Hunting Value
Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.
Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.
Right on. Thanks Rick Fernandez.
And thanks for everything. You rule and I hope you do well in all your future endeavors. You deserve it.
V/r,
Israel Logan
Here's my assessment at the moment:
SLJB is not well. If anything good was coming from the OSC they would have ended the trading hault. As far as I know, the OSC is acting in the best interest of the public. They should understand that further delays are hurting investors and would be investors... AND the company, SLJB. If the OSC believes that SLJB is a legitmate operation they should have ended the hault to allow SLJB, investors and would be investors to go back into normal operations.
I really can't see how AF's are the ONLY thing holding up the OSC from coming to a resolution and ending a trading hault. The OSC should have investigators every bit as good as Turner & Stone auditors and should have been able to determine if there is fraud. The fact that they have reinforced the trading hault just backs up the allegation that SLJB is fraudulent as determined by professional investigators at the OSC.
I really hope I'm wrong but I just can't see the OSC intentionally hurting a business, it's owners and the general public without having a good reason.
Yeah, I'm getting impatient. Sink or swim time for SLJB.
So which will it be for SLJB in your opinion? Good or bad?
Any day now...
SOURCE: Sulja Brothers Building
Jun 26, 2007 06:00 ET
Sulja Announces Move and Expansion
"More details of these and other plans will be posted on our website @ www.suljabros.com shortly."
Where did you hear that and does anything matter much until these pinkys post AF's? I mean given the track record of other pinks lately.
"((( I hear there is news coming out about some contracts and sales soon)))"
Yep, that looks better
Just DL Google earth, it's free.
I don't know if paying for a better version of Google earth will get you more current photos.
This site says "current" pics but it's $9.95:
http://www.ussearch.com/consumer/ntsrflow/product.do?&adID=204100B860&adsource=27&TID=0&...
I'm not paying... and I'm going to sleep :)
Niterz folks
EDIT....I think the picture you posted is cut off to the left. Need to slide the picture over to the right some more and then you see something more like what Frenchy posted... If it is even the same thing... this could be a hoax someone put out there.
Yeah, I just looked at it in google earth... it basically looks like a pre-dated version of what you would see there today... If it's even an accurate post... can't really believe all you read on these boards. I trust Frenchy's pic but dunno bout this.. could be a hoax. Maybe part of the commercial area use has brought cosmetic and other developments.
And quite a few folks point out that google maps images can be several years old:
Quoted from: http://digg.com/tech_news/Google_Earth_Continues_To_Raise_Security_Concerns
"as a GIS professional (this kinda stuff is what i do for a living) .. let there be no doubt that the aerial photos visable on google earth are low quality compared to what is publically available to anyone out there with a little research. granted, it is not as easily accessible as google earth .. but it is available.
also, most the the aerial imagery you are seeing on google earth is AT LEAST 5 years old, the vast majority of it is nearly 10 years old, if not older. rest assured that any truly 'sensitive' areas are ommitted / blacked out / replaced with 'dummy' images."
Also depends on when the sattelite photo was taken. I remember looking at pics of my house and it had some wierd truck in my drive way that was from the previous owner of the house which had to be from a few years ago. They may only update their maps when there is significant changes to road ways.. so landscape development or other cosmetics may not reflect. Not sure, just my 2-cents.
And yes, I agree... I can't wait to see the pages turn in this story. Hopefully it's neverending but hopefully we see some better times too.
You're not in the Altus area are you? Just saw a crusty lookin' civilian type walk in my work area on the base here and he was driving an El Camino that looked like yours. Was a few days ago.
Go SLJB or w/e.
Q-West? Is that a hint?
I was talking about the semi-liquid stuff that dries solid. I hear SLJB has a lot of it. /shrug.
Whatever Millionfl and Frenchy say. I dunno :)
AF's are coming AF's are coming!!! That's all that matters. People that hang on to negativity are bound to live depressing lives.
Good luck with that.
AF's is AF's and they'ze a comin folks! And when they come you bettah look out cuz they'z a bringin' hell with them to all those short termers that sold and come back to look at this.
It's a dang shame, I rekkin'. cept for those patient prospectorsa an' ole timers... they'ze likin to strike it rich!
tee hee hee
AF's will show you why. Until then you must wait patiently like the longs of SLJB... if you can, that is.
Sulja is good for your money, basically.
