Although he looks alone, somebody wants him on the phone.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
"will the people be confused and mixed up and take the Pfizer EUA jab thinking they are getting the real deal COMIRNATY?"
That is the Pfizer vaccine. The one that got FDA approval yesterday.
It's readily available and has been in use for quite some time now. Much to the chagrin of the anti-vax crowd...
Lol, sometimes it's just easy.
Did you actually read it? That is not a treatment for Covid-19. It's about a study regarding a treatment to mitigate Covid associated pneumonia.
I personally had a very good friend who spent some time in the hospital with pneumococcal (bacterial) pneumonia associated with Covid. The root cause of the pneumonia was the build up of fluid and damaged tissue from Covid. The pneumonia was treated with standard anti-biotics and he made a recovery. Due to his own experience, he would be among the first to tell you to go get the vaccine.
https://www.webmd.com/lung/covid-and-pneumonia#1
"It was improper to not continue the control" No, it would have been improper and unethical to continue the control.
Once again, those people volunteered to participate in those trials. You will not be able to find in any outline regarding the proper, ethical conduct of clinical trials in which it would be proper to segregate into perpetuity the control group once that trial's purpose has been accomplished.
Fortunately, Dr. Mengele wasn't running that particular show.
The study was done. Efficacy had been proven. The FDA granted emergency use authorization. It was proper and ethical to release the control group and allow them to choose whether to get the vaccine or not.
But a control group does remain in place. There is a segment of the population against which continued efficacy for the vaccinated population can be compared. If one is sitting at the table, looks around and can't pick out the sucker...
Yeah, Trump told the rally in Alabama the other night to "get the vaccine".
Now that Trump supporters know he is actually being controlled by Gates and Soros, that's got to upset their little Q-niverse a bit?
There are no "dumpsters". There was not any data "dumped".
The trials were ended once the efficacy of the vaccine being tested was shown. The participants who had received the placebo were given the choice to get the real vaccine. The smart ones got it.
This is the article which is twisted around by the "Conservative Treehouse" to say something it does not actually say: https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/02/19/969143015/long-term-studies-of-covid-19-vaccines-hurt-by-placebo-recipients-getting-immuni
There is an ethical consideration beyond the pure science. These people volunteered to participate in clinical trials very early in the process of introducing the vaccines.
To deny the vaccine to the placebo control group just because they had been randomly selected to receive a placebo, and even keeping them in the dark regarding the fact that they had received a placebo, once those initial trials had been completed would have been morally bankrupt from an ethical perspective.
Besides there is a "control group" in place at this point anyway, making placebo administration unnecessary in the ongoing study of the progression of Covid.
Recommended reading: "Arrowsmith" by Sinclair Lewis. While fiction, it deals head on with the moral conflict involved when prioritizing science for science sake over ethical considerations.
"Mayo claim that hydroxy was ineffective based on no data"
It's pretty simple: They said they had no data that hydroxy is effective.
That's why I suggested forwarding bitchute videos to the Mayo Clinic - Because then they would have such data.
That article is a classic piece of prevarication. If one actually reads the article referred to, the placebo group was offered the real vaccine after the FDA granted emergency approval. That means they did indeed "lose" the control group in a study regarding the efficacy of the vaccine, but they "lost" it after the study had already proven the efficacy of the vaccine.
That's like me running a math problem out on a piece of paper, and coming up with the a solution. If I was to then run the piece of paper through the shredder, that doesn't mean the solution to my math problem becomes a falsehood.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/02/19/969143015/long-term-studies-of-covid-19-vaccines-hurt-by-placebo-recipients-getting-immuni
So the Mayo Clinic is relying on data from a "criminal health racketeering enterprise"?
Wow, maybe we should forward some bitchute videos to Mayo - ya know, give Mayo some real information to work with?
"They are mass produced by the big pharma that you despise and they don't even want their own drugs pushed to treat the virus."
