Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I don't know. I'm a stranger here myself. LOL!
You mean jmc may have been lying to me???
Amen.
[the power of prayer should never be underestimated]
He's just angry because the comet left without him and he's stuck with all that kool aid.
Early Alzheimers? Keeps forgetting his password? I don't think he's a boxer. LOL!
Oh by the way, this IS you, isn't it Dave?
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/memalias.cgi?member=short_timer10
patchman never posted on the Jag Board but I did (note DID).
Yes, you apparently did, as recently as this evening.
This is the lawsuit for the EATC-RB subpoenas:
Eagletech vs Bryn Mawr.
11th Judicial Circuit FL
Judge Victor Tobin
# 03-012404-02
Eagletech Communications, Inc. v. Bryn Mawr Investment Group, Inc., et al.
Case No: 01-26217
This complaint originated with 42 named defendants and alleged that the defendants obtained control over the plaintiff?s securities through fraudulent representations. The defendants took actions to manipulate the stock price to gain a ?financial strangle-hold? on the plaintiff. The goal was to gain access to the plaintiff?s free-trading stock sold publicly, and to ?pump? up the trading value
of the plaintiff?s stock and then to ?dump? it either for profit while high or for an even greater profit by selling it short before driving the price of the stock down.
The plaintiff further alleged that the Defendants engaged in this conduct for profit by selling short the stock and by financially crippling and bankrupting the plaintiff, to enable them to obtain the plaintiff?s technology for a fraction of its value. After two years of litigation, the case was transferred to Broward County.
http://www.steelhector.com/print_profile.php?id=306
Look who archived the PR about the original lawsuit, and guess who was EATC's lead attorney:
http://www.mary.cc/astn/2.htm
Mike Tyson deserves credit for the phrase he originally uttered in 2002 after being pummeled for 8 rounds: "I guess I'm gonna fade into bolivian." There must be something about being struck repeatedly in the head that lends itself to such (ahem) wit.
Some others from Tyson:
"I can sell out Madison Square Garden masturbating."
"I'm just a dark guy from a den of iniquity. A dark shadowy figure from the bowels of iniquity. I wish I could be Mike who gets an endorsement deal. But you can't make a lie and a truth go together. This country wasn't built on moral fiber. This country was built on rape, slavery, murder, degradation and affiliation with crime."
"I'm on the Zoloft to keep from killing y'all."
"My power is discombobulatingly devastating I could feel is muscle tissues collapse under my force. It's ludicrous these mortals even attempt to enter my realm."
"At times, I come across as crude or crass, that irritates you when I come across like a Neanderthal or a babbling idiot at times. But I like to be that person. I like to show you all that person because that's who you come to see."
"The one thing I know, everyone respects the true person and everyone's not true with themselves. All of these people who are heroes, these guys who have been lily white and clean all their lives, if they went through what I went through, they would commit suicide. They don't have the heart that I have. I've lived places they can't defecate in."
"[He] called me a 'rapist' and a 'recluse'. I'm not a recluse."
"All praise is to Allah, I'll fight any man, any animal, if Jesus were here I'd fight him too."
I've been around...
We're just not posting on the same scam boards these daze. LOL!
Life is good! Howz by you?
"You know that the hypnotized never lie."
--Pete Townshend
hypnotize people and sell 'em CMKX. Dangle a diamond before their eyes.
What 'gravy train'? CDVJ used the prospect of a dividend to sucker fools into buying and/or holding shares as the price declined precipitously. To buy a million shares of CDVJ on April 8 would have cost $4500 and you would have been entitled to 100k shares of CSJJ that you can buy today for $300. You can buy a million shares of CDVJ today for $600. Be thankful you missed it. LOL!
Bezzbawl- You had to own CDVJ shares on either April 9 or May 19 to qualify for the dividend distribution of CSJJ shares.
Stockgate busted by one of the best...
---------------
By: sailbad43
04 Aug 2004, 04:57 PM EDT
Msg. 46608 of 46635
(This msg. is a reply to 46599 by jimymac.)
The Naked Short Virus Scam
"To complement its publication, 3DIntel said it has unveiled a new patent pending program, called The Naked Short Virus Scan, which enables US based public companies to determine their short position in their stock. ?The scan will identify in the size of short, date of occurrence, and the brokerage houses holding the short positions,? the company stated."
