Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Do you mean that contrary to the impression given, in reality VPLM’s motion in this case has not yet been granted and indeed may never be?
I wonder why anyone would pretend differently?
That’s pretty spectacular law/breaking right there:
2023-06-20 2023-06-16 4 Baggio Barbara vplm COMMON S - Sale D 0.0789 -90,000 -7 181,742,342
2023-06-20 2023-06-16 4 Baggio Barbara vplm COMMON S - Sale D 0.0783 -109,477 -9 181,832,342
2023-06-20 2023-06-16 4 Baggio Barbara vplm COMMON S - Sale D 0.0767 -120,000 -9 181,941,819
2023-06-20 2023-06-15 4 Baggio Barbara vplm COMMON S - Sale D 0.0785 -100,000 -8 182,061,819
2023-06-20 2023-06-15 4 Baggio Barbara vplm COMMON S - Sale D 0.0770 -250,000 -19 182,161,819
2023-06-20 2023-06-14 4 Baggio Barbara vplm COMMON S - Sale D 0.0764 -100,000 -8 182,411,819
2023-06-20 2023-06-14 4 Baggio Barbara vplm COMMON S - Sale D 0.0774 -150,000 -12 182,511,819
2023-06-20 2023-06-13 4 Baggio Barbara vplm COMMON S - Sale D 0.0780 -150,000 -12 182,661,819
2023-06-20 2023-06-13 4 Baggio Barbara vplm COMMON S - Sale D 0.0760 -150,000 -11 182,811,819
2023-06-20 2023-06-12 4 Baggio Barbara vplm COMMON S - Sale D 0.0784 -200,000 -16 182,961,819
2023-06-20 2023-06-12 4 Baggio Barbara vplm COMMON S - Sale D 0.0800 -250,000 -20 183,161,819
2023-06-12 2023-06-09 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0770 -150,000 -12 183,411,819
2023-06-12 2023-06-09 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0760 -100,000 -8 183,561,819
2023-06-12 2023-06-08 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0750 -180,000 -14 183,661,819
2023-06-12 2023-06-08 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0770 -100,000 -8 183,841,819
2023-06-12 2023-06-07 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0740 -150,000 -11 183,941,819
2023-06-12 2023-06-07 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0750 -200,000 -15 184,091,819
2023-06-12 2023-06-06 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0740 -150,000 -11 184,291,819
2023-06-12 2023-06-06 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0750 -21,950 -2 184,441,819
2023-06-12 2023-06-05 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0750 -178,050 -13 184,463,769
2023-06-05 2023-06-02 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0640 -200,000 -13 184,641,819
2023-06-05 2023-06-02 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0740 -100,000 -7 185,070,275
2023-06-05 2023-06-01 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0700 -228,456 -16 184,841,819
2023-06-05 2023-06-01 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0620 -150,000 -9 185,170,275
2023-06-05 2023-06-01 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0610 -100,000 -6 185,320,275
2023-06-05 2023-06-01 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0630 -70,000 -4 185,420,275
2023-06-05 2023-05-31 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0660 -150,000 -10 185,490,275
2023-06-05 2023-05-31 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0670 -59,701 -4 185,640,275
2023-06-05 2023-05-30 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0740 -35,000 -3 185,699,976
2023-06-05 2023-05-30 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0700 -121,544 -9 185,734,976
2023-05-30 2023-05-26 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0760 -150,000 -11 185,856,520
2023-05-30 2023-05-25 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0650 -200,000 -13 186,006,520
2023-05-30 2023-05-24 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0561 -150,000 -8 186,206,520
2023-05-30 2023-05-24 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0580 -200,000 -12 186,356,520
2023-05-30 2023-05-23 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0620 -200,000 -12 186,556,520
2023-05-30 2023-05-23 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0670 -150,000 -10 186,756,520
2023-05-30 2023-05-19 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0750 -220,000 -16 186,906,520
2023-05-30 2023-05-19 4 Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0800 -286,375 -23 187,126,520
2023-05-22 2020-12-17 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0010 -1,893,917 -2 68,106,083
2023-05-22 2020-12-16 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0110 -700,000 -8 67,406,083
2023-05-22 2020-11-13 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0150 -1,303,886 -20 61,079,878
2023-05-22 2020-11-13 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0140 -1,858,271 -26 62,383,764
2023-05-22 2020-11-13 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0130 -2,294,048 -30 64,242,035
2023-05-22 2020-11-12 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON G - Gift D 0.0010 30,000,000 30 80,984,559
2023-05-22 2020-11-10 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0170 -766,100 -13 60,081,468
2023-05-22 2020-11-10 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0160 -232,310 -4 60,847,568
2023-05-22 2020-11-06 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0190 -2,995,300 -57 5,541,168
2023-05-22 2020-11-06 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0180 -1,545,000 -28 58,536,468
2023-05-22 2020-11-01 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0120 -870,000 -10 66,536,083
2023-05-22 2020-10-15 4/A Baggio Barbara VPLM COMMON S - Sale D 0.0210 -626,570 -13 53,464,668
P
“Does Peru have a flexible enough corollary”
I have literally no idea of what that means. Please could you explain?
