Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Traders shorting would be "naked shorting".
Try it, and see.
MMs shorting is part of the market/algorithm process of market-making --- which has to be covered. This is NOT "naked shorting".
Is there no 'Rent Expense' showing on the financials for unpaid Rent?:
Dr Rent Expense (Income Statement)
Cr A Liability Account (Balance Sheet)
What 'shorts'?!
'Shorting' in pinks is a "myth" that gets spread around needlessly: Who is going to tie up a required 250,000.00 collateral to 'short' pinks??!!
Remember to bounce off your "bottom" when it hits "bottom" ---
so that we will all "know"!
TIA!!!
I took your post too negatively -- probably.
But with all that people say to possibly manipulate prices ---
not that I thought that ytou were trying to do that --- I felt
that my reply was necessary.
Thank you for yours --- and have a nice "one"!
It's not even 03/31 --- !!!
"Leaving out 2014 financials hurt...".
Too soon to worry about this with all
else that it took to get the Form 10!
LOOK AT "THE POSITIVES"!!!
Yes!:
Give it time to "sink in".
An 'apparent' double top is not really forming ('daily chart') ---
it's base-building at the current level(s) / solidifying. It has
to go thru previous prices --- re-trace. SAR has turned "positive".
The 'daily chart' needs to do a catch-up: the 'weekly chart' shows
some of the indicators have turned positive. Others to follow.
There 'could' be a --- BIG "POP"!!! (Once it ALL "sinks in"!)
WHAAAAATTT!!!???
R U gonna make him 'King of The World' --- NOW!!!???
After the blood, sweat, heart palpitations, bladder..., bowel...,
and tears that he put us thru for ALL of this time!!!
OK --- at 2.00 per share, though!
Have a nice --- one!!!
Also:
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=hhse&ql=1
Hannover House Files Registration; Announces Corporate
GoalsAccesswire(Thu 1:22PM EDT)
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/hannover-house-files-registration-announces-172200924.html
NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / March 12, 2015
Most of the 'daily' and 'weekly' charts (at least ten each that I look at) are positive in their indicators --- and those that aren't yet certainly look like they're heading in the right path.
Have a nice "one"!
P.S. I'm NOT a 'chart EX-pert'!!!
Mebbe they're watching IHUB for some ideas for their next "thriller" movie!?
Or mebbe their next "comedy of errors"?!
A bit of "both"!!!???
Lots of "both"???!!!
Have a "nice" --- one!
A Typo?!
Or possibly the blog was posted via a Pacific Coast server/company with three hours time diff from east coast (IHUB)
[?!].
Form 10 --- 0.10
Up-List --- 0.20
VODWIZ --- 0.30
ALL Else --- 2.00+++++
Before "30" is "29"!
Should be: Before "31" --- must be AT LEAST "30"!!!
Check "the rule"!
DISCLAIMER: I sm NOT a 'tax advisor'!!!
Is this new info?:
HoganTaylor announces merger:
http://hogantaylor.com/hogantaylor-announces-merger-with-hks/
Any 'tar-get'?!
Probably a NON-commissionable trade between MMs.
They do have "signals" as to 100, 200, 300, 400, and so forth, shares --- and what they mean.
For instance, one of them means: I need shares.
I have a "list" some-where --- but I do not plan to look for it now.
OOOhhhhh: I don't think that HHSE "...has the worst management".
"Market-teers" that do create "tears" --- some/many times.
After all:
1. It has taken some fine "talent" to juggle "the priorities" and get the company to where it is now --- like it, or not --- as we can SEE "THE PLAN" is coming together.
2. Even though 'speckulater' is posting historical results, they do tell a POSITIVE "STORY"!
Have a nice --- "one"!
As someone said some months ago:
POS = Profit Opportunity Stock!
That was a 'system glitch' --- I checked a broker.
Check your brokers.
That's not "a cents of humour"!
That's "a dollars of humour"!!
Have --- a nice "one"!
No!
Call again --- and if no reply within a week --- CALL AGAIN!!!
Make sure that your message takes clearly if automated.
"HMMMM WONDER WHY???????????????" !!!!!!!???????
"The reason" is be-the-cause Eric would then be doing blogs 24/7!
Some times --- JUST SOME TIMES --- the blogs have to be limited in scope just to get "the (root) message" out, and then keep on "chugging" / "plugging"!!!
This is known as "balance" within "THE TOTAL SCENARIO"!!!
It is ALSO KNOWN AS "TALENT" WITHIN "THE TOTAL SCENARIO"!!!
