Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I'm not the Judge who said after closed session that it wasn't that necessary to do so ... what is your guess?
I'm always thinking that Judge takes care for unnecessary costs.
Third option - From Judge view it was overacted to have filing under seal because POR seems so advanced that there is no danger anymore by ... mysterious competitors ... missing revenues ...
They were supposed to be discussing the DIP presentation that was filed under seal, apparently they did not.
Judge Boroff thought the reasons for having a closed session were ...
No post at 12:23 EC was denied.
No post at 12:30 about any audio gets posted.
Please make sure that your arguments sounds coherently.
Management decided to black knight sale of HYPERION free and clear and he went along with it. Rather contradictory IMO.
Really - I appreciate your energy. Some people would be very happy to have you in their team!
My first guess - Judge don't care about suggestions! He deals with facts in front of him ...
Second - May be tomorrow or later or never ... Hyperion team will be terminated or go by their own because there will be no work anymore and they will hire where Hyperion tech is. Judge don't need to care about something which is obvious.
Third - Hyperion crew is multifunctional and extremely versatile and Mr. Smick not that solvent to hire those ones from today.
Fourth - Who knows but may be some day new GTAT will buyback Hyperion from that guy (team including) or is able to pay royalties for using this tech ... they have experiences in buying companies. But that is too far away from today.
I know you're not asking me but judge is just consistent in his decisions ...
He denied the Bonus plan for MM.
He denied EC formation.
He will approve sale of HYPERION tech.
He approved $95 mil. loan and workforce cut ...
His decisons look like his mission to safe equity for being effective in POR but not to safe SH.
GT Advanced Technologies Inc (OTCMKTS:GTATQ) Has Sold Hyperion Division For $1.1 Million
http://www.journaltranscript.com/2015/10/gt-advanced-technologies-inc-otcmktsgtatq-has-sold-hyperion-division-for-1-1-million/
... as far as I know sale is still not yet official, isn't it?
Just makes sense when EC is not able to chancel Hyperion sale after formation....
Continuation ...
GT Advanced Technologies Inc (OTCMKTS:GTATQ) Extends Positive Momentum
http://www.journaltranscript.com/2015/10/gt-advanced-technologies-inc-otcmktsgtatq-extends-positive-momentum/
Don't be sorry - stay online! ;)
... and also tried to sell HYPERION for almost Mio. 1$ which seems to fit their expectations .... ridiculous!
melting gap between SMA50 and SMA200 ... additional boost for uptrend I guess when crossed in that way!
slight notice ...
GT Advanced Technologies Inc (OTCMKTS:GTATQ) Makes A ComebackGT Advanced Technologies Inc (OTCMKTS:GTATQ) Makes A Comeback
http://www.journaltranscript.com/2015/10/gt-advanced-technologies-inc-otcmktsgtatq-makes-a-comebackgt-advanced-technologies-inc-otcmktsgtatq-makes-a-comeback/
I assume there is one reason more why customers are a bit scared off ... within BK there is always a good chance that your financials are going to be made public ... New business is probably not interessted in open books and contracts and therefore still waiting on the sidelines for POR ...
Honestly speaking it doesn't matter if he made up his mind ... Parties should take their chances within 15 minutes and after that Judge will judge ... based on facts!
15minutes are a lot ...
There are people out there who bring up 100m in less then 10sec. 15 minutes is almost a half marathon ... don't forget to breathe!
When worms know it ... birds are coming ...
The early bird ... you know?!
17. GTAT will provide copies of the Exhibit to (a) counsel for the Ad Hoc Committee, (b) counsel for the Creditors’ Committee, and (c) counsel to certain unaffiliated holders of GT notes.
Given that GTAT is currently in the process of marketing the sale of certain assets, releasing this information would offer potential buyers an unfair advantage in negotiations, undermine GTAT’s efforts to maximize the value of those assets, and would impair the value of the estates.
To be completely honest with you.
Homepage of Lomiko is one of the obvious one to have a look for.
