I refer you to post 274514 for my final comment on this subject.

Please, do your own DD and stop casting FUD.

If you bothered to make some more phone calls and look around at the clear impacts of the lawsuit you would know that especially that particular PR is reliable.

However, you seem to be steering off of the rational end of things again...

In this case, SLJB IR is far more reliable than most of what you'll find posted on this message board. That's really all I said and that's all the more I'll discuss this topic.

Read the PR's, call the company, research the TA, research the sector and do your own DD.

You can not rely on information posted by most of the people on this board.

Again, do your own research and make your own decisions.

G-25

www.acronymfinder.com

might help

Wow, I never thought of it that way. Dilluting is awesome!

If they can continue increasing revenues they just might overcome their business expenses. I think that's what is holding the PPS back right now.

They are losing money according to their posted financials. Is that why the PPS doesn't move? Maybe I missed something:

http://biz.yahoo.com/e/070521/nawl.ob10qsb.html

Anyone comments are appreciated,

G-25

ALL In My Opinion As Always:

You were too impatient and sold too early. You went with the mainstream and paid the price. Had you and others held the PPS would be fine.

Your loss, other's gain. Soon to be validated by AF's.

Sorry for your loss and your wasted interest in invalid law suits.

GLTU

G-25

They aren't making money according to the financials so that's a turn off as far as I know. I first looked at this when it was around .30. I'm just making a first glance here. Considering jumping in since it's near a low. Any advice that includes verifiable info, links or w/e else is appreciated.

Someone posted a quote from AB or some message board that basically made the message board info look useless. I think that may have been forced on that message board by legal pressure. It was something I skimmed over so I don't recall it very well.

Not really something I'm concerned with, really. I just want to see AF's, OSC resolution and champagne.

Since the price is well under .008 the shorters should have no problem covering. Errr... Right?

My last post.. I'm getting tired and this is magic number 15.

Todd, I'm just interested as to what your opinion is about the share structure and the fact that SLJB only "officially" holds %18 in the treasury at this time...

How much controlling interest do companies usually have? I haven't trained my self to remember and compare AS vs OS of companies that I look at... maybe I'll start doing that.

Todd, from looking at your posts I respect you as someone that knows more about these things than I do. I expect a long post from you on this! lol

Just let it fly man... what is your opinion of SLJB's operations, management, sharestructure management, etc!!!

Uhh, relax? $3K is not that much money. I never said, "OH MY GOODNESS LOOK AT THE HEIST@!!!!"

What's interesting is the correlation between two similarly promoted stocks and the audience watching those stocks.

Take a chill pill and have a little respect, IMO.

Okay, in one quarter they spent $467K to sell their products and had a gross profit of $87K... Looking at their financials they've posted they are losing money:

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=nawl.ob

I guess the hope is that their increased revenues continue. and somehow offset their expenses...

When does the imminent buy in occur and how significant is the "naked" short position? I've been trying to get info but so far this all seems so mysterious. Huge volume recently... like 1/5th the float traded??? And the price

Thank you.

It would seem June was bearish as far as short interest went. SLJB's short interest grew by a factor of nearly %400. What's wierd is that another stock touted on these boards also saw a significant leap in short interest to the tune of %2400.

What's even more interesting is that the money thrown into the short position were similar amounts... roughly $3K...

http://www.shortsqueeze.com/index.php?symbol=pdgt

/key X-Files music

I'm interested in rational discussion with information that actually makes sense. I've never seen one thing from you that contained substantial reason to believe you. I certainly trust the word of SLJB IR, the Windsor Star, and actual investors that have visited and called SLJB in person over yours: a draconian message board personality.

This is my last response to you for a while. I really am sick of reading what you post and I wish moderators would do something about you.

Good luck to you.

G-25

You missed my signaure, for one. What's the point with going any further with you?

SLJB = Big in July. Wait and see...

The true criminals, in my opinion, are the people bashing this stock without knowing the whole story. Those short term investors that sold without knowing the whole story are just fairweather fans not worthy of being a part of the SLJB history.