NOOOOO matter what he does, he's going to be "criticized" / "criti-sized"!
Have a nice --- "one"!
I appreciate many of the posts on both 'sides of the fence' --- many give us "insights" for understandings.
Think on:
1. While we may focus on one point (vertically), Eric and Fred have to (try to) keep in balance many points (horizontally) --- and we can easily lose "sight" of this in our "fruatrations".
2. E&F have had many set-backs --- which have added to their "frustrations", and ours --- but they have always over-come and persevered.
3. E&F have tried, and are trying, to maintain "visibility" --- for which they now get criticized. Yes, "blogging" takes time, and possibly re-viewing these IHUB posts (or someone(s) giving them IHUB info) as well --- but this is part of what many posters have really asked for in DEMANDING "visibility".
4. If we "sit back" and seriously "look at" what has been accomplished over the years --- and what is being accomplished --- IT IS REALLY QUITE AMAZING! IT TAKES "VERY FINE TALENT" TO KEEP GOING UNDER ALL OF "THE STRESS", "THE CRITICISMS", "THEIR OWN (HUMAN) ERRORS", "DISAPPOINTMENTS", and SO FORTH --- and still GROW HHSE!!!
5. THINK ABOUT WHAT "GROWING HHSE" REALLY ENTAILS.
"SUGGESTION": CUT E&F SOME "SLACK" --- and let them do what they gotta do in a more re-laxed setting. Even then, it can be VERY DIE-NAMIC!
Have a nice --- "one".
Jerry
Looking at a five-year chart shows that the PPS has fluctuated --- risen and fallen --- VERY appreciably in the last 5 years!
It is "dark"est BE-FORE the "dawn"!
Take off the "AON" --- and leave it as 100,000 shares.
DO NOT CHANGE THE ORDER DURING THAT TRADING SESSION. (If you change the "bid" and/or the "share quantity" --- or cancel the order and re-input it later --- THAT/THOSE ACTIONS START THE ORDER ALL OVER AGAIN [additional commissions].)
At Scottrade, ALL executions of that 100,000 shares during THAT same 'day' as trades take effect are part of ONE BIG TRADE --- SO THAT THERE IS ONLY "ONE" COMMISSION SPREAD BETWEEN ALL OF THOSE TRADES.
IF --- only a few shares get bought, that is too bad.
But, at least, based on what you have said --- you would probably get some part of the 100,000 filled (and mebbe ALL of it).
Then you can decide what to do to-"morrow". (And even three-"morrow".)
Have a nice "one"!
At the "close" --- ALL 'day' orders drop off. Others are "cancelled". Even others are "added" (pending the next "market open" --- in a "DIE"-namic environment).
So any 'bids' at those times --- and between "market closes and opens" --- often do NOT make any "sense". And often the "spreads" between "bid" and "ask" get larger than what occurred during the "market session(s)". (Even though some ask questions during those times about such "spreads".)
Therefore, I'm not sure just what your question refers to --- and any point that you are trying to make.
Yes! To say that this is a 20-year old company doesn't give THE TRUE PERSPECTIVE as to what is, and has been, going on.
It may be the same 'corporation' --- or successor 'corporations'/'bodies' --- but in reality it does not resemble the 20-year ago company.
So THIS "HHSE" is having growING "PAINS" --- and PRO-bably will for some time!
It is VERY DYNAMIC! PRAYER-FULLY NOT "DIE"-NAMIC!!! NOT "grief" --- 'good', or other-"wise"!
Have a nice one!
Be-the-cause: Eric posts 'news' as blogs and not (the more expensive way as) PRs.
Blogs do not go out to 'the world'.
PRs go out to 'the world'.
The "FACT" that Eric replies to emails means a "lot" to me!
RE-GARD-LESS OF "ERRORS", "BAD JUDGE-MENTS", "SCREW-UPS", and "SCREW-DOWNS" --- HE IS "TOPS"!!!
Based on the "blog", I sent the following email:
"-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry ....
To: (hannoverhouse@aol.com) <hannoverhouse@aol.com>
Sent: Wed, Apr 9, 2014 10:58 am
Subject: Treasury vs Unissued Stock
hannoverhouse@aol.com (hannoverhouse@aol.com) ....
To: Mr. Eric Parkinson, Chairman / CEO
Mr. Fred Shefte, CFO
Ref: Blog 2014-04-09
Authorized, but unissued stock is not "treasury stock".
