Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Meetings Dec 4
medicalpete
http://sec.gov/news/openmeetings/2006/ssamtg120406.htm
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meetings.
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold the following meetings during the week of December 4, 2006:
An Open Meeting will be held on Monday, December 4, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. in the Auditorium, Room LL-002 and a Closed Meeting will be held on Wednesday, December 6, 2006 at 11:00 a.m.
Commissioners, Counsels to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be present.
The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), (9)(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a) (3), (5), (7), (9)(ii), and (10) permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
Commissioner Campos, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the closed meeting in closed session.
The subject matters of the Open Meeting scheduled for Monday, December 4, 2006 will be:
The Commission will consider whether to approve the budget of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and will consider the annual accounting support fees under section 109 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
The Commission will consider whether to propose a new rule under the Securities Act of 1933 to revise the criteria for natural persons to be considered "accredited investors" for purposes of investing in certain privately offered investment vehicles.
The Commission will consider whether to propose a new rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to prohibit advisers from making false or misleading statements to investors in certain pooled investment vehicles they manage, including hedge funds.
The Commission will consider whether to propose amendments to Rule 105 of Regulation M that would further safeguard the integrity of the capital raising process and protect issuers from manipulative activity that can reduce issuers' offering proceeds and dilute security holder value.
The Commission will consider whether to propose an amendment to the short sale price test of Rule 10a-1. In addition, the Commission will consider whether to propose an amendment to the "short exempt" marking requirement of Regulation SHO.
The subject matters of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, December 6, 2006 will be:
formal orders of investigation;
institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature;
resolution of litigation claims; and
adjudicatory matters.
At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.
Nancy M. Morris
Secretary
November 27, 2006
greeninvestor2 Do you feel
There is Naked Short Selling going on with PYPR. Also do you feel the brokerages are Failing to Deliver Shares ?
I have been and still am involved in a situation I beleive is NSS and FTD.
I did a SEC Complaint a while back about my concerns.
**************************************************************
what i did is call and tell them about what i think, than to backed up my idea, i explained the company and than reffered them to the MM's on PYPR then i explained the MM activity and then threw in that onn a down day the majority of trades are buys not sells. also they are supposed to contact me by this week. if they dont i told them i would have to take matters into my own hands. That really got them interseted.
I am survivor not so fast Buddy
Don't avoid the question, you made a statement now back it up with a answer. Your post below is False and Misleading.
A lot of people read your posts. I as well as others have an investment here in PAVC. I want facts and if you make a statement back it up.
You say you try to help people in their investments yet you post misleading information about PAVC and the fileing.
Yet with all that knowledge you posess you don't check when the Company PAVC Quartely's are due. Now how can you make that mistake Survivor?
Here is your quote "Why hasn't there been a single comment on the company missing it's deadline to file? I would think that would be something worth discussing.....In fact, how many people called the company and were told verbally that they would be filing on time..with no surprises in the filings? They told me that......"
WHO AT THE COMPANY TOLD YOU WHAT Survivor ?
***********************************************************
I am Survivor do you read all the posts
I posted on nov 16, 2006 Pavc yearly is due Dec 31, 2006. Read the post. Who did you talk to at the Company as your post states, here is your Quote " Why hasn't there been a single comment on the company missing it's deadline to file? I would think that would be something worth discussing.....In fact, how many people called the company and were told verbally that they would be filing on time..with no surprises in the filings? They told me that......"
Here is a portion of a section on a Quartely report. For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006. Now explain your post to all of us here who was the person you talked to at the Company.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-QSB
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006
**********************************************************
Why hasn't there been a single comment on the company missing it's deadline to file? I would think that would be something worth discussing.....In fact, how many people called the company and were told verbally that they would be filing on time..with no surprises in the filings? They told me that......
Yet, not only did they not file on time they did not even file the NT 10K saying they would be filing, but the filing would be late.
Why verbally tell people the company will file on time and there will be no negative surprises, only to not file and not even file the NT 10k saying they would be filing late??
So, how long before they add the dreaded E?
PAVCE.....NOT a symbol that will make longs happy!
I am Survivor do you read all the posts
I posted on nov 16, 2006 Pavc yearly is due Dec 31, 2006. Read the post. Who did you talk to at the Company as your post states, here is your Quote " Why hasn't there been a single comment on the company missing it's deadline to file? I would think that would be something worth discussing.....In fact, how many people called the company and were told verbally that they would be filing on time..with no surprises in the filings? They told me that......"
Here is a portion of a section on a Quartely report. For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006. Now explain your post to all of us here who was the person you talked to at the Company.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-QSB
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006
**********************************************************
Why hasn't there been a single comment on the company missing it's deadline to file? I would think that would be something worth discussing.....In fact, how many people called the company and were told verbally that they would be filing on time..with no surprises in the filings? They told me that......
Yet, not only did they not file on time they did not even file the NT 10K saying they would be filing, but the filing would be late.
Why verbally tell people the company will file on time and there will be no negative surprises, only to not file and not even file the NT 10k saying they would be filing late??
So, how long before they add the dreaded E?
PAVCE.....NOT a symbol that will make longs happy!
With a New Name comes a CUSIP number change.
IMO this is good and one instrument used to have the Shorters cover. It appears the shareholders meeting is going to be real good. Some of my Questions have been addressed in this PR,
No Dilution is great.
The name PayPro Inc. no longer clearly reflects the changes which have occurred nor those still to come. To clarify the planned evolution of PayPro Inc. from a pink-sheet penny stock company into a NASDAQ-listed Pan-American Enterprise and a clearly-defined forward-looking vision and Business Plan, will be re-named the PANAMERSA Corporation.
