I'm gone. Like a steam locomotive rolling down the track, I'm gone, gone, and nothing's going to bring me back. I'm gone. 06/29/2023
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
No. Clicking on “Active Boards” takes me to the Home page for iHub.
This just started happening:
When I click on “Hot” at the top of a page and then “Active Boards” in the drop-down menu, I am taken to the Home Screen, not the Active Boards screen. FYI.
I see Huggy Bear already mentioned Sponge Tech. That’s exactly what I was thinking.
If only they had movies that anyone would want to watch. Unfortunately, they do not.
With LWLG moving to NASDAQ and later Russell index, certain funds were obliged to purchase the stock. They know this security was overpriced at $19.00 and still overpriced at current levels. They know the move to NASDAQ was fueled by market pumps, not fundamentals, and it really belonged on the OTC.
But they had to follow their index’s raison d'être, so they held their noses and purchased the stock. But they aren’t stupid. They sold the stock short as a hedge, knowing the company was going nowhere.
Of course, some see this as some kind of nefarious short attack. It is not. It’s just the market dealing with reality.
I suggest doing a restart (not a shutdown/restart) to clear your RAM. Then reopen TWS.
Can you offer corroboration for any of these assertions? Beyond some “NDA-clad” hint from LWLG or a board poster?
Jeebus! Can’t they come up with something new? LOL!
Don’t bitch at me. Talk about it with the posters who supposedly talked about it with Lebby et al at supper this week. It was not I who brought up the subject. (I agree, it is a preposterous idea but what’s new with this outfit?)
Where’s the rest of the approx. 50% coming from? Lightwave wants to be a small operation with a small asset base and high ROI according to the diners.
Do YOU know what it costs to build, equip and run a wafer fabrication facility?
The plummet began at market open, it is just continuing.
As it will until it reaches the proper market valuation.
“Lightwave Logic. We cannot scale up our photonics to commercial levels but we have patented the heck out of our process.”
Some say the short sellers are “playing games”.
This is incorrect. The shorts know this is nothing but a story stock with only veiled hints from insiders to go on. Couple this with rabid longs who blow the hints up to hyperbolic dreams and you have shorts who can go short with impugnity.
A short seller’s dream come true. They are waiting for the company to get kicked back down to the OTC while the longs cheer “Games will be played”.
The only game here is the cheerleading.
As the stock price continues to drop.
You work really hard, for sure.
The nasty shorts aren’t manipulating the stock price. Nor are the dirty MM’s. Playing stupid blame games like that is fodder on the OTC, not NASDAQ.
The stock price is $6.68. Not because of the shorts. Not because of the market makers.
It is $6.68 because that is what it is worth. As the sageX poster once posted:
It doesn’t fit in the New York Stock Exchange either!
If the principal ever hopes to find a broker-dealer willing to sponsor relisting at a future date by issuing a Form 211, he would be wise to watch what he does in the intervening period.
The optics are horrible.
It appears you are pumping your stock’s price. As an insider, this could very easily be construed as a breach of your fiduciary duty to your shareholders.
The information your share on a stock message board is not like issuing a press release with wide dissemination and could also be construed as a violation of the SEC’s Reg FD.
I don’t care how “good” it makes you feel.
It is never a good sign to see a company principal posting on a stock message board, much less as prolifically as you do.
Not a good sign at all.
Per Lebby. Sure. Stated without any clarification about what he actually meant or even a hint at how he defines “excellent”. Excellent according to expected high volume yield norms? Or excellent according to his own expectations?
No one knows.
How does it yield in high volume fabrication? Final yield @ test post-assembly. Data link?
They have a ton of patents on a process that will never see high volume manufacture in a wafer fab.
QED