Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Different company thats in court
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
AVTAR SINGH CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD. A
http://courtnic.nic.in/Chandigarh/detail.asp
Videolocity International, Inc. (VCTY; has acquired a new subsidiary:
Avtar Singh Construction Co. (P) Ltd. (ASCC).
Advisory news releases are catching on
By Dominic Jones on July 6, 2010
A GROWING number of US companies are cutting costs and driving more traffic to their investor relations websites by using PR wire services to distribute alerts and links instead of full-text press releases.
Advisory news releases are distributed via PR wires to tell investors a company has posted new information on its website and to direct them to it via a link. They are one of the key tools in our new online disclosure model, in which companies use them to establish their websites as recognized channels of disclosure, one of the prerequisites for a Reg FD compliant company website.
Although a few companies have been successfully using advisory releases for several quarters, the process got a boost in April when Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) used an advisory release for its Q1 2010 earnings release. Now other companies are following Google’s lead amid growing IR community interest in corporate disclosure via the web.
http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2010/07/06/advisory-news-releases-web-disclosure/
You're right
JMC PROJECTS (INDIA) LIMITED
OUTSTANDING LITIGATIONS AND DEFAULTS
A. PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING JMC PROJECTS (INDIA) LIMITED (JMC)
I. Notices received by JMC
Noticer’s Name - Avtar Singh Construction Company (p) Ltd.
Date of Notice - 22.9.2008
Claim Amount (Rs. in lacs) - 50.24 alongwith interest @24%
Charges / Allegations - For recovery of outstanding amount
Avatar Singh was allotted work for Trichy, Madurai NH-45 B Road Project by JMC. In the said notice Avatar Singh has alleged that inspite of several reminders as well as assurance from various officers of JMC including Vice President and Managing Director, an amount of Rs.6,77,732/-, which was allegedly wrongly debited, was not released to him. He has further claimed that inspite of his request to return Bank Guarantee of Rs.20,00,000/-, refund security deposit amounting to Rs.43,46, 604/- JMC has not returned / refunded the same.
Avatar Singh has therefore claimed an amount of Rs.50,24,336/- alongwith interest at the rate of 24% p.a. and also asked JMC to return Bank Guarantee of Rs.20 lacs within 15 days.
OUTSTANDING LITIGATIONS filed against JMC.
(a) Civil Cases.
Suit No. 29/06
M/s. Avtar Singh, Contractors (ASC) V/s. JMC
The Court of Additional District Judge, Delhi
Amount claimed (Rs. in (lacs)- 3.30 along with pendentalite interest therein w.e.f. 01.04.06 and costs
ASC was awarded sub contract by JMC at M/s. Power Welfare Organization Site at Gurgaon, Haryana. It is alleged by ASC that in order to avoid delay in execution of the project, a 5% incentive was promised (quantified at Rs. 1,25,000/- approx) provided the work was completed in time. ASC alleges that the work was finished before time but JMC did not pay the promised incentive. Furthermore, of the amount alleged to be due after completion of the work, i.e. Rs.5,83,634/-, balance outstanding of Rs. 2,83,634 is allegedly due and payable and thus, a total amount of Rs. 4,08,634 was due and payable.
Thereafter, it is alleged that on 15.09.04, ASC was handed over a cheque for an amount of Rs. 1,72,000/- vide cheque no. 213301 of the even date, as full and final amount payable. ASC had deposited the cheque and the cheque was cleared. ASC has denied that the matter was settled for the said amount of 1,72,000/- citing certain exchange of notices between the parties, wherein JMC has alleged that the account has been settled for all times to come. The suit is for the recovery of the alleged balance outstanding amount of Rs.2,64,216/-, along with interest amount of Rs. 65,389/- (@ 18% from the period of 15.09.04 to 31.3.06) and thus the amount comes to Rs. 3,29,605/- and further interest pendentelite.
