Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Quote: The treasure is 5 miles from one of the biggest ballast piles The Baer has ever seen.
Today is the day.
$10 a share upon recovery of $60B. It’s only 6% of the estimated $1T.
_________________________________
This company will certainly go down in history but not for finding treasure.
Quote: Weeeee, look at em go and bringing up all that bling. Let's hope there's enough museum space for all of it.
Gonna need a bigger wet facility for sure!
____________________________________
NEVER in the history of treasure hunting has there been a clown show like this one. Actually, it's the cheerleaders who constantly enhance the entertainment.
*******Today is the Day*********
___________________________
Today is the day for what? You have inside information? Another hot air balloon launching coming up?
Quote: Seafarer is good.
____________________
Good. Good at what? Please explain. In fifteen years they can't find shipwrecks, can't find treasure but they're good? Well, perhaps they're good at circus 'hot air balloon' rides but at what else no one can say.
Quote: But what would we know? We're just actual shareholders who have done serious DD on our investment.
___________________________
As it was written; 'Fools rush in where angels fear to tread'.
Quote: "Judd hid it from us" theory pans out.
________________________________
Judd hid nothing. His son-in-law David Foster and the famous Sir Robert Marx were partners. Can one believe that he's going to hold out on them? It's absolute nonsense but considering all, just about everything this company says or does eventually pans out to be nonsense.
Quote: Attempting to present legitimate points can by a Sisyphean task against certain parties.
Let's face it, if your argument is that a brand new never before created machine that can find gold and silver under the sand and water will never work (without evidence to prove it does not) and can not possibly be used in any other industries and is a bad investment because proof of and use of this equipment won't cause a stock under half a penny to rise.
If that's your argument, you have no argument.
I think large SFRX shareholders are holding on to their shares for a reason.
___________________________________________
As usual, an impressionable job of smoke screening the obvious. That being the Timmy Toy is a flop as is the company.
Quote: Wouldn't the simplest, most cost effective, and time saving option be to go to Spain and try and get an agreement before spending resources they don't have and continue to dilute shareholder ownership?
____________________________________
You have omitted UNESCO in this equation. Spain was one of the main ram rods in the creation of the UNESCO Underwater Cultural Heritage Treaty. Based on terms and conditions of the treaty Spain will not make deals with private sector treasure hunting entities. Even if that were possible, its highly unlikely they'd even entertain issuing any sort of contract to this bunch of failed amateurs who have never even found a shipwreck or salvaged one.
Quote: Long story short, SFRX doing astounding work!
______________________________
I must say that's a pitiful statement. 'Astounding work? By what definition? And moving on to two decades as a colossal failure as a treasure hunting company. Astounding indeed.
Quote: Wow! Impressive that Seafarer divers have been able to recover items under zero visibility conditions!
I guess they can find things in saltwater after all!
_____________________________________
Not impressive at all. Even amateurs (which they are) can achieve that. It's called a hand held underwater metal detector with an audio headset. You don't have to see, you hear and your fingers do the rest.
Quote: if you can't name the ship and produce a manifest, none of it matters.
_____________________________________________
Sadly and embarrassingly, these clowns can't even find a genuine colonial shipwreck so forget about actual treasure.
To the point, this is the SFRX cheerleading squad 'excuse board'. Wanna be, gonna be, just you wait and see, oh but you don''t know. Hilarious.
Quote: I'm sorry. I don't care if SeaSearcher has located the mother lode. If they haven't performed on-shipwreck-site simulation tests, SeaSearcher doesn't work, period.
_____________________________________________
'On shipwreck site simulation tests' would be the practical common sense approach to the development and testing of this Timmy Toy system. In view of the fact that apparently none of the performers in this circus have any Spanish Colonial period shipwreck excavation experience, they obviously lack knowledge of what the electromagnetic effects are caused by the variations of igneous ballast rocks, fired bricks, pottery's and ferrous, non-ferrous metals. It matters little whether these clowns put Bugs Bunny on the moon, they seem to know nothing when it comes to shipwrecks and applied technology in an ocean environment.
