Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Do you have pics of the permits for each of the four wells? What are the permit numbers with the corresponding API#'s.
Three of the wells are about 100ft or so from each other, the other is a little bit farther from the others.
I'm not questioning your word, just was looking for pics of the different wells and the permit numbers that went with each of them.
Where are you getting those numbers? Is there some documented report or just off the PR by the company. The field is not getting anything close to that 20 bpd and I really doubt that it will. Not on any 30 day basis anyway. And there is doubts that it has a reserve anywhere near the amount the company has PR'd. It's almost a given that any pinky PR is over stated and one must take that fact in view when certain projections are given.
At any rate, whatever the bpd is or will be has to be shown on documented reports, so will be interesting to watch for that.
Where are the costs coming from. Are they expenses from any audited financials of BNPD? Or are there any links to verifiable data confirming that maybe what it should be or is. Of course, some wells don't do as well as others when it comes to getting the last of the oil out and expense to operate low producing wells are considerably more than better producing wells in relationship of expense per barrel of oil.
Also lets be clear on what exactly "ownership" is when it is "working interest".
BNPD (Gouger) is 25% "working interest" in lease paying the operator Tejones (Gouger). Shareholders of BNPD (no such thing as TXOM, just wishing and hoping at this point, which are not very good investment strategies) are paying Gouger (Tejones Operating Corp) whatever Gouger wants to pay himself.
Since Gouger (Tejones Operating Corp) hasn't been able to do much for years besides the same wells PR'd in the way of oil operations and these wells don't seem to put out much, are probably not very efficient when compared to the expense of operating to production of oil, and not have a whole lot of profit, it only seems fitting that he buys up some low end pinky shell and have shareholders pay for any operations.
Operations that he has been doing there already. Working, "re-working", whatever one might want to call it, he in fact has been there for some time verified by documents and reports.
In this business, one can call every day going back in and beginning to re-work the wells. Looks like just procedures of the industry, nothing spectacular thats for sure. And these wells seems like such small puddles of oil in comparison. On a thirty day basis, average barrels per day for the last report was only a few barrels per day.
I know oil prices are up, but I just don't think thats going to cut it for the amount of "working" the wells it's going to take to get the last of the puddles out. If it did, Tejones wouldn't need to work with a pinky shell, he would just go and make some money with the oil. But share selling a pinky shell is a lot less work and a lot easier and more profitable I guess.
Production reports, when Tom Gouger as Tejones Operating Corp has been working or "re-working" the wells, any lack of proper permits, etc can be and have been verified by may "eyes" witnessing and can be further documented here:
http://www.rrc.state.tx.us/data/online/index.php#
Again here are the numbers and data one can use to search through any reports, permits, actions, etc., etc for these wells.
Operator name: Tejones Operating Corp
Operator # 841338
Lease or RRC # 01090
Field #22897001
Lease name: Bryan Estate
API#03902624 #1; API#03902625 #2; API#03902626 #3; API#03902627 #4
http://www.rrc.state.tx.us/data/online/index.php#
One should expect BNPD (no ticker change yet, but it is Gouger) to be out there and Tejone Operating Corp (or Texas Oil and Minerals) to have some operating equipment out on the site.
It is about the ONLY site that Gouger has been operating and producing oil from for about three years now. Although it has not been much in comparison to how much is really needed to substantiate any PR forward looking statements or validate any exuberant or even decent pps.
Don't mean to belittle any effort or time to snap a few pics of the site, maybe snap a pic of the current and valid permit for each of the wells if possible. Not sure if they are even following the proper permits or safety regulations since Gouger has had a history of violating those rules and regulations.
Probably it would be good to compare with other sites that are actually pumping good business and plenty of oil and see how the site compares.
But the bottom line is how much oil is actually produced and the expenses that BNPD (not TXOM until there are filings showing at OTCBB.com) for example is paying itself Tejones Operating Corp to operate it. Only 25% "working interest" is BNPD or Texas Oil and Mineral and any profits Tejones does for their service is Gougers and not the shareholders; nor does Tejones services depend on profit from the wells and can get paid their fees from shares sold in BNPD whether BNPD shareholders profit or not.
Checking of production reports, permits, etc, etc can be quite helpful in any real DD on the company. Like I said they should be out there, the majority of anything that Gouger been doing with oil is out there at that site, even though it hasn't been much compared to the rest of the oil industry. In the bottom of the pack group for oil production and this site is also in the bottom for the majority of profitable oil operations.