Posted by: makin_dough99In reply to: None Date:11/27/2006 10:24:59 AMPost # of 14850
<A HREF='http://as1.investorshub.com/oasis/oasisc.php?s=43&w=336&h=280&t=_blank' TARGET='_blank'><IMG SRC='http://as1.investorshub.com/oasis/oasisi.php?s=43&w=336&h=280&t=_blank' WIDTH=336 HEIGHT=280 BORDER=0></A> PayPro Inc. Announces Important Message to Shareholders and PDR Holders from Micheal Scott Terrell, President & CEO and Pedro Borges Fiol, ChairmanNov 27, 2006 10:24:00 AMCopyright Business Wire 2006DALLAS and PANAMA CITY, Republic of Panama--(BUSINESS WIRE)--PayPro Inc. is currently undergoing a very rapid and fundamental evolution to become a group of dynamic, forward-looking business entities. In addition to its former business interests, this group now includes entities dedicated to promoting and assisting the Commercial Integration of Latin America into the Economic Development of the Western Hemisphere and the sustainable protection of Earth's Flora, Fauna and Water Resources through the MicroForests Program.The name PayPro Inc. no longer clearly reflects the changes which have occurred nor those still to come. To clarify the planned evolution of PayPro Inc. from a pink-sheet penny stock company into a NASDAQ-listed Pan-American Enterprise and a clearly-defined forward-looking vision and Business Plan, will be re-named the PANAMERSA Corporation.PANAMERSA Corporation will be headquartered in Dallas, Texas with an operating Latin American Division headquartered in Panama, the Hub of the Americas. The company will include a Board of Directors comprising a Chairman, President & CEO, a Senior Vice-President and 4 Vice-Presidents, Secretary and Treasurer. This group of well-qualified Pan-American professionals will oversee the implementation of our Business Plan in the company's four operating regions which are as follows:AMERICA I The CaribbeanAMERICA II United States, Canada, & MexicoAMERICA III Central America & PanamaAMERICA IV South AmericaThese changes will have a major positive impact on the Consolidated Balance Sheet of the off-shore Business Entities which will eventually become part of the NASDAQ-listed, Pan-American Enterprise.We wish to assure our current shareholders and PDR holders there will be no dilution, their interests will be carefully protected throughout all of these changes, and we will strive to keep you all fully informed of events by means of Press Releases to avoid any confusion or uncertainty which may arise as a result of rumor or miss-information.Finally, we would like to express our very sincere thanks to all our shareholders and PDR holders for their continued loyalty and commitment to PayPro Incorporated.About PayPro Incorporated:PayPro Incorporated (Pink Sheets:PYPR) is a global e-commerce and e-biz Solutions Company offering interactive e-commerce and e-biz programs. PayPro offers a range of goods and services ON LINE as follows:Visa prepaid cards; e-commerce merchant accounts; Life insurance policies, Gold transactions; Telephony services, Text messaging, VoIP, Micro forests properties, Real estate investment participations, Fixed and variable income Real estate properties in Costa Rica and Panama, Offshore financial services, Asset management and protection; Travel services, Leisure, Business, Health, Relocation services, and Digital marketing services.Forward-Looking Statements is not historical fact as "forward-looking statements" defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. Our forward-looking statements are the result of profound analysis on trends in our globalizing economies that we anticipate in our industry. It is our good faith vision and estimate of the effect on the globalization, integration and electronic business trends will have on our company. Our statements are also subject to risks and uncertainties beyond our reasonable control that could cause the results of operations to differ materially from those reflected in our forward-looking statements.Source: PayPro Inc.
Article on SEC
Posted by Dallas66
http://www.forbes.com/home/free_forbes/2006/1127/040.html
causeimdaddydamnit Two more Questions, please
Where does the CEO see the Company in regards to it's Busines Plan and Shareprice in 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months?
Does the Company have a plan to deal with and counteract the parties that are shorting the Company Stock?
BIGJOHN51 How Many Pinks post financials
And not just one Financial report but many. This is very rare and PYPR is doing just that. Looks Great IMO even if some say they are unaudited..
************************************************************
I could kick myself for not adding below .004. Although this company looks legit, I am very cautious about Pinks in general. However, PYPR is is very informative. Not many Pinks initiate buybacks and state no dilution. And how many have meetings for shareholders or announce revenues? I give PYPR a thumbs up. Next week should be very green.
Dallas66 I Agree and Bauer IMO
Is running the Company and letting others handle the fiascal caused starting May 19, 2006.
Someines not opening your mouth is the best way IMO.
*********************************************************
serfy, from what I've been told, we may very well get news from the company next week. Believe me, I'm as frustrated as the rest with the company staying silent. Hence my "soon" reference. But from what I understand, they have been silent for company protection, and it quite possibly came via the SEC. Since they have been actively working with them over the restricted shares issue, they may have been requested to keep quiet. Who knows the real reasons. With knowing several of the larger brokerages have been playing games, I can fully understand the company keeping things under wraps while working with the SEC to resolve issues. One thing for sure, we KNOW Bauer is no Rufus, so I can reasonably understand that direction by the company. Maybe with the company doing things the right way, and quietly working with the SEC, we will have the issues resolved "soon".
Happy Turkey Day to all
Midas I like your Charts. It appears You have been doing this for some time. Good job.
causeimdaddydamnit' Questions
Does the Company plan on opening up new Business Ventures in other regions of the World.
Is the Company looking into Merging with a larger company to get listed on a higher exchange. Reverse Merger
Who holds restricted stock in the Company and when will the Stock become unrestricted.?
On Financing , what forms of financing will the Company use to expand?
What avenues is the Company using to advertise its products?
*************************************************************
Questions/Discussion points for the CEO thus far....if you have more, let me know so I can add them to the list.
1. The gopaypro.com website is mostly fine, but the financials page is all out of whack.
2. The www.mybankcard.com site has many bad links that should be corrected.
3. The Financial reports for the third quarter aren't signed on the links from pinksheets.com.https://www.otcstockinfo.com/repository/612745/612745_FR21.pdf shows no signature, it may be the same in other places. It's signed on the gopaypro.com website.
4. Audited financials for the 4th quarter would show more commitment for preparing for OTCBB listing.
5. Some sort of filing on the stock buyback program. Not sure if that can be posted monthly or quarterly. Shows transparency.
6. Does Paypro have plans/intentions to be listed on the OTCBB.
7. Do they have plans to get their financials audited?
8. Do they ever intend to file with the SEC?
Timeframes for these first 3 would also be a plus.
9. SPECIFICALLY where are these Revenues and Profits coming from? I think we'd all like to have a better grasp on that one.
10. Since he say he will discuss what is public knowledge, would he be willing to share the company's plan for moving to the OTCBB with a general timetable?
11. Could you get clarification on this footnote #2 in financials obviously i know what it means . Its the implication whats disturbing if the notes were called ..rate to be deterined =how many shares and then be sold in market ect. thanks
The Company has received short term loans of operating funds. the notes are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due upon demand. The Company intends to repay the loans from the issuance of shares of it's common stock at a rate to be determined.
12. Has the share buyback begun? If so, at what rate?
serfdom my Crstal Ball says
I hope next week or the week after but IMO next week. Now what do I win if I am correct? Be nice now.