SLJB will be just fine. Everyone knows that July will provide a seasonal turnaround and everyone is just trying to time an entry point.

Don't miss the train folks... and hopefully some of you will hold for longer than six months this time.

I'm holding for at least another year.

GLTA

G-25

I'm not sure how significant the answer to your question will be. From what I see below it's interesting that for the period ending in June there was a raise percieved short value by a factor of more than 24 (%2420). That equates to nearly 1M shares shorted which at current PPS is equal to $3000.

You know, this is looking like a bizaare trend... I just looked at SLJB's short interest and it is also right at $3K for the period ending in June.

Anyways...

When: .2 days (ratio) according to the following:


http://www.shortsqueeze.com/index.php?symbol=pdgt

Stock Symbol:

PDGT $ 0.00
Paradigm Tactical Products Inc. 0.00
Shares Short 973,000
Days to Cover (Short Ratio) 0.2
Short % of Float %
Shares Short - Prior 38,600
Short % Increase / Decrease 2420.73 %
Squeeze Ranking™
% from 52-Wk HIGH ( 0.02 ) -566.67 %
% from 52-Wk LOW ( 0.00 ) 100.00 %
% from 200-Day MA ( 0.00 ) 100.00 %
% from 50-Day MA ( 0.01 )
-233.33 %
Price % Change (52-Wk) -67.80 %
Trading Volume - Today 2,494,290
Trading Volume - Average 6,254,000
Trading Volume Vs. Avg. 39.88 %
Total Shares - Float
Total Shares - Outstanding
% Held by Insiders %
% Held by Institutions %
Market Cap
EPS
PE Ratio
Sector:
Industry:
SI Record Date 2007-Jun


Information Provided Without Warranty

BusinessWeek article as of 1 July, 2007 shows one replacement of Turner stone by another auditor and two hirings of Turner Stone:

http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=2382626

Key developments
Moliris Corp. Replaces Turner Stone & Company, LLP with Killman, Murrell & Company, P.C as Auditors
09/28/2005
Moliris Corp. announced that effective June 27, 2005, dismissed Turner Stone & Co. as certifying accountants. On June 17, 2005, the company engaged Killman, Murrell & Company, P.C. as its new independent accountant. The Board of Directors has approved this action.

Regent Technologies Inc. Engages Turner Stone & Co. Replacing Salmon Beach & Company P.C. as its Independent Auditor
08/19/2005
Regent Technologies Inc. announced that effective August 8, 2005, Turner Stone & Co. LLP was engaged as the independent certified public accountant of the company as its principal independent auditor to audit the financial statements of the Company for the years ending December 31, 1999 through December 31 2004, and simultaneously the Company dismissed Salmon, Beach & Company, P.C.

Universal Fog Inc. Appoints Turner Stone & Co. and Dismisses Gately & Associates as Independent Certified Public Accountant
08/18/2005
Effective June 10, 2005 Turner Stone & Co. was employed as the independent certified public accountant of Universal Fog Inc. This action was taken upon the recommendation of the Company's Audit Committee and approval of the Company's Board of Directors. Concurrently, Gately & Associates was dismissed by the Company. Gately audited the Company's financial statements for the fiscal year ended October 31,2004 and performed a review of the unaudited financial statements for the fiscal quarters ended January 31, 2005 and April 30, 2005.

Yeah and the naked short position is always just a huge QUESTION MARK.

MM's are MM's and they'll set the price based on a number of factors: News, perceived demand, expressed investor sentiment...

One thing about seeing short numbers is it gives you a feel for what other investors are thinking. In otherwords, there is a 380% increase in folks who believed that the PPS would decrease over a certain period of time... Namely through June.

I think the short interest during July will be MUCH lower. I would not want to be shorting this stock in July.

all my opinion.

G-25

Then again that is roughly 230k or whatever of guarunteed volume at whatever the cover price is.

Should be interesting for SLJB if there is ever any action against naked shorting if it spans back to the LFWK days.

Jake, did you post the following at "the treehouse" and is it true?

