according to Jay, it is the SEC's fault, lol. He is very good at pointing the blame elsewhere, guess that is the lawyer coming out in him. Check out his other reply following the STI dividend reply regarding loaning WNED money at bottom.
STI shares have still not (thanks to the SEC) become
available for MOBL to distribute to our stockholders.
Progames deal is being held up by the SEC as Winning Edge
has to clear comments on its 14C.
__________________________
> ----- Forwarded Message ----
> <zgoldies2@sbcglobal.net>
> To: Jay Wright <jwright22@closecall.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 10:30:02 AM
> Subject: STI dividend
>
> Jay,
> Why did the MobilePro SH's never receive an STI dividend
> that was promised to them? Why did this topic seemingly
> get "swept under the rug"? Also, wasn't the ProGames
> merger supposed to transpire by the end of April, or is
> this simply something that will drag out over the course
> of time before it actually happens? Thank you for your
> time, Jay.
__________________
I have invested over $100,000 into Mobilepro common stock
through open market purchases. That common stock generates
0% interest and no warrants.
Are you interested in loaning money to WNED?
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
<zgoldies2@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Jay,
> Many MobilePro SH's have seen that you have loaned WNED
> $30k. Looks like you set yourself up w/a nice intetrest
> payment and stock options. It is nice to see you help
> other companies out, but why are you not doing this
> w/MobilePro?
On one other note, investology, many current SH's believe Jay may out the door by July, if that does indeed happen, it may be too late, but that is just an opinion, as you know.
Z
This is an extremely volatile stock, imo,
and TA does not apply here, nearly impossible, as evident by past posters blunders, and as I have stated before.
AIMHO
Yes , it is funny, isn't it? eom.
Good job WNEDer's, no merger between ProGames
and WNED, consider yourself lucky!
DesertSon, disregard my last post, there
will be no merger between ProGames and WNED, my apologies.
Z
STI shares have still not (thanks to the SEC) become
available for MOBL to distribute to our stockholders.
Progames deal is being held up by the SEC as Winning Edge
has to clear comments on its 14C.
On Thu, 3 May 2007 19:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
<zgoldies2@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> ----- Forwarded Message ----
> From:<zgoldies2@sbcglobal.net>
> To: Jay Wright <jwright22@closecall.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 4:22:10 PM
> Subject: Fw: STI dividend
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Forwarded Message ----
> From:<zgoldies2@sbcglobal.net>
> To: Jay Wright <jwright22@closecall.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 10:30:02 AM
> Subject: STI dividend
>
>
> Jay,
> Why did the MobilePro SH's never receive an STI dividend
> that was promised to them? Why did this topic seemingly
> get "swept under the rug"? Also, wasn't the ProGames
> merger supposed to transpire by the end of April, or is
> this simply something that will drag out over the course
> of time before it actually happens? Thank you for your
> time, Jay.
>
___________
PS- there's a reason to foward a message previously sent, fwiw,
no matter how many times
crashman, this is exactly why Earthlinks
misfortunes are a negative to MobilePro, as I tried to point out. Do you think it is OK that it will take at least 3 more years before Tempe breaks even? Good luck to you, whether you like it or not.
_____________
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/070521/municipal_wireless_woes.html?.v=8
DesertSon, no, I don't know everything, just
look back to last week when the 8-k came out, I said it would drop 10-15%, and it did the exact opposite. I also had said the day previously that MOBL would need an 8-K to ammend (delay) payments to Cornell, as they (MOBL) were close to being out of shares, and they did.
Regarding ProGames merger, I, like you, wanted to know the answer to that question, so I took the time to email the CEO of MobilePro, although not entirely reliable, it is better than most opinions here. If you have seen this before, my most humble apologies.
________________
STI shares have still not (thanks to the SEC) become
available for MOBL to distribute to our stockholders.
Progames deal is being held up by the SEC as Winning Edge
has to clear comments on its 14C.
On Thu, 3 May 2007 19:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
<zgoldies2@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> ----- Forwarded Message ----
> From: <zgoldies2@sbcglobal.net>
> To: Jay Wright <jwright22@closecall.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 4:22:10 PM
croinvest, yes I do have a good idea,
and Jay has told another SH that they are unable to meet current payroll. An origination fee has already been deducted, MobilePro has the availability to use an additional +$1MM in funds to meet payroll obligations, get your facts straight!
croinvest, no, this is my post from RB,
put some rose colored glasses on when you read it, lol.
__________________
Re: Articles: Good read (Not rated) 20-May-07 10:51 pm Does any one recall last year when ELNK mentioned in one of their CA city deployments about their expectations of about 18-months to a two year time frame for breakeven / profitability? Now that they're having problems with lack of subscribers and/or the structure of their present/past business model, they realize how far they were off the mark. According to that article, they have now changed those earlier predictions to 5-years to break-even, and 7-years to profitability. As one can see, Jay was NOT the only one way off the mark with his early profitability call of spring/summer 2007... It would be interesting to know how well Metro-Fi is doing with their free Model plan to attain breakeven/profitability, and the financing arrangement/terms with those two Venture Capital investors.
dinito1