So it shouldn't be any surprise or oddity that they are at least still in fact there. It matches to all the production reports. But now the shareholders are going to foot the bill and pay them to continue to work these measly producing wells that by the reports are again falling in production on the average monthly numbers.
And one can go to the Texas authority site and correlate that this field is about the only oil producing operations for Gouger and get every month for years back such as this one. But Tejones reports will compare to the field production report given for the entire time since Gouger took it over.
http://www.rrc.state.tx.us/data/online/index.php#
Looking like that pinky "sweet deal" for the ticker owners more all the time. Seems like there is an "owning" (25%) of a "working interest" lease with a company, BNPD (Texas Oil and Minerals) that pays itself and owner of the operating company (Tejones Operating Corp) with shareholders "financing" through shares of a public pinky company. Public companies are "financed" through selling either directly or indirectly of shares, nothing new about that.
Sure looks like this paying by itself (Tom Gouger and Texas Oil and Minerals, BNPD i.e.: shareholders) is paying itself (Tom Gouger and Tejones Operating Corp) to operate the wells. Not saying anything is a scam or illegal, but not so sure that it's such a "sweet deal" for shareholders and somewhat like the fox guarding the henhouse.
Wells (the “henhouse”) that have not done quite the production as what BNPD PRs want to impress upon the public it seems. Listed here is the production for 2010 and 2011 for that Bryan Estate which correlates to the income of Tejones Operating Corp production which for the most part were only this site. Now of course I'm sure there is more data and would hate to have anyone take anything out of context, just trying to figure this out. There should be some expense to those operations and what profit from the disposition and it should be fully disclosed and with some rare pinky transparency with verifiable links or documents.
I do understand that the "forward looking statements" are trying to submit that with some fancy dancy process and/or equipment that there will be some better production. But this is just a report of what the Bryan Estate did do. Not sure how many hours a day or how many days per month they actually operated at this point to get that "average per day" mark of 12 barrels that was PR'd or exactly what numbers they used. But averaging these numbers are considerably less than the 12 barrels just using even 20 days per month, and they should at least be operating that many days per month.
Also, like a pinky stock pps, it can go up and down with oil production numbers no matter whether it’s in a downtrend or uptrend. But there is an observation that the numbers of the two wells already in production as stated by the PR that the trend of oil production is going down and average per month is falling and the fact that the “future looking statement” only falls in the current average per well when all four wells are worked from their numbers. The increase of production is only by just getting the additional two wells going.
Maybe the bold got missed, also goes for ones who really might know some good DD on oil production, leases, confirming that oil production, processes, or lease and profit capabilities specifically for BNPD, Texas Oil and Minerals and the State of Texas area in which they supposedly operate.
Maybe a little help.
Tom Gouger has been working that site and leases since about 3 years ago, so that part is nothing new:
Operator name: Tejones Operating Corp
Operator # 841338
Lease or RRC # 01090
Field #22897001
Lease name: Bryan Estate
API#03902624 #1; API#03902625 #2; API#03902626 #3; API#03902627 #4
If any of those numbers or names are pasted on a sign.
Production report for the last month reported which was May for Tejone Operating Corp
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=65547944
Continuing on regarding BNPD and their future looking statements of production and profit abilities for actually doing business of pumping oil (to or from the moon or anywhere else). The hype is all about the four wells that BNPD (Texas Oil and Minerals) has got and that’s showing that oil will indeed be pumped to and from the moon, or at least profits will be. (Ok, again being a little sarcastic, but just can’t help myself sometimes with these pinks.)
There was a PR on 6/1/11 stating this:
A couple of requests for input from the DD board with going over a little with BNPD. It has been oil company play with a purchase of a shell that was long ago a soft drink company that had gone dark quite a ways back with it just being a shell with no product, no officers, and only an empty shell when purchased by Tom Gouger.
And of course the thing is being pumped to have some great pps value of a ticker change and pumping oil to and from the moon (a little sarcasm of course there). A simple ticker change that has been being over rated now about every day, all day, for about 2 months and has yet to come about. But it does bring up a couple of questions for this board with anyone that might have some good DD or info regarding a couple of things.
Please, I'm not asking for any debate with any pumper clowns, carnival barkers, or circus turkeys, (nor will I waste my time getting into any debate with the like), but some real input from anyone who might have some intelligent thought on it I would welcome.