Yesterday at 2:39pm, jake8812 wrote:

JUST SPOKE TO LESLIE: She wanted me to relay this to everyone:

That we are only closing the harrow location approx. 8 employees have decided to move to Alberta - some are going to the drywall office - we have put the people up in living areas - Ron and Mian will be in alberta again on Tuesday - yes that is the building that everyone saw on the internet - and no I will not disclose who we leased it by because it only causes problems that I nor anyone else needs right now. No I did not want to talk to Gary Rennee from the windsor star, when he puts something positive out there about maybe like give us a chance to build Alberta company up or like good luck - then I will talk to him until then he will have to wait for a day in court.

ErnestDD,

You asked why SLJB is closing the Harrow operation when their net rev percentages "might" be higher than HD's. First of all, a percentage is just that... it's a percentage. It doesn't determine business closures or business realignments.

Finally, the closure was done to consolidate business operations and expand into a better market. I know you read these boards and I believe that you already know this. In fact, at this point I believe it's pretty much common knowledge even to newer folks to the board that may not own shares of SLJB.

SLJB is expanding and consolidating. Smart business moves folks. Investing here is Good For Your Money (GFYM) if you are a serious investor.

No flippers needed but you are welcome of course. Wanted: more SLJB longs but that will come with time. No worries, mate,

GLTA

I believe HD is mainstream and SLJB has the inside track to better deals than HD could ever hope for.

I believe SLJB's profit margin will surpass HD's in some departments but may be less in others. One department I believe SLJB's margin will be lower is that of Cement brokering... but then again I'm not so sure that HD really "brokers" cement.

On another note, I'm pretty sure that net revenue percentage may be inversley proportional to gross revenues in most models. however, when you are getting the the big gross of HD it's okay for your net to be 6%. I believe smaller businesses usually have higher nets.

G-25

And yeah GFYM = Good For Your Money. Sulja longs know that...

I totally agree with your post, Jake. Good news is coming for SLJB!

It's highly unlikely we see too many more extensions... MAYBE one more but I just can't see it going beyond that... In my opinion.

Jake, in your opinion, Why do you think extension will go through summer? What is significant about summer?

Dude,you can't have my SLJB shares.

I agree and I'm looking forward to July for SLJB.

Like I said, "dozens" is a figure from is independent DD that seems to be supported by 1. SLJB and 2. The Windsor Star.

I agree, I'd like to see some movement with that. but until we do it's just wishful thinking... I mean, as far as I know. How is it evident to you? Share counting for the day?

SLJB IR is telling people that 8 employees have decided to move to the new SLJB Alberta location and that they have been put up in living areas. They also said that some key business affiliates will visit the new location on Tuesday. Not sure what the purpose of the visit is on Tuesday. I expect grand opening by end of July but that's my opinion.

They employ dozens according to independent DD as well as the Windsor star. Also, when I say "key staff" I'm talking about people in overhead staff positions. The "key staff" is just my opinion... I wouldn't consider them "employees" but more like owners. However, the 8 employee comment is reported from SLJB IR. No matter how you slice it SLJB will have a significant presence in Alberta.

I never said the "majority" and you calling my DD "laughable" IS A PERSONAL ATTACK. What I said is what I've been told from SLJB IR: 8 Harrow personnel moving to Alberta with pre-arranged living quarters!

What's the deal here? Bashers get free reign to attack people now? You can disagree with my opinion all you want... Just please STOP ATTACKING MY OPINION. Instead of attacking me just make your opinion known. Here's how you could have been tactful and non-attacking, "I disagree Grande, I don't THINK that 8 people from Harrow will move to Alberta... but hey, that's my opinion."

To much to ask?

Please and thank you:

"It's laughable for you to even suggest it."

Glad to hear it and me too.

July should be an interesting month, eh?

230K shares... that's roughly $3K? The 300% increase catches the eye but the big picture of $3K isn't really exciting.

I'm going to turn off my internet until the end of July. By then SLJB should be fully opened in Calgary and hopefully some AF's will be out.

GLTA