The Hon’ble Court vide order dated 1.12.2006 passed a decree directing JMC to pay Rs.1,10,000/-.
http://www.jmcprojects.com/pdf/draft-letter-offer-rights-issue.pdf
Why use the OTC Disclosure & News Service?
Demonstrate Regulatory Compliance. Making your disclosure available on www.otcmarkets.com is an efficient and cost-effective way to make information "publicly available" as required by SEC Rule 144(c)(2) and satisfy the information requirements of U.S. Insider Trading laws (1988 Insider Trading and Securities Fraud Enforcement Act) and SEC Rules 10b-5 and 10b5-1.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/companiesAndAdvisors/disclosure-news/overview
Final Rule: Selective Disclosure and Insider Trading
§ 243.101 Definitions
(b) Issuer. An "issuer" subject to this regulation is one that has a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78l), or is required to file reports under Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)), including any closed-end investment company (as defined in Section 5(a)(2) of the Investment Company Act of 1940) (15 U.S.C. 80a-5(a)(2)), but not including any other investment company or any foreign government or foreign private issuer, as those terms are defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act
(e) Public disclosure.
(1) Except as provided in paragraph (e)(2) of this section, an issuer shall make the "public disclosure" of information required by § 243.100(a) by furnishing to or filing with the Commission a Form 8-K (17 CFR 249.308) disclosing that information.
(2) An issuer shall be exempt from the requirement to furnish or file a Form 8-K if it instead disseminates the information through another method (or combination of methods) of disclosure that is reasonably designed to provide broad, non-exclusionary distribution of the information to the public.
b. Alternative Methods of Public Disclosure
We are recognizing alternative methods of public disclosure to give issuers the flexibility to choose another method (or a combination of methods) of disclosure that will achieve the goal of effecting broad, non-exclusionary distribution of information to the public (Rule 101(e)(2).
As a general matter, acceptable methods of public disclosure for purposes of Regulation FD will include press releases distributed through a widely circulated news or wire service, or announcements made through press conferences or conference calls that interested members of the public may attend or listen to either in person, by telephonic transmission, or by other electronic transmission (including use of the Internet). The public must be given adequate notice of the conference or call and the means for accessing it. The regulation does not require use of a particular method, or establish a "one size fits all" standard for disclosure; rather, it leaves the decision to the issuer to choose methods that are reasonably calculated to make effective, broad, and non-exclusionary public disclosure, given the particular circumstances of that issuer. Indeed, we have modified the language of the regulation to note that the issuer may use a method "or combination of methods" of disclosure, in recognition of the fact that it may not always be possible or desirable for an issuer to rely on a single method of disclosure as reasonably designed to effect broad public disclosure.
We believe that issuers could use the following model, which employs a combination of methods of disclosure, for making a planned disclosure of material information, such as a scheduled earnings release:
First, issue a press release, distributed through regular channels, containing the information;
Second, provide adequate notice, by a press release and/or website posting, of a scheduled conference call to discuss the announced results, giving investors both the time and date of the conference call, and instructions on how to access the call; and
Third, hold the conference call in an open manner, permitting investors to listen in either by telephonic means or through Internet webcasting.
By following these steps, an issuer can use the press release to provide the initial broad distribution of the information, and then discuss its release with analysts in the subsequent conference call, without fear that if it should disclose additional material details related to the original disclosure it will be engaging in a selective disclosure of material information. We note that several issuer commenters indicated that many companies already follow this or a similar model for making planned disclosures.
In the Proposing Release, we stated that an issuer's posting of new information on its own website would not by itself be considered a sufficient method of public disclosure. As technology evolves and as more investors have access to and use the Internet, however, we believe that some issuers, whose websites are widely followed by the investment community, could use such a method. Moreover, while the posting of information on an issuer's website may not now, by itself, be a sufficient means of public disclosure, we agree with commenters that issuer websites can be an important component of an effective disclosure process. Thus, in some circumstances an issuer may be able to demonstrate that disclosure made on its website could be part of a combination of methods, "reasonably designed to provide broad, non-exclusionary distribution" of information to the public.