*****************************************************
"we should expect to hear "something" from the company much sooner than later"
Hmmm....I have my red pen handy...do I circle a day, month, or year?
makin_dough99 Thanks and who is Jack Brown
I see by one of the filings he and Terrell own 2,500,000 shs apiece or 32% of the stock. As of March 31, 2006
*******************************************************
No form 4's or S-8's
BigMoneyAtl I am open minded
I listen to all with an open mind, and I am not happy at all with no PR. IMO I think the Company should and will say something soon when this mess has cleared hopefully soon.
IMO we will get the Certs.
************************************************************
Fwayneh1, I don't believe that Dallas66 and Same53 will volunteer simply because both of them are truely loyal couple to Paivis blindly. Something needs to be done in order to make the company pays for their wrecklessness and lies.
4Godnwv Question
Who holds the Restricted Shares and when is the date they are unrestricted? Has there been any from 4 filings or S-8's. Also what type of finacing does the company use.
Thanks
Share Structure:
*******************
A/S: 10 billion
O/S: 7,629,010,600 as of 6/30/2006 Quarterly / 7,629,010,600 as of 10/26/06 per TA (Florida Atlantic Stock Transfer, 954-726-4954)
Restricted shares: 6,500,000,000 (4Godnwv as per conversation w/ Mike Terrell 10/14/2006)
Float: approx 500-700 million as per PR dated 10/16/2006
Question On Restricted Shares Held
I am new here,
Does anyone have a break down on who owns what in the Company in the amount of restricted shares held.
Also when do they become unrestricted.
Has there been any dilution, do they use any form of Toxic financing such as Cornell?
Thanks
I am a survivor MANY 'mistruths'
Would you care to be specific on the MANY 'mistruths' they have told people over the phone. You previously posted you talked to someone.
Why call them?? So they can give you verbal B.S. and make you feel a little better? Has it not gotten thru peoples heads that whatever they say, should be taken with a HUGE grain of salt? Considering the MANY 'mistruths' they have told people over the phone, I fail to see why anybody would call them now, let alone believe anything they say.
**********************************************************
Why call them?? So they can give you verbal B.S. and make you feel a little better? Has it not gotten thru peoples heads that whatever they say, should be taken with a HUGE grain of salt? Considering the MANY 'mistruths' they have told people over the phone, I fail to see why anybody would call them now, let alone believe anything they say.
Now on the other hand..... and yes, this has already been done with 'interesting' results. Call. Ask your list of questions. Cover everything and be detailed. Demand answers. Dig as much as you can. Get them to 'say' as much as you can. Keep detailed records of your questions and their answers to you. Then have your lawyer call. They dont need to give your name, just they are calling on behalf of a shareholder and have been given the legal right to do so. Have your lawyer ask the exact same questions and see how they answer to your lawyer.
You will be quite surprised, to say the least, to hear the very different answers given to Joe Scmoe the shareholder versus the answers given to your lawyer.
MANY different answers given and I mean MANY.
The most telling to me was as a shareholder or interested investor that calls is they will happily tell you "the company did nothing wrong and has done everything legaly and the brokers are not getting the correct info to the TA". Yet, isnt it odd how they will NOT say that to your lawyer and in fact when your lawyer puts them on the spot and says "you told my client the company was not at fault and....."...and they respond and say they did NOT say that, it must have been a misunderstanding, the company has not publicly said we are innocent and the brokers are at fault...and they go on to say 'the issue is still being looked in to'....and they CLEARLY state they are not claiming they are 100% innocent and when asked if the company or third parties related to the company have engaged in any wrongdoing, they state they are 'looking in to that issue and can not comment'...
In any event, I think many will be surprised if they call and then have their lawyer call and see who gets what answers......, but I also suspect the company is aware that it is getting hot in the kitchen, and they must be aware that they are getting calls from people claiming to be shareholders, who may not be..and they certainly must be aware that many are taping their calls to the company...not admissable in court, but certainly any taped conversations can be turned over to the regulatory agencies or used in many other ways......So, I suspect if they even have a few brain cells working, they are going to start being very careful as to what they say over the phone....
Another thing...Call..ask all your questions.....then call back and dont let them know you just spoke to them.....Before you begin your conversation, for legal purposes make them aware that you are recording the phone call.....and watch how quickly they clam up and do NOT give you the same answers they did 30 minutes ago.......
Anyway.....no real biggie...most know that most micros are quite fishy and not 'investments'..they are simply gambling plays....I have made more money on scammy companies that are no longer trading then I will ever make on a big board stock. I am not advocating people buy micros and believe me, I have far more 'blue chip, big board' plays then I do micros and I certainly dont mind the gains I have gotten from GOOG and etc....but these scammy micros can make 1000 - 10,000% gains in a matter of days...heck, I think pavc saw 25,000% from it's low to it's high...of course it gave back 90% and then RS'd and then gave back another 90%.....the point is....this is the casino..not the big boards....98% of micro's are gambling plays and nothing more. HUGE %'s can be made and yep, huge %'s can be lost....that is why it is called the casino.....
So, why people are shocked to find something 'fishy' happening here is a tad odd as most should know 'fishy' is the rule here in the micro arena....The key is, just like gambling...know what to play and when..know when to hold and know when to fold and always remember that the house normally wins for a reason......Good luck to all.....
LP on e-trade
All I know from other posters is that they are not cooperating just like my brokerage firm.
My understanding is that some certs have been sent out to those who use smaller brokerage firms who were not involved in the fiascal started on May 19, 2006.
I do not beleive the Brokerages one bit. Ask them to send you the information on your account to you in Letter form on what they sent to the T/A. There are six items the T/A requested from the Brokerages. I think I posted them in one of my previous posts. Let me know if you can/t find them.
Also e-mail your Brokerage compliance dept as a backup to protect yourself.
*************************************************************
Same53 Anything new on the restricted shares? I just called Etrade and told them that I havent received my restricted PAVC shares yet, and that the required JPHC info must be sent to the ta for me to get the PAVC. Supposedly the info was sent July 28...but I'm having them research it again. The broker said he would call me tomorrow.
If you could share all you know about Etrade specifically in this situation it would be appreciated. tia
PAVC Yearly due Dec 31, 2006
Then if an extenstion is needed around Jan 16th
luvabullstalk everything is under PAVC
May 11, 2006 Merger Date APOA, JPHC
May 19, 2006 Name Change Paiv
May 23 2006 Conversion Ratio JPHC to PAIV
Aug 3, 2006 200 to 1 R/S and symbol Change PAVC
The Shares I own are Restricted per PR
http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/060629/0140620.html
'BigMoneyAtl don't you thimk
That there are more parties involved than just the Company as you state being at fault. How about the Brokerages, the DTC, the NASD.
