Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Orangeman:
You state, "Why dont you post some of my lies!!"
Orangeman...nowhere in my post did I accuse you of lying.
Further, you assert, "Stop that nonsence already I never made that claim that CTKH has been shorted. Please look at the posters who have asserted that CTKH has been shorted, and ask them!!"
Please re-read my post and identify in it, where, at any point, I thought you ever said the stock had been shorted. I would just like to know where you stand on the issue of covering a short position "IF" one were to exist (not to say one does exist with CTKH).
Finally, you state, "I am here to make sure we have a level playing field and that is my agenda."
Please tell me, other that the redundant vituperation from your posts directed at the CEO, how you think you are creating a level playing field.
I posed four questions to you; you answered only one. They are listed below...
If you would take the time to answer the other three please.
1) What is your agenda here? Your response...I am here to make sure we have a level playing field and that is my agenda.
2) Why would you continue to hold a position in this stock?
3) What would it take to get you out of this stock?
One more (hypothetical) question for you and PennyWorld.
4) If CTKH has been shorted to the extent and degree that some assert, when would you recommend those with a short position to start covering?
Keep in mind, the operative word "If".
Again...TIA
j
Orangeman,
What is your agenda here? Why would you continue to hold a position in this stock? What would it take to get you out of this stock?
One more (hypothetical) question for you and PennyWorld. If CTKH has been shorted to the extent and degree that some assert, when would you recommend those with a short position to start covering?
Keep in mind, the operative word is "If".
TIA
Penny:
Regarding your post on RB (to HPO); WELL STATED!
I don't post on RB, however I do read some of the posts from time to time. It's an exercise in futility. Somewhat like my golf game; some good some bad...more bad than good!
Take care!
j
Theory: I've been reading on several boards about the purported 600 million shares paid to a PR firm. A PR firm mind you in which services were never rendered according to the CEO because they "ran off" without providing these services.
The more I read about the way this CEO conducts himself and his tightfisted approach to business, it has become somewhat apparent to me that it is unlikely the (CEO) would give away 11% of the company for services from a PR firm when he will not even spend the few bucks to...
1) Get listed
and
2) Put out his own PR
This, coupled with the fact that we have seen no attempt from the CEO to enforce any restitution of services from this firm. This action (lack of) stands in direct contrast to the CEO's frugality IMO.
While I accept the fact that the CEO may be seeking methods and approaches to make this company more visible to potential business' and investors, it seems evident that he did not expend 600 million shares.
The total volume for 2005 in CTKH stock does not indicate that 600 million shares were dumped into the float.
Therefore, eliminate the impossible and whatever remains, however improbable must and should be considered.
The remaining conclusion is that the vast majority of these 600 million shares were never issued .
Someone with an open channel of personal communication with the CEO should contact and inquire with him regarding the status of these 600 million shares.
j
Orangeman:
Regarding your conversation with the CEO (and any prior conversations for that matter); his track record of being guile has been evidnet.
You write,
"I had a long talk with Hilal and he says he NEVER told anyone that DisplayTek was funded for any amount!!"
Is it possible he has been (or could be) less than forthright with you during your conversations with him. Are you different than any other SH?
He has more than likely told so many different versions of the same story, he has lost track of what he has said and to whom he has said it to.
Food for thought.
j
brg:
Thank you for your response. That's why I did qualify my statement. Orangeman is free to correct me (as are you).
I understand that you are among the disgruntled natives on board at this time. If memory serves, you're down roughly 60% (assuming you entered at 0.0025). WHOA!!! You may have averaged down recently though, so correct me if I'm wrong as well.
Thank you brg and good luck to you.
j
Orangeman:
Yet, you own how many shares in this company.
"Yes l have said it over 20 times right now 4.5 million and my high point was 8.6 million!!!"
and then you say,
"They made fools out of them selves Hilal is 10 steps ahead of these guys. So far its all smoke and mirrors."
Orangeman, I might think about classifying others as fools when you yourself were subject to the smoke and mirrors.
Where do you fall in line here? Assuming you believe what you write, you have been duped just as badly as anyone else here. If I recall one of your earlier comments (I may be inaccurate), you entered at what 0.0065. So, you're down 85% of your original investment. WHOA!!! Like I said previously, I don't blame you for being angry one bit. My only concern for you at this point is I would be doing somewhat more than constantly trying to prosecute your case against the CEO on this board (a case that has already been made) and consider getting out of this stock before you can no longer salvage even a dime!
Good Luck Orangeman!
j
Orangeman:
I find you to be very antagonistic. However, I understand why now. In at 4.5 million shares at what was it 0.0065. Just think, you could have waited and got in at a much lower price.
My position is very small here (negligible relative to yours). I don't invest in PS stocks. I got in to pacify my neighbor who is a retired finance banker just to get him off my back about how "great of an opportunity" he felt this was. (much like yourself and others not so long ago).
I think I've said that the CEO has operated under several falsehoods. I also understand that he has been confronted in/at his office. You live nearby and stalk his parking lot to quantify his car volume; was that you?
If you are that upset and dissatisfied with the conduct of this CEO (rightly so), perhaps you should consider selling, getting out, and moving on to another investment opportunity. Of course, with the volume as of late, it would difficult for you to download your investment all at once.
Good Luck to you Orangeman! I wish the best for you.
j
Ric(apple):
I think Orangeman's responses are reflective of his MO.
j
Rick(apple):
How are you? Interesting theory. As of right now, I just don't ascribe to your theory. The absence of volume (as of late) does not indicate the massive covering you have suggested.