We emphasize, however, that while Rule 101(e) gives an issuer considerable flexibility in choosing appropriate methods of public disclosure, it also places a responsibility on the issuer to choose methods that are, in fact, "reasonably designed" to effect a broad and non-exclusionary distribution of information to the public. In determining whether an issuer's method of making a particular disclosure was reasonable, we will consider all the relevant facts and circumstances, recognizing that methods of disclosure that may be effective for some issuers may not be effective for others. If, for example, an issuer knows that its press releases are routinely not carried by major business wire services, it may not be sufficient for that issuer to make public disclosure solely by submitting its press release to one of these wire services; the issuer in these circumstances should use other or additional methods of dissemination, such as distribution of the information to local media, furnishing or filing a Form 8-K with the Commission, posting the information on its website, or using a service that distributes the press release to a variety of media outlets and/or retains the press release.
We also caution issuers that a deviation from their usual practices for making public disclosure may affect our judgment as to whether the method they have chosen in a particular case was reasonable. For example, if an issuer typically discloses its quarterly earnings results in regularly disseminated press releases, we might view skeptically an issuer's claim that a last minute webcast of quarterly results, made at the same time as an otherwise selective disclosure of that information, provided effective broad, non-exclusionary public disclosure of the information. In short, an issuer's methods of making disclosure in a particular case should be judged with respect to what is "reasonably designed" to effect broad, non-exclusionary distribution in light of all the relevant facts and circumstances.
http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-7881.htm#P179_69952
Post Unavailable
Additional Information
General Information
Book #: 2787 Page #: 1413
Book Type: OR Instrument Type: RELEASE
Filed Date: 7/2/2010 Filed Time: 2:53 PM
Document #: 744685 Instrument Date: 1/26/2010
Grantor
SILVERCREEK CHILD DEVELOPMENT
THOMPSON, JEFF
Grantee
SISSON, VARIAN
http://www.wam1.landata.com/Detail.asp?iCntyNum=14&iApplNum=45&iSearchNum=263&sPriDB=Parker&tiGenStyle=0&iRecordID=177964&iSeq=21&intPageSize=25&iRowFrom=1&iRowTo=25
General Information
Book #: 1655 Page #: 630
Book Type: OR Instrument Type: STATE TAX LIEN
Filed Date: 12/7/1995 Filed Time:
Document #: 283606 Instrument Date: 12/5/1995
Grantor
SPRINGTOWN DAY CARE
THOMPSON, JEFFREY MARK
THOMPSON, SHERRY LANELL
Grantee
TEXAS STATE OF
http://www.wam1.landata.com/Detail.asp?iCntyNum=14&iApplNum=45&iSearchNum=263&sPriDB=Parker&tiGenStyle=0&iRecordID=1000399730&iSeq=7&intPageSize=25&iRowFrom=1&iRowTo=7
Owner Name: SISSON VARIAN
Property ID: R000064180
Geographic ID: 22130.003.002.00
Property Address: FM RD 730 11101 S
Legal Description: Acres: 1.370, TR:, BLK:, SURV: R. W. KEY
http://www.isouthwestdata.com/client/webProperty.aspx?dbkey=parkercad&id=R000064180
Kiphart Richard P • SC 13D/A • Swordfish Financial/Inc • On 8/30/10
Item 3. Source and Amount of Funds or Other Consideration.
On August 14, 2009, Nature Vision, Inc. (predecessor to Swordfish Financial, Inc.) closed a Stock Purchase Agreement with Swordfish Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) pursuant to which Nature Vision sold an aggregate of 10,987,417 shares of its common stock to the Company in exchange for a $3,500,000 promissory note. Under the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, Nature Vision canceled all of its outstanding stock options and warrants, including Mr. Kiphart’s warrants to purchase 200,000 shares and options to purchase 6,800 shares of Nature Vision’s common stock.
