Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
There's not supposed to be, until the company announces the execution of a definitive agreement.
"price action + volume is screaming "DILUTION" "
Of course it is. It is laughable to even suggest otherwise. However, those who are unwilling or unable to grasp what's going on here may not be convinced even when the stock hits trip zeroes and, eventually, .0001.
C'mon, Phil. Maybe that passes for "analysis" on other boards, but those of us who have known the company well for several years would prefer to keep it real here. There is no evidence whatsoever that anyone is shorting NEIK, and it would not make any sense.
This is testimony form a seperate party using the companies product. . . . I invest on my wits alone, not heresay or recommendations.
A scary thought indeed.
Questions about the exact Float are Mute with that low number.
On first glance, CICN looks very cheap - obviously people think there's a catch. What do you think it is?
I am holding I definitely will not buy anymore XXXX but on the otherhand I am not selling either!!!!
If we were to ask him whether anyone else is selling, I'm fairly certain he'd be a "noone"-er.
The 50,000 bid at .25 was back on Friday. Let's see how long it takes before he starts taking out offers. This thing is dirt cheap right now.
No. Echotec's technology does not do any of those things. Are you thinking of another company, maybe?
Just saw this post but I'm sure you figured it out yesterday -- Penny Stock Psycho email at the open. He wasn't comped for it, just trying to drum up interest for his paid pumps.
Good post. If I sounded critical earlier, I didn't mean to be. Thanks for your efforts. Like O'Brien, I've been involved with NEIK for several years and getting the word out has always been an issue, except for the brief period of excitement in late 2009-early 2010.
That wasn't an "article," it was a paid advertisement.
OK, got it. That may not be an exact date -- the closing date of the acquisition will depend on when the documents are completed and both corporations' boards of directors approve their signing.
TSTA has a bidder for 50,000 at .25 now. I think once this one clears out the relatively small supply under .34, it will move quickly. Next area of congestion on Level II is at .54 offer.
What is May 8th? If you're trying to assign a particular date to a pending corporate transaction, that is a risky proposition for various reasons.
I guess Mr. Ed was a gelding after his orgastration.
Multi-flavors here:
I am a new XXXX investor and did not watch the trading and volume so really not in a position to speculate as to the size of the short however have no doubt it is significant. I especially like XXXX because of its field being up and coming and the majority shareholder owning over 90% of the outstanding and being a billionaire to boot.
Unlike most situations he controls what happens with the company wheras in most cases the shortman is in control. I have this gut feeling he is going to put it to the shorts and make them pay dearly but time will tell all. Go XXXX!!!
Huh? Using sonar in the medical field? I must be missing something.
Undersea surgery, maybe? :)
Lenfest didn't get to be a multi-gazillionaire by paying unnecessarily generously for anything.
I don't agree with the "crew" on this board very often, but I have to concede that this is theoretically possible -- speaking from first-hand experience:
In 1998 I owned shares of a small OTCBB company that was acquired by a private company. My shares in the public company were converted into shares of the private company because I chose not to be cashed out. The plan was for the private company to do an IPO on Nasdaq a couple of years later. It's now 14 years later and while the private company is still in existence, obviously the IPO never happened.
The point is, it IS POSSIBLE for TEVE to cease being publicly traded, and for current stockholders to continue to be stockholders (if TEVE management chooses to allow it). In theory, it is then POSSIBLE for TEVE management to restructure the company, or merge it with something else, or just hang onto it for some period of time while they wait to become successful -- and then to go public again. Even on Nasdaq.
I am NOT saying that it is likely to happen, or that I think it's a real possibility. But it is THEORETICALLY possible.
As for the other things posted repeatedly here... Of course, there is no evidence that anyone is short TEVE. And I think that if the company had any chance of being successful, we would have seen some sign of it by now.
You just provided some with those 19 exclamation points! Here's a couple more!! We are rockin' now!!! :)
My overarching point here is that it's not the market makers who are "playing with it." *I* am playing with it, and other small traders like me are playing with it. On any given day, I may have several different bids and offers posted at different times through different market makers, trading around a core position while waiting for revenues to develop. All the MMs are doing on illiquid stocks like this is representing individuals' orders.
I've been trading directly through market makers since before discount brokers and online trading existed. If you don't believe what I've said above and in my prior post, you should try to find a market maker who is willing to talk to you so you can confirm it.