Question, did you put them in your SEC Complaint as well or are you blaming everything on the Company?
I just got a response back about my Broker and from all the info I have gathered on this situation I caught them in another lie which is stalling the whole process.
Have you directed any of your concerns and Questions to you broker the T/A, or Company?
***********************************************************
Everyone should, like I did, file complaint to SEC about the company lied about the round up shares in their PR and never delivered. I still do not have my 100 round up shares.
luvabullstalk here are links and numbers
In one of my past posts. The SEC Link is the one I would use.
IMO my Brokerage and some brokerages are still stalling and will continue to do so unless we complain.
Keep up the Fight
Call your Broker Compliance Dept
Call the SEC, NASD, your Brokers Compliance Dept. Do a NASD and SEC Complaint against your Brokerage Compliance Dept for not cooperating with the T/A on requests made for information needed by the T/A so we can receive our Restricted PAVC formerly PAIV Shares.
If we do not put the Pressure on the above parties you will never get what is legally yours.
THAT IS A FACT.
Here are Links and phone numbers for the SEC and NASD , Call the Compliance Dept Scottrade or your Brokerage Compliance Dept.
NASD phone # 1-203-375-9609 http://www.nasd.com/index.htm
SEC Complaint Link http://www.sec.gov/complaint/selectconduct.shtml
SEC Market Regulation 1-202-551-5777
Paiv Transfer Agent at Phone #1- 303-783-9055
Loyola Pavc Pr Firm 1-702-317-2300
Scottrade Compliance Dept Phone # 1-800-888-1980 EXT 1900.
fugeguy I beleive we are
At a different time now. I beleive that pressure is being put on Certain Parties to correct the broken fiancial system and corruption. It is way over due and I beleive we have finally turned the corner.
IMO If you do nothing, expect nothing.
Keep up the Fight we are being heard IMO.
If you do not complain
Your thoughts and views through a SEC Complaint in writeing you are only harming yourself. I have filed an SEC Complaint against my Broker and I have been contacted about my Complaint. Those who say a SEC Complaint does no good IMO are wrong.
I also caught my Broker in another stall attempt for their own selfish greed. I added it to my SEC Complaint and IMO it adds fuel to the Fire that some of the brokerges are still not cooperating with the T/A.
IF broker restricted online buying of ANY stock
REPOST
Jump to msg. #
LISTEN UP... IF broker restricted online buying of ANY
Is anyone having or had a problem with PAIV>
Posted by: dustybutler1
In reply to: None
Date:8/1/2006 3:58:27 PM
Post #of 55464
LISTEN UP... IF broker restricted online buying of ANY stock today, please call Bob Greene (SEC) and report it asap!
He is looking into INSN and IPRE right now and asked me to provide him with ANY other stocks that these brokerage companies are limiting online buying...
greener@sec.gov
But please call him at 202-551-6331
Post Brokerages not allowing Trades
By: same53
04 Nov 2006, 11:19 AM EST
Msg. 14312 of 14324
(This msg. is a reply to 14311 by songster101.)
Jump to msg. #
songster101 do you know
(by forcing a no sell policy existing share holders especially former JPHC shareholders.)
What brokerages do you know of are involved in this?
IMO with PAVC it shows the Brokerages are manipulating the stock.
It would be a good idea to include any info you have on this in your SEC Complaint or anyone else you contact, the Company, Transfer Agent state reps. My understanding is when it comes to trading in a stock it is the NASD that gets involved. NASD phone # 1-203-375-9609. It would be a good idea to contact them IMO.
And anyone else you think that can help.
Also I would call and then write an e-mail to your brokerage firm if they are involved in this policy and ask them to state in a return e-mail or letter why they have this policy. Also what other stocks (names) they are (the brokerages) implementing this policy.
Here are Links and phone numbers for the SEC and NASD
NASD phone # 1-203-375-9609 http://www.nasd.com/index.htm
SEC Complaint Link http://www.sec.gov/complaint/selectconduct.shtml
SEC Market Regulation 1-202-551-5777
Paiv Transfer Agent at Phone #1- 303-783-9055
Loyola Pavc Pr Firm 1-702-317-2300
Scottrade Compliance Dept Phone # 1-800-888-1980 EXT 1900.
*****************************************************************
By: songster101
03 Nov 2006, 07:50 PM EST Msg. 14311 of 14311
(Msg. is a reply to 14310 by same53.)
Same53 sounds like IMO the brokerages feel they can wait us out buying back a little at a time, by forcing a no sell policy on existing share holders especially former JPHC shareholders.
Stock Market Fraud
I have another article in the works that should be finished by
Monday...but in the meantime, this commentary is one I started a few days ago,
and just now finished in a caffeine-fueled fit of indignent anger.
Sometimes you just have to call a spade a spade.
http://www.faulkingtruth.com/Articles/Investing101/1069.html
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!
By Mark Faulk
Nov. 5, 2006
After almost three years of covering the issue of stock market fraud,
and after experiencing revelation after revelation about just how
widespread…and how controlled…the fraud really is, against investors, against
our economic foundation, against America, things have become, well,
let’s just say that events have become very predictable.
Those of us “who knew” saw the problems with naked short selling way
before it was (finally) in vogue to talk about it in the major media.
Those of us who were paying attention knew about how hedge funds were
dangerously manipulating the market long before the house of cards began to
collapse around them while federal regulators feigned mock surprise.
Those of us who ventured into the seedy underbelly of Wall Street saw
something insidious and menacing, something that we knew could eventually
collapse our entire economy if left unchecked.
No, it’s not that difficult to know how this plays out, and believe me,
it’s not a pretty picture.
The brokers will be exposed as the real villains here, revealed to be
just as crooked as the hedge funds (and even more powerful), and
everyone will once again posture in mock indignation, gesturing animatedly
while they launch investigations and promise to enact justice on the “bad
guys.” Meanwhile, they’ll be scrambling to eliminate the last few
shreds of evidence…beginning with your stock certificates.
To read the rest of this article, go to:
http://www.faulkingtruth.com/Articles/Investing101/1069.html
This article is also posted on my blog at The Sanity Check, along with
an excellent comment section, at:
http://www.thesanitycheck.com/Blogs/MarkFaulksBlog/tabid/86/Default.aspx
Monday view: Paulson re-activates secretive support team to prevent markets meltdown
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2006/10/30/ccview30.xml
From RB
coach9fl This is what is needed
By the Transfer Agent in a readable format.Keep the pressure on and do A SEC Complaint. It has been six months now.
