Keep it real
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Inovio HIV Vaccine Elicits Nearly 100% Immune Response Rates
in a Clinical Study
Amongst highest levels of immune responses ever demonstrated
in an HIV vaccine human study
PLYMOUTH MEETING, Pa., May 24, 2017 -- Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:INO) today announced that its HIV vaccine, PENNVAX®-GP, produced amongst the highest overall levels of immune response rates (cellular and humoral) ever demonstrated in a human study by an HIV vaccine. The vaccine candidate, PENNVAX-GP, consists of a combination of four HIV antigens designed to cover multiple global HIV strains and generate both an antibody (humoral) immune response as well as a T cell (cellular) immune response to both potentially prevent and treat HIV.
These preliminary results are from a study supported by the HIV Vaccine Trials Network (HVTN) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in collaboration with Inovio. The study evaluated a four-dose regimen of PENNVAX-GP DNA vaccine administered by intradermal (ID) or intramuscular (IM) administration in combination with a DNA encoded immune activator, IL-12 (INO-9012). Overall, 71 of 76 (93%) evaluable vaccinated participants showed a CD4+ or CD8+ cellular immune response to at least one of the vaccine antigens (env A, env C, gag, or pol). Similarly, 62 of 66 (94%) evaluated participants demonstrated an env specific antibody response. None of the placebo recipients (0 of 9; 0%) demonstrated either a cellular or an antibody response in the study. Notably, amongst the participants receiving PENNVAX-GP vaccine and IL-12 with intradermal immunization, 27 of 28 (96%) participants demonstrated a cellular response and 27 of 28 (96%) demonstrated an HIV env specific antibody response.
Amongst the evaluated participants receiving PENNVAX-GP and IL-12 via IM vaccination, 27 of 27 (100%) demonstrated a cellular response and 19 of 21 (90%) demonstrated an env specific antibody response. Similar immune responses and response rates were achieved via both ID and IM administration of the vaccine although participants vaccinated via intradermal vaccine administration received 1/5th the dose of vaccine compared to those vaccinated via intramuscular administration.
This breakthrough data was presented at a plenary session at the 2017 HVTN Spring Full Group Meeting on May 23 in Washington, D.C. by the Protocol Co-Chair of the HVTN 098 study, Dr. Stephen De Rosa, Research Associate Professor, Laboratory Medicine at the University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. The HVTN 098 trial was the first clinical study of PENNVAX-GP. The randomized, placebo-controlled multi-center study enrolled 94 subjects (85 vaccine and 9 placebo) to characterize and optimize PENNVAX-GP immunization regimens delivered through vaccinations using either intramuscular or intradermal delivery.
Dr. De Rosa, said, “The preliminary results of HVTN 098 are remarkable for a number of reasons. In HVTN 098, nearly all individuals vaccinated with the regimens including IL-12 had detectable CD4 responses and over half had CD8 T cell responses. Similarly, the antibody response rate was 100% or close to 100% for several of the env antigens tested in the assay. Thus, these high response rates are exceptional. Further studies will be needed to determine if this vaccine candidate can safely and effectively prevent HIV infection.”
Dr. J. Joseph Kim, Inovio’s President & CEO, said, “These results are among the highest ever responses we’ve seen with an HIV vaccine, and they are remarkably consistent with our recent data reported from our Ebola, Zika and MERS clinical trials in terms of demonstrating nearly 100% vaccine response rates with very favorable safety profile. Furthermore, our newer and more tolerable intradermal vaccine delivery device showed that we can elicit very high immune responses at a much lower dose. We look forward to advancing PENNVAX-GP into later-stage clinical development with our partners and collaborators.”
Development of Inovio’s PENNVAX-GP immunotherapy, which widely targets multiple major clades of HIV — providing global coverage — has been funded through a $25 million NIAID contract previously awarded in 2009 to Inovio and its collaborators. In addition, Inovio and its collaborators were awarded an additional five-year $16 million Integrated Preclinical/Clinical AIDS Vaccine Development (IPCAVD) grant in 2015 from NIAID.
About HIV Infection
Nearly 35 million people have died from HIV-related causes and over 36 million are living with HIV. HIV is a retrovirus that causes acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), a condition in which progressive failure of the immune system allows life-threatening opportunistic infections and cancers to thrive. HIV is classified into clades, sub-types within which the virus has genetic similarities. The most prevalent clades are B (found mainly in North America and Europe), A and D (found mainly in Africa), and C (found mainly in Africa and Asia).
HIV clade C accounts for 48% of worldwide and 51% of African-HIV type 1 cases. It is the most rapidly spreading subtype of HIV. Although highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens have dramatically transformed the treatment of the disease in developed countries, safe and effective HIV vaccines are needed to stop the spread of disease.
About Inovio's PENNVAX® HIV Vaccines and Immunotherapies
Inovio completed initial clinical studies of its HIV immunotherapy PENNVAX-B, targeting clade B viruses, to achieve proof of principle in generating potent immune responses using its SynCon® immunotherapy technology. In two published phase 1 studies, PENNVAX-B immunization via IM injection generated high levels of activated and antigen-specific CD8+ killer T cells. This ability uniquely positions PENNVAX as an important product candidate for both preventing and treating HIV infections.
