Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Quantum Dots Rumored for iPhone 6 Display
These are the reasons it may be a good possibility:
Quantum Materials Corp's Giant Tetrapod Quantum Dots (GTQD's) are:
[1] 10 to 100X brighter & remain
[2] highly stable (luminescent & non-blinking) for much longer (comparative) metrics (if not indefinitely) at a
[3] higher light output with less heat generation , which
[4] extends product service life. QMC has effectively mitigated the troubling
[5] 'aggregation' problem all other QDot manufacturers have stumbled-on (as Steve basically mapped-out in his LinkedIn comment today). For most intents & purposes, our giant thick-shelled CdSe TQD's could be considered
[6] non-toxic (below ROHS levels) due to having a far lower CdSe (heavy metals) content and needing less with better results while being
[7] heavily encased within the durable 6 to 19-layer thick,
[8] selectivity/uniformity enhanced end-product nano-particle shell....all of which takes place in the
[9] low-cost
[10] automated micro-reactor process on
[11] an industrial scale , which FlowId has already expeditiously adapted to our
[12] newly acquired GTQD tech. And as an added bonus , these GTQD's are able to be made
[13] application-specific & the higher stability allows for a
[14] greater 'on' time , which results in a much higher number of
[15] MEG (multiple exciton generation) reactions , particularly when
[16] interspersed onto sheets of graphene... MEG; the holy grail of renewable energy...producing more energy than is being taken in.
[17] overcoming the 'photobleaching' effect
[18] overcoming the Stokes Shift limitations
[19] overcoming the auger recombination effect
[20] customized arm lengths for specific apps
[21] customized arm chemistry for electro & pharma-chemical reactive apps
[22] multiple arms for a far greater series of effects & apps than spherical QD's
By my count, that makes 22 unique & formidable characteristics/attributes that put QMC GTQD's head-&-shoulders above the competition. The question you need to ask yourself is, Why am I not investing in this .06 cents company Quantum Materials Corp.? OTCQB ticker: QTMM
Quantum Dots Rumored for iPhone 6 Diaplay
These are the reasons it may be a good possibility:
Quantum Materials Corp's Giant Tetrapod Quantum Dots (GTQD's) are:
[1] 10 to 100X brighter & remain
[2] highly stable (luminescent & non-blinking) for much longer (comparative) metrics (if not indefinitely) at a
[3] higher light output with less heat generation , which
[4] extends product service life. QMC has effectively mitigated the troubling
[5] 'aggregation' problem all other QDot manufacturers have stumbled-on (as Steve basically mapped-out in his LinkedIn comment today). For most intents & purposes, our giant thick-shelled CdSe TQD's could be considered
[6] non-toxic (below ROHS levels) due to having a far lower CdSe (heavy metals) content and needing less with better results while being
[7] heavily encased within the durable 6 to 19-layer thick,
[8] selectivity/uniformity enhanced end-product nano-particle shell....all of which takes place in the
[9] low-cost
[10] automated micro-reactor process on
[11] an industrial scale , which FlowId has already expeditiously adapted to our
[12] newly acquired GTQD tech. And as an added bonus , these GTQD's are able to be made
[13] application-specific & the higher stability allows for a
[14] greater 'on' time , which results in a much higher number of
[15] MEG (multiple exciton generation) reactions , particularly when
[16] interspersed onto sheets of graphene... MEG; the holy grail of renewable energy...producing more energy than is being taken in.
[17] overcoming the 'photobleaching' effect
[18] overcoming the Stokes Shift limitations
[19] overcoming the auger recombination effect
[20] customized arm lengths for specific apps
[21] customized arm chemistry for electro & pharma-chemical reactive apps
[22] multiple arms for a far greater series of effects & apps than spherical QD's
By my count, that makes 22 unique & formidable characteristics/attributes that put QMC GTQD's head-&-shoulders above the competition. The question you need to ask yourself is, Why am I not investing in this .06 cents company Quantum Materials Corp.? OTCQB ticker: QTMM
Quantum Dots Rumored for iPhone 6 Display
These are the reasons it may be a good possibility:
Quantum Materials Corp's (QMC) Giant Tetrapod Quantum Dots (GTQD's) are:
[1] 10 to 100X brighter & remain
[2] highly stable (luminescent & non-blinking) for much longer (comparative) metrics (if not indefinitely) at a
[3] higher light output with less heat generation , which
[4] extends product service life. QMC has effectively mitigated the troubling
[5] 'aggregation' problem all other QDot manufacturers have stumbled-on (as Steve basically mapped-out in his LinkedIn comment today). For most intents & purposes, our giant thick-shelled CdSe TQD's could be considered
[6] non-toxic (below ROHS levels) due to having a far lower CdSe (heavy metals) content and needing less with better results while being
[7] heavily encased within the durable 6 to 19-layer thick,
[8] selectivity/uniformity enhanced end-product nano-particle shell....all of which takes place in the
[9] low-cost
[10] automated micro-reactor process on
[11] an industrial scale , which FlowId has already expeditiously adapted to our
[12] newly acquired GTQD tech. And as an added bonus , these GTQD's are able to be made
[13] application-specific & the higher stability allows for a
[14] greater 'on' time , which results in a much higher number of
[15] MEG (multiple exciton generation) reactions , particularly when
[16] interspersed onto sheets of graphene... MEG; the holy grail of renewable energy...producing more energy than is being taken in.