On August 17, 2009, the Company borrowed $200,000 from Mr. Kiphart evidenced by a demand promissory note in order to meet its short-term cash flow requirement. This demand promissory note is secured by a second lien on the Company's assets and has an interest rate of 15%. The entire principal and accrued interest is payable upon demand anytime after the date of the demand promissory note.
On August 18, 2010, the Company borrowed an additional $50,000 from Mr. Kiphart pursuant to a Promissory Note and Grant of Rights to further meet its short-term cash flow requirement. The entire principal and accrued interest is payable on demand one hundred eighty days from the date of the note. Under the note, Mr. Kiphart may convert at any time from the date of the note the principal balance plus accrued interest into the Company’s common stock at the conversion rate of $0.10 per share. As additional consideration for the note, the Company granted to Mr. Kiphart the right to convert his $200,000 outstanding loan, plus accrued interest, into shares of Company common stock at the conversion rate of $0.10 per share. As further consideration for the note, the Company also granted to Mr. Kiphart, the right to invest in the Company by purchasing additional 2,000,000 shares of Company common stock at a purchase price of $0.10 per share.
The source of the funds for Mr. Kiphart’s loans to the Company was personal funds.
Item 4. Purpose of Transaction.
As noted in Item 3 above, on August 14, 2009, Mr. Kiphart’s warrants to purchase 200,000 shares and stock options to purchase 6,800 shares of Company common stock were cancelled.
As consideration for his loans of $200,000 and $50,000 to the Company, Mr. Kiphart received rights to purchase 4,500,000 shares of Company common stock at a purchase price of $0.10 per share. Mr. Kiphart may convert his accrued interest owing on the promissory notes into additional Company common stock at the conversion rate of $0.10 per share. As of August 18, 2010, $30,000 in interest had accrued on the $200,000 note. Therefore, Mr. Kiphart has the right to purchase an additional 300,000 shares of Company common stock. Mr. Kiphart acquired the foregoing rights for investment purposes.
Mr. Kiphart presently does not have plans or proposals that relate to or would result in transactions described in paragraphs (a) through (j) of Item 4 of Schedule 13D, but he reserves the right to formulate such plans or proposals, and to take action with respect thereto.
Item 5. Interest in Securities of the Issuer.
(a)As of August 18, 2010, Mr. Kiphart is the beneficial owner of 5,243,952 shares of common shares of the Company (which includes 4,800,000 shares of which may be purchased upon exercise of conversion rights and other rights to purchase Company common stock), representing approximately 29.0% of the outstanding common stock of the Company.
(b)As of August 18, 2010, Mr. Kiphart has the sole power to vote and the sole power to dispose of 5,243,952 common shares of the Company (which includes 4,800,000 shares of which may be purchased upon exercise of conversion rights and other rights to purchase Company common stock).
http://www.secinfo.com/dRc22.r1m2.htm
http://www.secinfo.com/$/SEC/Registrant.asp?CIK=904775&View=All&List=A#Affiliates
Root Capital
Root Capital is a nonprofit social investment fund that is pioneering finance for grassroots businesses in rural areas of developing countries. We provide capital, financial education, and market connections to small and growing businesses that build sustainable livelihoods and transform rural communities in poor, environmentally vulnerable places.
