Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Good money to be made writing covered calls. I was able to write some Aug 2s for .50
Nice and polite - I like that.
I don't think Ben is in control of BABL and may not be in a position to comment on it. Additionally, he may have other deals in flight involving the same Brits or similar Brits that would be compromised if he came out and said "those guys don't give a damn about legacy shareholders".
But, but, but - it is a very highly qualified squirrel!
I think that about sums it up.
Actually, has is a part time sloppy twit who has a conflict of interest as a principal in a company that may be a lender of last resort to IBGR.
Ben has always responded to my polite, constructive and relatively infrequent emails.
If you were barraging him with emails, I don't blame him for blocking you and/or not responding.
I see you are a mod here too. So - use your mod superpowers! Edit the iBox (leaving puff's stuff there) and make a sticky post.
Sure - it is EASY for retail to do this.
If I hold 100K shares, and want to sell them, there is nothing stopping me from feeding them in 10K at a time.
I know that at Schwab I can do this on a "set and forget" basis (enter the trade once and walk away) by chaining "conditional orders" together.
No - I submit 4 digit limit orders all the time.
Actually, you are both right - neither will give in. Which is why the "settlement conference" is just a box to check in the legal process and not likely to result in an actual settlement.
"...distinguished seasoned penny playing highly intelligent Investing dignitaries..."
It is really hard to fit 6 oxymorons into 8 words, but you did! :)
I think you are reading in too much.
My dog could do the shell's financials. The statements are not complicated.
I also missed the call. From the transcript, it appears that the only question was about a mistake in the numbers - they apparently had said the missed shipments had the same impact to net income as they did to revenues, which was wrong just on the face of it.
Here's the question I wanted to get an answer to - The company indicated that a good portion of the revenue miss was due to shipping issues. Not surprising, as shipping has been a challenge for many companies recently. They said they were working on fixing this. I want to know what specifically are they doing that will get all those shipments out the door in Q3 and also get the normal Q3 production delivered without encountering similar delays.
Apparently not.
I own some KRTL. Small position for me, and not willing to add until I see more substantive developments.
It will definitely be this side of Christmas. As to Christmas of what year, the jury is still out...
Of course it is dilutive. All reverse mergers are dilutive. All the assets are in the private company coming in. The only thing the shell has, by definition, is the public listing.
More cryptic bullshit.
VDRM is not a tech stock.
It seems a clear tell (especially when added to other evidence) that the r/m will in fact happen. We are just waiting for the final terms.
There's a typo on the balance sheet. The first column for assets is titled June 30, 2021, while it should read June 30, 2022. Sloppy.
That is a pretty telling point.
The revenue miss seems attributable to shipping issues. This suggests that, if they can clean these up and get the products shipped, Q3 could look very strong as it would include the normal quarterly activity plus the Q2 revenues delayed by the shipping issues.
The primary reason for waiting so long to announce something is that you have nothing to announce...
What leads you to believe that something significant will happen next week? TIA
I don't think that is meaningful. 222 shares is a $7 trade - the MMs don't give a damn what an order that small fills at, or whether it shows on the bid or ask. De minimus.
In theory, getting to pink limited should allow individuals to purchase shares. However, on a practical level, each brokerage has its own list of securities that can not be traded. These are generally based on the OTC Markets classification, but the lists are not updated immediately when OTC Markets makes a change.
In other words, if BABL goes to pink limited on OTC-M, you probably won't be able to trade BABL immediately.
I'd love to believe you, but Richards has NEVER shown any sense of urgency. Further, to say something will happen by March implies that Richards has one or more offers he is sitting on while waiting on a better offer. I really doubt that he has an offer in hand.
I am rooting for something to happen before March although I am not convinced it will.
Is "imminent" based on specific info or wishful thinking or just because you figure something has to happen with the shell before March 2023?
"Change of Control" presumes that someone is actually in control now. There is no evidence of that as ASKH drifts aimlessly.
I know, change of control refers to controlling ownership, but I sure wish Richards would step up and DO SOMETHING.
What would drive a big jump in insurance expense? Only thing I can think of is adding more plant and equipment to the base of insured assets.
I am glad to see ANY sign of life for BABL
I get concerned when a company can only get financing from a firm controlled by its part-time CFO. Whose side is he on?
In general, "do your DD" doesn't mean "ask anonymous strangers on a message board"...
Additionally, given that this is a reverse merger, you won't be able to find those data as yet as all the history is in the private company.
If the wells were cash-flowing that much EACH, they would not have been for sale!
The figure is for all the wells, in total.
Unfortunately the similarity ends there. Something is actually happening with CSUI.
Total. I would think, from the wording of the PR.
How about door number 3 - absolutely nothing?
Is that the empty shell sector?
Interesting thought.
Is CSUi a Synergy shell? If not posts about it are off topic for this board.