"Treasury stock" is (its own) stock bought by the cimpany on the open market and then held for
future use, possibly being retired then.
Have a nice one,
Stockholder Jerry"
--------------------------------------------------
Eric replied WITHIN 10 "MINUTES"!!!:
" Re: Treasury vs Unissued Stock?
From: hannoverhouse@aol.com
Sent: Wed 4/09/14 9:05 AM
To: [ME]....; fred@hannoverhouse.com
Jerry - there's inconsistencies in the use of the term "TREASURY" stock. For instance, Investopedia defines it as follows:
Definition of 'Treasury Stock (Treasury Shares)'
The portion of shares that a company keeps in their own treasury. Treasury stock may have come from a repurchase or buyback from shareholders; or it may have never been issued to the public in the first place. These shares don't pay dividends, have no voting rights, and should not be included in shares outstanding calculations.
* * * * *
With respect to "authorized" but "not issued" shares in VODwiz, Inc., it's possible to refer to these under several terms, such as "unissued A/S" and at least according to Investopedia, they could be referred to as "Treasury" stock shares. I'm not trying to be contrary to your comment, just wanted to clarify where we got that term. If we get multiple inquiries or challenges, I'm not opposed to modifying the terminology used in this morning's BLOG so that there is no confusion.
Thanks ERIC"
------------------------------------------------------------
To "RE-PEAT"!!!:
RE-GARD-LESS OF "ERRORS", "BAD JUDGE-MENTS", "SCREW-UPS", and "SCREW-DOWNS" --- HE IS "TOPS"!!!
Have a "nice" one!!!
------------------------------------------------------------
Don't sweat the audit. At least he emailed you.
The mechanisms and the records can be in place to accomplish it, but the actual "details" may take much more "time" than is apparent.
I'm sure that this has proved to be an embarr-ass-ment to them --- you "know": "egg on their faces" --- but I'm also sure that there was no "evil intent", just no realization as to what was really needed besides some "record-keeping errors" which have CON-founded the whole thing.
Step back and "LOOK AT" what is being accomplished --- "THE TOTAL PICTURE"!!!
It's a very "dynamic" situation! Yes! DIE-NAMIC!!! (Maybe)
Have a nice one.
How should I know!!!???
Why don't YOU send him an email --- and ask him?
In many/most companies the "ACCOUNTING DEPT" would fall under the "CFO" --- in HHSE I don't think that THAT is the case.
The blog didn't specify that "TWELVE" debt is STILL being paid.
But IF it is --- then THAT shows that "the debt" IS BEING PAID OFF, WITH "CASH"! YES!!!???
This statement shows that you do NOT "understand" cash v. accrual!
I am using this reply to clarify where I see MISSED-CON-ceptions as to REVENUE, PROFITS, CASH, and the like by several posters previously. (Please get some "accounting knowledge" under your belts --- and over your belts.)
Let's say that I'm a company and I start with 100.00 cash.
Now I buy "product" on "credit" for 40.00. I still have 100.00 cash, INVENTORY of 40.00 and ACCOUNTS PAYABLE of 40.00.
Now I sell 25.00 of the INVENTORY on "credit" for 50.00:
a. I have SALES (REVENUES) of 50.00, COST OF SALES of 25.00, GROSS PROFIT of 25.00, (unsold) INVENTORY of 15.00, and ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE of 50.00.
b. I still have 100.00 cash.
Now I pay 15.00 of GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES:
a. My CASH is now 85.00.
b. My NET PROFIT is 10.00.
Some of you relate REVENUES and PROFITS as CASH, and this is NOT correct (for ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING)!
So, from the SEC report which link was posted do NOT forget the following ASSETS:
a. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE NET --- 2.7 million.
b. PREPAID PRODUCER ROYALTIES --- 1.9 million.
c. PRODUCER MARKETING RECOUPMENT --- 2.2 million.
d. FILM PRODUCTION INVESTMENTS --- .5 million
http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/displayfilinginfo.aspx?FilingID=9794837-1133-57074&type=sect&dcn=0001471242-14-000060
Does this help?
I haven't had time to read any posted messages yet, but if the latest "ACCESSWIRE" is read "care"-fully --- with all that is being handled, and regardless of set-backs, E & R sure keep the PRO-verbial "ball" rolling!
It can be easy to criticize, but E & R are ACTUALLY SHOWING VERY FINE "MANAGE"-MEANT!!!
Don't be: "Sorry"!
Be!!!: "PAY SHUNT"!!!
Well stated!