Richard P. Kiphart Principal, William Blair & Company
Mr. Kiphart is a principal of the Chicago-based investment firm William Blair & Company, having joined in 1965. He earned a bachelor’s degree in engineering science from Dartmouth College in 1963 an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School in 1965, and served as an officer in the U.S. Navy aboard a minesweeper during the Vietnam War. He served as chairman of Concord EFS, Inc., a NYSE company in the credit-card processing industry, which merged with First Data Corporation in 2004. He is chairman of Lime Energy, Ranir Corporation, and Hello Music. From June 2001 to June 2005 he was chairman of Chicago’s Merit School of Music. In May, 2006 he became president and CEO of the Lyric Opera of Chicago. In June 2006 he became chairman of the Erikson Institute, a Chicago graduate school in child development. He is on the Advisory board of DATA (Debt, AIDS, Trade, Africa), an organization formed in 2002 by rock star and social activist Bono. He and his wife Susan live in Chicago
http://www.rootcapital.org/about_board.php
http://www.williamblair.com/Pages/kiphart.asp
BANK GUARANTEE
TO: BANK NAME
ATTN: ________
FROM:
BANK GUARANTEE NO.:
CURRENCY: EURO
AMOUNT: EURO XX,000, 000.- ( SAY XX MILLION EURO ONLY)
DATE OF ISSUE:
MATURITY DATE:
BENEFICIARY: M/S ____________
APPLICANT: M/S _____________
ISSUING BANK:
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, __________WITH HEAD OFFICE AT _____________________________________________, HEREBY CONFIRM WITH FULL BANKING RESPONSIBILITY THAT WE IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY WITHOUT PROTEST OR NOTIFICATION, PROMISE TO PAY AGAINST THIS GUARANTEE, ON FIRST DEMAND, TO M/S PEACE THROUGH WATER FOUNDATION, OR BEARER OR ASSIGNEE THEREOF THE SUM OF EURO XX,000,000.-( SAY XX MILLION EURO ONLY) IN LAWFUL CURRENCY OF EUROPE UPON PRESENTATION AND SURRENDER OF THIS GUARANTEE AT OUR OFFICE IN _________________________________AT MATURITY DATE.
SUCH PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT SET-OFF AND FREE AND CLEAR OF ANY DEDUCTION OR CHARGES OF ANY FEES OR WITHHOLDINGS OF ANY NATURE, PRESENTLY OR HEREAFTER IMPOSED LEVIED, COLLECTED, WITHHELD OR ASSESSED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF OR HEAD OFFICE, _____________ OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR AUTHORITY THEREOF OR THEREIN.
THIS GUARANTEE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE LAW OF _______________________.
ALL SIGNATURES MUST BE DULY AUTHENTICATED AND RELEVANT SIGNATURE POWERS DULY CONFIRMED BY THIRD BANK.
THIS GUARANTEE IS TRANSFERABLE, ASSIGNABLE WITHOUT NOTICE TO US.
THIS AN OPERATIVE INSTRUMENT; NO MAIL WILL BE FOLLOW UPON ISSUED.
THIS GUARANTEE IS SUBJECT TO THE UNIFORM RULES FOR DEMAND GUARANTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (PUBLICATION NO.600) AND ANY DISPUTE ARISING THEREFROM SHALL BE SETTLED EXCLUSIVELY BY THE ICC INTERNATIONAL COURT OF ARBITRATION (PARIS, FRANCE).
FOR AND ON BEHALF OF ________________
AUTHORISED SIGNATURE
AUTHORISED SIGNATURE
UNQUOTE
AUTHORIZED BANK OFFICER AUTHORIZED BANK OFFICER
__________________________ __________________________
SIGNATURE SIGNATURE
NAME: NAME:
TITLE: TITLE:
DATE: DATE:
http://bankir.ru/dom/showthread.php?t=32903&page=13
You spend too much time on the homepage and not enough in your mailbox
Post Unavailable
Additional Information
There's going to be a name change?
Enwise?
http://www.enwisepower.com/Default.aspx
News 10/15/10
Sino Fibre Closes Acquisition to Acquire Inner Mongolia Bio-Energy Company
HONG KONG, Oct. 15, 2010 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Sino Fibre Communications, Inc. (OTCBB:SFBE) announced that it has closed an acquisition to acquire 50.1% of Europe-China Commercial Union Holdings Ltd "ECL" for US$100 million.