One; within the time of being a dark shell, the story immerges that the shell owner Pulver gives, issues, sells, whatever millions of shares to his then buddy Roger Pawson. For whatever reason, any deal between Pulver (original owner of BNPD shell) goes funky and they seen to not be so much buddies anymore. Pulver sells the shell to Tom Gouger, Texas Oil and Minerals and word comes about via the pumpers that those shares in question were cancelled or put a temporary freeze on them.
Now the question is that what options does Gouger have, a word is that it is Gouger that has to either now get a court order to continue any “freeze” or cancellation or do some other means to have the TA give some sort of statement or legal doc on those shares. Another word since it is really Gougers move to do something, that Pawson can just wait and have those BNPD shares once again to sell. Of course part of the pump is that since no one can link to any court docs or law suit from Pawson that the shares are safe and there won’t be any future selling or effect on the pps when there is.
But there is some thought that there won’t be any ticker change until these shares are accounted for and this issue taken care of, and that it is Gouger that needs to have any action looked for and that to just continue to “circus turkey call” out that there is no lawsuit found is of course just trying to hide the fact that these shares are an issue. Now I can’t see these shares that were supposedly issued by the TA to Pawson just being able to magically disappear. And I can’t see any of the three (Roger Pawson, J.D. Pulver, and Tom Gouger) wanting or letting this get to the courts or any lawsuits. But wonder what some thoughts were on all of it.
Of course the company BNPD isn’t coming forth with any full disclosure or transparency with the issue, but that can be pretty much expected since it has put itself right in the middle of the dubious pinky market where the largest majority by far is more in business to sell shares than really succeed in any real company business.
Number two issue is about actual oil production and site or oil leases that are pertaining to all the wonderful common pinky PR fluff and hype of gobs and gobs of oil and profit that BNPD is going to have in the future. But since there are links and some pics of docs and it has its own subject I’ll put that on the next post and leave any questions, answers, or opinions to this one for now.
Daily trend candles, bulk of trades have been settling for lower price. Yes it could turn up again for short term, but it may not.
5 tick trend candles (since we are talking current "trend"). Yes we get spikes partially instigated by BNPD paid promotion and trying to keep this thing from sinking below supports, but for the week ("current trend") the line is downward. IFTRSI, PPO, CCI, TMF, COG all indicating another downward dip.
Like I said it can be interpreted anyway one likes and infinite number of ways, with infinite of different charts and it depends on time frame and style of trading. I trade and interpret charts for me and I profit that way for the most part. But anyone can be misinformed by pinky hype as they please. Or choose to go on all nite with silly chart arguments, good luck with that, but again everyone should do their own for their own money.
Still not going to take care of the BS that is going on behind the scenes with the problems of this ticker and transfer of the shell. That is another issue and again it won't be waved away by simple BNPD hype saying it will. The SEC or FINRA doesn't pay any attention to that. And by the way, just looked and no new filings with SEC or OTCBB.com. Looks like we might just be getting another fluff PR of "soon", or "next week" or some other misleading BS fluff statements.
We can discuss technical after technical, I've been around so long that I know enough to know that the simple technicals are used and abused by company paid hype and promoters and used as fodder for about anything.
One day the pps closes green on a downward trend and it’s used as "look we broke the 20 Day" "whoopee" and another day when it closes negative the remarks are "well, the close doesn't portray the worth of the company and can't be paid much attention too".
Both kinds of statements have been used on the BNPD hype. Instead of wasting time discussing the literally hundreds of hundreds of technicals, my only point is that when anyone says green on a chart, it can be said red in some other technical, and vice versa. And it can go on all day and night.
What I know (since you asked) is profitable for me and my management of my money and I would suggest to anyone that once it is learned the basic knowledge of a chart or its technicals to expand that knowledge and learn so much more and do it for oneself, not just go on all the BNPD penny.com want to be and paid advertising.
At this point, BNPD is on a general downward trend with shell share transfer problems and two months since the original hype of a simple ticker change and down 50% from the high of that time. And so what that the ticker changes, big deal. The pps could change and go up a bit, but all I've seen is profits that can be gotten in hrs or days and no real long term positive aspects.
Again there is no real transparency or full disclosure with this company and only found in fluff PR's that are always misleading and paid promotional teams with just words, but never the real thing.
Along with my knowledge of charts and many, many of its technicals is the fact in the pinky world, BNPD included, is that the stronger the hype and stronger any uptrend is, the harder it falls in the longer term and that holds true no matter what technical one wants to talk about.