?Naked Short Selling: The Illegal Hacking of the U.S. Financial System,? by Alan Lomax.
Information about the book is at http://www.thirtythumbs.com , which the authors say describe the fifteen staffers involved in putting it together.
Here is what I was able to dig up in less than fifteen minutes.
Thirtythumbs.com was registered by Doug Brown and his email address is doug@flynotes.com
http://www.networksolutions.com/en_US/whois/results.jhtml;jsessionid=T5NDHXG2DNXPQCWLEALSFFA?whoisto...
Looks like Doug Brown is a football coach. Here is what a search on "flynotes.com" turns up.
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22flynotes.com%22&btnG=Search&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8
The next move was to look for Thirty Thumbs as a Utah corporation. Here is a link to help you locate it. Sure enough it is owned by "Douglas E Brown" of the same 6226 Meadowcrest as the domain names.
https://secure.utah.gov/bes/bes
Douglas Brown is a common name, so do a search on "Douglas E Brown" + "Utah" for some interesting results.
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Douglas+E+Brown%22+Utah&btnG=Search&hl=en&lr=&ie=U...
I liked this one in particular:
Defendant Douglas Brown pleaded guilty to securities fraud, being an unregistered broker-dealer, and wire fraud stemming from the sale of American securities to investors in Germany. He now appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss portions of the indictment for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The government cross-appeals the district court's loss calculation under the Sentencing Guidelines. We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1291; 18 U.S.C. § 3742(b), and affirm.
This case involves the fraudulent sale of American securities to investors in Germany. The grand jury returned a 255-count superseding indictment against Douglas Brown, Hans Kuhlen, and others, charging them with conspiracy, securities fraud, transacting in securities while not registered as broker-dealers, wire fraud, and money laundering. The indictment alleges in pertinent part that, from Utah, Mr. Brown created companies and stocks without substance, provided those stocks for resale in Germany through Mr. Kuhlen and others, misrepresented the value of those stocks to support their sale, and transferred the proceeds of the fraud from Germany to Utah.
http://www.kscourts.org/ca10/cases/1998/12/97-4165.htm
Taking into account that I could find no 3DIntel in Austin, I would suspect that Douglas E Brown is up to his old tricks. With able assistance from Financial Wire no doubt.
It looks like life has never been better for scammers.
---------------------
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=DTMG&read=46608
Janice- I don't think that the Jag lawsuit is available via PACER. PACER only provides access to the Federal courts, and not all jurisdictions make documents available. What is available is indeed very inexpensive--seven cents per page.
Another Heaven's Gate believer who missed the comet.
And now for something completely different...
Email has become a central communication channel for private and professional exchange. Its format remains equally neutral regardless of the relation to the recipient. While writing remains an excellent vehicle to communicate tone and emotion, this can sometimes be a painstaking and tedious process, and requires considerable skill.
EmoteMail is an email client that is augmented to convey aspects of the writing context to the recipient. The client captures facial expressions and typing speed and introduces them as design elements. These contextual cues provide extra information that can help the recipient decode the tone of the mail. Moreover, the contextual information is gathered and automatically embedded as the sender composes the email, allowing an additional channel of expression.
http://emotemail.media.mit.edu/
If Cortellazzi wanted to answer such questions, he could simply do what he's paid lip service to since March and file proper periodic reports with the SEC. Do you think bombarding him with calls from shareholders will change his strategy? Consider his Montessori school gambit. He apparently didn't respond to the angry parents until he was forced to do so by the court. He must read your posts and laugh.
You used to call Cortellazzi regularly, posting his lies on the RB board along with your own. Doesn't he take your calls anymore?
THE CEO DUNCE CARD By CHRISTOPHER BYRON
July 26, 2004 -- IT'S time to face facts, folks: The business of prosecuting white-collar crime in America is collapsing, manhandled toward ruin by clever, high-priced lawyers, inept and underpaid prosecutors, and the misuse and abuse of the basic principle of law known as scienter upon which the whole wobbly edifice rests.
It was damaging enough to the public's trust in the system when the media gave a soapbox to Martha Stewart, fresh from her sentencing in federal court two weeks ago, so that she could play her gender-victimization card and rail against the U.S. government for jamming her up with a rigged felony conviction on what she now insists was really nothing more than a "small personal matter."
