Breathin' clean fresh air and lovin' life.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
BC: For all we know, YA could be buying and retiring shares monthly so that when they finally do bring the NEOM shell back into full SEC compliance as a new entity the capital stucture will be vastly different and those that have thrown the dice and picked up some .0001's during this time could find themselves richly rewarded.
The .01 par value to me is intriguing. Some say means nothing. Maybe, maybe not. With a vastly reduced O/S upon "rebirth", that could be very easily attained.
No R/S required.
BTW, anybody have any proof to backup the claim I've read that NEOM/YA owes a million plus to DE in back taxes, fees, whatever before the shell could be used for a RM of any sort? If so, please do share. If not, must just be another NEOM myth.
Thanx.
lns
glenn: So, if Bravatek and their Ecrypt One is announced by DISA in the coming days or weeks to be its "new email gateway infrastructure" scheduled to be in place 7/18, essentially replacing Microsoft Exchange as the military's 'mail.mil' global server system for the troops and personell all across the globe - a BILLION DOLLAR DEAL - you don't see that as being able to provide the revenue necessary along w/ interested equity investors funds to affect an ASR bringing the O/S to a level creating a pps eligible for uplift to The Naz?
IMO...of course it is.
BTW...Anybody have any thoughts as to who/what - if not Bravatek and E1 - would be the next most likely candidate to be the supplier for DISA's "new email gateway infrastructure"?
http://www.executivegov.com/2017/07/report-disa-to-adopt-encryption-protocol-for-email-protection/
DISA's not talking about patching up an old email server system, in this case, Microsoft Exchange. They're referring to a complete "rip-and-replace" of Microsoft Echange making it no longer the email backbone server system for 'mail.mil'.
That is massively huge. And, DISA this far has been very quiet as to any hints of who/what that replacement will be taken over by.
Remember...Ian Treleaven was a lead software engineer on the team to first help develop MS Exchange way back when. He saw its flaws. He set out to create a much better, technicologically superior email server APPLIANCE which could quickly, easily and completely replace MS Exchange to provide entities a way to future-proof their organization's #1 cyber security vulnerability...email and its users bad habits.
http://bravatek.com/solutions/software/ecrypt-one/
Any thoughts? Anybody??
lns
Bigfoot: Well, if NEOM, the stock symbol, represents NeoMedia Technologies, Inc., (which it does) AND NM,LLC is the company that "brings us" NeoReader (which it is) AND their NeoReader still prominently displays the NeoMedia NAME and logo on its main screen (which it does) AS WELL AS prominently displaying and listing NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. as the owners of a number of the patents NeoReader relies on to work so well, then, completing the circle...
YES, TECHNICALLY SPEAKING, the NEOM stock symbol IS connected to NM,LLC.
And, until at least NM,LLC themselves remove the aforementioned 'NeoMedia' logo from the main screen of its flagship mobile app, NeoReader, AND they also remove the aforementioned clear indication of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. being the owners behind the patents for NeoReader, then NM,LLC themselves apparently either (1), don't care about the branding and ownership connection confusion it's causing the public regarding the connection between themselves and the NEOM stock OR (2), they know exactly what they are doing and why and (for reasons unknown to us) they are PURPOSEFULLY keeping a VERY PUBLIC connection alive between themselves and the NEOM stock.
Do you see it any other way?
Keep in mind that NOBODY here really knows what is going on behind the scenes and being planned long-term between NM,LLC, the patents and the NEOM shell stock which it legally controls.
Facts is facts, man.
lns
fox: Catch up...two days late. lns_eom
AD: Great, but you missed the point of my post with your reply. Same as you describe CAN and DOES happen for large BUYS as well. My point is one can BUY on the BID and the transaction tape here will indicate them in red as a sell everytime.
I prove time and time again this to be fact.
So, same goes for T-trades. In Friday's case it is CLEARLY EVIDENT from correlating the T-Trades to the ACCUM/DIST indicator that those .0019 T-trades were ALL BUYS.
Look at the pic I provided again and you will see and cannot honestly or truthfully deny the fact I present.
T-trades are just that...trades. They are NEVER necessarily sells OR buys and anybody can test it for themselves by buying in the BID or selling on the ASK...the ticker tape ONLY indicates if the trade was executed at the current BID (red) or ASK (green) price or in between (black). What the trade actually was (a buy or sell) is NOT AT ALL indicated by how the trade was reported. The intent of the initiator of a trade is completely lost in the daily 'trades' list and is NOT in any way, shape or form discernable one way or the other.
THAT is why astute traders rely on other analysis and indicators to uncover the truth.
