is...Gone. Didn't like the new changes.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
LOL. I suspect as time goes on and the stock doesn't do what it's supposed to, the clown posts will become even more absurd.
Any thoughts on the numbers over the years?
No, I really don't see any correlation between the two totals.
I don't know about you, but I'm never prepared to do that.
I imagine they're upset because people aren't buying and holding like they're telling them to.
The financials submitted to Finra that is posted on OTCMARKET must be correct. Is that a true statement?
No, it's not a true statement. They simply post their financials on OTCMarkerts, they don't submit them to FINRA.
If not it's that illegal for their account firm listed and PYCT.
You'll notice that the accounting firm isn't the one signing off on the financial statements, it's Pete.
LOLOL!!! Joe Canouse is here!
Mhmm. I figured he wasn't posting here a month or two ago just for the hell of it.
CEO Paul Norat has been working diligently for quite some time now to bring shareholder value to this stock.
Then I'd have to say that he has failed miserably so far.
perhaps after a Dos Equis?
LOL. Indeed. Funny isn't it how sociopaths can't help but to revisit the scene of their crimes.
Carter is in Ibiza with Muller
Are Michael Davies and Derald Johnston there with him?
What! how do you expect any company to sell 22 bil shares as a scam..
CMKX sold over 700 billion shares and it was blatant scam.
you have nothing to lose
Have you ever heard of Opportunity Cost?
Old Raptor was a little slow in creating that. It's my guess he's gonna try to add identity theft to his list of accomplishments.
I'm sure Carlos Fuente, Jr. and the boys don't need Franks help getting cigars into China, since they're already there.
I was never dumb enough to be burned by Frank. I just don't care much for thieves or their supporters. I'm fully aware that the biggest scams are sometimes the best runners, I just refuse to take part in them. I don't need the money that bad.
You don't care at all about the CEO's history? If not, you should.
Try doing about 5 minutes of DD on CAGR.
Where do you see this?
Apparently anyone who predicts the outcome of what will happen to a Lumb stock is in on the heist. Even though someone with a grade school education can plainly see that Lumb does the same thing over and over and over with every company he's involved with.
The hallmark of all successful businessmen is to not let past failures prevent future success.
Frank didn't fail in the past, he ripped the supplier off just like he intended to.
Buy first, do your DD later.
That seems to be a common theme.
I can't believe he's starting the whole "getting paid" thing again. Why the hell would you do that unless you're just one big attention whore?
Frank has at the very least proven his ability to leap over some very impressive hurdles in order to do meaningful business.
He did with the wine business too and we can all see where that ended up.
Maybe it bothered people that the new superman hired by the thief isn't mentioned anywhere on the internet, despite doing wonderful things for all those big companies.
And yet an internet search turns up nothing on this guy. How odd.
New day. New company. New opportunity.
You're right. Frank has a new opportunity to rip people off. Lets celebrate.
Looks like the little I-hub pump is running out of steam. What a surprise.
Yeah, I don't know. My view of this company is a little different than everyone else's. To me it seems like this is just a back burner project for those in charge and they just never seem to find the time to get around to doing anything with it. I do know one thing, even if they manage to produce the pads, without some decent advertising not many people are going to know about them.
It may have been someone with a Schwab account that placed two separate orders for their million shares.
I see old Frank managed to rope a few in today. If only P.T. Barnum knew how many times he'd be right after he was gone. I'm sure even he would be amazed.
This seems to be a repeat of SRGE, except on a larger scale, money wise. I wonder when we'll get a report that Adam Carter was found floating in a river in Mexico?
Even OTC broker/dealers.
??? The broker/dealers that handle otc stocks also handle exchange traded stocks. Every sanction that I've ever read had to do with miss reporting shorts in exchange traded stocks, not OTC's. But feel free to educate me and list a few of those sanctions that had to do with OTC stocks.
I've seen plenty of fines brought against broker/dealers for them miss reporting short positions
Not for OTC stocks you haven't.
is to assume that those that report the # to FINRA are not cooking the books.
In case you didn't realize it, it isn't the shorters who reports FTD's to FINRA, it's those who buy shares and don't receive them.
Why would anybody claim everything and everyone in pinkyland is a scammer but those that report short #'s to FINRA - seems odd.
Um, maybe because all the SEC complaints and court cases dealing with OTC stocks have to do with crooked penny stock operators and promoters?
Like I said, not hard to tell if they violate the provision as FTD's start popping up in volume. At that point they'd receive no more shares from the company.
Can anyone possibly be that clueless?
I've gotta answer, yes. For whatever reason, penny stocks seem to attract every moron investor in the known world. And actually, there are so many of them I'm starting to believe there may be another planet out there somewhere in space that's filled with them.
You said they don't usually audit to save money.
I implied that that is the excuse they use for going dark. Non SEC reporting OTC's are not required by law to be GAAP compliant. I'm assuming that website was talking about companies that trade on exchanges, which OTC's do not.
However, Shorting against stock that is owned is a common practice in pinkyland.
Shorting against the box used to be commonplace, not so much anymore though. Most companies caught on to it and put anti-shorting provisions in the convertible debt deals they draw up. And it's not hard to hard for them to see if the deal is being broken when significant FTD's start popping up. And once again, no one was caught off guard since the divvy was announced well in advance. I think shareholders may be caught off guard though. There's some pretty good circumstantial evidence that points to the fact that the same group of fraudsters that were behind SRGE are behind this caper as well. Except this time they just didn't settle for ripping off shareholders, they decided to go a little bigger in their heist. Like Sunspotter said, this has Alex Smid stink all over it.
What they may or may not do doesn't have much with the post I addressed, which was implying that all public companies had to be audited in one fashion or another.
There is no reason not to conclude that
There's an even better reason to conclude it didn't if one reads the complaint. But lets not let facts interfere with a good short conspiracy theory that'll be shot in the ass before long.