1.Legal Name: use the name in your broker account
2. Home address
3. Social Security Number
4. Total # of shares after merger & date
5. Total # of shares after exchange rate & date
6. Total # of shares after 200:1 reverse split & date
*******************************************************************
By: coach9fl
01 Nov 2006, 12:06 PM EST Msg. 14266 of 14276
(Msg. is a reply to by None.)
The latest response from TDAmeritrade.....
We have provided Executive Registrar & Transfer Agency, Inc. with the following information:
Your name
Address
Social Security number
Number of shares held in your account as of the record dates requested by the agent.
We sent a record of beneficial holders of Jupiter Global Holdings to Executive Registrar &
Transfer Agency Inc. as of 5/23/06 via overnight mail on 7/28/06. This record reflected your information
as outlined above and indicated the number of shares of Jupiter Global Holdings you held as of
5/23/06.
While this information should have been adequate for the agent to process the exchange; in
addition, Executive Registrar & Transfer Agency Inc. requested a record of beneficial holders of Jupiter
Global Holdings as of 5/11/06 and 8/03/06. As of 10/18/06, we complied with the agent?s unusual
request and forwarded a second list of beneficial holders to the agent via overnight mail. This
list was inclusive of the 5/11/06 and 8/03/06 dates. Again, the information provided to the agent
included your name, address, Social Security number and indicated the number of shares you held of
Jupiter Global Holdings on 5/11/06 and 8/03/06.
Should you require additional assistance, please contact our Reorganization/Safekeeping Department
at 888-723-8504, option 1.
serfdom IMO
Somewhere in between LOL. With that said I thinks things will work out just fine for PAVC Shareholders and Restricted share holders.
RE: Paivis silence...
It's either because the SEC told 'em to shut their mouths until this situation is resolved...or they CHOSE to shut their mouths...or they are afraid to actively promote the stock when the capital is all messed up (because they could be sued)...or because they are scammers.
Pick one.
Posistions were reversed
Check your Gainskeeper Scottrade feature. Yesterday it showed PAVC with share totals, today it is reversed back to JPHC. This is disturbing IMO and not right.
Rule 144
SEC Rule 144 allows for the resale of Restricted Securities to the public in limited quantities. Rule 144 generally applies to Corporate Insiders and buyers of Private Placement securities that were sold under exemptions from the SEC’s registration statement requirements defined in the Securities Act of 1933. Under Rule 144, Restricted Securities may be sold to the public by Corporate Insiders and buyers of Private Placements, prior to a two year holding period, without full registration of such securities under specific conditions and limitations. After a two year holding period, resale of such securities by non-affiliates of the Issuer to the public are unrestricted.
Back to Top ^
Rule 144a
Rule 144a applies to securities which are offered or sold by a seller (e.g., Qualified Institutional Buyer ("QIB")) only to another QIB or to a purchaser that the seller and any entity acting on behalf of the seller reasonably believes is a QIB.
Back to Top ^
What is an Equity Private Placement?
A private placement is a private sale of Restricted Securities by an Issuer to a relatively small number of institutions and/or individuals.
The private sale of restricted Equity and Equity-Linked Securities (i.e, an Equity Private Placement) is executed under certain exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 (e.g., Regulation D, Regulation S, Rule 144a).
However, these securities are ineligible for resale into the public market until such time that either (i) a resale Registration Statement has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and declared effective or (ii) resale is permitted under Rule 144 without the need for an effective registration statement.
deebster PAVC Web Site
Posted by: same53
In reply to: None
Date:10/1/2006 12:06:39 PM
Post #of 13770
PAVC WEBSITE
PAVC Home Page
http://www.webdesigngfx.com/paivis.com/index.php
PaivisCorp is a holding company with interests in businesses strategically positioned within the telecommunications industry. PaivisCorp will achieve a leadership position through the building of a synergistic network of innovative, profitable and global telecommunications businesses. Furthermore, PaivisCorp will continually build shareholder value by sustaining competitive advantage through the integration of unique market insights with innovative business concepts, processes and technologies.
PAVC Web Site the Company
http://www.webdesigngfx.com/paivis.com/company.php
PaivisCorp (OTCBB: PAIV.OB) is a publicly traded holding company with interests in key sectors of the telecommunications industry. With a focus on specific synergistic growth areas of the industry and investing in early-stage, high growth companies within each sector, we believe that we can achieve unprecedented economies of scale, price-competitiveness and profitability within the telecommunications industry.
PaivisCorp will continually build shareholder value by sustaining competitive advantage through the integration of unique market insights with innovative business concepts, processes and technologies.
PAVC News
http://www.webdesigngfx.com/paivis.com/news.php
PAVC Business MACRO
http://www.webdesigngfx.com/paivis.com/business.phpMacro Communications
Headquartered in Duluth Georgia, Macro Communications is a facility-based wholesale telecommunications carrier that delivers many application/value-added services. Macro operates and maintains a robust switching facility, offering over 16,000 ports with connectivity to most of the tier 1 carriers in the US and manages an extensive international (A-Z) network. In addition to the wholesale business, Macro maintains a large retail distribution network for direct to consumer services.
To find out more about Macro Communications, please click here. (link to www.macrosouth.com)
Please check back soon, as we will have additional business in our portfolio in the near future.
PAVC Contact INFO
http://www.webdesigngfx.com/paivis.com/contact.php
Dr. Jan Stahl resigned May 11, 2006
Also 8-K below shows 29-Jun-2006
Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities, Change in Directors or Principal Officers.
Item 3.02 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
On June 26, 2006, the board directors approved the issuance of 1,008,561 Series A Convertible Preferred Shares to the former Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant for the exchange of 10,085,614 common shares of the Registrant. The Series A Convertible Preferred Shares will be issued as restricted securities and are exempt from registration under §5 of the Securities Act of 1933, as the issuances are deemed exempt from registration under §3(a)(9), §4(1) and 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
*******************************************************
PAIVIS, CORP. (formerly APO Health, Inc.)