Bottom line is the toy doesn't do what it was suppose to do. Yes I know, 'just you wait and see'.
Quote: Now, now! We both know which company was a turd in a candy bar wrapper. Came and went faster than a far#, remember Mex$ ?
___________________________________________
I didn't work for MEXP. I worked for Hispaniola Ventures who found more treasure and artifacts in six months then these clowns have ever found in 15 years. MEXP was a penny stock con job thus the reason Webber defaulted the company and ended it all.
Hispaniola was the real deal. Webber is a master at what he does. So just to set the record straight, you're the one that owns stock in the turd in a candy bar wrapper.
Quote: Wait until the games are played Einstein. Just because SFRX has not produced evidence of the scans it has performed or done trials according to your timetable and expectations is not proof it does not work. SFRX will provide evidence of what SeaFarer has located in due time, then you can jump up and down all you want. Again, no evidence does not equal evidence. If you don't understand, I can't help you. We are done here.
____________________________________
The point is I fully understand. Apparently you don't understand what on-shipwreck-site simulation tests are. You avoid comment every time. If you're happy with the turd in the candy bar wrapper, its your choice.
Quote: Because the absence of any evidence is not evidence that supports your declaration.
______________________________________
Are you kidding? The absence of evidence speaks volumes especially with the likes of this circus. Three years and counting. If there was real evidence, they'd be shouting it from the mountain tops. I would have to believe you're also one of the group here that 'slinked' away from trying to explain why these scientific 'experts' had not the common sense to do actual verifiable simulation tests on a Spanish Colonial period shipwreck. On the other hand that just might have simply 'wizzed' over your head not being a saltwater man.
Quote: This guy Kyle Kennedy does not give up
____________________________
Why should he? Receiving a grand a day and producing no results, no dividends since the company began. Any professionally run company's board of directors would have fired his ass ages ago.
Quote: You have implied he is baffled by salt water. I'm saying he is not and I'm providing the most basic evidence for that fact.
_______________________________________
Salt water or frog pond water, so what? The 'toy' obviously doesn't work. No evidence that you can produce to prove otherwise. A turd in a candy bar wrapper.
Quote: For those still confused about Tim Reynolds, chief scientist behind the SeaSearcher:
_______________________
....and so what? There is no factual evidence that this 'toy' works, and if it does, it obviously doesn't find anything. So to you I guess the next best thing is to continue to pitch this egg heads credentials.
Quote: I'll stick with SFRX and their team of experts.
________________________________________
Experts in what? It sure as H isn't in treasure hunting / treasure finding. Experts in design and management of treasure hunting's three ring circus. There's never been one like it.
My understanding is funding was not acquired.
Quote: Oh, but there’s more. $10 per share........
when they get just 6% of the $1T in treasure that’s out there.
This is how full of treasure the unidentified Juno Beach wreck was.
____________________________________________
The blind leading the blind operation from the very beginning and it continues the same.
Quote: How could that be with “alleged” game changing technology and $19B in treasure on 2 sites?
___________________________________________________
All horse shit. For those who prefer the expression bull shit, that applies as well.
Today is Day 1001 since we were first.......
told the Timmy Toy worked.
Was there something that was misunderstood by that comment in a paid promo?
SFRX and their partners have spent over 2 decades searching a very small area, and what wreck material is there isn't even enough to positively ID the origin.
Good thing they hired rocket scientists, huh?
______________________________________
One thing can be said for SFRX. They have probably set the worlds record in modern day underwater treasure hunting. The longest running clown show with zero success in the industry. But wait. Those 'rocket scientists' will turn it all around.
Quote: The Volume is up for a Reason ....
Good things will be coming for SFRX and the Shareholders here in the Near Future.
It'll Skyrocket once the Announcement that
Treasure Found !!!
___________________________________
.....and the farmer hauled another load away......
Quote: 997 days since we were told Timmy’s Toy.......
worked.
