Lihkauai2004, When reading what can be a
lenghty SEC filing(s), these "foward looking statements", (see below), are always contained in the filings, to cover there azzes, and just my opinion. I do not think legal proceedings could be justified, under these circumstances. Mainlander made a simple point, though, about a Jay-mail, to me regarding "current scrutiny of Cornell", if you recall, and why, if the SEC had current scrutiny of Cornell, were the SH's not disclosed of this situation, only Jay? I wasn't smart enough to realize it at the time, but Mainlander made a very good point about such wishy-washy emails from J.
AIMHO
GLTY-ZZ
Forward Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The statements contained in this document that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including without limitation statements regarding our expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding our business, and the level of our expenditures and savings for various expense items and our liquidity in future periods. We may identify these statements by the use of words such as "anticipate," "believe," "continue," "could," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "might," "plan," "potential," "predict," "project," "should," "will," "would" and other similar expressions. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to us on the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements, except as may otherwise be required by law. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.
AI