Why some say charts are worthless down in the pinks, and it is partially true in many cases. But to learn to interpret certain technicals in ways that are much more advanced than the basic common simplicities are a good thing to thrive for and that is what I know and would suggest to anyone to know it as well.
Maybe, you might be right. Just never know, but it can also continue down with its current trend just as easy. Depends on whether one is "trading" or "investing" and how much risk one wants to take on and in what time frame. Definitely have some negative issues that are coming into play on this one.
And red is red. About two months ago, this thing topped out at .044, now down about 50%.
Yes, that topping the 20 Day by about .0003 was real exciting. Especially since the 20 Day has been on a downward slope for about 30 days now. Makes that close above a bit easier to get at EOD when the 20 Day is coming down to meet it. LOL
Again, I wouldn't suggest to anyone to hold their breath for any lawsuits, not to say they couldn't happen, just wouldn't hold my breath for them.
What I will expect is for sometime in the future selling of some "mysterious" shares or "mysterious" reasons and this problem be somehow attempted to be pushed away in a dark closet covered by BNPD promotional means so that no one will be looking at it.
Sorry about the mistake, looking at trend candles for a moment there. High of last Fri .028 high this Fri and how much percentage down? Along with generally most shares selling for lower with a downward trend. For the bulk of the shares, RED, RED, RED on the week.
BNPD RED for the week. High and close of this Fri is lower than of last Fri.
One of the comments going around is that Pawson just needs to sit and wait; it is Gouger that has to initiate some court order to follow through with some temporary action.
But I doubt too many will really know all of what went on when Pulver gave those shares to Pawson or all the specific details attached to the issuing, and I'm definitely not going to defend either and try to distinguish differences of who’s a crook or a thief.
Many will not pay attention to what will happen to the shares and it will have every effort to have hidden any problems to the general public by all involved.
But it does and will bring attention by any regulatory entity and with the increased scrutiny of these transferred shells, may continue to be an issue. Whether or not one wants to believe that these shares were "stolen" or not, the real fact is that they were issued and are floating around like some sort of stinky goo on a scum pond. They just don't go away with a magic wand or the mere statements of BNPD hype.
That’s just the way it is with these shells. I've stated before that they are getting to be like used TP and too many of them should have been flushed long ago. There are always some issues involved with them, just the way it is.
IMO, I don't think any of these guys really want it in the courts (i.e.: on Pacer) and common sense would tend to think that some other means would be used in order to move on and have the issue settled. I would half expect some sort of note or debt listed, but who really knows at this point.
What exactly that is going to entail is all part of the waiting game. But any real and total disclosure and/or total openness from the pinky company will only be found on BNPD hype and paid promotional ads, twits, misleading fluff PR's, etc in "future looking" or hype words only.
Reality, it is what it is.
Very true, the clearer head is most always sitting on the sidelines looking in.
If only it was reasonable to short a penny stock. It sure would be an easy target, thats a guarantee win with something like that.
But, for most retail, it isn't, one would have to get the shares to short and pay out big time in order to even try to do it. It just isn't feasiblele and way too much hassle for the most part.
But if it was, there is nowhere but down in pps for that to go and then guess what? Increase in A/S in order for more share selling business profit. Very vicious circle for any normal "investor".
I wasn't a bit surprised either and expected it not to. One can blame the two months of delay on the Government or even "vacations", but BNPD is going to have to get the BS between Pawson and Pulver settled out, and that is quite the stickler. But I would suspect both of them are going to be selling shares in the future. Of course all IMO and no thanks necessary for it.
But whether or not there is acceptance to the fact of a mess between Gouger, Pawson, Pulver, and the shell, it will still continue to get in the way for a bit longer and agree its just a waiting game. Of course results of the game and its connection to the pps and share structure of BNPD is always debatable.
The BNPD hype and positive will express that there is no problem and oil will be pumped from the moon and others will admit that there very well might be a problem and have certain effects on any future pps. But it does continue to be a waiting game.
Yes I agree, glad that post was also given.
Well stated. It was very gracious of you to even give such an explanation of whether or not "you owned shares". There seems to be quite the ridiculous notion that someone has to own shares or even want to in order to discuss a stock, its promoters, or insiders. The posts of "move on", "why are you here" kind of BS is just totally illogical and only used as fodder for pumper clowns.