That is exactly the most telling thing of all. If "Big Pharma" were criminal enterprises, it would only make sense they tout the effectiveness of quack treatments. Instead they tell the public it is not effective!
https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on-ivermectin-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/
Hydroxy showed some initial indications as a possible treatment. But ultimately the data proved that to be false.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/expert-answers/coronavirus-drugs/faq-20485627&ved=2ahUKEwi4gbbc_8TyAhWJW80KHTxXCjsQFnoECBcQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0wh05Cn1DOBLeSipEmrHoI
Data from the mRNA trials has been extensively peer reviewed:
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://scholar.google.com/scholar%3Fq%3Dmrna%2Btrials%2Bpeer%2Breviewed%2Barticles%26hl%3Den%26as_sdt%3D0%26as_vis%3D1%26oi%3Dscholart&ved=2ahUKEwjahMWZ_sTyAhVUHs0KHRzFCN4QgQN6BAgDEAE&usg=AOvVaw20vd-516IZImXjXUkCM7zw
Actually, one can find out a lot if one can tolerate information that may conflict with one's own preconceptions. As Valentine himself, to his own credit, was able to do prior to his passing.
Valentine was treated with doctor prescribed ivermectin.
"Prior to his hospitalization, Valentine said on the radio that he was "taking vitamin D like crazy" and that a doctor agreed to prescribe him an anti-parasite drug called ivermectin, according to the Associated Press. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has said not to take the medication to treat or prevent COVID-19.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/phil-valentine-dies-covid-conservative-radio-host-vaccine-skeptic/&ved=2ahUKEwiV2PL2_MTyAhWTVc0KHQfEBL0Q0PADKAB6BAgIEAE&usg=AOvVaw1_kSkzV6CsVo10sVlUiPPk
Clicked again. But that looks like the last I'm going to get out of that one unless someone is nice enough to click here?
https://ih.advfn.com/faucet/ym3dj7
Clicked!
"The FBI has warned that followers of the QAnon conspiracy theory could again engage in violence against political opponents out of frustration that the theory's predictions have not come true."
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/fbi-warns-that-qanon-followers-could-engage-real-world-violence-2021-06-14/
Even more things you didn't know about Texas:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165500570
Actually to be honest, I wasn't writing SPY puts today. I've been legging into writing QQQ puts for today's expiration.
QQQ puts had more premium available for the money one has to put up to cover than the SPY puts did.
Just before the minutes SPY was at 443.42 and today's $444 put was $1.08.
SPY was at 443.40 a few minutes ago and today's $444 put was 81¢.
That difference is implied volatility fading out.
It's volatility. The markets will probably go right back where they were before the release of the minutes.
Even though we are clueless as to what markets will do, implied volatility is going to come out of the options quickly. In simple terms, options will get cheaper.
Oooops yeah, they did mention "taper" - several times...
Hmmm, Fed must not have said "taper" too much in the minutes...
That is flat out false. That moron is on his own, and represents no one.
Got it!
And it's interesting to note what the guy who really wrote that book thinks of Trump: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/07/25/donald-trumps-ghostwriter-tells-all
Have I got a board for you: https://investorshub.advfn.com/Cat-House-19498/
Just follow Mike Lindell's advice and "forget about the evidence":
Oh, no worries. They'll just set another date - again.
That's an excellent observation. You are completely correct regarding unemployment benefit eligibility.
More mis-information from a political group which is trying to confuse the public by masquerading as what is actually a legitimate medical organization: https://www.aafp.org/group-six/home.html
No, not necessarily. But the shareholders who are paying for that phone should at least know how to contact him on it.
I realize this isn't on bitchute, but anyway:
After recovering from COVID-19, South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham returned to the Senate floor Tuesday with a message to his unvaccinated constituents: “For your own good and the good of our state, I would urge you to consider getting vaccinated.” pic.twitter.com/gwWNFZdzWx
— CBS News (@CBSNews) August 10, 2021
Hard to find anything remotely funny about that.
"There is no covid-19"
Oh, OK! Guess that makes a Coronavirus Anxiety Board a pointless endeavor...
W.H.O. said no such thing.