DATED: MAY 11, 2006
RESIGNATION FROM BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ELECTION OF
NEW DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
The undersigned, being a member of the Board of Directors and Officer of Paivis, Corp., formerly APO Health, Inc., hereby resigns from the Board of Directors and as the President effective immediately, and hereby appoints the following officers and directors effective as of the date hereof:
President - Gregory L. Bauer
Treasurer - Gregory L. Bauer
Secretary - Cathy Wilson
Director - Gregory L. Bauer
Director - Guriqbal Randhawa
/s/ Dr. Jan Stahl
Dr. Jan Stahl
The undersigned, being a member of the Board of Directors and Officer of Paivis, Corp., formerly APO Health, Inc., hereby resigns from the Board of Directors and as the President effective immediately, and hereby appoints the following officers and directors effective the date hereof:
President - Gregory L. Bauer
Treasurer - Gregory L. Bauer
Secretary - Cathy Wilson
Director - Gregory L. Bauer
Director - Guriqbal Randhawa
/s/ Kenny Leventhal
Kenny Leventhal
ACCEPTANCE OF APPOINTMENT TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
I, the undersigned, do hereby accept the appointment of President, Treasurer and Director , effective immediately.
/s/ Gregory L. Bauer
Gregory L. Bauer
I, the undersigned, do hereby accept the appointment of Secretary .
/s/ Cathy Wilson
Cathy Wilson
I, the undersigned, do hereby accept the appointment of Director , effective immediately.
/s/ Guriqbal Randhawa
Guriqbal Randhawa
**************************************************************
Form 8-K for APO HEALTH INC /NV/
29-Jun-2006
Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities, Change in Directors or Principal Offi
Item 3.02 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
On June 26, 2006, the board directors approved the issuance of 1,008,561 Series A Convertible Preferred Shares to the former Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant for the exchange of 10,085,614 common shares of the Registrant. The Series A Convertible Preferred Shares will be issued as restricted securities and are exempt from registration under §5 of the Securities Act of 1933, as the issuances are deemed exempt from registration under §3(a)(9), §4(1) and 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
On June 26, 2006, the board directors approved the issuance of 2,500,750 Series B Convertible Preferred Shares to a corporation controlled by a director of the Registrant for the exchange of 200,060,000 Series B Convertible Shares of Jupiter Global Holdings Corp. (a subsidiary of the Registrant). The Series B Convertible Preferred Shares will be issued as restricted securities and are exempt from registration under §5 of the Securities Act of 1933, as the issuances are deemed exempt from registration under §3(a)(9), §4(1) and 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
On June 26, 2006, the board directors approved the issuance of 500,000 Series B Convertible Preferred Shares to a corporation controlled by a officer and director of the Registrant for the exchange of 50,000,000 Series C Convertible Shares of Jupiter Global Holdings Corp. (a subsidiary of the Registrant). The Series B Convertible Preferred Shares will be issued as restricted securities and are exempt from registration under §5 of the Securities Act of 1933, as the issuances are deemed exempt from registration under §3(a)(9), §4(1) and 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
T/A number 303-783-9055
Again Simple Answer Call them
In my past posts are many contact phone numbers to call. Anyone can call. You can ask questions and get answers.
I know if I am a shareholder and want answers I go to the source to get answers and that is what I did.
The problem as I see it, some posters are to lazy to pick up the phone and call. If that is the case then shame on them.
*************************************************************
<<How do we know the company did no wrong? >>
I know you do extensive DD and you are smart enough to state this is your opinion, not fact.......but the bottom line is very simple....The company has not said a word. Considering all the MANY issues and MANY confused shareholders who are part owners of the company......PAVC NEEDS to speak up....They OWE it to shareholders. Did you read the post I just read from a poster who said he doesnt want info from a message board, he wants it from the company...
And he and every shareholder should feel the exact same way.......all this time and all the many issues and the company OWES IT TO SHAREHOLDERS to NOT keep them in the dark and to SPEAK UP...
Even more alarming is the company claims, although not in writing or officialy, that they did nothing wrong and other parties are waht caused this mess...so they are saying WE ARE INNOCENT and OTHER PARTIES have screwed us.......
How many innocent people or companies that are truly innocent and were truly harmed by third parties, dont speak up? I dont know of any. It is akin to being accused of rape.....you know you did not comitt the crime, but you dont say a word and let everybody think you are guilty...
Innocent parties usually SPEAK and SPEAK LOUDLY......
To say the company is 100% innocent, but it and it's shareholders were screwed by another parties illegal actions......and they dont say a word in their defense..not a word to shareholders.....nothing official announced...not even a pr saying we are alive and working to resolve the issues......well, that is simply pathetic.....That is one giant huge red flag, IMO..and I mean GIANT......They are innocent and were harmed by others illegal actions and they dont say a word?? PLEASE........Who actually is going to buy/believe that B.S.??
There is no way in hell any public company is going to let a third party(s) ILLEGALY harm them and just sit there and not say a word...in fact, the opposite should occur...they should be PR'ing everyday declaring their innocence and letting shareholders and prospective investors know they are not going to sit idly by while third parties harm their biz and shareholders.....Sorry...but any company in this situation, claiming they have been harmed and it was somebody elses fault...well, they speak up and they speak up loudly...
For anybody to believe PAVC is claiming third parties screwed them and their shareholders verbally, but not officialy and nothing in writing.....and they are doing nothing and saying nothing......well, I've got some swamp land in the sahara for sale <lmao>
Seriouly though...not menaing to be negative...just calling it as I see it and it is pathetic if anybody believes innocent people are harmed, but do nothing and say nothing....well....again, that is just pathetic....INNOCENT PEOPLE speak and speak loudly....how this company can claim they have done no wrong and others have hurt them, but they refuse to say a word and have most shareholders confused and frustrated, prospective investors dont have a clue what is going on.....different answers from different parties everyday...but the company does not say a word itself....well, folks need to realize they have a brain and common sense and use just a little of it...
I have heard talk that they are saying things verbally but not making it official, because it is part of their plan to screw the shorts....LMAO....So, they dont want anybody to know they are going to screw the shorts, but they know very well everything they say will be posted on a message board that shorts will be able to see and read.....
100% B.S., imo.....HUGE RED FLAG folks and this is not a rule for PAVC only...it is a general rule of investing....if they say it verbally but will not put it in writing and make it official, then there is something very wrong.........
I'm innocent, but will let everybody accuse me of being guilty and although I KNOW I am innocent I dont say a word and let people think I am guilty, when I KNOW it is the other person that is guilty but I still wont say that and declare my innocence and point the blame where it belongs?? LOL.....
I sincerely hope the company eventually speaks and hope they are being truthful and they are not involved in any 'shennanigans'....but until they do speak, I simply cannot believe they are 100% innocent and are simply letting people think otherwise, while they dont say a word.....Nope....at this point, after all this time and all the many issues, the companies actions are very alarming, imo....