But it was only days later when former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger moved the goalposts for prosecutors right out of the stadium. This happened when the news broke last week that Berger had gotten caught 10 months earlier pilfering top secret documents from the National Archives in Washington, following which the FBI was alerted.
Relying on Berger's preposterous claim that he had done nothing improper, the FBI has reportedly spent the last seven months quietly "investigating" whether Berger's theft amounted to a crime ? a conclusion that it still has not yet reached.
It is tempting to point to such outrages as yet more of Bill Clinton's legacy of warped Presidential leadership. But there is more at stake here than whether the difference between "oral sex and sex" is any greater than the difference between the theft of a fistful of top secret documents from the National Archives, and simply walking out the door of the building with the papers hidden in one's briefcase and coat pockets.
Of course it was a crime for Berger to do what he did. But the public has become so numbed to the rhetorical waltzing of its leaders in such situations that no one seems to notice what this all really means, especially when it comes to the criminal law.
What it means is just this: Given the direction in which the law has been proceeding in this area, one can now reasonably say that when it comes to the criminal behavior of those who wear suits and ties to work, the legal principle of res ipsa loquitur (the thing speaks for itself) no longer applies, meaning that a clever liar can now get away with just about anything.
In truth, the work of prosecuting white-collar crime in America has been in a state of disarray for years, with the experts unable to agree on what white collar crime even is.
THE only thing that re ally distinguishes white-collar crime from the other types is the tender treatment that white collar criminals receive from the judicial process by way of the concept of scienter or "criminal intent."
In white-collar crime cases, it is not the crime itself that matters, but the state of mind of the defendant: Did he have scienter, or guilty intent, when he committed the offense?
Whatever purpose scienter may once have served in white collar crime cases, the concept has by now become nothing more than a ploy by which a quick-witted defendant can beat a rap. It was former Secretary of Defense Clark Clifford who showed the way, employing what amounted to an "I'm stupid" defense to exonerate himself from criminal responsibility at the start of the 1990s in the infamous BCCI bank fraud affair.
One of the cleverest politicians in Washington, Clifford was acquitted of fraud and bribery charges after arguing in court that he had nonetheless been stupid and naive when the head of Saudi Arabia's secret intelligence service walked into his office dressed in the raiment of a Bedouin nomad and handed him a bag of cash money to serve as his mouthpiece in what turned out to be a criminal conspiracy to infiltrate America's banking system.
In the world of Wall Street, the "I'm stupid" defense has hogtied prosecutors from bringing countless numbers of the crooks and swindlers in the bull market in of the 1990s to justice, and the diversion of resources that has resulted from the attacks of 9/11 has made the problem even worse.
In Miami, a two-year undercover sting operation dubbed Bermuda Short netted 58 people on stock market charges of various sorts in the summer of 2002. One defendant in the case pleaded guilty and became a federal witness against the operator of a fraudulent $1 billion hedge fund, the Lancer Group, that was shut down by an emergency order of the SEC a year ago. But no charges have yet been brought against any of those involved.
Of the dozens of large and well-publicized cases that have been the focus of criminal investigations in the world of post-9/11 Wall Street, only three have ripened into cases that have brought courtroom convictions.
They are: investment banker Frank Quattrone of CS First Boston, for obstruction of justice; John and Timothy Rigas of Adelphia Communications for securities fraud, and Martha Stewart for obstruction and making false statements to federal investigators. Seven other individuals ? four from Qwest Communications, two from Adelphia, and one from Tyco International ? have been acquitted.
Twelve more individuals, including Sam Waksal of Imclone Systems and Martin Grass of Rite Aid Corp., have pleaded guilty to offenses of one sort or another, while a half dozen others, including Kenneth Lay of Enron, Bernard Ebbers of Worldcom, and Richard Scrushy of HealthSouth Corp. ? have pleaded not guilty and are awaiting trial.
The trials of two other defendants (Dennis Kozlowski and Mark Swartz, both of Tyco) have already resulted in hung juries, with both men now awaiting retrial.
Only three more cases of any importance are still to come. The first, in which Richard Scrushy, the former chairman and CEO of Alabama-based HealthSouth Corp. faces charges of fraud, conspiracy, money laundering, and other offenses involving $2.5 billion in accounting frauds, is set for trial in September.