Yeah, materials seized by the OSC/RCMP required to complete AF's were returned to SLJB. That's the RUMOR... what of it?
The originals required for the auditing firm... yes... is that so obscure to you? LMFAO
Pssst, EarnestDD... RUMOR has it that the OSC/RCMP returned the papers needed to complete the audit to SLJB. I'm pretty sure that the concrete deals were included in what was held by the OSC/RCMP...
You do the deductive reasoning on if SLJB has ANY concrete allocation... lol
I think this is my last post... you aren't milking a i-hub subscription outta me just yet... soon enough I'm sure.
My SLJB shares are GOLD!
LMAO All The Way To The BANK!!!
I did offer something of substance: Commone sense. People need cement. Sulja provides it. Pretty easy.
It's all speculation. Nothing more. No proof that it affects SLJB. Just pessimistic reasoning and negativity.
Yeah, that is my INTELLIGENT contribution. Thanks for the recognition. People still need cement... no brainer IMO!
You're the one that brought up cement as a concern for SLJB. Why else would it be a concern unless you don't believe your own post?
LOL... you are starting to sound like that that guy in Team America, "Well, the corporations are all.. uhhh Corporationy... UHHHH"... LOL
The allocations are all allocated to somewhere else and then uhhh the allocated cement has to get allocated to uhhh you know.... uhhhh customers that are reallocated to the allocation... uhhhh ALLOCATE@!!!
Hmmm, peculiar you are.
Hey, people still gonna need cement and I'm sure Sulja will still provide it! Bode schmode!
Could be a system test to make sure the logarithms are working right? don't want some math error to cause a 100 share buy to result in a 100% PPS drop/raise or w/e.
I'm just nervous about how much all that is costing them to sell their product. That's one thing about NAWL that worries me too... I just hope we don't see a financial report where the cost of sales out paces the sales themselves. With NAWL, it looks like they are on the come back trail... With PDGT there's no telling at this time.
Hopefully PDGT is just making money hand-over-fist :)
Yep, I'll hang around for a year or more to see how this PDGT story turns out.
Good post, ragsisme
I'm not sure what you just typed but there was a lot of it and words like "albeit" so I'm convinced by your argument.
I'm seeing a trend in Canadian organizations and release of information...
These are the stats reported on Yahoo:
Shares Outstanding: 447.39M
Float: 318.09M
Other interesting numbers... some fun (revenue growth, market cap) some blah (profitability, cash flow) but that's my inexperience talking... let me know your thoughts:
VALUATION MEASURES
Market Cap (intraday)6: 492.13K
Enterprise Value (13-Jul-07)3: N/A
Trailing P/E (ttm, intraday): N/A
Forward P/E (fye 30-Jun-08) 1: N/A
PEG Ratio (5 yr expected): N/A
Price/Sales (ttm): 2.93
Price/Book (mrq): N/A
Enterprise Value/Revenue (ttm)3: NaN
Enterprise Value/EBITDA (ttm)3: N/A
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year Ends: 30-June
Most Recent Quarter (mrq): 31-Mar-07
Profitability
Profit Margin (ttm): N/A
Operating Margin (ttm): -718.99%
Management Effectiveness
Return on Assets (ttm): -144.60%
Return on Equity (ttm): N/A
Income Statement
Revenue (ttm): 168.03K
Revenue Per Share (ttm): 0.001
Qtrly Revenue Growth (yoy): 1076.90%
Gross Profit (ttm): 45.42K
EBITDA (ttm): -1.20M
Net Income Avl to Common (ttm): -1.85M
Diluted EPS (ttm): -0.008
Qtrly Earnings Growth (yoy): N/A
Balance Sheet
Total Cash (mrq): 232.89K
Total Cash Per Share (mrq): 0.001
Total Debt (mrq): 5.43M
Total Debt/Equity (mrq): N/A
Current Ratio (mrq): 0.083
Book Value Per Share (mrq): -0.012
Cash Flow Statement
Operating Cash Flow (ttm): -1.55M
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm): -1.78M
Ohhhhh reaallly now.... Still feel the same way?
Seek and destroy in full effect?
Maybe related to the "seek and destroy" PR? hmmmmmmm :)
They are just keeping the overhead costs down. Good business model, imo.
The OSC has stopped communicating. They don't give a damn about SLJB investors. Who knows?
Cool and I hope so too. Thanks