Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
If you were holding LGBS this time last year, you would not comment like that. This time last year, they only talked about 4 leased wells, no algae business, no that senior engineer , no merger, no acquisition. This time there are a lot of things new., no matter good or not good.
Better wait until you see the revenue in Q or K before you talk about it. I have seen speculated revenues many times, but have not seen any reported revenue from any deal in the past three years. Don’t believe speculated revenue any more.
A RS is much more likely than a reverse RM. How many thousand million shares have been diluted in past 2 weeks?
Diluted a lot in past 2 weeks. Cannot believe the AS will be reduced before a reverse split. I feel bad for having bought this thing.
What news?
Not very quite everywhere. Under LGB* , it's very noisy. Maybe we have to wait for a little bit longer.
Last Friday we were very slow also.
We are so quiet today.
I see, thinks. Hopefully you are right. Have been holding on this one for over a year, want to see some gains.
Close to what?
The volume is so low today
I see. Thanks.
Thanks. Read those info a while ago. Wish it is the time now.
How can you tell it's near break out, technically? Previously, we dropped back when hit 0.0006~0.0007 multiple times.
What is moving this up?
I read all the Ks and Qs in the past years after they came out. Those financial reports were pretty negative and scary to me. But the PPS movement is much more positive, although not so good as Kay promised. Maybe there is something hidden from public, and you try to reveal. Maybe SFOR and ACS develop multiple webs for advertisement purposes.
ZPaul has been posting new technical developments of SFOR. I cannot tell which are facts, which are his speculations, because his posts are not supported by finance reports, and in most cases not followed by PPS movement. There are also a lot of other great news posted in the other board maybe to keep people in high spirit. So I skip a lot posts in the other board.
I would rather improve skills of TA and trade this stock accordingly, don't care much what people post.
I can tell you have much more knowledge than I do about SFOR.
This web is not finished yet. Is this the web of a branch of ACS?
I didn't say SA bribed the judges. I said if...
Invalidating the claim in this lawsuit is not the same as invalidating patents.
I don't agree with you in this part. If laymen can invalidate technical patents, it would be too hard for patent owners to protect their technical properties. Other companies can bribe some judges to invalidate the technical patents which they want and use the technology without paying anything, then billions of dollars will be gone for the patents owners just due to the decision of laymen.
Just looked up, non-precedential means the court decision is "imprecise and nondirective.", An empirical study "casts serious doubt on whether the official criteria for publication of opinions provide a meaningful guide to the judges." In other words, the judges indicated the attorneys from both sides to purse other judicial approaches to resolve the conflict.
Wish SFOR's attorneys work a little bit hard, and treat this lawsuit a little bit serious, spend some time with Ram to know SFOR's patents, and know how to defense the weak spot where SA broke in, seriously treat the resort of SA's attorney. I still hope they can reverse the decision of the local and circuit courts.
Would you explain more about "nonprecedential"?
I picked up some last week, but I was too slow. Mine price was relatively high.
Would you post a link about the lawsuit? Thanks in advance.
In the announcement you posted a few days ago, the circuit court affirmed the the decision of local court. What was the decision of local court? “ not to surpport the claim of SFOR in the lawsuit with SA. There has been nothing to do with the validity of the patents of Sfor. The announcement that you have not stolen anything from me” is not the same as my property is not mine.
One thing for sure is the effect of the announcement is horrible, will cause serious negative effect for all the related lawsuits and potential projects for Sfor.. wish R&G and BR realize the horrible result of the incapability and behave like top lawfirms.
Anyways, I am not selling at rsi=30. I will play with curves and indicators, not the speculations or dreams of anybody.
Don’t agree. There might be some therotical weakness in their patient, in other words, their patent is not 100% perfect. But this does not mean the paten is invalid. It only makes it harder for them to protect the patent.
Have you read the circuit court announcement? It only affirmed the decision of local court, nothing else. You over interpreted the court decision.
Already experienced what in your post. Will not trust Kay's words anymore, not the speculations of some people either. Only stick to the curves and indicators.
I wish all your shares were washed away in 0.003s last week.
Did that kind of thing happen 14 years ago? Kay only lied in interviews. So far I have not seen him lie in official report, like Qs or Ks.
How do you know?
In 2020, ACS should pay SFOR 9 mil. Do you remember this?
Are you selling at RSI=30?
I don't convince myself anything. I am waiting to see what is going to happen in the next few months.
Don't agree. Only one patent was involved in the lawsuit, and the court decision only declined SFOR's claim that SA has been infringing SFOR 's key logger defense, did not invalidate even this one patent. The other 2 patent were not involved in this lawsuit at all.
Please stay with fact, don't spread rumor.
Patents are still there. No revenue is the big problem.
What do you mean? Do you think Kay already signed the contract with Mcafee to provide key logging defense ?
According to sleddog SFOR is not going to do business with govt directly, and the company expect to provide keylogging defense to Mcafee who is working on govt contract already. From his posts, it seems Mcafee has several options: SA, SFOR, G(something, I forget the name). If SFOR won the infringing law suits against the other 2 companies, Mcafee will only have one option: SFOR. He said Mcafee believe the other 2 are infringers, and will not pick them. I don't think so. I guess Mcafee is still waiting to see the result of lawsuits. Whether they are infringers or not, it is up to judges, not Mcafee, not SFOR's attorneys either. If SFOR's attorneys cannot reverse the decision of local and circuit courts, they will lose not just the lawsuit, but also the Mcafee contract as well, unless SFOR already signed the key logger defense contract with Mcafee.
The above is just my guessing. I don't know whether SFOR already signed a contract with Mcafee or not.
I don't know what partnership means in Kay's words. He said in interviews multiple times he was positive big money would by paid to SFOR within a couple of quarters.
Yes, you were right. Thanks
Saw the relationship between WWIO and M. Line.
How is M. Line related to Wowio Inc?