More than a dozen of Scrushy's underlings have already pleaded guilty in the case, but Scrushy is hanging tough with his own version of the "I'm stupid" defense, and is claiming that any fraud at the company was the secret work of diabolical underlings like his ex-CFO, Bill Owens.
Both of the big guns in the other A-list cases remaining ? ex-chairman Kenneth Lay of Enron Corp. and his counterpart at Worldcom Corp., Bernie Ebbers ? are also copping the "I'm stupid" defense. Lay claims he was oblivious to the frauds that were erupting under his nose at Enron and that he had been duped by his ex-CFO at Enron, Andrew Fastow.
SIMILARLY, Bernie Eb bers of Worldcom says he too is not guilty by reason of stupidity, and is expected to point the finger of blame instead at his own CFO, Scott Sullivan, when the case goes to trial in January.
Bottom line: When it comes to restoring public confidence in the courts and Wall Street, all the guilty pleas on earth won't amount to much if their purpose is to gain evidence against CEOs who nonetheless wind up tap-dancing their way to freedom on a smile and a handshake and the assurance that they're really, really stupid.
When you run a red light, or assault your spouse, or shoplift something from The Gap, the cops don't look at you and ask, "OK, now tell us, what were you really intending to do?" Quite the contrary, they charge you with what you did plain-and-simple, because what you did was obvious, and why you did it was irrelevant.
Why should it be any different for people at the very pinnacle of the economic ladder? If you're smart enough to know that what you did was stupid, then you're smart enough to take responsibility for it. As they say in the law: res ipsa loquitur.
*Please send e-mail to: Cbyron@nypost.com
Bonnie- I think moderator here is the more prestigious position. LOL!
Yep, sometimes a picture is worth...
...well, you know.
Nanuck- If you ran the board, Matt would have to change the designation from 'moderator' to 'agitator'. LOL!
I wrote and asked to become the moderator some time ago, but Matt politely declined to grant me the position.
I guess I'm not 'moderate' enough. LOL!
A move to AMEX is a common 'carrot on a stick' that's offered by penny trash with no real hope of qualifying other than with a reverse split. I'd love to see statistics on how many such companies tout the move but never make it.
That's not to say it doesn't happen--some do indeed 'graduate':
http://www.otcbb.com/dynamic/tradingdata/daily/graduations.htm
It seems as if you get the last word here, Sandra, for Gabe has been 'fried'. That's IHUB parlance for being kicked off the site. His brain was apparently fried long ago. LOL!
So what ever happened to those pictures you were going to post for us. I'm sure most of us would love to see at last what the Penny King looks like.
In any case, I hope all is well with you and the kids, and would wish you good fortune.
I think he sat with a list of penny trash and started requesting new boards. Matt called him a 'pumper clown' when he fried him. He fried Willy today as well, and guess which two ex-IHUB posters are workin' the MAGR board on RB.
There was a time here on IHUB when a significant percentage of the penny trash boards were moderated by a certain non-EE who had claimed to be a director of ECNC and laughed like one of the Three Stooges. Bombarded with complaints about selective deletions, Matt slapped him down and eventually fried him.
Round up the usual suspects!
(Sorry...couldn't resist. )
Co-Editor of Jack Anderson Column Files Sui Against Internet Free Speech Advocate
Douglas Cohn, CEO of HQuotient Software and Co-Editor of famed investigative journalist Jack Anderson's Washington Merry Go Round syndicated column has filed a SLAPP suit against Max Jones, an internet critic of his company.
(PRWEB) Lefty's Bar and Grill.org, a private internet community of penny stock market reform advocates, announced today that is sponsering a legal defense fund site for Texas native Max "jigfish" Jones, an internet message board critic of Vienna, VA based HQuotient Software. HQuotient, a "penny stock" trading on the Pink Sheets, offers various medical software products and services. Jones has been sued by Douglas Cohn, CEO of HQuotient for posting allegedly defamatory comments about the company on the Internet message board site Raging Bull. "Jigfish" is the internet alias under which Jones posted his comments.
The defense fund site is on the Web at:
http://leftysbarandgrill.org/max/maxjonesdefensefund.html.
All donations to the fund will be deposited to a trust account maintained by Jones' Virginia counsel, and will be used only for the direct expenses of his defense.