Kyle said long long ago when they got on site it should only take a few days.
Don’t forget it was “operational” over 2 years ago, and they had scanned in mass. Timmy said…..”near term.”
_______________________________________________________-
One understandable word explains it all; HORSE SHIT.
Quote:They would only be digging for treasure, right?
___________________________________________
Of course. This company, always in great display of wisdom and experience, wouldn't be wasting time on junk or trivial artifacts. After all they possess the worlds only see all, know all GOLD & SILVER detector.
Quote: Ask about the crow shareholders have been.......
served regarding the Timmy Toy.
It’s Day 992.
_______________________________________________________________
I say this honestly. I have seen and have been aware of treasure hunting ventures that have come and gone. Some succeeded but most failed. That said, I have to say this has been the longest running clown show in the history of underwater treasure hunting.
Quote: I believe the fools were the naysayers that stayed behind on the dock, as the ships sailed. Don't worry I'm keeping that crow on ice! Of course I'll buy a beer to wash it down! I'll stick with my shares. Jmo
__________________________________________________________
As it al, adds up, this is inevitably a lunch reserved for you. Thanks anyway.
Quote: Exactly! Been adding a few more shares lately. Looking forward to visiting SFRX and seeing the equipment in person in the future. Jmo
____________________________________________________________________
There's that old 'Fools rush in where angels fear to tread'
The love of 'the turd in a pretty candy bar wrapper' goes beyond comprehension.
Quote: "We just did our first scanning of some of these areas and I'm waiting on the analysis right now....I'm hoping this thing does shows us our site does have gold and silver, because the equipment will show gold and silver. The question becomes does your site have gold and silver?"
_____________________________________________________________________________________
.........AND THE FARMER HAULED ANOTHER LOAD AWAY................
Quote: It seems the equivalent of standing outside Kennedy Space Center in July 1969 spouting how they haven't PROVEN they can put a man on the moon so therefore they can not and NASA is full of shit, even though there have been many tests and trial runs with previous missions and the actual scientists working on it are saying it does work and that they can put a man on the moon.
____________________________________________________________________________________
The bottom line, historically, is SFRX is 'amateur hour'. Has been and continues to be. To try and make an analysis of them to NASA in any respect of technological development is absolutely absurd.
Obviously the see all, know all "Timmy Toy' doesn't do what it's suppose to do so after two years plus, just lable it as 'still under development'. What a cop-out.
Quote: You and others posting here have failed to address my statement regarding 'on a wreck site' simulation tests.
You have failed to address your egregious failure in logic.. Stating categorically that something does not work in the absence of proof either way is wrong my friend.. The only thing proved here is that SFRX has not released information on SeaSearcher in a way and on the time frame that our arm chair technology "experts" deem appropriate. That and the fact that apparently they did not require logic be taught in all schools when I was younger as I once thought. Absence of ANY proof is not the basis to make a definitive statement one way or another. But please, continue to prove my point.
________________________________________________________________________________
Failure in logic. Are you kidding?
Your answer comes as no surprise when considering the fact that you obviously know nothing as to what I'm talking about. I for one am not a arm chair technology "expert as you put it.
I was part of 'simulation testing' as I have previously described. These very same tests were set up and performed on the 1733 Fleet 'Capitana' that lies in 24 ft. of water off of Plantation Key, Florida Keys.
The tests were to verify the performance of a from surface towed analytical detection system produced by a high tech. scientist out of California. It failed.
I find it both interesting and amusing how you (and others) continuously run defense for a Mickey Mouse piece of equipment for which there is no proof of performance whatsoever. I can only surmise it must have to do with investment verses being stuck on the flypaper.
Quote: It would be great if someone doing real DD went to Florida and asked the scientists themselves about the SeaSearcher and confirmed their confidence in it.
Oh right, some have already.
__________________________________________-
No need to. The silence tells it all. No performance, no results = failure.
Keep trying to put a new wrapper on that 'T' brand candy bar.