TIA!
“B + B = C (BRILACIDIN + BEAMED = CASH $$$$$”
The real equation:
LE + B(DIBR)= -$4m
Where:
LE = Leo Ehrlich
B = his Israeli BeaMed buddies
DIBR = deal in a back room
-$4m = money stolen from IPIX shareholders.
Only one bit of this is possibly true (highlighted). The rest is easily falisfiable garbage:
Huan Nguyen may have polished up the handle on the big front door until he became the ruler of the Queen's Navy, but UAMM is and always will be an obvious scam controlled by Canadian mafiosi.
It sounds a whole lot better, but unfortunately it's a complete misrepresentation of the actual meaning:
LOL.
It's always helpful when an obvious scam like UAMM identifies other companies that clearly need scrutiny.
So who are Pascal Studio, and where is their website?
Maybe it's these people, but the website is deeply uniformative:
https://pascal.studio/
The lack of clarity about the actual people involved in a company is always telling.
It’ll still be a scam no matter who’s in nominal control.
6.1 million shares dumped so far today.
I wonder how many of those are Babs’ or other insiders?
Recent history tells us that it’s probably most of them.
When penny stock CEO self-enrichment schemes like VPLM fall below 10 cents and begin their inevitable (although often punctuated by brief spikes) decline to the trips, it becomes clearer who among their followers are sheep who have been woefully misled and misdirected by the said CEO, and who are the wolves in sheep's clothing who have actively connived with the CEO to transfer his marks' money to their own pockets while pretending to be among those very marks.
While I already have a pretty good idea who on social media (not iHUb, obvs!) falls into each camp, it will be fascinating to get a more forensic feel for this over the coming months.
In the meantime with abandoned lawsuits (for which VPLM has to pay its own costs) and MegaDilution, it's going to be an interesting rest of 2023.
Zero possibility.
It would be grossly illegal.
Of course they do.
But it's very "preliminary".
LOL.
As someone who can actually read, I deplore the new "post a message" page, with its plethora of images and its absence of actual words.
Ugh.
“ But next approvals happening in this summer is very possible as Mr. Ehrlich said.”
Depends what you mean for “approvals”.
But FDA clearance for use of this laser in patients with epilepsy is at least three years away, including a several hundred subject “product test” (=clinical trial) and several million dollars cost (even the insurance for such a study will be well North of a million dollars).
Of course, it will never happen.
It’s just another bait and switch.
Blimey.
The development of this system is years further away than we were led to believe originally.
I can see why the BeaMed boys and Leo “tomorrow never comes, unless it’s pay day” Ehrlich are such bosom buddies.
Or partners-in-crime, as they like to “joke”.
“I guess that why some are a Little Irritated....Not making some EZ money Flipping PKTX..”
I think it’s more likely they’re irritated with themselves for falling for this obvious scam.
Ten minutes’ research would have shown them that PKTX is owned and run by Canadian mafiosi, even if latterly they’ve used an American beard to attempt to disguise the truth.
“ her insider trades were not illegal.”
But not reporting them within two days was illegal.
Hi. I first bought BRK.B in 1997 when it first became affordable for me after the split in 1996.
Having admired his style for some time and read Lowenstein’s book it seemed like a smart thing to do, although 98 and 99 were a bit tense when I compared BRK’s performance with AMZN, JDSU and other hot stocks at the time (I had AMZN but not JDSU which looked like a crazy stock to me).