In the suit in the US District Court for Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division, case #04-CV-468, Cohn alleges that Jones is behind a sinister plot to sell his company's stock short and profit from a decline in its share price. Since filing the suit the penny stock-which trades on the pink sheets under the symbol HQNT-has lost 75% of its value. Jones denies any involvement in HQNT trading or short selling, and has not been a shareholder of HQNT for several years.
Corporate suits against critics are often termed SLAPP suits (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation).In contrast to most litigation, SLAPP suits are brought, not to resolve a problem, but to remove a controversy from the public arena-where the company may be loosing the battle of opinion-to the judicial arena where the "chill" and expense of defense may enable the company to use its financial resources to silence its critics.
The suit against Jones is doubly ironic in that Jack Anderson, famed investigative journalist and free speech advocate, served until recently on the HQNT Board of Directors and shares authorship of his Washington Merry-Go-Round syndicated column with HQNT CEO Cohn. Anderson will always be remembered for his dogged pursuit of the truth and his tireless defense of free speech rights. Anderson's writings have earned him a Pulitzer prize, and he has received numerous awards and citations for his defense of the First Amendment.
"Jack Anderson has always been a hero of mine," said LB&G spokesperson Thomas "Lefty" Malone. "but he seems to have slipped a cog or two lately. Why on earth would Jack condone suing a person for asking questions about the management and public claims of a public company? Since he was on the Board of Directors of the Company and closely allied with Cohn he had to have known of this action."
"Anderson seems to have had problems with his famed sense of smell in the recent past," continued Malone. "He wrote a undocumented column devoted to the psuedo issue of "naked shorting" in which he claimed that this practice was funding terrorism. Neither he not Cohn disclosed in the column that they were principals in a company claiming to have been a victim of this practice. Now he is condoning this abuse of free speech by his silence."
HQNT recently announced the resignation of Anderson from the Board of Directors of the company. According to a company statement, Mr. Anderson resigned because of serious health problems.
"In our opinion," continued Malone, "this suit is nothing but a desperate attempt to silence critics of what looks to be a failing business. Our-Street.com, an internet watchdog publication, accused the company of accounting irregularities last year. The company announced the resignation of its auditor two weeks before its annual audited financial statements were due, and has since missed deadline after deadline for filing audited statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Because of this delay the company has been delisted from the NASDAQ OTC-BB market and now trades on the pink sheets. Max did nothing but ask legitimate questions. We think Cohn targeted him because he is 70 years old, has heart problems, and has no resources for his legal defense."
Other HQNT woes include losing a civil fraud suit filed by the Ohio Hospital Association, who alleged HQNT misrepresented the capabilities of their software products and their corporate capabilities. Although HQNT is appealing the case, they were required to post a bond of over $500,000 to guarantee payment of the judgement should their appeal of the original default judgement be unsuccessful. HQuotient is also defending itself in a $1.9 million dollar lawsuit that alleges that HQNT committed stock fraud. Detailed information about this suit and other HQNT financial issues are available at the Our Street website, www.our-street.com. Our Street has no affiliation with Lefty's Bar and Grill.org.
"SLAPP suits are the last resort of a scam in most cases," said Malone. "When company officials cannot refute critics, they try to silence them through abusive use of the court system."
"Max is standing up to this abuse and fighting it," continued Malone. "but he needs your financial assistance. It's that simple. If you believe in free speech, then go the Max Jones Legal Defense site and donate."
"Maybe," said Malone, "Anderson will come to his senses and send in a pledge."
The Defense Fund is on the Web at http://leftysbarandgrill.org/max/maxjonesdefensefund.html
# # #
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/7/prweb143394.htm
Co-Editor of Jack Anderson Column Files Suit Against Internet Free Speech Advocate
Douglas Cohn, CEO of HQuotient Software and Co-Editor of famed investigative journalist Jack Anderson's Washington Merry Go Round syndicated column has filed a SLAPP suit against Max Jones, an internet critic of his company.
(PRWEB) Lefty's Bar and Grill.org, a private internet community of penny stock market reform advocates, announced today that is sponsering a legal defense fund site for Texas native Max "jigfish" Jones, an internet message board critic of Vienna, VA based HQuotient Software. HQuotient, a "penny stock" trading on the Pink Sheets, offers various medical software products and services. Jones has been sued by Douglas Cohn, CEO of HQuotient for posting allegedly defamatory comments about the company on the Internet message board site Raging Bull. "Jigfish" is the internet alias under which Jones posted his comments.