The consideration for the $100 million acquisition was 400 million SFBE shares ($0.25 per share) representing 140 million SFBE newly issued shares (valued at US$35 million) and a promissory note for 260 million SFBE shares (valued at US$65 million). ECL indirectly holds a 70% interest in approximately 70 sq. kilometers of leased land in Inner Mongolia Province, China. The land rights expire on 31 December 2049.
Daniel McKinney, CEO of Sino Fibre, commented on this new business; "This acquisition is a major turning point in the history of our company and propels us into the high growth arena of bio-energy, bio-diesel, wind and solar farms in China. With our large land resource in Inner Mongolia, the company can develop multiple streams of cash flows in this high growth, green sector."
The company will be appointing new management and board of directors, as well as changing the company name to Sinobioenergy.com. Please see: www.sinobioenergy.com
About Sino Fibre Communications, Inc.
Established in May 2005, Sino Fibre Communications, Inc. is a Nevada Corporation.
The Sino Fibre Communications Corporation logo is available at http://www.globenewswire.com/newsroom/prs/?pkgid=4102
This press release contains forward-looking statements based on management's expectations and beliefs, and involve risks and uncertainties which may involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results to be materially different from the results implied herein. Actual results may differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements and therefore readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements made in this press release.
CONTACT: NVESTrain
Investor Relations:
Dennis Burns
419-951-4842
denny@nvestrain.com
www.NVESTrain.com
http://www.globenewswire.com/newsroom/news.html?d=203840
Guess what
Not sure if this means anything, but they both have the same transfer agent
PACIFIC STOCK TRANSFER COMPANY
Yes and I think the correct test here is using the 300 shareholder limit since it does not include the 10M criteria and at that time SYNJ had 50 shareholders of record
Deregistration under Section 12(g) and Suspension of Reporting Obligations under Section 15(d)
Once delisted, a company may nonetheless be required to continue reporting pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act if it has more than 500 holders of record and total assets exceeding $10 million, or pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act if it at any time had an effective Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933.
To avoid this result, a company can deregister under Section 12(g) and suspend its reporting obligations under Section 15(d) if it has less than 300 shareholders of record. Section 15(d) reporting obligations may be automatically suspended if the issuer had less than 300 shareholders of record on the first day of its fiscal year.
Note that Section 15(d) obligations can never be terminated in this manner, they can only be suspended. After “going dark,” an issuer’s reporting obligations can be reinstated if the issuer exceeds the limit on the number of record holders on the first day of any fiscal year after it files a Form 15.
For example, brokers and other institutions holding shares in street name can elect to cease holding the shares in that capacity, and cause the transfer agent to record the shares directly in the name of the persons for whom they hold the securities. In such a case, each beneficial owner will become a record holder, and the stockholder count may exceed the limits.
To avoid having to reregister, companies which have “gone dark” should carefully monitor the number of record holders they have during the year, and take steps (such as a reverse stock split or stock repurchase or tender) to ensure that they continue to have less than 300 record holders before the applicable test dates under Sections 12(g) and 15(d).
http://www.dorsey.com/going_dark_voluntary_delisting_deregistration/#_ftn2
You have to go back to my original post to see what I was talking about
Dragon
Deregistration under Section 12(g) and Suspension of Reporting Obligations under Section 15(d)
Once delisted, a company may nonetheless be required to continue reporting pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act if it has more than 500 holders of record and total assets exceeding $10 million, or pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act if it at any time had an effective Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933.
