Seafarer Exploration Corp (SFRX)

[Raider21]

Quote: You and others posting here have failed to address my statement regarding 'on a wreck site' simulation tests.

You have failed to address your egregious failure in logic.. Stating categorically that something does not work in the absence of proof either way is wrong my friend.. The only thing proved here is that SFRX has not released information on SeaSearcher in a way and on the time frame that our arm chair technology "experts" deem appropriate. That and the fact that apparently they did not require logic be taught in all schools when I was younger as I once thought. Absence of ANY proof is not the basis to make a definitive statement one way or another. But please, continue to prove my point.
________________________________________________________________________________

Failure in logic. Are you kidding?

Your answer comes as no surprise when considering the fact that you obviously know nothing as to what I'm talking about. I for one am not a arm chair technology "expert as you put it.

I was part of 'simulation testing' as I have previously described. These very same tests were set up and performed on the 1733 Fleet 'Capitana' that lies in 24 ft. of water off of Plantation Key, Florida Keys.
The tests were to verify the performance of a from surface towed analytical detection system produced by a high tech. scientist out of California. It failed.

I find it both interesting and amusing how you (and others) continuously run defense for a Mickey Mouse piece of equipment for which there is no proof of performance whatsoever. I can only surmise it must have to do with investment verses being stuck on the flypaper.