The defense fund site is on the Web at:
http://leftysbarandgrill.org/max/maxjonesdefensefund.html.
All donations to the fund will be deposited to a trust account maintained by Jones' Virginia counsel, and will be used only for the direct expenses of his defense.
In the suit in the US District Court for Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division, case #04-CV-468, Cohn alleges that Jones is behind a sinister plot to sell his company's stock short and profit from a decline in its share price. Since filing the suit the penny stock-which trades on the pink sheets under the symbol HQNT-has lost 75% of its value. Jones denies any involvement in HQNT trading or short selling, and has not been a shareholder of HQNT for several years.
Corporate suits against critics are often termed SLAPP suits (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation).In contrast to most litigation, SLAPP suits are brought, not to resolve a problem, but to remove a controversy from the public arena-where the company may be loosing the battle of opinion-to the judicial arena where the "chill" and expense of defense may enable the company to use its financial resources to silence its critics.
The suit against Jones is doubly ironic in that Jack Anderson, famed investigative journalist and free speech advocate, served until recently on the HQNT Board of Directors and shares authorship of his Washington Merry-Go-Round syndicated column with HQNT CEO Cohn. Anderson will always be remembered for his dogged pursuit of the truth and his tireless defense of free speech rights. Anderson's writings have earned him a Pulitzer prize, and he has received numerous awards and citations for his defense of the First Amendment.
"Jack Anderson has always been a hero of mine," said LB&G spokesperson Thomas "Lefty" Malone. "but he seems to have slipped a cog or two lately. Why on earth would Jack condone suing a person for asking questions about the management and public claims of a public company? Since he was on the Board of Directors of the Company and closely allied with Cohn he had to have known of this action."
"Anderson seems to have had problems with his famed sense of smell in the recent past," continued Malone. "He wrote a undocumented column devoted to the psuedo issue of "naked shorting" in which he claimed that this practice was funding terrorism. Neither he not Cohn disclosed in the column that they were principals in a company claiming to have been a victim of this practice. Now he is condoning this abuse of free speech by his silence."
HQNT recently announced the resignation of Anderson from the Board of Directors of the company. According to a company statement, Mr. Anderson resigned because of serious health problems.
"In our opinion," continued Malone, "this suit is nothing but a desperate attempt to silence critics of what looks to be a failing business. Our-Street.com, an internet watchdog publication, accused the company of accounting irregularities last year. The company announced the resignation of its auditor two weeks before its annual audited financial statements were due, and has since missed deadline after deadline for filing audited statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Because of this delay the company has been delisted from the NASDAQ OTC-BB market and now trades on the pink sheets. Max did nothing but ask legitimate questions. We think Cohn targeted him because he is 70 years old, has heart problems, and has no resources for his legal defense."
Other HQNT woes include losing a civil fraud suit filed by the Ohio Hospital Association, who alleged HQNT misrepresented the capabilities of their software products and their corporate capabilities. Although HQNT is appealing the case, they were required to post a bond of over $500,000 to guarantee payment of the judgement should their appeal of the original default judgement be unsuccessful. HQuotient is also defending itself in a $1.9 million dollar lawsuit that alleges that HQNT committed stock fraud. Detailed information about this suit and other HQNT financial issues are available at the Our Street website, www.our-street.com. Our Street has no affiliation with Lefty's Bar and Grill.org.
"SLAPP suits are the last resort of a scam in most cases," said Malone. "When company officials cannot refute critics, they try to silence them through abusive use of the court system."
"Max is standing up to this abuse and fighting it," continued Malone. "but he needs your financial assistance. It's that simple. If you believe in free speech, then go the Max Jones Legal Defense site and donate."
"Maybe," said Malone, "Anderson will come to his senses and send in a pledge."
The Defense Fund is on the Web at http://leftysbarandgrill.org/max/maxjonesdefensefund.html
# # #
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/7/prweb143394.htm
E- The NMKT releases are being spammed relentlessly by the members of the get-shorty cult as 'proof' that so-called 'bashers' and the evil marketmakers are aiding and abetting the nefarious height-challenged nudists in their quest for world domination.
Quite seriously, I've not seen such a suspicious scenario in a while, and this one cries out for intense scrutiny.
Hoist the Jolie Rouge!