Note that Section 15(d) obligations can never be terminated in this manner, they can only be suspended. After “going dark,” an issuer’s reporting obligations can be reinstated if the issuer exceeds the limit on the number of record holders on the first day of any fiscal year after it files a Form 15.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=43477321
Dragon
They must have less than 500 shareholders on record as of Jan 1st. If they don't, then the suspension of duty to file is lifted and they are required to start reporting.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=43481847
subtlerise
500 shareholders of record would be a huge amount and I doubt they have any where near that imo
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=43482448
Dragon
I realize that. Every cert holder and anyone that has shares in their own name would be counted separately. Also the doubling AS must've created more.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=43482812
I know that you haven't been around here lately
but I still wanted to show you something
500 shareholders of record would be a huge amount
Shareholders of Record 4,300 a/o Sep 22, 2010
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=55517147
DECISION AND ORDER
Petitioner Shareholder Advocates, LLC., fil ed an Application for Appointment of Custodian over National Health Scan, Inc., on August 30, 2 10. This Decision and Order granting the Application follows.
Nevada Revised Statute 78.347 provides that a stockholder of a corporation may apply to the district court for an appointment of a custodian of that corporation when it has abandoned its business and failed to properly wind up.
Under EDCR 2.20(C), “within 10 days after service of the motion ... the opposing party must serve and file a written notice of non-opposition or opposition therto. ...” Failure to file an opposition "may be construed a. an admission that the motion ... is meritorious and a consent to granting the same." Additionally, EDCR 2.23(c) provides "the judge may consider the motion on it merits at any time with or without oral argument and grant or deny it."
Shareholder Advocates has submitted an affidavit from its manager, David Keaveney, showing that it is a stockholder of National Health Scan, the prior applications for appointment of custodian it has filed and the result of those applications, and National Health Scan's apparent abandonment of it business , thus requiring a custodian. Based on the application and the accompanying affidavit, this Court finds it appropriate to appoint a custodian over National Health Scan.
It is therefore ordered that Shareholder Advocates, LLC., a shareholder of National Health Scan, Inc., is appointed custodian of National Health Scan, Inc. pursuant to NRS 78.347
It's all about the water
http://peacethroughwater.com/ptw_006.htm
http://www.bluemajestic.net/
Ahhh...The good old days
http://web.archive.org/web/20030417075632/oasisfoundation.org/oasis/ecowood.html
If they're uncollectable what are they going to recover?
It's somewhat interesting
The problem for me is that it just keeps going on and on. Blah blah blah...
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/secretgoldtreaty/secret_treaty_part%204.1.htm
Come on Janice, don't poo poo on my party
Let it play out for a while. This entertainment is pure gold...lol
NEWS 10/12/10
New Generation Biofuels Names Miles F. Mahoney as Chief Executive Officer and President; Carl O. Bauer Joins Board of Directors
COLUMBIA, Md., Oct. 12 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Renewable fuels provider New Generation Biofuels Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq: NGBF) ("NGBF" or the "Company") today announced the following organizational changes that are effective immediately:
•Mr. Cary J. Claiborne has resigned his position as the company's President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, to pursue new professional opportunities. Mr. Claiborne will be available to provide consulting services to the Company to insure a smooth transition.
•Miles F. Mahoney has been named by the Board of Directors to replace Mr. Claiborne as the company's President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Mahoney has also joined the Board of Directors.
•Carl O. Bauer has joined the Company's Board of Directors.
"I would like to thank Cary for his hard work, dedication and many contributions to the company over the past three years," said John Mack, Chairman of the Board of Directors. "Cary has managed the organization during the critical time as we transitioned from a strong technical concept to achieving commercial sales. We wish him well in his future endeavors. At the same time, we are excited to welcome Miles Mahoney to the management team and Board of New Generation Biofuels."
Mr. Mahoney most recently served as President and COO of Evergreen Energy leading their public company into the global $3 trillion greenhouse gas and carbon credit trading marketplace. Mr. Mahoney was responsible for transforming the organization from a science and research culture into a market and customer driven company. Prior to Evergreen, Mr. Mahoney served as Vice President and General Manager at SAS Institute, Inc. the world's largest privately-held software company. While at SAS, he developed and implemented new strategic alliance partnerships, strategic joint ventures and developed new revenue opportunities through outsourcing and licensing relationships worldwide. Prior to SAS, Mr. Mahoney has had several executive roles responsible for identifying and cultivating major growth initiatives, overseeing worldwide business development through new market expansion and managing major revenue growth programs.