My guess is there is more then one 'guilty' party in this fiasco...I dont think for one minute it is all the brokers fault...every broker is involved and screwing the company, while the company does/says nothing......I suspect there is far more going on that we dont know about, and yes, I do suspect the company is doing things shareholders may not be aware of...all my opinion...but a common sense opinion...the company is not going to know they are innocent and let the guilty parties bury them without them saying a word....my guess is the company is doing things behind the scenes and making money as we speak and they dont speak <lol>
Just my opinions....again, I wish the best of luck to all and do very much hope the end result is good for the longs....I will be thrilled to post here one day and congratulate the longs if they get their shares, and are able to sell them for far higher prices......
'tiger1 that is correct
Did you get the Fax from T/A as I did, it states facts. Facts that show the Brokerage Firms are not complying with the T/A.
Put the SEC Complaints in, call your Brokerage Firm, back up everything with a e-mail to your Brokerage Firm, ask them to send you information on your accounts that they sent to the T/A in a letter.
Don't be surprised if you find out that the T/A has not received your information requested from your Brokerage firm.
Yet your Brokerage Firm will tell you they sent everything to the T/A. Get it in writing from your brokerage Firm as I did.
********************************************************
All Who use Scottrade , Just talk to ta, Scottrade is over 10 million fail to recive thats at the old os . he said it would be a great help if we call Tammy Green She is supervisor in complance dept # 314-965-1555 ext 1329 and demand are shares also ask for certs . For those who have TDameriatrade he just got the package in today . Go luck to all
Simple Answer
How do we know the company did no wrong?
Because I have been doing a lot of DD as you can see by my posts and I have made a decision based on information from all parties. Of course this is IMO.
**********************************************************
Message In Reply To:
No energy except for this response...
<<Also Why should the Company say anything IMO. They did no wrong IMO and they are focused to build the Company and Revenues. IMO the Company is very aware of what is going on..
>>
How do we know the company did no wrong? A PR saying they did nothing wrong would be nice. You state 'the company knows what is going on' and infer because they do, there is no reason to say anything. Well, I am happy for the company that they know what is going on.
However, they have an awful lot of shareholders that are very confused and frustrated, are getting jerked around, getting different answers to the same questions from different people and they have no clue what is going on. And they will not have a clue unless answers come directly from the company or the sec. Anything the TA or brokerages are saying right now is moot...too many different answers with nothing 'official'..
Considering the many fiascos, unanswered questions, many confused shareholders ( what about prosepctive buyers? With all the fiasco's and with them not having a clue what is going on with PAVC are they going to get new investors after people do thorough DD and see everything, with all the fiascos and still many unanswered questions/issues?) and etc, etc, at the very least, I think the company at least needs to put out a PR letting shareholders know they are alive, know there are issues and ensure shareholders they are working to resolve the issues...thats it plain and simply.....Frankly, looking at all the confused shareholders and issues that have been going on for quite awhile now with no answers and not a peep from the company, I am alarmed they have not at least let shareholders know they are alive and are working to resolve things...nothing major..nice and simple to let people know they have a pulse .......You mentioned it is the brokers fault so company shouldnt say anything and let the brokers clean up the mess...no offense, but that is a bit off the wall...The bottom line is the shareholders of PAVC are very confused and are seeking answers and not getting them...PAVC needs to say something as you are part owners of their company....even worse would be if the brokers really did cause this messa nd the company does not speak up...if they care about their biz and their shareholders and they feel the brokers are at fault, they are idiots for not saying something publicly to their shareholders....could you imagine being the CEO of a publicly traded company and any third party..I dont care who...as long as it is not the companies doing....creates a nightmare for your shareholders...and you simply dont care and dont say anything while YOUR shareholders are being harmed by OTHER parties?? LMAO..If I were CEO and something happened to effect my company or my shareholders and it was NOT my fault or the companies fault, I would issuing PR's everyday to stay in touch with shareholders and let them know I will not let OTHER parties hurt the company or it's shareholders...I sure as heck would not let a third part effect me in such a manner and sit there and not say anything...my gosh...if it is NOT the companies fault, they should be speaking up frequently and loudly, IMO.....
But as I said at the very least, in all this time, with all these issues, company should at least let people know they are alive......complete 100% silence when you are claiming off the record that third parties have harmed your company and hurt your shareholders, makes zero sense...
All the energy I have folks....good luck, and I sincerely hope this turns out good for all longs when all is said and done....
nukuhiva B/S simple as that
Call the T/A and verify first they sent your shares, second ask the T/A to Fax you what he requests of Ameritrade.Then match up the two what Ameritrade tells and the T/A gives you.
I received a Fax about from T/A about Scottrade and I am not happy with what I read. I will not post the contents of the Fax on message boards as i stated before.
This fax from the T/A to you will then let you make an intelligent decision on who is telling the truth.
You know where I stand by my posts.
As far as the Company saying anything IMO they are sticking to their game plan and IMO positive things are happenung at the Company.
Again it is a slow process and the SEC IMO is very interested in what has been happening with PAVC. Our SEC Complaints IMO have helped. No matter what your view is.
Also Why should the Company say anything IMO. They did no wrong IMO and they are focused to build the Company and Revenues. IMO the Company is very aware of what is going on..
Let the Firms that caused this situation hang themselves as they are doing IMO.
*********************************************************
Reply from AT.
Mr ****
Although I am unable to send you a copy of the information that was sent to the transfer agent, please rest assured that as of 07/28/2006, TD Ameritrade submitted Executive Registrar & Transfer with the shareholder of record information as requested.
Recently, the transfer agent has requested additional information to be submitted in order to process our request to have certificates issued. I show that TD Ameritrade has provided this information as requested on 10/12/2006.
Once the physical certificates have been issued by the transfer agent, they will be mailed to shareholders directly. At this time, we do not have a date as to when you may expect to receive the certificate.
Laurie W.
Apex Reorganization and Safekeeping, TD AMERITRADE
Division of TD AMERITRADE, Inc.
Four posts put togeather
I posted this on Allsocks to another poster. Now after you read these posts I think you can see what is going on.
Chad its not the T/A
You want to contact your Broker they are the culprits here. Everyone Call T/A and verify what is going on.
Read the below posts on what is really happening with Scottrade and Ameritrade.
Then Call T/A
303-783-9055
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=5814
Posted by: same53In reply to: same53 who wrote msg# 13647 Date:10/18/2006 10:22:48 AMPost # of 13702
Everyone Read this post again.