Using a $25 million contract from the NIH, Inovio designed its universal, multi-clade, multi-antigen PENNVAX-GP immunotherapy targeting the env, gag and pol antigens to provide coverage against all major HIV-1 clades. Inovio’s HIV development focus for both preventive and therapeutic purposes is on PENNVAX-GP.
About the HVTN
The HIV Vaccine Trials Network (HVTN), headquartered at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, Wash., is an international collaboration of scientists and educators searching for an effective and safe HIV vaccine. The HVTN's mission is to facilitate the process of testing preventive vaccines against HIV/AIDS. The HVTN conducts all phases of clinical trials, from evaluating experimental vaccines for safety and the ability to stimulate immune responses, to testing vaccine efficacy. Support for the HVTN comes from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH). The Network's HIV Vaccine Trial Units are located at leading research institutions in 27 cities on four continents. Internationally renowned HIV vaccine and prevention researchers lead the units.
About Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Inovio is taking immunotherapy to the next level in the fight against cancer and infectious diseases. We are the only immunotherapy company that has reported generating T cells in vivo in high quantity that are fully functional and whose killing capacity correlates with relevant clinical outcomes with a favorable safety profile. With an expanding portfolio of immune therapies, the company is advancing a growing preclinical and clinical stage product pipeline. Partners and collaborators include MedImmune, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, The Wistar Institute, University of Pennsylvania, DARPA, GeneOne Life Science, Plumbline Life Sciences, ApolloBio Corporation, Drexel University, NIH, HIV Vaccines Trial Network, National Cancer Institute, U.S. Military HIV Research Program, and Laval University. For more information, visit www.inovio.com.
CONTACTS:
Investors: Bernie Hertel, Inovio Pharmaceuticals, 858-410-3101, bhertel@inovio.com
Media: Jeff Richardson, Inovio Pharmaceuticals, 267-440-4211, jrichardson@inovio.com
They better come with an update!
Hopefully better prepared so our shareprice is not attacked two years in a row.
I haven't heard it yet. Still await pk/pd to determine optimum p2/p3
Without PK/PD data, without and IND, don't think so!
Gotta start research somewhere. Gone are the Medieval practices of administring directly to man.
And it was paid by an outside organization, great!
Did not spot any.
However self paid promo's are so often abused. And given our trading volume it seems it seems the article is not attracting more attention towards TPIV.
FYI, paid promotion
2016 MicrocapResearch Fee Disclosure:
Received $10,000 from unrelated third party to raise investor awareness in TapImmune Inc. (TPIV)
23 actors??? Who??
Yesterdays trade was a textbook example of technical trading as described by 123Tom
Oh by the way what other Alzheimer drugs were recently approved?
Existing warrants are still there to raise cash if needed.
You do understand that 4 phase trials are running or to be started. What do you expect? These trials need time to run before we get results.
Wasn't this supposed to start 1H 2017?
The combo is worse then 2-73 standalone. Missling had all but abondonnned this
Luckily we have our stop losses in place to protect our AVXL investment!
No, that's with the one with DOD grant and a patient population of 280. Recently someone posted on here that some clinics were gonna start recruiting soon.
I can only speculate, but the trials are initiatilg or running. What can he do between now and data readout? Twiddle his thumbs ?
We are in a quiet news period, awaiting interim results.
Consider the following: dr Bonfiglio was attracted for his expertise in financing, strategy and corporate profiling.
It seems to me all his goals are achieved.
1) warrants restructured and financing assured
2) uplisting to Nasdaq
3) collaborations with Memorial Sloan Kettering and AstraZeneca
4) 4 Phase2 trials initiated or running
Not much he can do at TPIV for the moment. The trials have to run their course and this takes time. I'm guessing he got borred and wants a new challenge.
And of course these millions of clients are well reflected in our anemic volume.
Missling did provide guidance by saying it would be released when ready. So no holding back. Anything different would be a material event
Pretty sure that the market has no clue who Anavex is or what drugs we have in the pipeline.
Yeah sure one of Anavex 9 employees is busy monitoring this Ihub board...
Oh very volatile indeed: from 5.85 to 5.75
Market what's to hear trial starts, partnerships,...
It is not immaterial when Missling has stated publicly on multiple occasions that it would be released when available.
Any update on the average shareprice?
Remember 2015 when the shareprice was walked up in order to trigger warrants?
Same could happen again
There will be no offering. Warrants have been converted in the past to raise cash and there are still some left at various trigger prices.
It's a quote from an Anavex PR, to be found on the website.
Not too difficult to find
Source is an Anavex PR. Calling that misleading?
I am an investor, expecting return on investment. Yes the run was nice between April and Nov 2015. Waiting to bring the stock price to a higher level.
Incorrect. It was never said they had enough data to start.
But hinting at working with FDA on p2/3 and 18 months later not started yet and no official guidance, is annoying.
Nov 2015 a pr went out saying they are working with the FDA to do a p2/3. We are now April 2017, and waiting.
Luckily no downward spiral!
Beware of fake volume and liquidity pools. Saw similiar in the Alzheimer space.
Great day, but cautious with conclusions is my advice.
Baseless claim.
I would call it not doing due dillegence
Please don't confuse shareholder confidence with postings on an anonymous board. Institutional ownership is increasing quarter after quarter.
Why blame a company for personal bad investment decisions. Did they force to hold the stock?