And yes - you'll find there quite a lot more investor relevant information then on GGG.v. side ... but in general both pages make me upset.
You ask for some information?
Compare the latest financial report with reality and you've got it!
Sorry, but this company is waiting for something happen but not qualified to generate revenue.
Supplier?!
Are you looking in the crystal ball or look a few years ahead?
Today they supply them with some news on twitter but nothing valuable.
Give me a year when LMRMF is going to start supplying GGG.v with ... for example Graphit?
Old news!
Why not refering to overdue milestones?
BTW - right now LMRF is the owner of greenfields and has no revenue stream!
It's a question of time when LMRMF starts selling shares of GGG.v ...
Old news!
Why not refering to the latest ones?
http://lomiko.com/investors/reports.html
You wrote something about a chart and you are not able to show us your source of perception. Furthermore you don't want to talk about charts.
Is there something you would like us to help you or do you have a source to share about HTM or ... ?
Please stop going in circles.
Thank you for your understanding!
Thank you for advice but I know how to reach BOD.
You're right - but I don't mentioned they need to provide these documents just on their pages but at least a copy or a link.
Actually there is nothing on GGG page regarding investors which helps me to understand their financial situation.
No - it doesn't need more quarters to read the latest one and understand and it's no guesswork to see that results for year ending May 2015 are inabriated by success.
I'm looking forward for any official statement (what about a telco to discuss this in a public way?) but I guess I will get the results by the 1st quarter even faster.
I appreciate your reply but like I wrote ... You're free to write one of your blogs about latest financial results and not just about obvious positive items.
Till end of May they sold filaments with !negative! cash flow.
I've never refered to expenses in detail and what about the other pos. (Mio. 2.8$) on the other hand?
Alright - they doubled their production (investment - we don't know right now the costs). Does that mean they will automatically generate more revenue then goods cost to sold?
Anyway - I just want to have a more sophisticated look on it.
Hello Mr. Anderson,
It's obvious that this company is in trouble at the moment (annual report end of May 2015). Why is there no critical comment on your webpage which refers to GGG.v financial situation?
There are a few companies they put their results online ... look at Lomiko by the way.
http://www.lomiko.com/investors/reports.html
I didn't checked all of your named companies but here is 3D systems one.
http://www.3dsystems.com/investor/annual-reports
And no - it doesn't help if someone like you just post something positive without giving a complete perspective.
GGG.v may just gained something about Mio.1$ after that annual season but the main thing is that revenues by selling filaments seem to be more underachieve.
Revenue: $41.000
Start of sale: March, 16th
Price per filament box: $55
They sold (best case) 745 boxes and they have a negative costs of goods sold and under the line an operations net loss of Mio.4,2$ ... Something is not working that proper.
I'm really disappointed and honestly missing a statement by MM to that last (first) year. What about the strategy to increase revenues along with decrease costs of goods sold?
Who is going to update this thread front page with all these information regarding HTM which need to be updated?
What are your thoughts about missing financial reports on homepage of Graphene 3D Labs?
Ok - next one. As I remember you are a great fan of GGG.v
What about this?
http://www.sedar.com/GetFile.do?lang=EN&docClass=5&issuerNo=00032267&fileName=/csfsprod/data152/filings/02399888/00000001/C%3A\SEDAR\FILINGS\150531Graphene3DLab_AFS_cm.pdf
".... These factors raise significant doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company's ability to continue its operations and to realize assets at their carrying values is dependent upon obtaining additional financing or maintaining continued support from its shareholders and creditors, and generating profitable operations in the future. ..."
Looks pretty healthy, doesn't it?
Welcome aboard!
Nice nick and more then just obvious that Lomiko is trying to get public more informed. But this is not really a message to increase shareholder value and without any detailed timeline ... as always.
Public interest is too low, isn't it?
Thanks for sharing that reply.
I'm not confident to get any further digestible information before end of this year.
Mr. Gill is more acctive in Golf and politics then countable pushing and increasing shareholder value.
Where are the power converter, LED driver ... what do they spent money for when nothing has been provided since last October.