I have a buy order in at .0604 and don't intend to raise it as long as I'm the best bid, so getting filled at a higher price won't be possible.
What you're saying does not make sense. I am going to make a wild guess that your orders do not meet the minimum size requirement to be displayed. Do they? If they don't, you won't have much luck buying at the bid and selling at the offer because the only market maker that knows your order exists is the one to which your brokerage firm routes it.
I've been following this stock for several years, have been posting on this board since 2010, and have NEVER had a problem getting my orders represented and displayed (getting filled is not 100%, obviously). It is not "the market makers" who have the inside bid and offer on ALRT -- it is almost entirely individual investors and traders (and maybe a few small funds). On an illiquid stock like this, when market makers trade for their own account just to provide liquidity, their quotes will generally not be the best offer, and will ALMOST NEVER be the best bid except when they've just sold a few shares short on the offer and want to cover.
I don't understand your analysis. Who is "they"? On thinly traded stocks like this one, market makers are only representing orders from individuals. That bid for 10,000 at .0604 through ETMM is my bid. I don't really need to buy, so I'm content to be the high bid and see if I get lucky.
The other TEVE guys are nuts, too.
I'm sure Catfish doesn't mind a little comic relief, just this once.
Sorry -- as usual, I don't know what you're talking about. I have no desire to buy TEVE, although I'm sure it will trade between .05 and $5.00 eventually.
Hard to imagine that the nonsense they post will induce anyone to buy that POS.
Agreed. In the meantime, I've had low bids in much of the time and have picked up some shares here and there.
It's an office building and Suite 300 appears to be a shared office suite. Suite 300 is also the address for Beacon Hill Staffing Group, EG Communications Group, Regus/HQ, DiTocco Law Group, PLLC (Tony DiTocco is a bankruptcy lawyer), and THE RUSSELL LAW FIRM, P.L., and probably other companies. Here are other businesses in the building, per Google Maps:
"Selected businesses at this address:
AAA Apartment Staffing? -
Assurance United Group LLC? -
BB&T? -
BB&T - Cypress Creek Branch? -
Byron Real Estate & Management? -
Dirt Pros? -
Full Circle Debt Relief? -
HONORE INVESTMENTS & PROPERTY MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC? -
Institute of Business Appraisr? -
International Beauty & Barber? -
Jack Richman & Associates? -
Laufer Allen CPA? -
Law office of Randy Zeldin P.A.? -
Law Office of Sasha Katz, FL? -
New Century Solutions? -
Newbridge Financial Inc? -
Newbridge Mortgage Corporation? -
NIA Technologies? -
Nursing Spectrum? -
Search Momentum, Inc.? - "
Edit - never mind, mods please delete
Holdonasec. Is he saying that Obama has spoken about CMKX?
Start with a bad premise and layer fanciful speculation on top of it.
I disagree. No one is trying to scare anyone -- it's just people selling their stock. Their are a lot of shares outstanding, so ALRT needs to create demand to offset those few sellers who will always be around.
Alan, I don't know why this is not getting through to you: If your bid is not for the minimum displayable number of shares, it will not be seen by any market maker except the one to which your brokerage firm sends the order. For every other market maker, that order may as well not exist. They don't know it's there.
Yep, it really is a mystery to me. If I were that certain of a 5- or 10- or 20-bagger, I'd want to be the high bid at all times hoping to catch some sellers. (I'm currently doing that with 8-10 stocks that I know are undervalued.) It appears that despite everyone's outward confidence, no one is willing to put his money where his mouth is.
That's a non sequitur to me. Would you mind explaining what you think the legal issue is here?
As Hank and others have pointed out many times on this board, the stock has been able to trade all along. If those who are distressed by the wide bid-offer spread would put in orders with higher bids or lower offers that meet the minimum size required in order for the order to be displayed, the volume might be more than an occasional trace. It is up to you and other individuals, not the market makers, who have no interest in trading the stock for their own accounts and are only displaying orders that they have received from brokerage firms.
As long at the $6 x $99 stalemate continues, the stock is unlikely to trade much. But I don't understand why those who think the stock is worth $99 won't put in bids at $20-30, or even $7.00.
The D is automatically removed on the 21st trading day after a reverse split, at which time the ticker reverts to what it was before.
Looks like .125 is not going to happen as the bidders are piling in. We have .18, .1801, .20 and .201, which were from at least three different people.