Although he looks alone, somebody wants him on the phone.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Not speaking for everyone, but sometimes I have to edit my own posts due to comma or apostrophe abuse...
That will happen if someone edits a post after you have initially read it.
You do know that "ad" was produced by a Republican organization?
There is a grant application process in place. Fauci can't just send Congressionally appropriated funds to whoever agrees with him, or with hold them from those that don't.
He would be abusing his office were that the case.
Really? And how many times has the knuckle dragging rural white male been ID'ed as being the core of Trump's support??
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/sep/14/donald-trump-alpha-male-chimpanzee-behavior
I'm a primate. I have no issues with it. It's science.
So who selects the author of the "ethnic cleansing" A.I. algorithm?
The real point of the story is one that seems to be missed:
"The company, which tailors content to users based on their past browsing and viewing habits."
What we've got (and this is by no means limited to Facebook) is AI 'bots' feeding us information which tends to re-enforce (mis?)-information that we may have already been fed by various internet sources.
The problem lies with those who can't (or won't) think for themselves being encouraged in their own cognitive biases.
Fauci is not in a position to "grant" money to anyone.
Only the Congress can grant money.
Humans are "primates". All of us.
https://www.britannica.com/animal/primate-mammal
"I'm sure NYBob will be at my side!"
You two would be pretty formidable. Not sure anyone could win any arguments against that team...
A legitimate clinical trial is underway:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04885530
They are apparently still recruiting participants. Contact information:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04885530#contacts
Wow, Dr. Peter McCullough does not stand well under even casual research.
Why is everyone and/or institution he claims he's ever been associated with suing him to stop him from saying they are associated with him?
I, for one, certainly can't challenge Dr. Stella's qualifications regarding that particular approach toward medical treatment...
"WWG1WGA"? Well, if ya wanna go there yer gonna have to go it alone...
"Who needs medical or science degrees, or experience in epidemiology?
We certainly don't need that! Not when we got BitChute!!!
The answer's pretty obvious:
"What's not to like, except that she advocates a rational approach to dealing with COVID?"
There's no room for rationality!!
Exactly. My profession involved worldwide travel. Checking with the State Department for required vaccines was routine.
I can't imagine a circumstance where I wouldn't have wanted to have them.
"Therapeutics are banned from discussion on t.v., radio, social media."
Well, you sure wouldn't know that by watching, listening and reading TV, radio, and social media. .
"Are you not informed that Ivermectin is used to treat humans?"
Oh! So it's not banned?
I thought you said it was banned??
Failed to respond? I explained it in the post you are replying to:
"If the US Military are still faithful to their nation and everything we
have witnessed was in fact allowed to happen as a tactic known as
"Devolution", then surely that milestone has been reached."
The current state of affairs was explained to us all 43 years ago:
That is true, perhaps due to an anti-inflammatory characteristic but there is a lack of data regarding whether it was the ivermectin, or whether the particular patient involved would have been a mild case anyway.
The official stance is it should not be used as a treatment as there has never been a scientifically conducted trial that showed it was actually effective.
Merck makes human qualified ivermectin and, it's worth noting, has no stake in a vaccine. Their stance:
https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on-ivermectin-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/
It's actually misinformation being peddled by the anti-vaxxers that ivermectin or hydroxy are banned. If you want to hook up with a doctor willing to prescribe it, there's no reason you can't get it as a treatment.
Just send these guys $90 and they say they'll fix you right up: https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/treatments/how-do-i-get-covid-19-medication/
They're not banned. All you got to do is send 90 bucks:
https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/treatments/how-do-i-get-covid-19-medication/
Unless, of course, this is an illegitimate organization...
Hydroxy is not "banned". Neither is ivermectin for that matter.
It's just that neither of them are recognized as legitimate treatments for Covid, and therefore legitimate health care professionals aren't using them.
I dunno, you're the one that threw out the 1%. It's actually 1.6% in the U.S. That is significantly higher than 1% on a statistical basis.
For certain populations though, it's much worse than even that:
https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality
Actually, it's the uninformed ignoramuses that have fallen for the "group think" that believes America's Frontline Doctors is a legitimate medical association:
https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-critical-thinking-pseudoscience/back-away-americas-frontline-doctors
https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/90536
https://time.com/6092368/americas-frontline-doctors-covid-19-misinformation/
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-most-dangerous-and-deranged-claims-in-americas-frontline-doctors-motion-against-covid-vaccinations
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/voices/2020/08/03/americas-frontline-doctors-dangerous-viral-video-column/5550377002/
https://medika.life/americas-frontline-doctors-want-to-become-the-new-republics-nih/
https://medika.life/simone-gold-and-americas-frontline-con-artists-launch-a-road-trip/
Uhhhh, yeah. That video was obviously meant to be satirical.
"If your words and actions kill people, you certainly deserve to be prosecuted."
No.
Although the Vax denier's words and actions certainly contribute to that end, no one should be prosecuted for having an opinion.
No matter how far one's opinion may deviate from reality, it's still one's right to have it.
"The 1% danger of dying?"
That is actually an extraordinarily high incidence. A 1% mortality rate in any endeavor would be completely unacceptable. Would any sane person want to walk on a stairway, get in a vehicle, fly an aircraft, or even fly into space if the mortality rate of such an action were 1%?
And besides that, Covid can screw one up pretty badly without actually having to kill them.
Yeah, except that's just completely false.
Yeah, except that didn't happen. And technically it won't be Tuesday in D.C. for another 2 1/2 hours...
Yeah, except that story is 100% false.
We had a Victrola record player when I was a kid. We weren't allowed to touch it until we were teens, because the records were incredibly brittle.
A timely tune considering Ida is ashore and heading for Mississippi:
Yeah, but then we could also have a conversation about attractions to sticky girls...
That's just dumb. Here's a proof: Try picking up a key with a magnet.
You would think if your link pointed to a real "Bar Association" they would have something going on besides vaccine paranoia?
I mean, there must be something else going on in the legal world over there:
https://indianbarassociation.in/blogs-iba/
That just doesn't pass the common sense test.
One example: There are literally thousands of election precincts in the United States. So if this widespread fraud took place, one would expect at least a few precinct captains or chairpersons to have spoken up. You know, saying "Hey, wait a minute!". But the silence from the bottom is deafening.
The only people who have this "preponderance of evidence" have been a handful of Trump's bootlickers who, it's worth noting, he does not hesitate to discard once he perceives he no longer has use for them.
"Same words selected by a Bar Association with a million or more lawyers"
Except it's not. That's posted on a website built by someone who is impersonating this group: https://www.indianbarassociation.org/