[17] overcoming the 'photobleaching' effect
[18] overcoming the Stokes Shift limitations
[19] overcoming the auger recombination effect
[20] customized arm lengths for specific apps
[21] customized arm chemistry for electro & pharma-chemical reactive apps
[22] multiple arms for a far greater series of effects & apps than spherical QD's
By my count, that makes 22 unique & formidable characteristics/attributes that put QMC GTQD's head-&-shoulders above the competition and if the Apple Rumor for the iPhone 6 is true everyone will be jumping on the band wagon. OTCQB Ticker: QTMM ...... closed 4-2-14 @ .065
Could be a spoiler, CSTI has 100k @7 that was up earlier before they went back to CSTI @.065, either way it's heading in a direction that is looking positive!
Do you know of any platform that provides all pending orders?
Bill
$QTMM Quantum Dots Rumored For iPhone 6 Display
These are the reasons it may be a good possibility and a min 10 bagger, it's an unhatched Nanomonster:
Quantum Materials Corp's Giant Tetrapod Quantum Dots (GTQD's) are:
[1] 10 to 100X brighter & remain
[2] highly stable (luminescent & non-blinking) for much longer (comparative) metrics (if not indefinitely) at a
[3] higher light output with less heat generation , which
[4] extends product service life. QMC has effectively mitigated the troubling
[5] 'aggregation' problem all other QDot manufacturers have stumbled-on (as Steve basically mapped-out in his LinkedIn comment today). For most intents & purposes, our giant thick-shelled CdSe TQD's could be considered
[6] non-toxic (below RoHS levels) due to having a far lower CdSe (heavy metals) content and needing less QD's because of their better results while being
[7] heavily encased within the durable 6 to 19-layer thick,
[8] selectivity/uniformity enhanced end-product nano-particle shell....all of which takes place in the
[9] low-cost
[10] automated micro-reactor process on
[11] an industrial scale , which FlowId has already expeditiously adapted to our
[12] newly acquired GTQD tech. And as an added bonus , these GTQD's are able to be made
[13] application-specific & the higher stability allows for a
[14] greater 'on' time , which results in a much higher number of
[15] MEG (multiple exciton generation) reactions , particularly when
[16] interspersed onto sheets of graphene... MEG; the holy grail of renewable energy...producing more energy than is being taken in.
[17] overcoming the 'photobleaching' effect
[18] overcoming the Stokes Shift limitations
[19] overcoming the auger recombination effect
[20] customized arm lengths for specific apps
[21] customized arm chemistry for electro & pharma-chemical reactive apps
[22] multiple arms for a far greater series of effects & apps than spherical QD's
By my count, that makes 22 unique & formidable characteristics/attributes that put QMC GTQD's head-&-shoulders above the competition. In-all; what's not to like ;)
Definitely something to consider even though you can't smokem: http://www.qmcdots.com/ OTCQB ticker: QTMM
$QTMM Quantum Dots Rumored For iPhone 6 Display
These are the reasons it may be a good possibility:
Quantum Materials Corp's Giant Tetrapod Quantum Dots (GTQD's) are:
[1] 10 to 100X brighter & remain
[2] highly stable (luminescent & non-blinking) for much longer (comparative) metrics (if not indefinitely) at a
[3] higher light output with less heat generation , which
[4] extends product service life. QMC has effectively mitigated the troubling
[5] 'aggregation' problem all other QDot manufacturers have stumbled-on (as Steve basically mapped-out in his LinkedIn comment today). For most intents & purposes, our giant thick-shelled CdSe TQD's could be considered
[6] non-toxic (below RoHS levels) due to having a far lower CdSe (heavy metals) content and needing less QD's because of their better results while being
[7] heavily encased within the durable 6 to 19-layer thick,
[8] selectivity/uniformity enhanced end-product nano-particle shell....all of which takes place in the
[9] low-cost
[10] automated micro-reactor process on
[11] an industrial scale , which FlowId has already expeditiously adapted to our
[12] newly acquired GTQD tech. And as an added bonus , these GTQD's are able to be made
[13] application-specific & the higher stability allows for a
[14] greater 'on' time , which results in a much higher number of
[15] MEG (multiple exciton generation) reactions , particularly when
[16] interspersed onto sheets of graphene... MEG; the holy grail of renewable energy...producing more energy than is being taken in.
