A couple of requests for input from the DD board with going over a little with BNPD. It has been oil company play with a purchase of a shell that was long ago a soft drink company that had gone dark quite a ways back with it just being a shell with no product, no officers, and only an empty shell when purchased by Tom Gouger.
And of course the thing is being pumped to have some great pps value of a ticker change and pumping oil to and from the moon (a little sarcasm of course there). A simple ticker change that has been being over rated now about every day, all day, for about 2 months and has yet to come about. But it does bring up a couple of questions for this board with anyone that might have some good DD or info regarding a couple of things.
Please, I'm not asking for any debate with any pumper clowns, carnival barkers, or circus turkeys, (nor will I waste my time getting into any debate with the like), but some real input from anyone who might have some intelligent thought on it I would welcome.
One; within the time of being a dark shell, the story immerges that the shell owner Pulver gives, issues, sells, whatever millions of shares to his then buddy Roger Pawson. For whatever reason, any deal between Pulver (original owner of BNPD shell) goes funky and they seen to not be so much buddies anymore. Pulver sells the shell to Tom Gouger, Texas Oil and Minerals and word comes about via the pumpers that those shares in question were cancelled or put a temporary freeze on them.
Now the question is that what options does Gouger have, a word is that it is Gouger that has to either now get a court order to continue any “freeze” or cancellation or do some other means to have the TA give some sort of statement or legal doc on those shares. Another word since it is really Gougers move to do something, that Pawson can just wait and have those BNPD shares once again to sell. Of course part of the pump is that since no one can link to any court docs or law suit from Pawson that the shares are safe and there won’t be any future selling or effect on the pps when there is.
But there is some thought that there won’t be any ticker change until these shares are accounted for and this issue taken care of, and that it is Gouger that needs to have any action looked for and that to just continue to “circus turkey call” out that there is no lawsuit found is of course just trying to hide the fact that these shares are an issue. Now I can’t see these shares that were supposedly issued by the TA to Pawson just being able to magically disappear. And I can’t see any of the three (Roger Pawson, J.D. Pulver, and Tom Gouger) wanting or letting this get to the courts or any lawsuits. But wonder what some thoughts were on all of it.
Of course the company BNPD isn’t coming forth with any full disclosure or transparency with the issue, but that can be pretty much expected since it has put itself right in the middle of the dubious pinky market where the largest majority by far is more in business to sell shares than really succeed in any real company business.
Number two issue is about actual oil production and site or oil leases that are pertaining to all the wonderful common pinky PR fluff and hype of gobs and gobs of oil and profit that BNPD is going to have in the future. But since there are links and some pics of docs and it has its own subject I’ll put that on the next post and leave any questions, answers, or opinions to this one for now.