These boards, unless specifically for something else other than the particular stock or company (and include many companies or stocks), are for discussion of that particular company and its people behind them like paid promoters, shell owners, officers, etc.
There is no "admission" (with exception of course to non free boards) required for discussion or reason to be there and anyone has every right to come in and discuss and put out information or give their opinion on any particular stock and their insiders.
There is also can be a line drawn sometimes what the actual "company" owns and what the insiders or shell owners own. For example, Pawson many times has been stated not to be an actual officer, but does have many involvements with several "companies" (term in which used very loosely) including BNPD, and definitely has an effect with shares owned and sold and does have effect in the pps of each of those "companies".
But all this interest in whether or not anyone has shares of any company is more or less irrelevant and only maybe a very small part in one’s own decision to have any.
Factual reasons why one does or doesn't might have more relevance and again it was very gracious of BB to give those.
And the link to Scions board where I picked it up.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=65466549
Along with the wait while the "rinse and repeat" goes through the proccess, here is the connection with BEHL and Rivera.
Since we're just waiting for debt to be bought up here and the inevitable fluff PR and R/S with this toxic shell transfer, an interesting event regarding one of the old involvements with BEHL.
SEC Wins Summary Judgment Against Biofuel Scammer
Jul. 22 2011 - 10:05 am
http://blogs.forbes.com/danielfisher/2011/07/22/sec-wins-summary-judgment-against-biofuel-scammer/
The long, strange career of would-be biofuels pioneer John H. Rivera came to an end yesterday when a federal judge in Mississippi granted the Securities and Exchange Commission a summary judgment against Rivera, barring him forever from the penny-stock business.
From the beginning, the facts behind SEC vs. Rivera were almost too good to be true — for a journalist. I came across Rivera when I was poking into the the profusion of green-energy scams in late 2006 that sprang up in first flowering of biofuels mania. Rivera was a small-time hustler who had a history of promoting tires-to-energy schemes, among other things. He saw his main chance arrive when biofuels became a national priority. Faster than you can say “unregistered stock,” he whipped together a publicly traded outfit called U.S. Sustainable Energy Corp.
You gotta give the man credit: He was committed to his version of reality. In an interview Rivera would have been smarter to have skipped, he tried to convince me his magical process could convert soybeans into biodiesel at a rate that defied the laws of physics and chemistry. When I told him I had already consulted the leading experts in the exact process he claimed to be using, and they said his numbers were nonsensical, Rivera simply told me the experts were wrong.
The SEC followed a year after my story with a lawsuit accusing Rivera of penny-stock fraud.
The recitation of facts shows just how much a determined scamster can get away with in the public markets, especially when the SEC only pursues a fraction of these cases. One SEC lawyer told me the agency simply can’t justify the expense of going after penny-stock swindlers, since even a clear-cut case like Rivera’s can occupy a trial lawyer’s time for months or even years.
In Rivera’s case, he told bold-faced lies about how he had souped up a centuries-old process called pyrolisis to produce millions of gallons of biodiesel. He also put out a press release saying he’d secured the backing of a major investment bank — false — and that he’d recruited a director named Dr. David Crow, who promptly ordered Rivera to retract the announcement when he found out about it.
The biggest mystery in the Rivera case is why it didn’t involve John Stanton, the Tampa penny-stock promoter who provided financial backing to Rivera and many other dicey operations. Stanton put out press releases promoting USSE and lent the company $3.3 million. When I got him on the phone, briefly, he explained he didn’t back Rivera’s USSE but another company that just happened to have the same name. He couldn’t explain the public company’s filings identifying him as a backer, and quickly ended the interview.
Stanton’s name isn’t mentioned in the Rivera summary judgment. Nor are the names of any of the shady brokers and intermediaries who allowed Rivera to sell millions of shares in USSE during its prime. Instead of focusing on whether a longtime hustler with a history of making grandiose statements about his scientific process could really defy the laws of physics and chemistry, the SEC should have spent its time figuring out who facilitated the sale of so much worthless stock on the open market.
The summary judgment says Rivera could be ordered to disgorge his profits from the scam and pay fines and pre-judgment interest at an Aug. 8 hearing. It would be interesting to know how much money others made on the spread between what Rivera got for his shares and what the suckers on the other end ultimately paid.
http://blogs.forbes.com/danielfisher/2011/07/22/sec-wins-summary-judgment-against-biofuel-scammer/
The debate of how much "protection" by the law or governing bodies may be up for debate. But the fact that there needs to be some is not. Also when there is an obvious lack of “protection” in comparison to the rampant scams and lack of real business other than to just sell shares for the personal benefit of the ones who doing the scamming, then more “protection” (more regulation and/or enforcement) is definitely warranted.