However, your theory is not entirely implausible (regarding the CEO) engaging in some form of questionable tactics in keeping the PPS repressed.
Thanks.
j
Orangman:
While I admit to lacking the complete history of CTKH since its inception, I'm very much aware of the most recent history surrounding CTKH. (R/S, share buyback, share dilution, etc).
As far as your assertion of me "not knowing the rules." I believe you have misquoted me. I commented to JoFotoz that I'm not as aware of SEC regulations as him (JoFotoz), not that I do not "know the rules." Not being as knowledgable as another and simply not knowing are two entirely different concepts. Please, I ask that if you are going to quote me, do so accurately.
Now with that said, I understand some of the falsehoods that this CEO has operated under. Without question, I dissapprove.
But, Orangeman, your post seems to contradict itself. You state,
"So far Hilal has ripped us off with his lies he knows he can get away with it."
and
" All you do is question other posters and babble about Hilal must come clean He does not have to come clean what makes you say that this is a PS stock!!"
You are angry that he has ripped you off with his lies and does so with impunity, yet readily admit that he does not have to come clean. Therefore, his actions should be of little surprise to you. Go figure.
My instinct tells me that the CEO does not sit back and laugh at the SH's and make expletive gestures at us. I may be wrong, but I don't think so. It is evident that you are frustrated with how this CEO has conducted himself (as are many others). This is the central theme to the majority of your posts. But, it is just my feeling that not only you, but others as well, can and have stepped over the line with some of the comments made about the CEO. Comments that the CEO is not present to defend against.
That is merely the only point I was trying to convey.
You're correct Orangman. This is a PS stock. Very high risk, speculative, and its future is precarious at best. It's safe to say that if the CEO does come clean (eventually), the PPS might move. One way or the other!
j
Pennyworld:
This Orangeman gentleman writes, "He is laughting at you and giving you the finger."
Referring to actions of the CEO in this manner is absurd.
I thought you said this board was for serious investors whom want to read, share, and expand their information base. Posts and comments like this are not helpful, but false and antagonistic in nature.
j
JoFotoz:
Two questions for you.
1) It was recently postulated on one of the boards (I can't recall which at this time) that H. Fayiz might attempt to only buyback shares from some of his larger SH's; perhaps those with larger positions. Keep in mind doing this (the selective buyback) in a private manner.
Is that possible and is that legal for him to pull that off?
2) Somebody should disclose this "mystery" company. What's this guy (Fayiz) waiting for?
Thank you for any input.
j
One final note. Steelers over and will cover! Hope that doesn't get me deleted!
OT: Mr. Apple1,
Posted by: rickapple1
In reply to: None Date:1/22/2006 6:26:08 PM
Post #of 7298
"STAY IN CTKH."
"GET OUT OF SEATTLE."
Rick, are you sure you don't have this backwards? It's still early though...
Sincerely,
J
OT: JoFotoz,
Understand, I don't have a problem with you. I do not feel my post to you was invective in nature.
Posted by: JoFotoz
In reply to: abcsofhealth who wrote msg# 7227 Date:1/19/2006 5:09:41 PM
Post #of 7248
"And IMO..Social skills are hard to determine on a toneless thread...."
I would agree with your previous comments above.
Perhaps it might serve you well that you consider the below thought before responding to a perceived insult/attack from someone.
"Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength."
All the best.
J
OT: JoFotoz,
Interesting assertion by you below.
John
Posted by: JoFotoz
In reply to: Dunkj who wrote msg# 6714 Date:12/30/2005 9:32:53 PM
Post #of 7235
Dunkj...KUDOS to you.
You muster a very polite reply to roundmot...
... despite his demeaning , sarcastic and pompous post to you.
"Lets all try and follow your lead for 2006...."
Then roundmots "arrogant preaching" will stick out even more blatantly than it already does!!
jo
Orangeman3: Sophistry. eom.
Orangeman3,
You state the following:
"Thats exactly what l told you guys when you came aboard!! Did you listen NO!! You guys said l had no clue of what was going on and called me a basher!! Now you can see l was telling the truth all along!!"
I'm somewhat curious about the following.
1. Do you have a position in this stock?
If so, why?
2. What is your interest in this company?
You seem to approach it with inexorable certainty.
In reading the majority of your posts, the recurrent theme you would have others believe is that CTKH is the dystopian harbinger of sub-penny stocks.
BTW...
By raising these two questions, it should not be insinuated that I feel you have no clue nor will I concede just yet that you are a basher.
John
JoFotoz-I'm not as well versed in SEC regulations as you appear to be. Your points are valid. I did not purchase these shares prior to the delisting. With that said, I'm just as subject to the "suspect" and "deceptive" nature of this company as anyone else.
j
Pennyworld/Bigcue-FH needs to release information and be more forthright with his SH's. The continual evasive nature of these QPR's regarding the financial well-being of the company is becoming tiresome. The frustration and aggravation is abound. All evidence suggest that this stock is significantly undervalued and has potential. I feel that FH has retracted on his responsibilities as the CEO of a company he seeks to elevate as a major force in this sector of technology.
Pennyworld, you're correct in your assessment that this (board's) atmosphere is far less caustic. Fewer people have an axe to grind with somebody (compared to RB). It would be nice if opposing viewpoints could be addressed with respect to this company and its (current and future) disposition in a constructive and informative manner.
j