[17] overcoming the 'photobleaching' effect
[18] overcoming the Stokes Shift limitations
[19] overcoming the auger recombination effect
[20] customized arm lengths for specific apps
[21] customized arm chemistry for electro & pharma-chemical reactive apps
[22] multiple arms for a far greater series of effects & apps than spherical QD's
By my count, that makes 22 unique & formidable characteristics/attributes that put QMC GTQD's head-&-shoulders above the competition. In-all; what's not to like ;)
Definitely something to consider: http://www.qmcdots.com/ OTCQB ticker: QTMM
$QTMM Quantum Dots Rumored For iPhone 6 Display
These are the reasons it may be a good possibility:
Quantum Materials Corp's Giant Tetrapod Quantum Dots (GTQD's) are:
[1] 10 to 100X brighter & remain
[2] highly stable (luminescent & non-blinking) for much longer (comparative) metrics (if not indefinitely) at a
[3] higher light output with less heat generation , which
[4] extends product service life. QMC has effectively mitigated the troubling
[5] 'aggregation' problem all other QDot manufacturers have stumbled-on (as Steve basically mapped-out in his LinkedIn comment today). For most intents & purposes, our giant thick-shelled CdSe TQD's could be considered
[6] non-toxic (below RoHS levels) due to having a far lower CdSe (heavy metals) content and needing less QD's because of their better results while being
[7] heavily encased within the durable 6 to 19-layer thick,
[8] selectivity/uniformity enhanced end-product nano-particle shell....all of which takes place in the
[9] low-cost
[10] automated micro-reactor process on
[11] an industrial scale , which FlowId has already expeditiously adapted to our
[12] newly acquired GTQD tech. And as an added bonus , these GTQD's are able to be made
[13] application-specific & the higher stability allows for a
[14] greater 'on' time , which results in a much higher number of
[15] MEG (multiple exciton generation) reactions , particularly when
[16] interspersed onto sheets of graphene... MEG; the holy grail of renewable energy...producing more energy than is being taken in.
[17] overcoming the 'photobleaching' effect
[18] overcoming the Stokes Shift limitations
[19] overcoming the auger recombination effect
[20] customized arm lengths for specific apps
[21] customized arm chemistry for electro & pharma-chemical reactive apps
[22] multiple arms for a far greater series of effects & apps than spherical QD's
By my count, that makes 22 unique & formidable characteristics/attributes that put QMC GTQD's head-&-shoulders above the competition. In-all; what's not to like ;)
Definitely something to consider: http://www.qmcdots.com/
Quantum Dots Rumored For iPhone 6 Display $QTMM
These are the reasons it may be a good possibility:
Quantum Materials Corp's Giant Tetrapod Quantum Dots (GTQD's) are:
[1] 10 to 100X brighter & remain
[2] highly stable (luminescent & non-blinking) for much longer (comparative) metrics (if not indefinitely) at a
[3] higher light output with less heat generation , which
[4] extends product service life. QMC has effectively mitigated the troubling
[5] 'aggregation' problem all other QDot manufacturers have stumbled-on (as Steve basically mapped-out in his LinkedIn comment today). For most intents & purposes, our giant thick-shelled CdSe TQD's could be considered
[6] non-toxic (below RoHS levels) due to having a far lower CdSe (heavy metals) content and needing less QD's because of their better results while being
[7] heavily encased within the durable 6 to 19-layer thick,
[8] selectivity/uniformity enhanced end-product nano-particle shell....all of which takes place in the
[9] low-cost
[10] automated micro-reactor process on
[11] an industrial scale , which FlowId has already expeditiously adapted to our
[12] newly acquired GTQD tech. And as an added bonus , these GTQD's are able to be made
[13] application-specific & the higher stability allows for a
[14] greater 'on' time , which results in a much higher number of
[15] MEG (multiple exciton generation) reactions , particularly when
[16] interspersed onto sheets of graphene... MEG; the holy grail of renewable energy...producing more energy than is being taken in.
[17] overcoming the 'photobleaching' effect
[18] overcoming the Stokes Shift limitations
[19] overcoming the auger recombination effect
[20] customized arm lengths for specific apps
[21] customized arm chemistry for electro & pharma-chemical reactive apps
[22] multiple arms for a far greater series of effects & apps than spherical QD's
By my count, that makes 22 unique & formidable characteristics/attributes that put QMC GTQD's head-&-shoulders above the competition. In-all; what's not to like ;)
Definitely something to consider: http://www.qmcdots.com/
Not thought of yet - that's an understatement! Who knows where this will go when you have companies like Toshiba submitting patent applications such as 20130322873 in for: SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR QUANTUM TELEPORTATION
Claim #17. A system according to claim 1, wherein said light emitting diode comprises a quantum dot.
It's only the beginning and it really hasn't started yet!