I see a lot of posters asking Questions that they can get themselves. I did exactly what I posted below. I also followed up with the Brokerage Firm I use in requestiong New Information. I am waiting on that.Again i will not post on the message boards what I found out.
I did do a SEC Complaint against my Brokerage firm and I am pissed that we are being lied to and deceived by these firms.IMO Do not think for one minute that the brokerage firms are working in your be half. At first I thought they were.NOT ANY MORE*
**************************************************************Important info on Brokerage Firms and T/A
I would highly suggest that all here call their Brokerage Firms and speak with your Compliance Examiner.Ask and demand from your Brokerage Firm compliance dept all information on your accounts that they sent to the transfer Agent Mr Jack Donelly .
All Documents!Do not take no for an answer you have the right to receive this information on your accounts from your brokerage Firm.
Do not listen to the excuse that you may here from your Compliance Examiner saying to you (you can see everything we sent to the T/A by looking at your account it is all there.)You want to see and have physical possession of all the Documents sent about your account to the T/A..
You may have to request this information in writeing which is what I had to do.
I hand deliverd a letter to the branch manager at my local branch office and I got a copy of the letter for my records.After this I sent an E-Mail to the Brokerage Firm I use stating exactly what I just did and reiterated the information I wanted mailed to me.I mentioned names of all the parties I talked to.By doing an E-Mail to your Brokerage Firm it insures that they receive your requests. You protect yourself so the Brokerage Firm can not come back on you and state they never received any such request from you.Next call the T/A and speak to Mr Donelly.
Ask Mr Donelly if he could send you a Fax about the information he has requested from the Brokerage Firm that you are using.
I did just that and Mr Donelly sent me a Fax on what he requested from my Brokerage Firm I use which is Scottrade..
Mr Donelly verified that I was a clinent of that Brokerage Firm before he sent me the Fax.I will not post the contents of the Fax on this message board.
It is up to you to call the T/A and get a copy for yourself.I can state this after reading the information I received from the T/A I sent a SEC Complaint against the brokerage Firm I use.
I have been asking my Brokerage Firm questions for months with e-mails, phone calls and talking face to face with the branch manager with no results. What are they trying to hide?Now I know the answer.
*********************************************
Posted by: same53In reply to: None Date:10/18/2006 1:21:59 PMPost # of 13702
Post from RB this is what is going onThis is exactly what I am getting at.
Read the post below.
By: rinderles18 Oct 2006, 11:35 AM EDTMsg. 14031 of 14032Jump to msg. #
I would strongly suggest that anyone who has restricted shares for JPHC to contact the transfer agent and verify that the transfer agent has your shares. I would also make sure they have the correct amount.
I called yesterday to verify my position and to my surprise he told me my shares were not even listed with the Scottrade record position.I thought all my shares were sent months ago and im pretty disgusted to learn after all this time my shares were not included for some reasonThis could be a huge problem.
***********************************************
Posted by: Dallas66In reply to: None Date:10/18/2006 6:09:54 PMPost # of 13702
I spoke with Jack Donnelly last Monday and last Friday concerning the delivery of shareholder information from TDAmeritrade involving the restricted shares. Jack told me as of friday, he still has not received the complete and correct listing of shareholders, and what information involving share count received with that information is incomplete, this was from TDAmeritrade.
I contacted TDA last Monday after talking to Jack and demanded the following information be sent to the TA immediately. I was told by Jane in the compliance dept., the information had already been sent.
I asked her to verify with me what that information was...not names and numbers...just the specific information the TA had requested, and when it was actually sent. Jane was unable to supply me with that information. Jane assured me that MY personal information would be resent, and it would be done on Tuesday of last week.
I also requested an email verifying my personal information so I could again contact the TA to verify he indeed did receive the correct and accurate information.
As of last Friday Jack had not received the information, nor had I received an email conformation as I was promised.
Today I contacted TDA again spoke with John, and was told MY PERSONAL INFORMATION was propriatary by TDA and they did not have to disclose that information to me.
That was the wrong answer. After a brief conversation with a supposed dept. head, to make this shorter...I was told I will be sent the requested information via snail mail excluding my SS# for security reasons, which will also be resent to the TA.
I can live with that. I was also told by this person at TDA that they sent all requested information to the TA on Oct. 12, 2006.
How many months late is that from when the TA requested it?
The TA faxed me the letter he sent to TDA. TDA DID NOT COMPLY. EVERYONE...PLEASE DO THE FOLLOWING:CONTACT YOUR BROKER...DEMAND THEY RESEND "YOUR" PERSONAL INFORMATION TO THE TRANSFER AGENT. DO NOT TAKE NO FOR AN ANSWER. DEMAND THEY SEND YOU A COPY OF THAT INFORMATION TO YOU VIA SNAIL MAIL. AGAIN...DO NOT TAKE NO FOR AN ANSWER. TELL THEM UP FRONT YOU WILL BE VERIFYING THIS INFORMATION WITH THE TRANSFER AGENT PERSONALLY.
IT DOESN'T MATTER IF THEY TELL YOU THEY HAVE SENT IT A DOZEN TIMES...DEMAND THEY RESEND...IT IS YOUR RIGHT TO SEE IT.
here is the information the TA requires in order to complete the delivery of your shares.Legal Name: use the name in your broker account
Home addresstax id (SS#)
1. Total # of shares after merger & date2.
Total # of shares after exchange rate & date3. Total # of shares after 200:1 reverse split & date05-11-06 is the merger date05-23-06 is the jphc to paiv ratio date08-03-06 is the 200:1 reverse split dateIf you had APOA shares, there is an additional piece of information needed.
The stock record position and date for the div. I believe that was around 5-12-2006.....maybe 5-10-2006.these three records for your shares are called the"stock record position"you also need specified if you had only jphc...onlyapoa...or both jphc and apoa shares.
If your curious about the letters the TA has sent to the brokers, you will have to contact the TA and he will gladly FAX a copy to you involving YOUR broker.
Posted by: scrath50
In reply to: None Date:10/18/2006 3:17:07 PMPost # of 13702
interesting......"Thank you for your email. Scottrade is waiting to receive further instruction from the stock's transfer agent regarding the additional shares that are due shareholders.
All the shares will be credited to the necessary accounts when Scottrade finally takes possession of them.We apologize for the delay. Please let us know if you have any furtherquestions regarding your account. Cordially,Jon M.National Service CenterScottrade Inc."