Go back and take look at my post it will be seen what REALLY took place on Friday w/ not only the large after-hour reported T-trades but ALL DAY LONG...
$BVTK MASS ACCUMULATION TAKING PLACE NOW AND HAS BEEN ALL ALONG, soaking up the planned dilution.
There is a method to this apparent dilution madness and it's in the form of future NOL's.
But, Friday's T-trades were CLEARLY not sells and CLEARLY not dilution.
Mark it!
lns
War: I still don't understand, why are they STILL updating NeoReader (another one I just updated the other day...that's two updates I installed over the last month) and keeping NeoMedia advertised on the main screen as well as STILL indicating NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. as the owner of all the patents it utilizes?
Think you should inform them of their mistakes they should address and correct (remove?) next update?
How simple is that?
Ball's in your court.
BTW, they really improved NeoReader's user experience over the last year of continued updates. Changing text is easy. Why haven't they? I don't buy the 'sloppy work' excuse others here seem to like to cling onto. Should be no issue bringing this to their attention to 'fix' and them 'fixing' it.
Can't wait to see what you and they deliver here. Another update soon coming?
Don't let us down.
lns
TenK: According to the A/D and CMF, those T-trades were BUYS at the BID, just like my late day BUY at the BID was. But, as always, the buy/sell data can NOT(!) be trusted as an accurate report of what is an actual investor/trader initiated buy or sell. My BUY reported as a sell is the 13:55:53(MT) 95+K trade...
Again, the REAL story of what took place all day INCLUDING those last two MASSIVE T-TRADES is shown using more sophisticated analysis and that shows since mid-afternoon Thursday MASS ACCUMULATION is what REALLY took place. Note how the two T-trades spiked it to breach 150MM shares ACCUMULATED(!) since Tuesday. 4day/5min chart..
Yes, I do believe Tommy Boy WILL be bearing gifts this year for both his shareholders and his country.
Possible BONUS GIFT...E1 patent allowance could easily come next week.
lns
p.s. - Why is your outdated "Merskey" sticky still up? Why not replace it w/ the updated share count info from yesterday as you have liked to do from time to time in the past?
BC: And, why bother to improve advertising w/ a .us extension as I thought NEOM was no more?
lns
I-G: Patience, Grasshopper. lns_eom
scania: And advertising NEOM.us? lns_eom
Cheds: Mon. opposite day for ya? lns_eom
Mo: No, he didn't and he won't. lns_eom
keepit: "NM" is new and them blatantly touting themselves a public company is also new information they have just recently put out on their website.
They, "NM", stating they license the patents TO NM,LLC is also new info.
So, I am only reporting facts.
Why haven't the removed the NeoMedia references from their latest, kick-ass version of NeoReader?
It's too easy to get rid of those references so it's hard to imagine it's just sloppy developer practices behind leaving them in place.
All will be revealed soon enough.
lns
keep: "NM" are the ones that tout themselves as a public company, not me. Let's get that straight. I am only reporting verifiable information being made known to the public right now.
And, we all know, all of us that are truthful that is, that it's only a matter filing some new updated paperwork and paying to current any necessary fees the state may require to make eligible NEOM's shell for a RM of some sort.
So, begs the question...What are the subsidiaries under NM,LLC that comprise "NM" and what exactly does Angelo and Gambino have planned for "NM" to align it w/ THEIR OWN WORDS of it being a PUBLIC company, NOW?
Tick tock...
lns
p.s. - BC, you've hedged correctly...delivered w/ no reply. A call directly to The Col. is now, again, forthcoming, This will be the third time this year I will have spoken w/ him. I like The Col. He's a good guy.
IPO: I'm sure they (YA Global) wrote the debt off and they own everything (via, NM,LLC) lock-stock-and-barrel. I personally believe they (YA Global) will take something public a la NeoMedia but 'not'...and w/ all the patents in tow. No reason to dilute like crazy or possibly even at all after they restructure the shares prior to taking whatever public via THEIR CONTROLLED NEOM SHELL.
They can. It's all perfectly legal. FINRA can't shut anything down or de-list a stock if there is at least one MM to sponsor it to trade. Just one. That's all it takes. That's why I've been watching my first investment ever stay listed and make the blue-moon trade every so often and it's going on 14yrs now like that (LMGR).
NEOM won't be shut down by FINRA. It has no DTCC restrictions. It is a shell that can be used. It is trading regularly. It just traded over $20K in one day last week. Something is going on behind the scenes.
People can say what they want to the contrary but those are the facts as they stand now.