Bill
If anyone wishes to send this to NITE feel free. Address it to:
ETGTradingsupport@kcg.com
psdesk@kcg.com
esg@kcg.com
Dear Sirs,
Quantum Materials Corp. (symbol qtmm.ob) stopped being traded by your firm yesterday, 19 March 2014. This is causing a great deal of concern to the shareholders as well as for the company.
If this situation is not rectified quickly I am deeply concerned as an investor that it will result in loss of investor confidence
in the company. There is absolutely no reason for NITE to have stopped trading QTMM shares and for this to have occurred.
In fact earlier this week the company actually resolved the CTO that was initiated in 2009 by the British Columbia Securities Commission in CANADA. NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEC or FINRA in the USA! I have attached a copy of the revocation order and history from the BCSC for your review and file.
Can you please rectify this situation ASAP.
Issued Date Name Juris. Status Expiry Date Exception Type
2014/03/17 Hague Corp.. BC Revoked None No Ban Securities Trading OF
2014/03/13 Quantum Materials Corp. BC Issued 2019/03/13 No Ban Securities Trading BY
2014/03/13 Quantum Materials Corp. BC Cancelled 2019/03/13 No Ban Securities Trading OF
2014/03/13nd Quantum Materials Corp. BC Issued 2019/03/13 No Ban Securities Trading OF
2010/04/14 Hague Corp. BC Amended None No Ban Securities Trading OF
An unhappy investor with your incompetent and irresponsible actions!
Thank you,
The more letters they get they might actually feel a sense of urgency.
Bill
NOT a QTMM problem, it's a SYSTEM problem: I have USAA and they posted -
Special Notice Posted : Wed, Mar 19, 2014
Due to a temporary system problem, some brokerage accounts may not be reflecting current account information
Bill
I would think that given the latest PR news that it is sitting in the access2flow shop being retrofitted/redesigned to accomodate the necessary equipment for the additional shelling capabilities. If they knew this was coming 4 months ago, it is possible they wanted to wait for this finalization with LANL. The fact that they recently announced the funding leads me to conclude the order was not placed until after and if the LANL deal happened before it was completed and shipped the better to incorporate the improvements. I think I remember reading the Micro was to be in place by the first quarter and the larger reactor by the end of the third quarter. This new change of events would most likely push the Micro reactor to the second quarter but I would think the larger reactor could still be delivered in the third quarter as originally planned. That's my best guess at what's happening. I'm sure I missed something time wise along the way. When it gets here, it gets here, nothing we can do about it.
Bill
Chessmite – nice composite of points! I like this one in particular:
"....and says that the Los Alamos National Laboratory’s (LANL) Thick-Shell technology will be integrated with a variety of the composite tetrapod quantum dots to develop a line of advanced high performance quantum dots."
Several significant points in this one paragraph. 1) LANL, 2) variety and 3) advanced high performance.
Partnering with LANL is huge, they see what Rice recognized years ago when they renegotiated licensing terms for the TQD to QMC – high volume mass production. The second key word here is variety, not just the CdSe we tend to always relate the TQD to. Many patents are for In, Ga, Pb …with different shells, so being able to manufacture many types with the newly licensed thick shell technology using the proprietary microfluidic-reactor is a game changer for the industry. The third is the advanced high performance LANL thick shell patent # 7,935,419 Thick-shell nanocrystal quantum dots being incorporated into the QMC process. This took some of the advantages the Tetrapod Quantum Dot had before and puts it on steroids with added bulk to boot! This really does create a NanoMonster.
It has super powers with laser eyes from increased brightness. Its FWHM strength delivers a color so pure it stuns you. It has an impenetrable shield or special aura that prevents photobleaching, keeping it as vibrant as the day it was created. Its shell, being of many layers make it tough to the core. It is not afraid of getting wet and is impervious to chemical attack from fluids like Hexane. In its arsenal of super weapons its intensive energy (eV) is derived from multi-exciton emissions and the fear of all fear is it is non-blinking, it never stops. It is relentless to shine superior! .
Combine those attributes with consistency, one of the most significant and overlooked competitive advantages QMC has with the microfluidic-reactor process. Being able to reliably reproduce the same quality product throughout the production process is superior to all batch synthesis techniques. Timing, temperature and maintaining the exact component element ratio’s is paramount to the process for a consistently high quality product. The reactors, for lack of a better breakdown at this time, are just but one piece in the process that will drive a stake into the competitions heart. Will the competition survive? Depends on how long they wait to get assistance before they bleed out when QMC makes the death move.
It’s a superhero, villain struggle currently, where it looks like the villain (3M/Nanosys Dow/Nanoco) currently have unstoppable powers against the NanoMonster (QMC) and will take over mass production for the world. The truth is you’re looking at a classic example like Ford who brought the car industry to the world and Mercedes who brought the upscale quality with performance to the car world. Nanoco and Nanosys may have introduced the Quantum Dots to the world but I believe it’s QMC who is bringing the high performance, impeccable quality and customized product to the stage with the mass production advantage that Ford became famous for. IMO when it’s all said and done NanoMonster, for the good of all mankind, will blow their doors off and leave them spinning in a cloud of “What just happened?”