EVEN- Matt will remove posts based on the notion that the content is 'off-topic' and that is used as a broad catch-all. Someone must of course complain about the post and TOS it. I've found that writing to Matt privately asking to restore the post works with a reasonable request.
I would support the notion that this board has been used for broader purpose than discussion of just TLXX, and that discussion regarding PIPE financing as it applies to other scenarios is quite ON topic here.
Worth a try. In general I've found that Matt is fair.
EVEN- I just ran the corporate record for XXR and then googled the address to find that Gere's Tibet House is located in the same building.
Current Entity Name: XXR CONSULTING, INC.
Initial DOS Filing Date: SEPTEMBER 06, 2002
County: NEW YORK
Jurisdiction: NEW YORK
Entity Type: DOMESTIC BUSINESS CORPORATION
Current Entity Status: ACTIVE
DOS Process (Address to which DOS will mail process if accepted on behalf of the entity)
MARISA KRAMER
SUITE 7A
22 WEST 15TH STREET
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10011
http://lin.kz/?n6itb
Richard Gere
22 west 15th Street
New York NY 10011
http://lin.kz/?jiqdh
I suppose it's coincident. Kramer must have been a tenant in the building at the time of the registration. Another reference gave their location on Long Island.
Well Bonnie, I'm an infomaniac (please enunciate carefully ), so I'm always exploring the how and why of things. Sometimes the information is even useful. LOL!
Bonnie- I don't know how that could relate...
...and I don't think an exchange of certs is a 'trade' that's reportable. In any case it was occuring prior to the share exchange announcement.
A famous basher oopsies while commenting on typically toutish spelling...
By: firebird_1965
22 Jul 2004, 11:18 AM EDT
Msg. 48990 of 49020
(This msg. is a reply to 48989 by DueDillinger.)
Due, it's the way they teach 'em at tout school...
Looser!!
three sure-fire ways to tell a paid tout:
1) ask 'em to describe in their OWN words what makes this a good stock to buy - they can't answer that.
2) they use the "Strong Buy" voluntary disclosure
3) they mispell the same words over and over... especially loser
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=NXIA&read=48990
Lard have Marci.
(Needs to eat less carbohydrants)
Amazing grease! From the RB Religion board...
By: sam77084
28 Apr 2004, 01:42 PM EDT
Msg. 199340 of 388599
(This msg. is a reply to 199301 by eryk.)
eryke
thank you for the information, also I might add, that first religion that beleived in one god called Zorostrian, which started in persia/iraq, he beleived in one god with several daughters, then came or was another religion started in rome (europe) called motharizm (spelling?) and both were before christ. I was shocked to learn that matharizm beleived in god who had son born from virgin woman and they celebrated december 25th. If you connect dots and read plato and other ancient writers you see that a myth was created but changed by man to suit his culture or used to win and dominate people. For example, before christ they believed God had daughters then religion called them angles. Before christ the knew of seven planets but later became seven heavens. dec. 25th also came from matharizm religion. If you read galgimish story which was written during bibeloneon/Summer time and before christ talks about the flood and if you compare the three major religion you find exact copy of this myth story religious books.
Of course one can make money in a pumpadump, which is why they exist. I'd love to see the rules tightened so that such stocks could not flourish. For every experienced trader who knows how to play and is not greedy, there are many others who buy into they hype and stupidly hold for the homerun that never comes.
With today's press release, Cortellazzi seems to be confirming that no shares have been repurchased to date, negating all of the pumping speculation we've seen about how much has been bought back. Since he's announced a stock buyback before, today's (ahem) 'news' provides but a quantification.
He's of course announcing only the INTENT to buy back LESS THEN 10% of the O/S--essentially a non-event because the rules prevent doing this in such a way as to affect the price.
Hilarious that anyone thinks this is a useful and positive action at this point in time.
Right, you find ascerbic acid in orange joose.
I was accused today of working for a 'Short and Distort Outfit', so I asked if that was a badly cut suit. (rimshot)
Yes, beware indeed...especially if you're uncomfortable with facts. While I'm proud to be called a 'basher', I have no affiliations and have never been compensated in any form for posting.
I'm curious, cookingreen...what is a 'Short and Distort Outfit'? Is that like a badly cut suit? LOL! You pathetic stucks will believe anything as long as you don't have to acknowledge that you bought into a pumpadump, believed the lies and are stuck.