What about that kickstarter announcement?
I guess they are looking for a lekker buyout possibility.
Graphite, Graphene and Lithium are the common base elements.
Is there anything wrong about thinking they have to provide financials every 3 months?
Graphene 3D Lab Files Full Patent on Graphene Manufacturing Process
http://www.graphene3dlab.com/s/news.asp?ReportID=724495&_Type=News&_Title=Graphene-3D-Lab-Files-Full-Patent-on-Graphene-Manufacturing-Process
What A Move on GT Advanced Technologies Inc (OTCMKTS:GTATQ)
http://www.microcapdaily.com/what-a-move-on-gt-advanced-technologies-inc-otcmktsgtatq/113320/
Why do I have to think about May, the 15th?
High: .45$
50cts .... Get Rich or Die Tryin’
NR: U.S. Geothermal Confirms Reservoir at WPG Geysers Project
BOISE, IDAHO, Sep 21, 2015 (Marketwired via COMTEX) -- U.S. Geothermal Inc. (GTH)(nyse mkt:HTM) (the "Company"), a leading renewable energy company focused on the development, production, and sale of electricity from geothermal energy, is pleased to announce it has received the reservoir engineering report for the WGP Geysers project from third party engineering firm GeothermEx Inc..
As previously announced, the Company successfully completed a flow test program in June on the three largest production wells at the WGP Geysers project in northern California confirming that the wells were still open and ready for production. GeothermEx Inc. (a Schlumberger company) designed the isochronal (step-rate) flow test program, and monitored the testing of the wells.
GeothermEx reports that the four production wells are capable of delivering an initial capacity of 28.1 MW (gross) or 25.4 MW (net) based on current power plant steam conversion rates from a detailed design for a 28.8 MW (net) power plant. These longer term tests show the wells would initially produce a combined total of 458,000 pounds per hour of steam compared to 462,000 pounds per hour of steam from short term tests performed when the wells were first drilled, demonstrating that the capacity of the wells is virtually unchanged. Using the average steam production rate from these wells and an assumed interference factor of 30%, GeothermEx estimates that an additional 2-3 production wells would be needed to support the long term operation of a 28.8 MW (net) plant.
Two methods were used by GeothermEx to estimate the long term capacity of the WGP project, and both support a high probability that a 28.8 MW (net) plant can be operated for 25 years, given the modern plant design and the available productive area. The first is the p/z method, an established natural gas reservoir engineering calculation that is routinely used at The Geysers. Based on the plant design and the increase in available injection that would result from WGP's planned hybrid cooling system, GeothermEx estimates that the reservoir could support the 28.8 MW (net) plant for up to 54 years. The second method, which is an empirical approach based on GeothermEx's extensive experience at The Geysers, is used to estimate the steam production capacity per acre within the productive area of a geothermal leasehold. On this basis, GeothermEx reports that the productive acreage within the WGP leasehold has steam reserves sufficient to supply up to 44 MW (net) with a conventional injection level of 25%, and potentially more at the higher injection levels associated with the planned hybrid cooling system.
"The results of this analysis from our test program clearly shows that the WGP Geysers project has approximately 30 megawatts of steam, drilled, tested and ready for production, and that, with the higher injection rates provided by hybrid cooling, it has the reservoir to support long term generation," said Dennis Gilles, CEO of US Geothermal. "We are pleased with last week's passage of SB-350 in California, which now raises the Renewable Portfolio Standard for the state to 50% renewable energy by 2030, the highest in the country, and we anticipate this will increase the interest in a power purchase agreement for our WGP Geysers project. We are also pleased to announce that the recent forest fires reported in The Geysers area did not impact our geothermal wells, project equipment, or project site."
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-geothermal-confirms-reservoir-at-wpg-geysers-project-2015-09-21-81734456
Sapphire technology market - North America expected the high growth rate by 2015 - 2021 according to new research report
https://www.whatech.com/market-research/industrial/91113-sapphire-technology-market-north-america-expected-the-high-growth-rate-by-2015-2021-according-to-new-research-report