Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Have I ever claimed otherwise?
Go ahead, try to find a quote that I have. Search long and and hard in my history. Spend all morning. Heck, spend all day. Spend all week if you like. Nothing is stopping you. Go nuts.
Oh, the delicious irony of calling me stupid when you yourself don't seem capable of comprehending what I have or have not said.
"impotent opinions"
Yet there is so such concern that I air them. Obviously they do in fact bother the hell out of the lying pumpers.
"hatred for Sharp"
Why would I hate Sharp? I've never even met him. Look at you revving up the lie counter this morning.
"I'm buying more GVSI!"
Knock yourself out. It makes absolutely no difference to my existence if you do. Or even if you don't and are actually lying about it. My day stays exactly the same.
"The guy has never shown he can pick or make a winning trade"
I have also never shown I can pick or make a losing trade. This is because I do not "make picks" at all. This has been explained to you many times over, maybe someday you will actually understand that not everyone is a lying pumper like you.
"just goes around and tells people what not to buy."
I have never instructed people not to buy something. Go ahead, try to find a single quote where I did. Knock yourself out. Hint: you won't find one because I never have. This is just another lie coming from you.
"So folks spreading spew like you where it will take 6 months minimum is complete garbage."
I have never said it will take 6 months minimum. Once again, go ahead and try to find a quote where I said that. Enjoy yourself. And again, you won't find one. Because I have never said it. Goodness, the lies this morning.
"GVSI wouldn’t get current because it didn’t show 2 years of filings"
I wonder how many times now I have had to explain to you that your beef is with OTC Markets and the fact that they do not seem to follow their own published guidelines. Let me know how they respond when you lodge your complaint with them.
"there were issues with FINRA/SEC that would never be resolved"
I have never said "never". While you're searching for the other quotes that I have also never said, add this one to the list. But guess what? You won't find it. Because I have never said it. Man, these lies keep piling up.
"I’ve never made a winning trade"
Unless you work at all of my brokers you cannot possibly know anything about the entirety of my trading history. And since I have had plenty of winning trades I know that you do not. Once again, hoo boy, with all the lies this morning.
And it's still early.
"FINRA name/ ticker changes are averaging about 30-35 business days for it to happen." - HokieHead, Friday, August 11, 2023
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172570721
"This ticker got its name and ticker change with FINRA in about 35 business days. I’ve seen many others with the same time frame." - HokieHead, Monday, August 28, 2023
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172699478
"Could be as early as this week. This ticker changed in 35 business days." - HokieHead, Monday, August 28, 2023
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172705548
Yesterday was 35 business days and it has come and gone without a name/ticker change for GVSI.
The same Sharp Legal Team with most of the share cancellations dismissed already and not a single one granted?
Wow, very impressive bunch there.
FINRA has to put a “time limit” on everything they do, they can’t leave anything “open ended”.
If the GVSI changes don't take place in 35 business days (which will be Wednesday) as has been getting pumped, it might be a safe bet that those particular lying pumpers will then move the goalposts out to "up to 6 months".
Others have been contending up to 6 months all along.
ICOA has roughly a 6 billion share float.
You really should know things like this.
@OTCpinkGVSI:
Previous management also attempted to execute a reverse split and name change, but was denied by FINRA because of deficiencies
who did you speak to, please provide a name or show the email.
Just got a PM from a top 50 IHub poster, one of the most legit ones here, that they are a shareholder and do not post here though
In the real world, actual traders understand the fact that a pump and dump is exclusively a compensated awreness campaign that assists in the the dilution of a stock that permanently increases the O/S and damages shareholders in the long run.
He took about 50% OS out from SRNW, expect the same here.
He did not state that "they did" on 7/18, he stated "will".
And we haven't heard a thing since.
George is a fan of providing shots of receipts and stuff when he makes submissions. Yet he did not here. So did he follow through, or not? No one knows.
Anyone claiming they know for sure is lying. Otherwise we would have seen the proof.
I don't have a crystal ball. That's why I used the word "if", unlike the lying pumpers that use language to pretend that GVSI corporate actions are a foregone conclusion with no chance at failure. They absolutely can fail. And given the fact that I have seen absolutely no evidence that the FINRA Notice of Deficiency has been taken care of then it seems much more likely that the actions will not go through.
On the other hand, So if we are FINRA denied what will be the next spin by the lying pumpers??
But it did not have an unresolved official FINRA Notice of Deficiency.
Just throwing out the word "deficient" does not magically make them equivalent.