The theory of we all need to take our own responsibility and cannot protect the less intelligent, weaker, less experienced, more naive, etc from themselves can only go so far. If we did not have laws, courts, etc against thieves, muggers, and crooks and only say that people need to be stronger, more in shape, trained, carry more guns, gets irresponsible in itself.
Again the question is "how much" or what kind and then the real big one -- enforcement with proper priorities and not succumb to the financial abilities of the violators, but instead attack those abilities and create proper means to collect the costs from those violators by any means possible. Along with a goal of making the fact that crime should NOT pay due to one of the problems, especially in the pinky market, the crime so often does.
But there is validity in that we as a society, all need to take more responsibility in our actions and some of those responsibilities are in fact to govern, give structure, and give tools and opportunity for others to learn and choose the proper “personal responsibilities” of their own. It can also be said that it is also each of our responsibilities to protect the weaker, less experienced, more naïve and elect, put in place, and give support to better means and more attention to the rampant misuse of the pinky market.
Also it includes the “personal responsibilities” of the ones in authority like the SEC, FINRA, and other regulatory entities to do their job that we as a society give them to do. And it includes all of our “personal responsibilities” to give them the power or means to do it.
A “personal responsibility” may include one speaking up against the abuse, and help make aware and expose that very abuse. It definitely is not a good “personal responsibility” to be a pumper clown and support the abuse and the scams of this degraded pinky market.
Just a couple of articles that I posted on Scions board that may be of interest on money to SEC and FINRA. Of course the subject discussed in the articles is always up for its own debate.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=64822387
Very true. They also give out hours and hours of entertainment, and BNPD has become quite entertaining.
Well now lets get the bid up where it shows what one will pay for it. LOL
Oops. Now look what happened. The ask and bid dropped.
Low volume is one thing, but practically no volume is another. Guess that "old" BNPD hype and promotional act isn't working so well. Can always throw in a couple of more "ticker change, ticker change, ticker change", or some other chorus sounding BNPD statements. Maybe that will do it.
Don't tell me that over hour "old" trade of 309 shares is going to be the paint of the day and week? At least someone can paint a more current trade than that "old" one. LOL
But maybe it can be the "old" junk statement of "MM's signal". With all of this "old" talk, I would half expect it.
But come on now, there some more .02's there to paint with to not make it so "old". LOL
Well, I think one is asking too much. All there will be is BNPD flip flopping around with "look at BNPD and officers old stuff" then "wait a minute, that doesn't conform to the BNPD hype, it's old". Hilarious. What can one expect, its a pinky where more money and/shares are given to advertising than actually becoming a real business and fully reporting to the SEC with audited financials and full disclosure.
But, hey you can get a ticker change, ticker change, ticker change. LOL
But then again, BNPD is having a hard time even doing that simplest of things.
BNPD - birdgangstocks - who is this promotional company?
This promotional company hit my radar because they put out a recent press release announcing that they are now promoting BNPD:
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2011/7/prweb8628668.htm
One possibility could be that the owner of a $106,500 debt Note which can legally be converted into free trading shares any time after March 31, 2011 may finally be looking to convert and sell those shares. The owner of that Note gets to convert their shares at $.001/share which means they could would have 106,500,000 shares to sell if they do a full conversion. They could make a nice profit off of those 106,500,000 share at the current trading price of $.0253/share getting a return of $2,694,000 on their $106,500 investment, but why not go for more by paying for a promotion? Just raising the share price a half of penny will make that $2,694,000 into $3,226,950. More than likely though the promotion is just to lure in new buyers to support the share price as much as possible while some of those shares are being sold if the debt Note holder is indeed involved in the paid promotion.
Who is the owner of that Note? The filings don't say. Could be JD Pulver the former owner of the shell? Could be Roger Pawson who attempted to purchase the shell while using it to pump their other company, BEHL with a fake dividend? BNPD has a very dirty history.
