InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 40
Posts 5535
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/19/2009

Re: None

Tuesday, 07/26/2011 1:08:12 AM

Tuesday, July 26, 2011 1:08:12 AM

Post# of 37472
Looking like that pinky "sweet deal" for the ticker owners more all the time. Seems like there is an "owning" (25%) of a "working interest" lease with a company, BNPD (Texas Oil and Minerals) that pays itself and owner of the operating company (Tejones Operating Corp) with shareholders "financing" through shares of a public pinky company. Public companies are "financed" through selling either directly or indirectly of shares, nothing new about that.

Sure looks like this paying by itself (Tom Gouger and Texas Oil and Minerals, BNPD i.e.: shareholders) is paying itself (Tom Gouger and Tejones Operating Corp) to operate the wells. Not saying anything is a scam or illegal, but not so sure that it's such a "sweet deal" for shareholders and somewhat like the fox guarding the henhouse.

Wells (the “henhouse”) that have not done quite the production as what BNPD PRs want to impress upon the public it seems. Listed here is the production for 2010 and 2011 for that Bryan Estate which correlates to the income of Tejones Operating Corp production which for the most part were only this site. Now of course I'm sure there is more data and would hate to have anyone take anything out of context, just trying to figure this out. There should be some expense to those operations and what profit from the disposition and it should be fully disclosed and with some rare pinky transparency with verifiable links or documents.

I do understand that the "forward looking statements" are trying to submit that with some fancy dancy process and/or equipment that there will be some better production. But this is just a report of what the Bryan Estate did do. Not sure how many hours a day or how many days per month they actually operated at this point to get that "average per day" mark of 12 barrels that was PR'd or exactly what numbers they used. But averaging these numbers are considerably less than the 12 barrels just using even 20 days per month, and they should at least be operating that many days per month.





Also, like a pinky stock pps, it can go up and down with oil production numbers no matter whether it’s in a downtrend or uptrend. But there is an observation that the numbers of the two wells already in production as stated by the PR that the trend of oil production is going down and average per month is falling and the fact that the “future looking statement” only falls in the current average per well when all four wells are worked from their numbers. The increase of production is only by just getting the additional two wells going.

The initial production from the first two wells when they were returned to production last year was 12 barrels of oil per day without cleanouts or treatment. We feel with that removing the paraffin buildup and the cleaning out of the sand screens will increase the production from all four wells to between 20-32 barrels per day.
The Bryan Estate property presently contains 4 wells all of which are expected to be worked-over and cleaned out and brought online over the next 1 to 2 months.


But, like I stated, just some numbers to look at. More verifiable data and links can always be posted. I'm getting this data from
http://www.rrc.state.tx.us/data/online/index.php#

But I do believe that BNPD owes to any “investor” and “investors” owe it to themselves a little more than 2 months of hype of “ticker change, ticker change” or hyped up unsustainable pps projections and oil revenues along with the fact that true “positive debate and constructive conversation” requires that some negatives about the company or issues are given and analyzed in balance with any positive statements. Just BNPD hype or paid promo campaigns are not very constructive nor do they usually end up being positive for any “longs” or even traders in the long run.

Even if one wants to look at this stock as only just another pinky and that it doesn’t matter what kind of “real” company it is or if it is at all, there is a limit of barrage of BNPD hype that can be constantly done over and over and only for so long and have any positive effect; and will destroy trading opportunity and eliminate any MOMO that is getting harder and harder to find with BNPD. “Consolidation” and “flippers out” statements are found on the “dump” side of every pinky Pump and Dump.

An expected simple ticker change with a shell purchase of a long time dark ticker with no product, no officers, nothing but 4 letters is “much ado about nothing”, but the fact that it can’t be done and hasn’t been done in some reasonable period of time is much more questionable and some real transparency and disclosure from the company should be applied.

If BNPD, Texas Oil and Minerals, Tom Gouger with its investors or traders, any positives or negatives, want to be a “big boy” and a real company, then it’s time to quit the BS and act like it. Either that or just succumb to a fact it’s just like any other of the thousands of sub standard immature pinks and only full of paid promo and hype and it will end up sooner or later down on the bottom with 99%+ of all the others.