This statement is laughable. So you should put out announcements that a product works without providing evidence? LOL. You double your error by stating that SeaSearcher definitively does not work because no evidence has been presented either way. I suggest looking up logical fallacies in order to avoid them in the future.
_______________________________________________________
The 'Toy' is a turd in a candy bar wrapping. You and others posting here have failed to address my statement regarding 'on a wreck site' simulation tests. Apparently brilliant Timmy and veteran treasure finder Kennedy didn't think of that, or perhaps better said, didn't want to because of exposure of failure.
QUOTE" Pretending it is not out there does not mean it is not there.
_____________________________________________________________________
Yes, and it seems most here believe in the tooth fairy as well. What Timmy did or what Timmy says just doesn't cut it. Bottom line is performance - results. There aren't any are there?
Quote:Based on the people who actually know something, it seems it is rather obvious that the SeaSearcher does indeed work.
Kyle says it works, the multiple scientists who made it say it works, heavy investors who have thoroughly investigated the operations are speaking with their money and saying it works.
_________________________________________________
EVIDENCE PLEASE.
This tech makes finding treasure a very repeatable event. So you have a wreck but don't know if there is treasure? SeaSearcher can tell you in a day.
_______________________________________________
Are you actually serious? There is no hard fact verifiable evidence that the Timmy Toy (SeaSearcher) could find a gold elephant turd. On and on with ...'and once upon a time'.........
Once again I ask. Please make a list of verifiable's the 'Toy' has found, stating target description, density/weight, sub-bottom depth, etc., etc.
Quote: Thanks Golden. I love how the experts love to project backwards to incidents that happened years ago as evidence that SFRX is the same company it always was. Hate to break it to them that past is not prologue with respect to SFRX. Since the addition of Tim Reynolds, it is not the same company. You think SeaSearcher is just a gimmick? Perhaps you need to do a little more DD on Tim's history as a highly successful engineer and tech entrepreneur. If he says it works, you can make bank on it and that is not to say it is not continually being tested and updated like any product. Unlike those who constantly speculate, this is not his first rodeo, so we will see evidence of SeaSearcher's success on his timetable not some novice armchair self- appointed "technologists" here. I have no doubt they have located items of significance with SeaSearcher and look forward to the day they can be shared with us all. If some are so confident they are correct about SFRX, why they would "load the boat" if there is a significant announcement? Sounds like some lack the courage of their convictions.
_______________________________________________________________________________________-
Reynolds is one of thousands of successful engineers and entrepreneurs across the nation. So hats off and credit for him. The recognizable issue here is the fact that ocean science and technology isn't his thing. If that were not so, he wouldn't have produced this unsuccessful 'toy' which certainly hasn't pin-pointed any shipwreck gold or silver treasures. I would have more respect for the man (and SFRX) if they would have done simulation tests on an actual Spanish Colonial shipwreck site (many to select from), where gold and silver targets are buried into, and surrounding the wreck site. The difference here from the famous Kyle swimming pool or fish tank tests are that an old wreck site has mixed and opposing electromagnetic forces; targets ranging from igneous ballast stones containing magnetite, various ferrous and non-ferrous material, fired ceramics (olive jars, shards, etc.), fired bricks (galley). These tests were never done and most likely would have failed because Timmy apparently doesn't know anything about these procedures. Nor does the CEO running this circus. Perhaps the Timmy Toy just might find that 4 billion dollar pile of gold and silver five miles from that very big ballast pile with no cannons, that just might be possible if they attach a grappling hook so they perchance might snag it.
Quote:
...its own proprietary technology...
Company will own it.
__________________________________
It's rather obvious the 'Toy" doesn't work.
Quote: Glad to see progress is being made on the SeaSearcher.
__________________________________________________________
What progress. Explain that?
Still under development? A nice cop-out for 'it doesn't work'? Better get that see all, know all Timmy Toy working so it can find the billions in treasure five miles from that big ballast pile with no cannons. What a continuing circus. Never devoid of laughs.