It wasn’t my largest stock holding then but it is now, even though I haven’t bought any more after adding between 1997 and 2007.
I’ve sold small tranches since then to help buy real estate occasionally but mostly just held.
I’m Scottish, lived in England, New Jersey (I was a VP in a largish Pharma business for a few years) , England again and for the past five years in Ireland to escape the Brexit madness. Semi-retired although still involved in a couple of businesses, one in France and one in Luxembourg.
“And the ones you love better be paying divys.”
The one I love the most -same one as bar1080 I suspect- never pays a dividend.
Or at least not for a long long time.
“If "Babs" didn't file, as required by law - how, again did you know about it? These things make no sense to me - words are funny that way.”
It’s quite simple. She didn’t file her sales within two days as required for some years. And then she very belatedly filed some of them with the SEC recently which is how we know.
It’s been discussed on this board many times.
I’ll leave the patents to the real experts and to the courts.
But one thing that scams like LLEG (Laidlaw Energy) have taught me is that penny stocks often don’t actually own the things they tell their shareholders they do.
That’s why the probity and integrity of the CEO and the management team is critical.
If they can’t be trusted then they can’t be trusted period.
And Emil, Babs and Rich have shown themselves to be far from trustworthy.
So are you sure the shareholders still own these patents?
LOL.
I think you’ll find IR guys for highly targeted penny stock affinity scams are somewhat more “in the loop” than Director level minnows in Fortune 100 companies (although even there the IR folk usually know exactly what is going on).
As for Babs selling millions of shares hand-over-fist for years, she’s certainly entitled to do that.
What she’s not entitled to do is to hide those sales by spitting in the face of regulations and the law and not filing the disclosures required by law as an insider.
As for you having met Cameron, I hope you got his autograph. LOL again.
“On the other hand the US represent a about 30%”
Sorry- that should be 50%.
“The USA has a population 332 million out of some 7.9 billion currently residing on planet Earth”
On the other hand the US represent a about 30% by revenue of the total global pharmaceutical market. Japan’s another 20%.
All the rest are bit players.
Incidentally, another two VPLM Red Flags you may wish to consider:
1) the existence of a contract to shoot Rich Inza in both legs by one of his criminal associates:
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article164048227.html
2) The aggressive behavior of VPLM's advocates on social media. Indeed it was the presence of one of the Internet's most notorious penny stock promoters that first drew my attention to VPLM. The recent addition of Hans Brost to the roster of VPLM's social media pimps is another Red Flag in itself.
Thank you for your courteous request.
I'm glad you appreciate the information I share on this board. It's important to be informed when making investment decisions, especially when it comes to penny stocks. I've been researching and exposing scams in the market for a while now, including the infamous Spencer Pharmaceuticals case, where I helped uncovered false claims of a buyout.
Regarding VPLM, I understand your concerns and it's great that you've independently verified certain red flags. It's crucial to consider all available facts and well-reasoned arguments when assessing an investment. Now, let's address the offer from Gil Amileo and how it fits into the scam thesis.
Firstly, it's important to recognize that many fraudulent schemes utilize false announcements of mergers, acquisitions, and buyouts to manipulate stock prices positively. These claims are designed to create an illusion of legitimacy and attract unsuspecting investors. This tactic has been employed in numerous penny stock scams in the past.
In the case of VPLM, the press release about the offer from Dr. Amelio may have been part of such a strategy. It's possible that the offer itself was not genuine and was merely a ploy to boost investor confidence and increase the stock price. If that were the case, Dr. Amelio might not have publicly disputed the press release as it would have been aligned with the manipulative intentions.
Moreover, even if the offer were real, it doesn't necessarily disprove the scam thesis. Scammers often create elaborate facades to deceive investors, and a seemingly substantial offer can be part of that deception. By rejecting the offer and opting for smaller periodic amounts, scammers can maintain the illusion of long-term value and sustainability, which keeps investors hooked and prolongs their scheme.
How’d I miss this fine stock from the AUCTUS list:
LINGERIE FIGHTING CHAMPIONSHIPS, INC ?
On clicking on "Deletion Review Requests" on one of the MBs where I am a moderator, I'm directed to the iHub anding page:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/
Is that just me?