Bill
News travels faster in Bermuda. lol http://ri.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0LEVxDDSSBTIE8AUMpx.9w4;_ylu=X3oDMTByODJtaWUzBHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMwRjb2xvA2JmMQR2dGlkAw--/RV=1/RE=1394711366/RO=10/RU=http%3a%2f%2fwww.prnewswire.com%2fnews-releases%2fquantum-materials-corp-moving-closer-to-volume-production-of-tetrapod-quantum-dots-249708461.html/RS=^ADAL83DzZj0FwVMKH5DlGEESsGBbNk-
Bill
That’s what I get for bending the elbow, several inaccuracies. First is Nanoco and Dow are pushing CFQD not Nanosys and 3M. Second, thanks to Big E the overall weight of the device is not to be used. Their definition for a homogeneous device would be the screen only as the QD's are an integral part. I have been unable to determine just the weight of the screen, so there is a flaw in my analysis. I cry UNCLE. You got to know when you’re in over your head.
Third,I also estimated for the full use of the screen and not using “on EDGE” technology as is all of QD Visions applications. A Full screen “On Surface” application of QD’s will use significantly more than “on edge” and on edge uses more than the “on chip”. That is why QD Vision pushed the edge technology because they couldn’t produce enough QD’s for full screen and the on chip runs at such a high temperature QD life is too short. You get a much better picture with a full screen application of QD’s than with edge or “on chip”.
The bottom line is the quantity of GTQD’s will be significantly less to achieve the comparable output of standard QD’s. The reasons: aggregation, 10 to 100 fold brighter, 80-100% non blinking, higher yield, not to mention narrower full width half maximum (FWHM) which boils down to a “purer color”. If they did want to go to the least amount of GQTD’s then the “on chip” is now a possibility as GQTD’s are less susceptible to thermal degradation.
It’s a win win in all areas for the future, if QMC is below the threshold they win the jackpot, if the exception goes through, they win and if not, they have the Cadmium Free Giant Tetrapod Quantum Dot (CFGTQD), it’s just not as efficient. Still bothered I don’t have hard numbers to back up not needing an exemption for GTQD’s but I’ll get over it by sunrise.
Bill
I was just thinking what a wonderful world it would be if QMC didn’t have to worry about compliance with RoHS. QD Vision is currently filing for exemption and having to justify in length every reason imaginable why they should be granted an exemption. It appears everyone is on board but 3M and Nanosys. They bet the farm on CFQD. Every company has supported it but I didn't see QMC on the list. Why?
I looked up RoHS - Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS)
The Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations set limits for the following substances:
• Lead
• Mercury
• Cadmium
• Polybrominated Biphenyls (PBB)
• Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDE)
To certify to the above compliances, these substances must not be intentionally added to the product AND cannot exceed the following maximum allowable levels as a trace substance:
0.1% (1,000 ppm) for: Lead*, Mercury, Hexavalent Chromium, PBB and PBDE
0.01% (100 ppm) for: Cadmium
These requirements must be applied at the homogeneous material level.
Too put it into perspective, think of a soldered joint, we have all seen them at some point. They are a drop of molten metal from a pin head to some pretty nasty looking amateur creations with flux stains. Each board could have a few, to hundreds of these beads of lead solder. Weight wise these drops containing lead start to add up and push them over the RoHS limits. Now look at a drop of QD’s in liquid form that are one QD in thickness, what would the coverage area be? Think of a drop of water or blood between two glass plates that are squeezed really tight. My unscientific result for a small drop yields a minimum coverage area of 1 sq in. ( I wasted a good drop of my Malibu Bay Breeze, I hope you appreciate that) In order to cover a 2.5” x 5” phone screen we would need 12 small drops.
1 drop equals .0648524ml or .06 grams or .72 grams at 12 drops per screen
• The iPhone 5S Weight:is 3.95 ounces (112 grams)
Now if a phone like the one I found having approximately the same dimensions, is only 112 grams total, the weight of quantum dots .72 grams as a component of the certified device, my math works out to <.01% at .006% That would be below the threshold for reporting the device outside the RoHS criteria. Given my unscientific method is off, you could probably get 2 sq. in. per drop and that would half the weight again.