What I'm most curious about is what are the subsidiaries that make up the entirety of "NM". Darious Gambino, esq. and Mark Angelo (YA Global) both approve the public indication that NM,LLC has more than one subsidiary under it...hence its plurality. And, they also both approve the public notification and advertising that "NM" (NM,LLC and its Subsidiaries) is a PUBLICLY TRADED COMPANY...RIGHT NOW.
Their words, not mine.
Happy Thanksgiving, NEOMITES!!!
lns
keepit: I understand NM,LLC controls it all and that YA Global and Darius Gambino is behind that.
They also control the NEOM stock.
They are also using the old NeoMedia names in their flagship mobile app, NeoReader.
NM is not trademarked to them. It's just a reference to NM,LLC and its Subsidiaries.
We get that.
We also get that their stock traded the largest $ and transaction volume in a couple years just last week.
We also know they can use their NEOM shell to bring a company public someday in the future of they choose to.
We also know nobody knows WTF is really going on behind the scenes.
We also know the OTC is a crap shoot in most cases.
We also know NEOM fits that bill...it's a crap shoot.
We also know the time tested scenario of "volume precedes price" holds true very often.
Folks can roll the dice if they like.
I never stated I hoped and prayed or even expected NeoMedia's return.
I've just been stating the facts.
And, NeoReader for Android, latest version offered by NM,LLC works great and is the best version yet w/ many user experience improvements compared to my last version.
lns
War: But, YA is in control of the NEOM stock, NM,LLC, NM and the NeoMedia trademark(s) and for some odd reason, their flagship app, NeoReader's latest version (which works perfectly fine for Android, BTW) prominently displays BOTH the NeoMedia logo AND the full NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. corporate name as in control of the patents behind it.
I wonder why.
So...should we be seeing an updated version soon w/ all that labeling in reference to NEOM removed from their flagship NeoReader app???
Time will tell.
And, why in the world would they clearly state NM licences THEIR patent portfolio to NM,LLC, CLEARLY indicating them as TWO SEPARATE entities?
Isn't that just the oddest thing if in fact they are the same entity? If that were the case, it makes no sense at all.
Any explanation you'd like to offer for this apparent oddity?
Just chalk it up to a sloppy webmaster, are we to accept as the explanation?
lns
NeoMedia, the BRANDING, and NeoMedia Technologies, Inc., listed as the PRIMARY relevant entity behind the patents, are both PROMINENTLY displayed in NM,LLC's latest version of their premier software, NeoReader.
Odd, given what we're told by some here and the fact that their (NM,LLC's, presumably) 'NeoReader' barcode reading mobile phone software app is their primary reach and connection to the world.
Hmmm....WHY? It's the latest 2017 updated version I just downloaded for my Android phone. It kicks ass, BTW.
Somebody needs to find out why they have yet to change that branding and patent information on their flagship software offering.
Makes no sense, now does it?
lns
shotsky: Will you acknowledge an ASR Program does not rely on equity investors purchasing NEW stock but rather putting up monies for the borrowing of existing stock via a massive "big short" which an investment bank then covers for them, returning the covered stock to the company for them to retire or put in treasury, in exchange for giving the equity investors preferred shares for future, years down the road, redemption?
Hello???
Worth a revisit...
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=133878452
lns
watchful: You never really got your question answered. Maybe the advice/opinion given in lieu of answering your question directly was based on possible knowledge of massive dilution for IDDR ahead? After all, they have a 90%+ ceiling left before they hit their A/S max which they just recently raised.
So, your friend doesn't really answer your stated question, stears you away for some unknown reason from investing in IDDR and for that you are not going to invest in BVTK.
OK.
lns
scania: Nobody here knows what is really going on. That is why I sent the following questions to IR@qode.com. I'm wondering if we'll see the company that is in control of all this will go public again as QODE. That symbol change was talked about here 10yrs ago!
jmmatt: Right. TC is no "typical penny CEO". lns_eom
scania: It almost appears that way, although, vieled. Wonder why?
This link of current screenshots and links is very telling...
https://1drv.ms/f/s!Ai0_wRzHeIwugWkxB76mna3FUcI3
NM can't be NM,LLC because NM is licensing THEIR patents TO NM,LLC.
So...According to NM,LLC's OWN website, www.qode.com, THEY tell us that NM OWNS and licences THEIR patents to NM,LLC.
Where and when did NM come into all of this, because...
The LAST TWO patent portfolio assignment entries only pertain to NM,LLC and NeoMedia Technologies, Inc.
NM,LLC is the company that offers NeoReader for users to download.
NeoReader is copyrighted by NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (2017) and protected under a series of patents that reads as owned as well by NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (2017) per the NeoReader app itself.
Those same patents are shown as owned by NM on the Qode website.
NeoReader on Twitter directs users to the Qode website.