I'm not sure the present situation for BNPD is all that much better with the lurking Note holder and the addition of new CEO, Thomas Gouger, who can be linked to Titan oil & Gas (TNOG) and Greenstar Energies (GSRE) and has some safety violations in his past oil and gas experience:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=64898840
The BNPD legal counsel, David L. Kagel, can be linked to some past shady activities as well:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=64900772
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=64901624
------
So who is Bird Gang Stocks?
http://www. style='background-color:yellow;'>birdgangstocks.com/
some of the stocks they have claimed to promote in recent months include:
BDLF
VGPR
DEGH
ENTI
NWTT
WNBD
VIGS
SFNL
OPLO
ZLUS
NRPI
Not the shining group of penny stocks that's for sure... in fact that is a pretty rotten bunch overall
The birdgangstocks disclaimer doesn't list individual compensation received which I believe it is legally obligated to do:
http://www. style='background-color:yellow;'>birdgangstocks.com/disclaimer
It only gives this broad statement:
Please be advised that Birdgangstocks.com receives compensation to perform promotional and advertising services for companies mentioned on our website, social media platforms, & our emails by third parties. Anyone viewing this newsletter should assume the hiring party or affiliates of the hiring party own shares of these companies of which they plan to liquidate, further understanding that the liquidation of those shares may or may not negatively impact the share price. Birdgangstocks.com receives compensation as a production budget for advertising efforts and will retain amounts over and above the cost of production, copy writing services, mailing and other distribution expenses as a fee for our services. As such, our opinion is neither unbiased nor independent, and you should consider that when evaluating our statements regarding companies mentioned.
The WhoIs information for the website gives us the following information:
Bird Gang Stocks
2152 Ralph Avenue
Suite #1
Brooklyn, New York 11234
United States
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: BIRDGANGSTOCKS.COM
Created on: 17-Jan-10
Expires on: 17-Jan-13
Last Updated on: 18-Jan-11
Administrative Contact:
Gang Stocks, Bird support@birdgangstocks.com
2152 Ralph Avenue
Suite #1
Brooklyn, New York 11234
United States
+1.3525778625 Fax --
The 353-577-8625 phone number is also listed on the website. It is a Bronson, Florida number with no web search results.
The 718-968-6868 phone number from the press release gives us a few results. It is a New York number belonging to Shawn Porat. Shawn Porat has used this number for a few businesses including:
Recovery of Judgement
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2011/5/prweb8484466.htm
http://www.recoveryofjudgment.com/
Fortune Cookie Promotions (he does a lot of advertisements looking for telemarketers for this company)
I need a group of telemarketers to call for sales for our company. You can see our company at www.FortuneCookiePromotions.com. Please call me at 7189686868 to discuss. Thanks.
http://www.FortuneCookiePromotions.com
Judgement Marketplace
http://www.judgmentmarketplace.com/
Shawn Porat also used the following email: snp711@gmail.com
Which leads us to Shawn Porat - Notary Public
http://notarycrm.com/find-a-notary-public/New%20York/brooklyn/shawn%C2%A0porat
And this very recent craigs list ad seeking a Silent Partner - $350,000
http://newyork.craigslist.org/mnh/bfs/2468276263.html
The other name attached to Bird Gang Stocks is Donald Winston-Day (president and CEO of Bird Gang Stocks)
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/donald-winston-day/1b/9a/187
http://www.updown.com/member/doctorday/networks
http://www.chasetrade.com/member/doctorday
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=65029378&txt2find=birdgangstocks
Seems like there are plenty of shares at the ask also if anyone wants all those, they keep being put up. For a while there, I was wondering if anyone was going to do anything. LOL
I don't care what is interpreted from the charts, still needs more volume than this thing is giving out. Turning into a real dud.
Thanks for the reply. Nevada does seem to have certain issues to contend with for shareholders of any stock registered there. Even though Nevada is one of the worst states for these issues, I believe many states need to step up their criteria for these sub standard toxic shell pinks as a whole.
I know that states need the filing fees, income, etc, but if there was a overall better protection for the shareholders of these pinks, it would help at least curb the scams that are taking place so regularly with the pinks and give one less tool that pumper clowns could try to use for misinforming and pumping a troubled stock and/or dubious companies and their insiders and promoters.
Many SELL the hype also. Especially the front loaders and company insiders, promoters, etc.
I will agree that it is up to each ones interpretation. Charts are used for hype all the time, thats why I just do my own interpretation for my trading and this one is at a big risk with it pounding at its supports and could break more of them any time.
But risk is what these pinkys are all about, but still hard to do anything with such measly volume and little interest and many just waiting to see if this thing does break its supports and goes down which quite a few technicals are indicating it is.
But good luck to all.