Why would the competitions QD’s not meet RoHS and the Tetrapod QD will? The first thought that comes to mind is the aggregation on TQD’s is much better, resulting in less volume required and being more evenly distributed. That is a result of their tetrapod shape and having a very high quantum yield. Approximately 95% of the final product produced from the microreactors are TQD’s with the same characteristics and shape. The competitions yield is less, some as low as 40%. The last development for QMC is the most important, the license they acquired from Los Alamos National Labs (LANL) made it MOST DEFINITE they will use less TQD’s since the Giant-TQD (GTQD) are 10 to 100 fold brighter, stay on for 80% to 100% of the time (Non blinking) where all the competitions QD’s are blinking, on 20%, requiring more QD’s to be used and with less intense color . Does it mean we can use 80% less GTQD’s and achieve the same color intensity? I don’t know the answer to that from actual performance results but I’m sure you can use half the GTQD’s in display and medical products for the same or better results. Why didn’t QMC jump on the band wagon to throw support for exemption of the cadmium quantum dot limits? Is it because they don’t need too? JMO
Relaxing in Bermuda, that was until I started using this wifi that works sometimes and is slow as cold molasses. Frustrating to say the least. Time for rethink my priorities.
Bill
$QTMM - If you're looking for a technology advance that could make YOU rich (one of the reasons you’re on this board): Quantum Dots – What’s it about?
If you're a day trader this isn't for you YET. Not enough movement intraday to make it worth while. This is for those wanting to get in early for long term growth returns.
Bill
$QTMM - If you're looking for a technology advance that could make YOU rich (one of the reasons you’re on this board): Quantum Dots – What’s it about?
If you're a day trader this isn't for you YET. Not enough movement intraday to make it worth while. This is for those wanting to get in early for long term growth returns.
Bill
$QTMM - If you're looking for a diversified technology to invest in: Quantum Dots – What’s it about?
If you're a daytrader this isn't for you YET. Not enough movement intraday to make it worth while. This is for those wanting to get in early for long term growth returns.
Bill
$QTMM - Reminder, if you're looking for a technology advance that could make YOU rich: Quantum Dots – What’s it about?
If you're a daytrader this isn't for you YET. Not enough movement intraday to make it worth while. This is for those wanting to get in early for long term growth returns.
Bill
I say everyone is right and wrong at the same time. its a modified Wall Street wonder in the making that I was using for a Seeking Alpha article but they rejected it because the stock is below a dollar and doesn't have a 500 million cap. So that I didn't waste all my time I just re posted it with a title change on WordPress.
As far as Nanosys is concerned, the 2000 kilograms was their goal. They had achieved earlier in the year so to be conservative the 7.69 something kilograms per day I changed to 10 to round up and give them the benefit of the doubt. "the shipment of more than 2,000 kg of Nanosys Quantum Dot Concentrate". That was as of September 30th 2013.
Thanks Swamp Angel I didn't notice I left out the kilo on the 10 grams in the article. That was just revised. Thanks again.
Bill
Vuduu you too have two. It was a loophole they overlooked!
6 no PR, 8.5 PR
Bill
PROBLEMS SOLVED by QMC
As identified in the Key Markets for Quantum Dots
http://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=10668
Technology Gaps in Current-Generation QD Materials
Although QDs have proven their potential, they are still not the preferred material for the display and lighting industries. One fact is the hesitancy among OEMs to adopt new technology like QDs prior to earning their investments in other similar and potential technologies like OLEDs. However, QDs need to overcome several other technological barriers to prove their advantage over other rival technologies:
• The suitability of existing fabrication techniques to a cost-effective mass production
• The ease of producing blue QDs
• Blinking issues with QDs
Despite the development of many different efficient QD production techniques, most of them are not suitable for cost-effective large-scale production. Hence, research efforts to design new fabrication techniques or optimize existing techniques are highly required. The commercial success of QDs may be not possible until the development of a cost-effective fabrication technique.
ALL obstacles to commercial success removed incorporating Giant TQD's into the manufacturing process!
Bill
DDHawk not sure why your post 607 was deleted but thanks for the reminder. At time 47:14 Dr. Chakravarthy mentions about the research they are currently doing to detect biomarkers. We know they are using the TQD's and with todays PR using GTQD's it should help him ID specific precursors and cancers better.
http://internetmedicine.com/nanomedicine-weekly/
Bill
What is a Quantum Dot? Try this one on for size:
Sorry Demdots, retirement is exhausting. I don't know where the time goes but it seems to fly by. The Olympic's and 14" of snow that needed to be removed hasn't helped. I really didn't have anything of significance to mention that I saw in the 10Q. The best I had was:
"thereby creating the opportunity for a step change in the solar energy industry through the use of quantum dots in printed photovoltaic cells."
and
"As the Company moves forward, it expects to be able to meet all payment and other obligations under the Licenses, and the Company’s funding strategy takes account of these requirements."
That's it until the next PR. Typically they do one a week and last week started it off. This week the 10Q was probably the second so until next week...
Bill
If QMC has tighter control over the emission peaks on their TQD's that would be another advantage over the competition -------
"QMC has developed the technology required to produce TQDs with very narrow emission peaks as well as TQDs with high quantum yield (high brightness)." In the RoHS report Seth Coe states, "We can typically tune in color in 2nm increments for our customers." If QMC can control growth of the TQD's tighter than that, then cha ching, they'll be banging down the doors.