"I am pleased Miles has joined the Company at this critical time as we begin to increase the commercialization of our unique biofuels technology," said Mack. "Miles' experience and leadership in building revenue through implementing critical strategies and partnerships will strengthen sales and resource development for the Company."
"I am truly excited to lead New Generation Biofuels in this next chapter of the Company's development", said Miles Mahoney. "I feel very fortunate to join the Company as it seeks to establish a leadership position in the biofuels industry."
Mr. Bauer has more than 30 years of experience in technical and business management in both the public and private sectors. He retired as Director of the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) in January 2010, one of the national laboratories owned and operated by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). NETL serves as the lead field laboratory for the Department's Office of Fossil Energy as well as a major implementer of DOE's Fossil and Renewable Energy Competitive Extramural R&D. Mr. Bauer was responsible for directing and overseeing the implementation of major science and technology development programs that advance energy options to fuel our economy, strengthen our security, and improve our environment. Mr. Bauer has held multiple positions at the Department of Energy (DOE) Headquarters. He has also served as Director of Engineering Support and Logistics, Naval Sea Systems Command for the U.S. Department of Defense; Vice President and General Manager of Technology Application, Inc.; and Vice President, Ship Systems and Logistics Group, Atlantic Research Corporation.
"Carl brings a wealth of industry, government, and business experience to our Board," said John Mack. "These attributes will be greatly valued as we accelerate our activities to profitability. We welcome Carl and look forward to his strong contributions as we grow the Company."
About New Generation Biofuels Holdings, Inc.
New Generation Biofuels is a developer and provider of renewable fuels. New Generation Biofuels holds an exclusive license for North America, Central America and the Caribbean to commercialize proprietary technology to manufacture alternative biofuels from plant oils and animal fats that it markets as a new class of biofuel for power generation, commercial and industrial heating and marine use. The Company believes that its proprietary biofuel can provide a lower cost, renewable alternative energy source with significantly lower emissions than traditional fuels. New Generation Biofuels' business model calls for establishing direct sales from manufacturing plants that it may purchase or build and sublicensing its technology to qualified licensees.
Forward Looking Statements
This news release contains forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements concern the Company's operations, prospects, plans, economic performance and financial condition and are based largely on the Company's beliefs and expectations. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties related to our business, which include all the risks attendant an emerging growth company in the volatile energy industry, including those set forth in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and in subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this news release, and the Company assumes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements or to update the reasons why the actual results could differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements.
Media Contact:
Bryan McPhee
ph: (410) 652-1159
bkmcphee@newgenerationbiofuels.com
IR Contact:
Rob Schatz
ph: (212) 370-4500
Rob@wolfeaxelrod.com
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/new-generation-biofuels-names-miles-f-mahoney-as-chief-executive-officer-and-president-carl-o-bauer-joins-board-of-directors-104766264.html
Interesting
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukarno
I think they put "yes" if they were ever on the list
As you can see they are not on the list now
http://www.otcmarkets.com/marketActivity/reg-sho-otc
"Reg SHO and Rule 3210 threshold lists notes if there have been 'excessive' fail to delivers for the respective security."
Yes there has been ftd's - back in March 2009
Thanks for the update
Where do you see the flag?
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=40605478
Yes and every time people get all excited
But the big question is from what accounts and why?
Oh man, I thought you were going to say Hammer time!
Transferring shares between accounts, hence no movement
Service Providers
Auditor/Accountant
N/A
Legal Counsel
N/A
Investor Relations Firm
N/A
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/INFX/company-info
25,349,550 Shares of $0.001 par value Common Stock outstanding as of September 14, 2007
Reporting Status
U.S. Registered & Reporting: SEC Filer
Latest Filing: Sept 14, 2007 FORM 10-QSB