He's obsessed with him, he cannot not respond. Like mentally ill level of obsession. Look at his posts on other boards. He's a fuggin nutcase.
Do I lie?
Or am I just "toxic" because I take on the lying pumpers and call them out unapologetically?
There is some truth-telling here, however it is intentionally drowned out by the lying pumpers so as not to be noticed by the naive that they need to dump their shares on.
Take a look at the chart going back a bit. Take a look at the folk bragging about averages around .002 to .003. It's not a coincidence that they are also the most vociferous pumpers.
It's because they have been selling this whole time and need rubes to not know the truth about the seriousness of the unresolved FINRA Notice of Deficiency.
There have been no 20 million share trades.
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/jpx-global-pk-JPEX/trades
No.
Was that a 20 mill buy?
So Sharp would apply for name and ticker change without knowing he wouldn’t be approved?
So you are keeping up your lie of pretending that a ticker with some late filings in its past is the same as a ticker with an official FINRA Notice of Deficiency. It is not.
Give everybody an example of a name/ticker change that a company with an unresolved FINRA Notice of Deficiency accomplished.
Oh that's right, you cannot.
You are just counting on the naive and the dumb to not know the difference. Which makes you a real piece of garbage.
Thanks for your opinion as a random anonymous ihubber.
Has FINRA confirmed this thought of yours?
I don't think I've seen that anywhere. Let us know where it can be found.
The 6 years are not needed
By what authority do you speak for the thoughts of everybody on this board?
Oh that's right, you don't.
Thinking you do is quite psycho or quite douchey.
Of course, it could also be both.
And what happens if the name/ticker change never show on the Daily List and George finally tweets "Sorry, I tried but I could not overcome past management's mistakes"?
You guys gonna apologize?
You posted this on the AAPT board. It's a totally different ticker.
So I guess one should not be able to swing a dead cat around Nasdaq without hitting at least several dozen Caveat Emptor OTC tickers that uplisted.
Yet It seems that not a single one ever has.
Go ahead, name an OTC with a CE in place that uplisted to Nasdaq. Let's see it.
You are truly delusional. Really, a CE is a RECOMMENDATION in your world, somehow? That is absolutely bonkers.
https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/Material_Search.aspx?cid=34&mcd=LQ
You are lying. The FINRA Notice of Deficiency was specifically for the missing years of financials, not for trying to enact a reverse split. You are attempting to mislead the naive and the dumb, unfortunately some of us see right through you.
As far as "none of that applies now", perhaps you missed when George recently withdrew the SEC appeal attempt that had been made. There would be no need for even attempting that if "none of that applies now".
As far as "look up examples of deficient tickers", once again you are attempting to mislead the naive and the dumb by using the term deficient as if it is the equivalent of an official FINRA Notice of Deficiency. It is not. I have challenged you to provide a ticker with an actual Notice of Deficiency that had name/ticker changes go through. You claim there are some but you are lying. You cannot provide even one example, you just move on while throwing out insults.
Let's see an example. Demonstrate that you are not a lying sack of crap. I'll bet that you cannot.
You have not provided a single example that had an unresolved FINRA Notice of Deficiency like GVSI does.
You are trying to use the term "deficient" as if it's the same thing but it absolutely is not. You are attempting to mislead people.
Go ahead, let's see an example with an actual Notice of Deficiency. If you don't have one, then you are a lying sack of crap.
So are you calling September 6 for GVSI?
The Caveat Emptor disqualifies TXTM from Nasdaq uplisting. You can't just "bypass".
Repeatedly begging isn't going to make it happen.
ICNM did not buyout AAPT. They simply purchased an asset from them. That's all.
All the huffing and puffing in the world makes not a lick of difference to investors while the Caveat Emptor is still on.
Learn the new OTC Rules.
There is a difference between an official FINRA Notice of Deficiency and ihub pumpers loosely throwing around the term deficient as if they are the same thing.
They are not.
You sure do love cherrypicking singular past dates to distract from reality.
Here's a dose of reality from as current as today:
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/good-vibrations-shoes-pk-GVSI/historical
"Put to bed already" is what lying pumpers tell to dumb naive traders that don't know any different when there is no actual DD to offer.
Go ahead, tell me what DD has been presented that the Notice of Deficiency has been resolved.
Oh, you can't, can you? That's because there is none.
It has not been put to bed. Only really dumb people have been suckered into believing that it has.
The FINRA Notice of Deficiency has never been resolved. If you are claiming that it has then provide your proof.