Bill
EzAl is the one to thank for taking the time to express his feelings and concerns to management in a diplomatic way. His reflected the thoughts of many. KUDO's to Art for taking the time to address Al's concerns.
Bill
It appears we are having a fairly wide spread power outage due to the weather last night. I'm on a generator with limited capabilities. Ezal1 was wondering as everyone else is as to what's going on. Al asked the following questions to Art Lamstein, the QMC Director of Marketing:
>On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 9:51 AM, "ezal1 wrote: > >Hey Art, > >How goes it? I am sitting here getting a bit frustrated since I was expecting to hear something in a PR by now. Are we getting close to releasing something? Watching the board is killing me. I know you guys have a ton going on but not having any specific knowledge makes it impossible for me to judge a timeline or settle my nerves. >Do you still work out of CA? Who is in TX at the lab? I am going to be in TX next week but wouldn't be able to get to the park until the evening...they aren't there then are they? >Well sir, thanks for letting me vent. >Have a great day, > >Al
This is Arts response to Al:
On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 1:29 AM, Arthur Lamstein wrote:
Hi EZAL1 > > >Thanks for your email, I will try to answer your "How goes it?" questions, but can't give specifics->I believe the stock price has no relationship to the true stock value. >We do not know the cause of the dumping, if that is what it was. > > > >Yes, Toshi and I are in the SF Bay Area. We have the marketing and sales function, and the San Francisco bay and San Jose are in Silicon Valley and we attend most nano and bio conferences prospecting, and meet with companies. >In addition, companies are calling us. That is a sign that the market is much more aware of quantum dots this year than previously. In the coming months we will attend and exhibit at many conferences that will generate clients down the road. >We will also expand our marketing as we become more able to supply demand by scaling our automated process. > > >Our management and lab personnel are at San Marcos in the Silicon Hills of Austin. Texas State University has an industry/university program with us we are developing, and I believe an intern, and we consult with TSU faculty and use their state-of-the-art equipment on campus. Some companies have visited our San Marcos facilities. There is a common reception area and conference room. We have an office and lab and there are other, newer companies in the same building. There is room for expansion in the facilities as we grow, and 38 acres if we need more. STAR Park has allowed us access to all of the above advantages without having a high overhead. > > >We are producing and shipping tetrapod quantum dots samples as we have said. >We have more NDAs and are speaking with many companies about their projects. > We are all highly focused on company goals to be the leader in both quality and quantity of tetrapod quantum dots because we also know that doing so will bring clean renewable solar energy at LCOE to better other energy sources, over 90% energy savings for solid state lighting, increased functionality in features, brightness, lifetime with less energy use in printed electronics, desalination of water, energy storage, and directly save lives with ubiquitous POC diagnostic assays and other biotech and biomedicine uses, and more. No one expects all this overnight, but few doubt most all of this will happen. > > >You can argue that many companies have changed the world, but how many have made the world a better place, and how many have the potential to make the world a better place tomorrow? Many nanotech and biotech companies have that potential in their specific field, but Quantum Materials has that potential as an enabling technology for many fields of science. That doesn't mean we're better people, it just means that tetrapod quantum dots have the potential to do more good in more areas. > > >My sincere thanks to the many who continue to stick with us for these reasons. > > >Kind regards, > > > >Art Lamstein >QMC Director of Marketing
That's it for now. Back to sitting in the dark soon. Generator will only do the refrigerator and freezer. Funny that I never lost power for more then an hour for the 25 years I was employed at the utility company and now that I'm retired I'm out of power, and I thought I left on good terms.
Bill
Haven't been to the new lab but visited the facility at ASU 5 years ago. There has been a lot of water under the bridge since then. My take away talking then with Dr. Jabbour was they didn’t give a rats a$$ about the money or stock and its price. These guys are not your typical financial people. These guys are in it for the science. Dr. Jabbour and DR. Wong are more interested in solving pollution problems and leaving the earth a little better through science. His talk was more about the cradle to grave mentality. How to develop a better product less hazardous and more eco friendly when it comes time to dispose of the product after its useful life. That is what impressed me more, their hearts and souls are in it for the right reasons. Steve and Dave are in a different category. Steve more in the business side (CEO) with his heart in the science side. My interests were peaked at the time for a different reason. I saw the potential profits that could be gained should they be able to successfully execute their business plan to mass produce the TQD’s that Dr. Wong had developed. Haven’t been to the new lab and don’t need to. Figure I would only get in the way at this point in time. Once they have the reactors functional and they settle out of the startup/development phase, it’ll be a trip I’ll take. Demonstrating to someone that is not going to contribute to revenue at this phase is not where I want the company to be focusing their resources. There are enough reports the shareholders can read or they can go to the Microreactor videos from FlowId/Access2flow that Danny organized:
September 5th, 2013 .04 cents, 1,374,813 were traded,almost the same number of shares that traded today (1,343,010). The good news is a week later it was @ .07, we want better news this time. http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/interchart/interchart.asp?symb=QTMM&insttype=Stock&time=8&freq=1
Bill
The TQD’s versatile use is so omnipotent that its reference to grains of sand in cement sheds light on the broadness that will befall the products list and extent of the global reach. Art Lamstein the Marketing Director summed up the list as such, “:market forecasts will need be rewritten for quantum dot based renewable energy, photovoltaics, biotech diagnostic assays, drug delivery platforms, theranostic cancer and other biomedicine treatments, QD-LED and opto-electronic devices, photonics, low power SSL lighting, batteries, fuel cells, thermo-QD applications, quantum computing, memory, and conductive inks (to name a few).”