The NeoReader End User Licence is granted to users by NEOMEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
BUT, again, NM,LLC's own 'www.qode.com' shows us that NM licenses their patents to NM,LLC and NOT the other way around.
NM,LLC's own website ALSO shows that NM "HAS LED the open standards for the barcode ecosystem"...meaning IN THE PAST. But, WE KNOW that NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. ALREADY that did that IN THE PAST. Hmmm...
The NeoReader End User Licence directs users to also see the/its Privacy Policy.
The Privacy Policy is all about NM,LLC and www.qode.com.
The Qode mobile investors link shows NM as a subsidiary of NM,LLC.
To 'learn more' about NM, the mobile investors link (2017 NM), directs investors to the NEOM (NeoMedia Technologies, Inc.) MarketWatch webpage.
So, looks like NM could by a 'dba' name for NeoMedia or vice-versa?
Hard to say exactly but all of these (Qode, NeoReader, NM,LLC, NM, NeoMedia Technologies, Inc., NeoMedia and NEOM) are alive and well today in 2017 and NEOM just had its highest dollar and volume day in years this past week.
Folks can decide for themselves what YA is really up to w/ all of this and what their plans are for all of this that they are in 100% ultimate control of at this time.
I am just reporting facts as they can be found TODAY.
Something is brewing, that's all I can sense.
lns
HW: Math disproves T-trade drama. lns_eom
shotsky: What is a 'naked short' and who creates them? Those answers should show us something. Know the significance of Patrick Byrne and his crusade?
lns
keepit: Volume Precedes Price. Period. lns_eom
84MM vol. and UP 100%. NICE. lns_eom
joboggi: Calm before storm. Huge buy-op NOW! lns_eom
madrabbit: E1 is a software APPLIANCE. lns_eom
Inorout: Dilution has been tamed and updated O/S #'s as of market close yesterday proved ONCE AGAIN that T-Trades do NOT necessarily equate automatically to dilution. They are just what they are defined as. Why some continue to claim daily that T-Trades=Dilution is beyond me. That simply and factually is plain NOT TRUE.
lns
Pauly: The revenue proved the late August E1 healthcare deal was for real. This shows part of the turnaround here is that Bravatek's revenue indicating PR's can be trusted as gold.
HelpComm revenue from the Hurricanes should show up on the next Q and they may help facilitate the planned future share buyback.
lns
http://m.neom.com/mobileinvestors ...
"'CLICK HERE' to learn more" takes one there:
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/NEOM
Interesting. Still. Trading. Restriction. Free.
NEOM
lns
Deal: It's real simple...add up all the T-trades that go through over say a two week period then compare to the O/S when it's updated.
Last O/S update was two weeks ago on 10/16. We've had many many more than 5,555,553 T-Trade shares over the past two weeks. That 5MM+ was the dilution since then per today's 10Q. That was a small % of the T-Trades over the past two weeks.
This quickly and easily dispels the notion that all T-Trades = dilution. They simply don't. That is fact. It is false and incorrect to think T-Trades = dilution all the time. They just don't. Period. End of Story.
lns
L2 looking VERY intersting this morning...THINNY THIN THIN!!! Getting lower on shares to trade? Meez tinks so.
lns
NEOM did the 'ol L2 flipperooni again! Now there are LOTS to BUY at .0001!! Get 'em while they're hot!!!
TenK: You CANNOT state for FACT that BVTK cannot undertake an ASR AT THIS VERY MOMENT w/ the assistance of equity investors similar to how Virtusa did. That would be a false statement.
Have any other 'variety of reasons' BVTK could not do this tomorrow if they have everything lined up ready to pull the trigger?
Reason I ask is because your 'specific' paragraph 3 states THEY STILL CAN IF after giving it effect the corporation IS able to pay its debts as they become due in the normal course of business AND IF their articles of incorporation ALLOW such w/ its total assets being less than its total liabilities.
Hopefully this will be addressed tomorrow SPECIFICALLY.
Are you suggesting TC is being deceitful to his common stock shareholders when he strongly suggests NO R/S and instead they are looking at equity investors to assist in a share buyback?
You outright calling him a liar?
Time will tell...
lns
Ten: I think you are wrong. Looks like we got our first question for Tom on Wed.
lns
shotsky: Bravatek could conduct an ASR Program tomorrow for all we know because THEY CAN and IMVSHHO, they will in the very near future. Read this and tell us again it can't be done. I keep telling you they can. Here is the proof...
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170503005820/en/Virtusa-Announces-108-Million-Strategic-Equity-Investment
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=135409795
lns
rocket: Did the 'ol L2 flip again today! lns_eom