And here is why:
QMC’s Tetrapod QD Advantages:
Quantum dot brightness (high - quantum yield and uniformity),
Photo-Chemical stability (longer lifetime),
Narrow band,
Purer colors (including high luminous red),
Wide spectrum,
Dual color emission (one color from the core and a second from the arms),
Tunable emission spectrum,
Less aggregation,
Strength (Tetrapods diverse structural system of a hexagon-type lattice offers minimum mass and maximum stiffness constructions),
2 Types – Bulk and Hollow,
QMC has developed the best technique for characterizing individual TQD’s using their patent pending continuous flow reactors to maximize: the size distribution, shape and composition of these miniscule crystals. Precise control is vitally important for creating the optical and electrical properties required to satisfy the clients specifications. There are many shapes of these ultramicroscopic crystals but why is the Tetrapod QD shape best and why for optical and electrical properties?
The simplest 3D structure is the tetrapod which consists of four tetrahedrally coordinated hexagonal arms that grow from a central nucleus [1].
The branched nature of tetrapods enable it to have a more diverse range of applications compared to its non-branched equivalents (e.g. rods, spheres, cubes). For example, branching enables multiple interfaces to be made and as a result entire devices have been demonstrated with single tetrapods [3].
Less aggregation for a more even distribution. This reduced clumping factor alone is a display markets ticket to higher profits. Any manufacturing process that has less waste, has higher uniformity will be more efficient and in the display industry, less is more.
Uniform contrast at the edge by the atomic planes are atomically clean and the facets are flat. So what does that mean? Better bonding! The intersections with greater surface area contact means greater strength. In terms of resistance in electrical applications you will have less heat build up at those contact points. Again less means more in this atomic structure.
What typically makes up exceptional optical properties: [C]
broad absorption,
narrow emission spectrum,
high quantum yield (QY),
chemical stability
Everything that QMC’s TQD delivers!
Oh to sum it up: Quantum Materials Corp. is a NANOMONSTER with their Tetrapod Quantum Dot! (That creative term is the brain child of Dave McDonald – a nano sleuth) It is a monster in respect to applications.
Hope that helped and welcome to the board.
Bill
Hang in there IPO$, this is nothing, you haven't been waiting 5 years.
Some light reading over in the medical field for those bored while waiting: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3625755/
Compared with organic dyes and fluorescent proteins, QDs have several advantages and unique applications. Firstly, QDs have very large molar extinction coefficients, about 10 to 50 times larger than that of organic dyes. Therefore, QDs are able to absorb 10 to 50 times more photons than organic dyes at the same excitation photon flux, leading to a significant improvement in the probe brightness. Secondly, QDs are several thousand times more resistant against photobleaching than organic dyes and are well-suited for studies over a long period of time. Thirdly, the large Stokes shifts of QDs (measured by the distance between the excitation and emission peaks) can be used to further improve the detection sensitivity. Organic dye signals with a small Stokes shift are often buried by strong tissue autofluorescence, whereas QD signals with a large Stokes shift are clearly detectable above the background [48]. Owing to the advantages mentioned above, QDs have utility in bioimaging, real-time fluorescence tracking and detection of live cells in vivo, diagnostic assays for cancer detection, detecting local extension of cancer cells and their distant metastases, and identifying the surgical tumor margins on the operation table.
The major benefits of QDs as an in vitro diagnostic tool are: imaging of tumor cells overexpressing certain oncomarkers, staining of tissues and their sections, and observation of individual molecules and cells in real time.
A simple sentence (not really) I found in this article with huge impact on enhancing life as lived today: “a multiparametric tool for tumor cells detection is likely to be developed and implemented for early cancer and detection of micrometastases for monitored targeted cancer therapy”. By using QD’s it’s saying they will be able to detect pre-cancerous cells and then destroy them. The AMA is not going to like that because they won’t be able to sell chemo and all their other costly medications, treatments and prescriptions that make them and the drug companies a windfall in profits.
Still have time to kill?
Near-Infrared Quantum Dots as Optical Probes for Tumor Imaging
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3629965/
or
Quantum Dots for Molecular Diagnostics of Tumors
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3347596/
Still waiting! ugh
Bill